Mini 1397: War is Hell (Game Over)
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
I have only skimmed the previous games (shame on me), and want to look at them further. Special consideration for the plans that tajo and Fonz (iirc), laid out in Hurting people. Let's see how well that would work in a different setting, especially due to the Heal difference here.
While I do that, I'd like Yos's input.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Apologies for bringing up pansy angel decision-planning.In post 7, kanyeknowsbest wrote:refresh my memory on what youre referring to.
'tajo talked about a fake voting system (I can keep VCs if we go this way), only Hurting people decided by consensus.
Fonzie had a "buddy" system, where Hurts would be called out by a player and required another's support to go through.
Personally, especially with the alteration in the Heal mechanic, I'd rather use 'tajo's method. There isn't much of a risk in dragging because we only increase HP-from-Heal when Rage accumulates, and The Fonz's buddy method can be disastrous. Yes, voting is slow, but we don't have deadlines, and it creates patterns that are easier to study than the buddy plan.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
!
Okay, this is nice. We lose an HP every time we Heal, right?
Important questions first:
@Oh Great Adversary:
Do all HP-lost-to-Healing points get restored upon Rage accumulation? That is, if Player A Healed three times between accumulation, does Player A gain three HP at accumulation time, or just one?
Do we know whether Accumulation happens at the same time for everyone?
We may be able to enforce sacrifices to increase falling health of those considered Town. Instead of Hurting, those pseudo-voted should Heal others until they die (or close to it; it drags the game down because of the 24h cooldown, but it keeps Townreads healthy). This may be subject to adjustment given the Accumulation (Player A has been mass Healing, is at 2 HP, slated to die... Rage accumulation hits, Player A is back to full HP--oops?) and players may need to be Hurt to die, but we should milk Heals from them before they die.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Rage interferes with the Hurt/Heal cycle cooldown. Look at the sample role PM. You can Rage in cooldown, but then you have to wait to Heal/Hurt.
In post 10, kanyeknowsbest wrote:what in particular makes you want to hear yos' opinion especially?I want to agree with Yos2Yos is by far the best theorist in the game.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Oh, I see what you mean now--I missed the 'scum' bit. Yeah, can't find the role PMs in WiH2.
Of note that, in that game's commentary, Flay made it very clear that Hurting willy-nilly is stupid and very damaging to Town in the long run. We need coordination, not people convinced their scumread is the bestest and needs taken down now now now.No random Hurting.Don't be stupid.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
I bear gifts!
Don't know if this works because my connection is being etc. Let me know if it doesn't work and I'll pester Flay/Feysal for another version.
But if it does, it's the collected archive ofmore pansy angels being whiny and not killing people nearly fast enough wtf why is this 200+ pagesWar in Heaven 3. Credit goes to Feysal, s-lullaby and yours truly.
http://www.mediafire.com/?abeqx9yyaokuq82-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Hey quadz--the sample role PM is a Fallen Seraph. It'sfucking Astaroth, commander of forty legions of spirits. That should answer a couple of your questions and make it clear that 11 HP is probably not the average value.
Wrong setting, sir. I don't know about you AMURIKA people, but on this side of the ocean of FIRE there tends to be a lot more brimstone and a lot less...quadz08 wrote:HOLY HELLholiness. Ew.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Sorry too busy watching ponies to actually notice stuff like this. >.> You can be Town. Proceed.In post 49, quadz08 wrote:Hell to Tierce, Hell to Tierce: please attempt reading the words again.
My latest experience with D1 massclaim was a massive game stall and general demotivation throughout the rest of the game. I'm against it if all that there is for it is ~vague benefits of vagueness~.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
HEAL: Lady Lambdadelta
More later when I'm not half asleep.
Remember that we don't know whether accumulation hits all at the same time (and I don't think we should claim it--scum probably get to know it due to their own accumulation periods, but claiming ours may our PRs due to different recovery times).-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Don't get me wrong, I can see everyone getting it at the same time for a pure logistical reason--this game is already hell (heh) to mod even without different accumulation times (and frequencies! Imagine continued different frequencies for 2+ people, there would be no end to the PMs Flay has to send). I'd say accumulation hits at the same time for everyone, but with a variation in frequency throughout the game. But it's still something we should not claim unless we massclaim. I have to think better on that and see if I can fathom the benefits of massclaim without you bringing them up. I don't see why scum would need to lie about what type of role they have; if they are Angels, they have the angel part of role as well, they're just missing the "Fallen" bit.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Rage accumulates and we gain the 1 HP we used on Healing.
From Post 2: "In this game, Healing will 'steal' a HP from you until the next time you gain Rage."
It's a temporary loan. At Accumulation, we will gain health.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Heh, bugger that, he'll just spin a pretty tale.
MattP is scum. I don't recall any instances in which he was doing this pussy-footing I'll-wait-for-when-you-get-back as Town. In a game where votes count less than normal (and FoSes are ridiculous, quadz), Matt being this disinterested with unleashing unholy fire on someone (anyone) is justnot him.
VOTE: MattP
PEdit: Oh there you are. Hi!-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
I couldn't care less about your mother in the context of the game. I'm sorry you're having RL issues, but that doesn't change your alignment or mine. And your vote on me is the definition of OMGUS. Town Matt doesn't pull this crap. You have given literally no reason for me being scum. "Tantrum"? What, where, and how would that ever make me scum? You're the one throwing a hissy fit over a vote on you, and instead of trying to go through it with me, you pitched a fit and voted me in turn. If anything, you are throwing a couple of posts wildly out of proportion, trying to scavenge for anything you can pass off as scum intent where there is visibly none. You're a poor ripoff of Fate flinging crap at people he knows aren't scum.
Furthermore, you're accusing me of confirmation bias--as scum? What? How can I have confirmation bias about calling you scum if you are Town and I'm scum? That doesn't make any sense.
We can stand here all day calling each other stupid if that's what you're interested in, but again, no alignment change there.
No, I don't have a read on Zdenek yet.I don't have a read on someoneYeah, stretch more. And Zdenek knows very well why I made that post.with two pseudo-votes on himoh my Satan Tierce must be scum.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
I don't care. I don't have to give a read on a player just because two others have voted him. If I had a read, I would have shared it. I'm not going to fabricate a read for anyone's convenience.In post 166, MattP wrote:I'm obviously in a bad mood, so I will try to be rational for a second and then just come back later
I feel that your behavior regarding Zdenek is scummy, even if it is only two votes because it was two successive votes and you were the next poster. I think that you not having a read in any form is safe and weird, and your commenting looks convenient given the time you gave it. That is all.
The tunneling comment was possibly out of line because it can't really be explained at present. Suffice to say that both Zdenek and I understand where it's coming from.
You aren't reallydoinganything (or weren't before voting me). Waiting for charter doesn't mean you can't pay attention to anything else. For Town Matt, it makes no sense to focus on a player that will only be available days after the game has started, when he could be putting pressure on people whoarein the thread nad getting reads out of the reactions to it. The fact that you waited until you were called out on it, the fact that you waited untilpage 6, all the while claiming some vague interest on someone who was not accessible to play, does not mesh with your views on Town scumhunting. THAT is why your behavior rings alarm bells. Waiting for page 6 and three days and a half into the game isnotattacking someone before most players can get in their groove. You know perfectly well what I'm talking about, and that is why I think you are scum.
Apologies accepted for the lashing out bit, but there's no way I'm disregarding the posts themselves. I hope things get settled quickly, I know how distressing housing and family can be.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
It's so blatantlyIn post 18, MattP wrote:Scumhunting depends on a few key ideas. If you agree with these things you MAY find that your scumhunting improves. I don't know if my scumhunting strategies are great but I find that about half of the time I hit scum, and the half of the time I don't about 3/4 of those times I'll realize pretty quickly I hit town
First: Early game is the most important portion of the game for finding scum
- If every player went into a round and mutually agreed to skip RVS and have some way of doing it effectively it would be ideal. What I mean to say is that a player should call another player scum for their first one or two posts and VEHEMENTLY push them. The pusher should ideally be someone that other players trust so that they will follow along and form an immediate wagon with little to no information. The absolute key to this is to force a situation between you and the player you are attacking where you are both online at the same time and move into a full-fledged argument that persists until you have reached an incredibly heated situation. At this point you stop posting altogether for 24 hours.
At this point if any other players in the game posts RVS material or something unrelated to the feud they are making a deliberate choice to ignore it, a deliberate choice to not form an opinion or push for or against the wagon. Since no scum would feasibly do this unless they are moronic, and town should genuinely feel compelled to respond to the situation, all players in the game will respond to the situation.
This is where you catch scum. This should hopefully, if you did a good job, be a point in the game where players are just beginning to post so they won't be "on a roll". All players, or at least good ones, get on a roll. This is to say, as their post counts in the thread increase they become better at looking the part of town. It is important to remember that this theory is not correlated to time. As in, if a player's first post is on page 10 of the game and another's first post is on page 2, that makes no difference. They both start their "mojo" at the point of their first post. The better the player, the less time it takes them to get on a roll. Some players can start looking town immediately. Early game is necessary to catch more novice scum.
RVS is bad because it's a chance for players to joke around and this helps them get on a roll so that once out of RVS when they MUST be serious they already know how to fake being town for that game. Having an RVS is anti-town. The first step to being a good player is to not have RVS, not ever joke around, and push the game into a non-RVS mode. If you don't feel capable of being the person to do that, then shut up. Don't say anything until someone more capable does it. Once out of RVS start talking, because if you're town you should have no issue going immediately into town mode because for you there is no "town mode".
Therefore, if you are town and do not feel good enough to push the game out of RVS in the way I am saying (which is to push the game into a situation where players MUST respond to a wagon, then don't bother posting until someone else has done it
This creates a sort of issue. If this is the case and becomes site meta, then noone will talk in RVS because they'll all be waiting for end of RVS or for someone to start a wagon against, which means noone will talk. This isn't an issue yet, so whatever. There are plenty of people more than happy to yap their heads off and RVS so as long as that exists this plan works dandy.
[snip]not this. Not his attack on me, not his behavior toward charter, not his brief attack on quadz. MattP is very clearly disregarding his own Town meta and methodology, and even though today's posts may be explained by a complicated family situation, the ones before today cannot. He's scum.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
No, you asked me for a read on Zdenek. This is hardly "moving to me", this is merely studying an option. You moved to me after I voted you and explained my scumread on you.
I still think you re blowing things out of proportion and that your behavior does not match what I expect and what I have seen from games where you are Town. There's no point in arguing this with you, as neither of us will "convince" the other that they are scum, but I frankly think you don't even believe I'm scum right now. And yes, I'm BoPing you--I expect far more capable behavior from you than the weak stuff you have been trying to pass off as a read on me.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Sorry, wanted to address this the other day and forgot. I think your plan is a bad idea, because that will result on several players with reduced health. We have limited Healing power in this game, and that would leave people far too open to attack. I understand the interest for accountability, but that just means that we have to try and study wagons a different way.In post 175, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Because while I don't want to drag this out I'm annoyed/worried people like Tierce and Yos won't address my concerns about a pseudo voting system.
That said, I agree with the "settle on a planand stick with it" idea. The most damage I've seen in previous games was from endless theory discussion that ended with both parts trying to play their way.
Did scum gain Rage/other powers from being involved in a Town death in previous games? I'm wondering if we should only let general Townreads inflict Hurts--like scumreads should be the ones Healing surprise Rage attacks.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Why just a FoS?In post 180, kdowns wrote:FoS: MattP and ZD
At the moment because holy hell... Do their responses come off as very scummy... Plus the immediate OMGUS.
LLD: Yeah, thegeneralTownreads thing was the main problem with that. We can probably call two or three people obvTown, but there will neer be consensus enough for a Hurting team.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Burden of Proficiency - Matt is far more capable and proactive as Town than this. I'm not saying he should befindingscum, but he definitely should be making more of an effort.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
ITT we lean that voting a scumread when someone else has two votes on them (omg! And I haven't even given a read on him, too~)In post 192, Kinetic wrote:
Perhaps my meta is a bit dated, but I'm referring to a variant of the "Tarhalindur Chainsaw Defense". See here. The normal version would be if someone attacked me directly. That person would be extremely scummy. The version that TierceZdenek wrote:
What is this noise? Tierce is attacking Matt, who's calling me town, to chainsaw the case against me. What chainsaw is this?In post 190, Kinetic wrote:if Tierce's timing on his attack was just a little too convenient and he is using that to chainsaw the obviously strong case against you.mightbe using is a variant where you distract the town/wagon that was beginning to form on a scum buddy by instead attacking someone else in the town in an attempt to distract.mightbe "an attempt to distract". Uhm... what now? If I was attempting to distract fromanything, the attempt to defuse MattP's ad hominem attitude would be spectacularly out of place. I could have fanned that one spectacularly, and if there's something people who have played with me know, it's that I can get in catfights with my scumreads like nobody's business.
I understand your worry, but look at the facts. I was clearly voicing a scumread, and yes, I'd much rather lynch MattP than Zdenek, but that's because I have a scumread on MattP. The way events developed doesn't match with any "attempt to distract" from me re: Zdenek, because I was very clearly not brewing a distraction when I had motive and opportunity to do so.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
You're looking at behaviors over motivations. Think deeper.
If Zdenek usually irritates me and I have issues reading him, won't I be trying to read him in my own time, and trying for a situation in which my read won't be biased? A player lashing back at his attackers just because he's frustrated is hard to read, as that frustration can be Town or scum. I deal better in seeing Zdenek produce his own work and getting a read from that. Forcing him into a reactive position is hell on my scumhunting and devolves into walls upon walls upon walls. He's fairly ignorable once I have a read, but until then,I have to read his posts. He does the same thing I've been trying to cut from my play: argue pages on end with scumreads. It's pointless, drags the game and kills Town motivation.
I'd rather pick my bones with Zdenek inwardly and get a clean read, instead of lynching him for things that are annoying yet don't make him scum. So I don't want you or anyone else to engage in behavior that will inevitably lead to the latter.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Oh, come on.
"I'm not playing to the Town version of the meta you showed, and as scum I would be able to fake it."In post 171, MattP wrote:You seriously don't think if I'm so cognizant of my playstyle that I wouldn't mock it as scum, at least to SOME degree, especially if I made it public knowledge?
"But I am playing to my Town meta!"In post 173, MattP wrote:But you're wrong, I did choose an early target and I had full intent to tunnel them and I strongly think they're scum. They stopped posting, and after two days I finally called them out passively on it. Then they claimed it would be another two days so I did move to you for your post on Zdenek. I pointed this out prior to you calling me out.
You're contradicting yourself and trying to backtrack. You're either not playing to that meta or you are, and there is no reason to make 171 if you truly think you are playing to that meta as 173 says you are. In addition, waiting "two days" on charter when there were people actively posting is a terrible idea as Town, as it allows everyone else to get rolling and scum will get comfortable. Town Matt doesn't wait on anyone, he would've pushed someone else if charter wasn't available, because Town Matt doesn't give a fig about being wrong, just about shaking things up and getting reads fromthat. You did nothing of the sort.
Zdenek: Very very much not interested in discussing Kinetic now. And no, if I thought he was scum, I wouldn't have asked him to back off from youandexplained why. I don't want my scumreads to be helpful to Town, and want themdead.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
The absence of explanation should not be perceived as accidental, dahling.In post 239, PeregrineV wrote:Remember that whole "reason" thing? You can start giving them now if you really feel that way.
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Okay, let's throw you a bone. It's Nightless, I can be as obvTown as I want to~In post 246, PeregrineV wrote:Me too, but since it would mostly start out with "Anyone with less posts than me is probably scum", I'm willing to wait.
How about doing anything that does not involve theory? You clearly have time in your V/LA to read these posts over and mull on the implications, so I don't see how you can't take 5 minutes to read someone in context and in ISO and form reads.
There is nothing. Nothing at all.All you have talked about so far is theory, and I find it hard to believe that a Town player would have literally no opinion worth noting of the situations that have since arisen which are actually relevant tofinding scum. There is no point in deciding when we start Hurting a player if you don't show interest in Hurtinganyone at all.
"But Tierce, I totally have reads and they are awesome and stuff!" Right. Show me.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
That does not answer my question in any manner. Stop dodging. Which reads of mine do you agree with?In post 251, PeregrineV wrote:
All of the ones where you gave a reason that wasn't based on game theory.In post 250, Tierce wrote:
Oh?In post 249, PeregrineV wrote:Also agree with all your other reads.
Which ones?-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
You're not stupid. You're just super skimming. Look at PV and tell me why he's scum.
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
In post 264, MattP wrote:As for PV
This was in reference to PV's first post, which gave me a scumvibe mainly before of the fluffy non-productive way of it.In post 44, MattP wrote:pedit: I actually have a LOT of good townreads right now and if I pushed anyone it would be really rough and counterproductive,so I'm just going to wait until the lil sheep I'm spying comes back to graze in the fiery pits of hell.
This also seems very postured and too dumbed down / stiff, specifically the bolded parts. I don't see a SLIP like you supposedly seeIn post 222, PeregrineV wrote:I see your point. However, If this is a normal sized mafia game, there are 3 scum. If 2 town and 3 scum decides someone dies, you can guarantee it'll be town that dies. This doesn't have to happen more than a few times to screw town over.
I think that we should stay with 7 for the first lynch. If this doesn't appear to work, we can modify for next lynch.
The killers should be the ones voting.
Votes will be tracked.
Votes without reasons should be subject to the most scrutiny.
I don't like when he calls me scum out of the blue, but I don't like it any less than LLD's comment, which I'm very curious to genuinely see her response to my post to her.
Except this is yet another player you are letting get on a roll, because you did NOTHING about him once he posted again, only mentioned him when called on it, and THAT to say thatIthought he was scum.
You know what's more?
It's a lie.
"Fluffy non-productive way of it", you call it.In post 4, PeregrineV wrote:Bam!
Are we going to try and do this calmly, or just blast the shit out of each other?
Post FOUR. The first post in the game. His next post was waaaay after your Post 44. You know who posted before 44, who you could comfortably say "oh guys I had a scumread on them it was awesome and stuff" for your convenience when you needed to vote a nice growing wagon?
PeregrineV
kanyeknowsbest
Tierce
Kinetic
Zdenek
quadz
And you're telling me you got a 'scumvibe' fromthe very first post in the game.
And did nothing with it.
After that player return to the thread multiple times.
And didn't even mention it when you started saying you wanted to talk with charter and Yos2.
I mean, honestly.
I know the previous games punished bussing to a certain, but are you guys THAT bad at it?
Still waiting for PeregrineV's explanation of what reads of mine he agreed with.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
What do you mean by "beating"? Hurting/Raging? Don't. We want people accountable for "lynches" and Hurting willy-nilly will put Town in trouble in the long run. We don't want heroes who Hurt because they are so very very sure they are right, because that will result in bickering and petty fights that will decrease the overall Town health. Healing is limited, since we lose one HP per Heal-on-others (and regainonly onepost-Heal HP total at Rage accumulation; read my posts for details), so we're keeping everyone as topped as possible and then pushing them to zeros when we get majority.
You should bevotingMattP, though.
You should Heal kdowns as per this:
and then vote MattP. Scum #2 is keeping a vote tally.In post 128, Tierce wrote:scooby Heals ABR
ABR Heals scooby
LLD Heals PeregrineV
Xalxe-charter Heals kdowns
Zdenek Heals Yosarian2
To scooby, ABR and LLD: the bolded in my quote still needs to happen.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
There is literally nothing to lose from Healing him (you'll lose one Health point till your Accumulation, putting you at your original health temporarily, and that's it--it's a loan).In post 282, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Tierce, I have zero desire to heal PeregrineV. Like, none. And don't give me that town solidarity lecture youse. >=(
Just for the sake of questioning, why should I heal someone I believe to be scum?
Believe me, I fully understand and sympathize with your stance here, but that is the kind of outlook that will lead to petty "I'm not Healing you!" down the road.
Hurting won't be made much more complicated by an extra Healing now, we have plenty of people to use. But it protects a bit against scum rage dumps.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Oh.In post 292, MattP wrote:YOU ARE CAUGHT IN A LIE.YOU ARE SCUM. OK GOOD AND FINE YOU CAN ENJOY MY LYNCH BUT YOU'RE NEXT
You mean likeyou? The case on you from me that you're handily ignoring in place of throwing a shit-fit at LLD? Who, by the way, is ridiculously obvTown, and who never said you 'slipped'? You are the one throwing "slip" back and forth, both in relation to you and PeregrineV.
Oh okay. Continue ignoring me, I'll be here eating popcorn.
Spoiler: On post 292
PEdit: No you may not.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
When, where and how?In post 297, Zdenek wrote:The case on Matt, while it had reasonable beginnings, has become somewhat unbelievable.
You realize he has ignored every point I brought against him, right? Because he's just throwing a CAPSLOCK OMG I AM TOTALLY GENUINE fit at LLD instead of actually addressing the issues that are making him a scumread.
The claim that LLD "lied" is inane and thrown wildly out of proportion, and he's choosing to focus on this instead of actually doing something. Like addressing Yosarian, PeregrineV, or, you know,my case on him.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Oh, you mean I should be bothered answering you when you've neatly dodged EVERYTHING I SAID ABOUT YOU.In post 313, MattP wrote:That's directed at Tierce, you shouldn't respond to it
No.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
LLD is obvTown, quadz. She proposed a point based on theory (the Hurting business), didn't try to push it over the rest, and is working in a very logical, grounded manner. Scum-LLD is much more likely to go over the top with ridiculous pushes. She's not trying to cast a broad net of suspicion, doesn't have bullshit reasons for her votes. Being loud and on your face is null with her, and while the "disappearing" bit was a bit of an exaggeration, it's not scummy, it's genuine irritation with a scumread. She's coming across as very genuine and open.
Before this game, I was chatting with Empire and he was going through her meta with me. She's Town here; vote MattP.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Seriously, look at this dissonant crap. He wants me to take his cases seriously, but thinks my reasoning/whatever is hilarious and says he'll ignore me and I'm the first person he appeals to. A person he is openly accusing of not being rational. Instead of, in fact, ignoring me and resorting to his other Townreads, he is making cases formeto look at? What is with this deflection and appealing to reason fromme?-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Not tonight; I'll answer you later when I actually feel like reading stuff in depth. The short version is that (obviously) I disagree with you.In post 360, Zdenek wrote:Tierce, you asked me to explain about what I think of the case against Matt. No comment? I mean, when I see this
I get the impression that you aren't really paying attention to LLD's push against Matt, which is over the top.In post 341, Tierce wrote:Scum-LLD is much more likely to go over the top with ridiculous pushes.
Also, why is Xalxe an easy target?
And no, I don't think that LLD's push resembles the kind of pushes she does as scum.
Xalxe is an easy target because he's not a great player. He lurks, he flakes, he doesn't push wagons effectively or draw NKs. Despite his join date, he's below MattP's pay grade. I've played with him and modded for him a few times. Sadly, this is the truth.
And I don't think MattP's comparison is actually fair. Have you looked through the rest of D2 in Newbie 1289? Xalxe didn't question my Townieness there, and only thought to bring it to question on D3 (hilariously, I died overnight, so that was cut short). Here, he decided that a few posts against him and in support of me merit a massive scumread. That is nonsensical, especially when Xalxe claims to have been following an could already have formed reads. Coming into the game with his decision made is NOT scummy in any manner.-
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV