I do not have a post restriction.
Further, I'm pretty sure that something LIKE a post restriction would be listed as a passive ability.
RC hit it on the head.Walk me through this one.
Its not the self vote.SpyreX: could you explain the Gorrad vote?
This is "lol, RVS" (combined with "lol, jokes" earlier) as a rationale for what happened.Dutch, you're new here so slack shall be cut. Look up the Random Voting Stage in the wiki. Basically, at the start of the game a whole bunch of people are silly and vote randomly. Then one person says 'OMG the RVS suxxorz' and there's a big debate over whether or not to have an RVS. Depending on which side has more, either the most vocal person for or against the RVS is the D1 lynch. The game proceeds from there.
For those who would call me out on this, the above is satire. Satire is a type of social commentary that uses sarcasm and hyperbole (not the round thing, that's a hyperbola. Hyperbole is exaggeration), possibly in conjunction with juxtaposition.
Hey Korlash!Kor wrote:What? You're not actually saying doing something outside of the "norm" at the start of the game makes you town are you? And what prevents scum from acting crazy or moronic?
1.) There was a discourse that wasn't 'RVS'.Gorrad wrote:
When someone asks why everyone's voting this quick, I'm going to tell them about the RVS, as the RVS is why we're all voting this quick. I wasn't saying 'lol, RVS'. That implies that I'm using the RVS as an excuse to make a vote regarding which people have called me out. I'm not. I was trying to make an explanation for someone who didn't seem to know what was going on.
Not liking Cyberbob. He seems to be doing the classic tells of following the crowd while actually contributing next to nothing.
Note for those who would call me a hypocrite as I have not contributed myself: I'm not pretending to contribute. This is my first contribution post. Cyberbob is faking it.
Vote: Cyberbob,Gorradscum can hang later.
The PR-business stuck me off.SpyreX, you are like driftwood in the ocean.
So, a vote for replacement (which I guess is a function of him being new but otherwise a throwaway).Vote: Dutch One So KK doesn't need to find a replacement D1.
DGB, I want you to claim. I don't care if it's real or fake, your claims are fantastic and often game-changing, and I don't want you to be NK'd before you have the chance to turn this game on its head.
So, we move into a justification for awesome 1 (which isn't any justification and we'll get to the weird DGB-non-alignment love later) BUT we get another awesome.http://www.mafiascum.net/archive/viewto ... 1b894dc06d
If you're bored, read this game with a focus on DGB. It's worth the time. I have, on more than one occasion, joined a game primarily to see what the heck DGB's gonna pull in it.
That said, I'm getting a gut read as well. Unvote, Vote: Gorrad
DGB is 3 for 3.If you're referring to the first part, it is not a joke. DGB is one of my favorite mafia players, as she plays the game to have fun as opposed to winning.
If you're referring to the second part, well done! You have successfully deduced that I have read my role PM, and therefore cannot have a gut read on myself.
Hi I am fluff lets move on.KORLASH!
I haven't seen you in ages! Why didn't you join my Large Theme? Have you been doing well for yourself?
Ohh hey sup fluff I'm your bro fluff lets hang out sometime.@Korlash: Yeah, read at least the OP of Gorrad's Favorite Fictional Characters mafia. I think you'll approve. My next theme will likely be a sequel to it or Webcomic Wars. I've also been tossing around doing something involving the Blackest Night event in the DC universe.
Now, this is the beginning load of crap.Dutch, you're new here so slack shall be cut. Look up the Random Voting Stage in the wiki. Basically, at the start of the game a whole bunch of people are silly and vote randomly. Then one person says 'OMG the RVS suxxorz' and there's a big debate over whether or not to have an RVS. Depending on which side has more, either the most vocal person for or against the RVS is the D1 lynch. The game proceeds from there.
For those who would call me out on this, the above is satire. Satire is a type of social commentary that uses sarcasm and hyperbole (not the round thing, that's a hyperbola. Hyperbole is exaggeration), possibly in conjunction with juxtaposition.
So, he partially 'addresses' what I was saying (without addressing me directly a tech move).When someone asks why everyone's voting this quick, I'm going to tell them about the RVS, as the RVS is why we're all voting this quick. I wasn't saying 'lol, RVS'. That implies that I'm using the RVS as an excuse to make a vote regarding which people have called me out. I'm not. I was trying to make an explanation for someone who didn't seem to know what was going on.
Not liking Cyberbob. He seems to be doing the classic tells of following the crowd while actually contributing next to nothing.
Note for those who would call me a hypocrite as I have not contributed myself: I'm not pretending to contribute. This is my first contribution post. Cyberbob is faking it.
Vote: Cyberbob, Gorradscum can hang later.
The first part is "I am sheeping DGB"Chevre isn't looking good. I agree with Shakespeare-scum tell and non-committal posts-tell, so let's see if we can hammer at one of those.
Chevre, I want your opinion of me, CKD, and Cyberbob, and SpyreX. No less than three sentences for each, stating why you believe them to be scum or town. Make it so that a random person I walk up to can understand you without issue. (Please note: I live in Texas. So assume a low average intelligence).Me because I was the first wagon. Cyberbob because he's my main suspect. SpyreX and CKD because they have yet to be the target of any talk, so Chevre can't just follow the crowd.
Aside from an obvious question this is still timid baiting. Real timid.CKD, money where your mouth is time. Point out where the firm stances and opinions are.
Chevre, I honestly appreciate the time and effort you put into making such a post. Mod: Would giving Chevre's WoT post to a person on the street and asking their opinions of it be in violation of any rules (such as talking about the game outside of the thread)?
That said, as I just hinted to, you really didn't give anything firm. The trend with you so far has been a lot of analysis with very little solid hunting. It's early game, so that can be forgiven, but I expect to actually see firm stances as the game goes on.
Mmm semantics the most delicious of fights.You're dodging the question. I didn't say I didn't see any, and that isn't the point. You said "Firm" stances and opinions, and I want you to enumerate exactly what you meant.
DGB, all fluff? Seriously? I goofed around at the start, but I'm playin' serious (by my standards, at least) now.
So, another 'lol irony joke' framed in... nothing. Explaining the game to the outside just led us down eye-melt alley and that is not awesome.In my defense, I more wanted him to post it in terms that someone on the street who already knew the game could understand. I was shooting for trying to get him to stop hiding behind fancy vocabulary (not that there's anything wrong with it in principle- it just seemed like he was being sesquipidalian for its own sake). I did not honestly expect him to explain out the entire game.
Dodge shuck and weave.I have no evidence to believe so. Your case against me was the best I'd seen of anyone so far (against me, that is. Not cases in general). You haven't precisely been vocal, though, so I don't have much to go on other than the case on me.
Because a CLAIM WAGON FOR THE SAKE OF A CLAIM IS FFFFFFFFAnd yet you're the one who repeats what I say in a mocking tone to make me look stupid then continue to insinuate it's scummy without any actual explanation for it.
Tell me, which is scummier: Me acknowledging what DGB's doing in a quick, quiet way, or you announcing to the world what the play is. Tell me exactly what my motive as scum would be to make my last post. Because if you're scum with Chevre, it would be in your best interest to make sure Chevre knows it's a claim-wagon.
Nope. Not for pressure and I still dont like it. (Needless to say, one of the 'obvious' things I've been talking about is the simple fact that one of chamber/inHim being scum would sure point at the other).I don't like nocase's first post. Stating the post restriction, but no vote or anything. Just focusing on his own role. Cyber's first reaction is probably null, but first instinct gives me bad vibes. However, the vote coming after Antihero's catch and Spy's vote worries me. Antihero's reaction makes sense as town realizing that post restrictions shouldn't exist. Spy is probably scum for laying a vote. I think townSpy would sit back and think, "wait a minute. What is this guy doing?" before just laying the vote.
This is your reads?ww wrote:There hasn't been anything scummy from my point of view on me. There is a lack of activity, which I pursue in other games
Dutch is voting me on meta
-possible scum?
Farside is saying things that i've "done" without presenting examples
-Hypocratic Scum?
Antihero is voting me because i'm not a "noob"
-basically saying that I am not playing experienced and deserving of a vote
-SCUM
ckd votes me for using "recycled reasoning"
-nobody had used that reasoning before...
RC is voting me for meta
-Scummy move
Personally, I find the voting for meta most scummy
Gorrad-scum is voting for me
Antihero and Chevre have been voting me for some time
-not really wagon jumping
yabba wrote:NOW EXCUSE ME.
BUT.
WHY.
THE FUCK.
IS THE CHEVRE WAGON DYING?
Now, I'll admit, at THIS point I thought we had some towns BUT:yabba wrote: Wasn't quite 72 hours here. Still calling myself prodless on the yGDB.
Chevre made a lot of sense whilst I was reading. Let me go back and make a meaningful ISO case.
among other things.
I need the thought process here really defined because it sure looks like you came in with a solid read considering you said you agreed with your predecessor, said you were going to reread because all of a sudden it made sense AND THEN came back with the starting position after saying you changed your mind.yabba wrote:I've changed my mind.Chevre, then nocase presuming a red flip from the former, and then we proceed from there.
More votes on Chevre please.
There is something to be said for it, in all honesty.player x is easy to lynch, therefore player x is town.
they could build monuments to my powers of deduction.
Riddle me this batman.Your scum team is welcome to take a shot at Dutch. If you're right and he's with the other team, it looks like I'll be the bonus auto-lynch!
I'm really not sure what the first part has to do with anything.If there's nothing to gain and one isn't trolling, noone in the game of mafia lies about something verifiable. I'm certain that even if I would be tragically wrong on the Dutch one, he would have had a genuine mixup of not remembering that Gorrad was on his „questionable“ list instead of his „scummy“ list. The dealbreaker then boils down to whether it is Dutch town going „you haven't read my posts and your vote seems opportunistic after yabba; vote pf“ or Dutch scum going „OMGOMGUS“
What do you see here that I don't? What is huge there?