The tem "fluff monkey" is a term that I (and others, but isn't a common term I think) use to describe a play with a large post count.
Here is an example. Is posting alot scummy? meh, its nullish. I think there's scum motivation in it and I know that I've lynched both Saki scum and Mastin scum for artificially inflating thier vote count.
In post 2587, Nero Cain wrote: In post 2585, AxleGreaser wrote: In post 1813, Boonskiies wrote:I'm playing the way I am for a reason
. This reason shall be brought out, and most likely the main subject of Day 2.
In post 2581, Boonskiies wrote:This game is based off the neighborhoods. It's meant to be the main points of discussion.
No on D1 one your claim was about your role being "the main subject of D2"
Boons 2581 was saying that...see....mods know what they are doing. When a mod makes a game with hoods they EXPECT hood talk and thats what he was saying. So this looks really misreppy.
^^^
that was the basis of my scumread on you.
In post 2593, AxleGreaser wrote:Because frankly its making you look scummy, as making baseless insults that put people down and denigrate their opinions is a scummy way to argue a point.
here is your OMGUS attack on me.
Earlier, you were arguing that MY attack on you was scummy.
So I asked
IF you called someone scum and they attack you back, would you think they are scum or town?
You told me that it depends on intent.
I asked you to explain my intent.
You then
LIED
and claimed that you never attacked me.
I have not pushed a single policy lynch. I have voted you, Tobylobby/Fonz, and Flubber. Those were all scumreads at the time of my vote. And all three were explained why I was voting. We are three days till deadline and its time to compromise. So I shouldn't vote someone that I'm suspicious of, why? So tell me wich pl did I push, if I did not push a pl then why are you claiming that I did?
In post 4428, AxleGreaser wrote:and look Nero has been on and off the Thor lynch with never a statement that he considers Thor scummy.
ok.
In post 850, Nero Cain wrote:So, I haven't really commented on the Thor/PV situation yet. TBH I skimmed over most of it. Ummmm...I got kind of a NY164 vibe. In that game I had argued that the size of the game/current site meta made it unlikely to be singleball. One of Nacho or CTD (both scum btw) had asked me to show them "proof".
So yeah, Thor asking for proof from PV made me a lil' weary
.
In post 1056, Nero Cain wrote:
no, I read fine but I want to see if you have a legit town read or if you are just appeasing me
, but also didn't you have me as a somewhat scummy read? If so, what did I do to change that?
In post 1063, Nero Cain wrote:I'm asking you a very simple question Thor. I see no reason why you are acting out.
In post 1179, Nero Cain wrote: In post 1105, Scripten wrote:Thor v. Nero Cain looks weird. I'm not sure I'm following what Thor was doing where he told Nero that he was buddying him, and I'm not sure why Nero took what Thor said as reason to vote him. (Yes, I realize that buddying is a scum tactic. I don't think it follows that claiming to be buddying someone is also a scum tactic.)
Well, I don't really see a reason that Thor would not elaborate on why I'm townish. Explain the town motivation there?
dislike tier's asking boon to claim.
dislike gamr for similar reason. His "If it is multiball all you had to do was wait one day and you could of keeped it hidden from scum." is p silly. Scum already know if its mb or not.
still dislike the toby slot. Her claim that I was being "iffy" on my Csaro read and was scummy for that while being iffy herself is highly hypocritical. I also dislike fon'z "catchup" post being a bandwagon hop onto PV.
hephaestus, dave and muffin are my other scum reads.
maaayyyybbbeeee Thor. I'm pretty unsure on him.
maaayyybbbe scripten
this is a scum list, and golly Thor is on it.
In post 1202, Nero Cain wrote:
TBF, I think Thor is just extremely argumentative. My vote on him was more me being goofy than anything but I guess
him not explaining his town read on me is rather silly.
In post 1734, Nero Cain wrote: In post 1731, AxleGreaser wrote:If slap fight meant to you what it means to me I thought you should want to as well.
It doesn't. I'm calling it a slap fight just 'cause they are bitching back and forth.
Of the two I think Thor is the scummier
, but I also think its a bunch of noise. What is your current read on Thor?
In post 2587, Nero Cain wrote:Slandaar
Scripten
The Fonz
TierShif
Garmr
Muffin
IZ
maybe Axle
maybe Thor
^
is p much where I want to go today.
Another scum list, with Thor on it.
These posts are claiming that I am suspicious of Thor which is consistent with me having him on my pl list. You are claiming to have ISOed me and that you did not find any of these posts. I find that EXTREMELY hard to believe. Why are you once again lying?
In post 4426, AxleGreaser wrote:His D1 case on PereV was all sorts of horrible (but you only pointed that out on D2, didnt say so on D1, and never described what and how it was horrible)
We've already been over this so all I'll say is you are pushing schematics instead of an actual contradiction.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit