word? what word?...dear god what word?
Mini 754 - Frogs Mafia Game, Set and Match.
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
So if you didnt do it to start conversation, why are you stating it? Smells of someone trying to look good for a "good" deed, though the deed was unintentional.crywolf20084 wrote:
Well not exactly but it did, did it not?curiouskarmadog wrote:
wait, did you vote me with a dice vote purely to start conversation?crywolf20084 wrote:Well did it not start converstation?
I didnt really care about your random vote. It is common to dice vote at the beginning of day 1. I didnt really care about other's "attacks" of that vote. Day 1 people attack anyone for anything to get stances, conversation, apply pressure. But when you try to make the random vote look pro town, though that wasnt your intention...that to me looks suspect. If I meta you..will I find you random voting in every game?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
curiouskarmadog wrote:crywolf20084 wrote:
Well not exactly but it did, did it not?curiouskarmadog wrote:
wait, did you vote me with a dice vote purely to start conversation?crywolf20084 wrote:Well did it not start converstation?
So if you didnt do it to start conversation, why are you stating it?Smells of someone trying to look good for a "good" deed, though the deed was unintentional.
I didnt really care about your random vote. It is common to dice vote at the beginning of day 1. I didnt really care about other's "attacks" of that vote. Day 1 people attack anyone for anything to get stances, conversation, apply pressure. But when you try to make the random vote look pro town, though that wasnt your intention...that to me looks suspect.If I meta you..will I find you random voting in every game?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
from post 82, kloud has hit my point and questions on the nose. Again, I dont care about the random dice vote..happens a lot...what I dont like is Cry's reaction to TSQ (who I think is just getting conversation moving, null tell)...Cry seems to be trying to take credit for being protown after the fact. By saying that the dice vote did start conversation.
I havent got an answer from Cry about...but I dont think I am going to at this point. I am not sure why his is misunderstanding my questions. I dont think he dice voted to start conversation....but I also dont think that the dice vote was scummy...his reaction to TSQ was only slightly scummy....just making a note at this point.
I am not sure I unerstand Hate's beef with TSQ...I agree with kloud that it appears that hate is distorting (I prefer the term "Stretching") the facts...But is he doing it to scum hunt or push a bullshit case?...I dont know.
Hate, can you (in layman's term for the slow) explain why you think TSQ is mafia? Your thoughts on why TSQ doesnt have any other votes other than yourself?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Unvoterandom.
Caught up, couple notes I think are worthy (typing as reading).
I am not a big scot fan. Nothing personal, just don’t like his game play. I cant remember his alignment in those past games I have played with him (I think I have seen him as town and scum)..I think this is the first game I have seen him on the attack with reasoning I agree with. he makes really good points in post 105. 1st, there is no fucking thing as overly defense…and I would like to go a step further, CK, if you think Hate is “classicly” “over defensive”…my question is to you…So?
2nd, being “70%” sure of someone being scum in this game after 4-5 pages seems silly. I do think Hate is new…I do think Hate appears to be eager.
OK, so why bring it up? (which scot asks right after)Citizen Karne wrote:
Yes there is. However, it is not a scumtell.scotmany12 wrote:
No such thing as overdefensive. Defending yourself is not a scum tell.Citizen Karne wrote:Sounds like a classical case of an overly defensive beginner.
I don’t like CK’s math in post 130. Initially, I didn’t have an issue with “70%”. I took it as he thought hate was scum or had a vibe that he might be scum. I thought it was sort of silly, but not scummy…NOW, that Scot calls him out on this, he is back tracking a tad stating
and again, why mention it? How were we suppose to know you start at 50%? Your posts so far seem fluffy. I need a point of reference to know what 70% means from you. Right now, you have left yourself room to maneuver around if you have to. What is my % and why? TSQ’s? Scot’s? Cry’s…and why? How does lurking affect your %s?Citizen Karne wrote: At the beginning of a game, I am 50% sure a person is scum. The extra 20% is not as big of a gain as I think you are making it.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
I dont know what I think yet...I think he posts are fluffy. I think his numbers are apparently meaningless and I am urging him to put some meaning behind them. I think numbers and percentages are suspect without meaning behind them...do you have a problem with me asking him to provide other's percentages as well? You are right, vollkan DOES provide percentageS....not just one. This is not what vollkan does.
This is someone who basically said he is getting a scummy vibe on someone...then, when pressured a bit about it...backs off, that I also find suspect, and I am not sure how you are missing that point....the defense is noted.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
CK
from the bottom of page 6, bolded questions
curiouskarmadog wrote:
I am not a big scot fan. Nothing personal, just don’t like his game play. I cant remember his alignment in those past games I have played with him (I think I have seen him as town and scum)..I think this is the first game I have seen him on the attack with reasoning I agree with. he makes really good points in post 105. 1st, there is no fucking thing as overly defense…and I would like to go a step further,CK, if you think Hate is “classicly” “over defensive”…my question is to you…So?
2nd, being “70%” sure of someone being scum in this game after 4-5 pages seems silly. I do think Hate is new…I do think Hate appears to be eager.
Citizen Karne wrote:
Yes there is. However, it is not a scumtell.scotmany12 wrote:
No such thing as overdefensive. Defending yourself is not a scum tell.Citizen Karne wrote:Sounds like a classical case of an overly defensive beginner.OK, so why bring it up?(which scot asks right after)
I don’t like CK’s math in post 130. Initially, I didn’t have an issue with “70%”. I took it as he thought hate was scum or had a vibe that he might be scum. I thought it was sort of silly, but not scummy…NOW, that Scot calls him out on this, he is back tracking a tad statingCitizen Karne wrote: At the beginning of a game, I am 50% sure a person is scum. The extra 20% is not as big of a gain as I think you are making it.and again, why mention it? How were we suppose to know you start at 50%?Your posts so far seem fluffy. I need a point of reference to know what 70% means from you.Right now, you have left yourself room to maneuver around if you have to. What is my % and why? TSQ’s? Scot’s? Cry’s…and why? How does lurking affect your %s?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
unvotefor now....biggest beef was that he left himself room to manuver later...even though his numbers are close to each other, we are still early day 1...I will downgrage to aFoS. Bonus points for taking stances on everyone, though i did not ask for it.
Vote Cry, for lurking here, but posting all over site. Also early game moves.
Cry, why are you avoiding this game?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
9 pages is not that much...you seem to be active everywhere else..why?crywolf20084 wrote:I too am LA due to the fact I work tonight, tomorrow, Friday, and Saturday...along with two art projects that desperately need working on because its due on Monday. I may need replacing...I dunno how much I can catch up with...I will try.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
welcome farside, good to be in a game with you again..
question, what do you think of this comment for CK in reference to CW? Been waiting for anyone to comment on this..but no one has yet....
still comfortable with my vote on CW however...for now
Citizen Karne wrote:
If she truly is active elsewhere, then this lurking is very disturbing to me.curiouskarmadog wrote:
9 pages is not that much...you seem to be active everywhere else..why?crywolf20084 wrote:I too am LA due to the fact I work tonight, tomorrow, Friday, and Saturday...along with two art projects that desperately need working on because its due on Monday. I may need replacing...I dunno how much I can catch up with...I will try.FoS: crywolf20084NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
my problem with this comment wasnt that it wasnt 100% original..it was almost like you were throwing suspicion on CW without committing to it. "it that is true" then it does look scummy....why didnt you go check to see if my statement was true for yourself? this is the problem I am having with you all game (only 10 pages)...comments without the feeling of commitment, or leaving yourself room to manuver later if needed...Citizen Karne wrote:
Well, I can't push out original content in 100% of my posts. Sometimes what is out there is what I believe, and I say that I agree with it. If all I did was follow, I would be a sheep and it would be scummy. But withfarside22 wrote:
Looks like a BW vote without the vote. I've noticed that some of CK's votes I get the impression he's not really trying to look for scum and just agreeing with whatever is out there.curiouskarmadog wrote:welcome farside, good to be in a game with you again..
question, what do you think of this comment for CK in reference to CW? Been waiting for anyone to comment on this..but no one has yet....
still comfortable with my vote on CW however...for now
Citizen Karne wrote:
If she truly is active elsewhere, then this lurking is very disturbing to me.curiouskarmadog wrote:
9 pages is not that much...you seem to be active everywhere else..why?crywolf20084 wrote:I too am LA due to the fact I work tonight, tomorrow, Friday, and Saturday...along with two art projects that desperately need working on because its due on Monday. I may need replacing...I dunno how much I can catch up with...I will try.FoS: crywolf20084somebeing the operative word, I hardly fine that to be a bad thing in any way.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
my reply to CK's 239 (trying to avoid long quote pyramids), why did you go check to see if my comment was accurate?
unvote Cry...need to think on that claim...parts of it are sticking out in particular, but I think i know what she doing, so will leave it at that...however, i dont think I understand why you would want to lynch your partner....do you know if your partner knows your alignment?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Citizen Karne wrote:
Also, ckd, I'm confused by your question.
let me put it this way.curiouskarmadog wrote:my reply to CK's 239 (trying to avoid long quote pyramids), why did you go check to see if my comment was accurate?
you and I are managers trying to find shitty employees. I tell you "Bob was late today". You tell me "ifBob really was late, I am going to fire him"....then you give Bob evil stares all day.
My question to you is, why didnt you check Bob's time card to see if he was indeed late, before giving him the stare? You took my word for it without looking it up for yourself..why?
Why FoS him without seeing if I was stretching the truth? It doesnt seem like you are trying to scum hunt and you are taking whatever people say at face value..why?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
either you are dodging the point or not really getting it, I am not sure. Can you please demostrate a time in this game that you have scumhunted? that would of been a great point (checking my statement for truth) to do it. Maybe cry was just posting in GA and avoiding all of her games? Maybe I was stretching the truth to serve an evil purpose....Citizen Karne wrote:
It seemed such a foolish thing to lie about. cry didn't argue it, either. The intention of my FoS was to see what cry's response would be, and it was one of admittance. Also, one example of taking something at face value hardly constitutes a dearth of scumhunting throughout the game. Now THAT is a statement I'd like you to back up.curiouskarmadog wrote: You took my word for it without looking it up for yourself..why?
Why FoS him without seeing if I was stretching the truth? It doesnt seem like you are trying to scum hunt and you are taking whatever people say at face value..why?the point is, you didnt feel the need to find out, which says something about your situation in this game. You left yourself room to manuver with the "if"...if later someone did check and found that maybe I was incorrect..you could always fallen back on the "if" if you were pressured as to why you jumped on the wagon (yes your fos is wagon jumping)..."well, when I FoSed Cry, I said "if"".
I have been getting a bad vibe from you, on and off all game....as I believe Cry's claim..
vote CKNO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Updating. Typing as (re)reading
From CK post 285
The question to Gorrad is scum hunting I guess, but back and forths about you lack of votes/use of FoS is hardly scum hunting. That is reacting to people attacking you. Analysis…also is just your opinion and has nothing to do with scum hunting. I think you are more scummy than Gorrad because of your play. The way you maneuver or at least leave yourself open to maneuver. I appreciated your stance on everyone without being asked to do it, but something with your recent posts are sticking out.Citizen Karne wrote:
Is this good enough? Here I am asking Gorrad a question about an action I consider scummy and looking for a response to help me form an opinionCitizen Karne wrote:
Do random votes really count towards anything anyway? How is a random FoS any different? I suppose it prevents speedlynching a little. I really can't see any difference. If you want to make a big deal about me not voting, well that's silly. This is how I play. Deal with it. If you want to call me scum because of it, go ahead. I'd love to see your argument on how it makes me scum in this game as opposed to other games where I have been town. I do not think it is at all anti-town, either. It certainly does not inhibit my ability to discuss intelligently.
My FoSes are, for all intents and purposes, votes.
Speaking of FoSes that are, for all intents and purposes, votes, I dislike Gorrad's play so far. His second post seems to me like he is trying to stay out of the focus. His retraction of his analysis of TSQ seems as though he is backing out of a possible confrontation for the sole purpose of not getting into an argument with a player rather than simply mixing up people in his head. (I don't feel as though I am expressing myself accurately, but hopefully you understand me.) With whom did you confuse TSQ in your head, Gorrad?
Also, his posts in response to Haterade strike me as overly hypocritical cheap shots to try and gain town points by advocating for discussion.
Also, why does neither my analysis of the game nor various back-and-forths not count as scumhunting (I'm assuming you couldn't have overlooked those, but if you did by all means tell me)? They prompted discussion and certainly helped me (and I'm sure others too) formulate opinions on people in the game. Maybe we just don't consider the same things scumhunting. If not scumhunting, they certainly helped move along the game and provided solid content, neither of which I think of as anti-town. Why do you think I'm more scummy than, say, Gorrad?
God I hate this post too.crywolf20084 wrote:Arch srsly, You sound all depressed and blaaaaaah and like this game has no interest to you. Liven up could ya??
TSQ had his computer stolen..So did Haterade. Though Haterade, but he wasn't here prior to that. Kloud is a different story. I asked him to post once but he hasn't yet. Hrmmm...
Unvote/Vote: KloudPolicy vote. though its for the exact same thing i was doing
Cry you never answered my questions...you have been lurking here but posting everywhere else...so, given your logic on voting kloud, why shouldnt I return my vote on you?...
--------
ML post, 294 is a very good one
fishing?mikeburnfire wrote:
What makes you think they aren't?2) How do you know all frogs are vanilla?
MBL, however does have a point about the claim being risky.
“Hi, I am posting just to post”scotmany12 wrote:Guys, this whole argument is distracting us from lynching Gorrad. MBF and Dahill should join forces and help bring down the scum gorrad.
Not a helpful post.
I was curious who was scum hunting and who might comment on this first..and then who would agree after… Trying to find links and connections to people….or on the flip side, see who attacks who and why. As it stands no one did, until I commented on it. I wanted to see how Farside’s view of CK differed from MBF’s (or lack thereof)..also, I was tired of waiting.kloud1516 wrote:
Why exactly were you waiting for others to respond before doing so yourself? What does waiting for others to notice something accomplish? Why bring this up when farside "replaces" in, when it was something you had felt needed to be addressed (as you state above) before?curiouskarmadog wrote:welcome farside, good to be in a game with you again..
question, what do you think of this comment for CK in reference to CW?Been waiting for anyone to comment on this..but no one has yet....
still comfortable with my vote on CW however...for now
CitizenKarne wrote:
If she truly is active elsewhere, then this lurking is very disturbing to me.curiouskarmadog wrote:
9 pages is not that much...you seem to be active everywhere else..why?crywolf20084 wrote:I too am LA due to the fact I work tonight, tomorrow, Friday, and Saturday...along with two art projects that desperately need working on because its due on Monday. I may need replacing...I dunno how much I can catch up with...I will try.FoS: crywolf20084
MBF vs. ML’s debate on mason.
I think that if Cry has a mason partner and that partner had anything important to bring to the table right now..he/she would. Cry is either scum or mason…maybe both, but I am doubting it. I believe Cry’s claim….I also think that Cry is probably new to the game. I think that the partner coming out right now will hurt us more than help us…If Cry is indeed telling the truth, at this point, Cry’s claim has nullified the usefulness of role. My biggest problem was Cry’s attack of that partner….did you ever explain why you thought it might be a good idea to lynch your partner?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Updating, as usual typing and reading.
did you review his posts...thoughts?mikeburnfire wrote: I could see moving my vote over to Archon, but I don't know about Karne. I would need to review his posts first.
I see that he has been replaced, so it sort of suck that he cant answer this..."what personal reasons stopped you from posting in this game, but posting everywhere else?" But he is no longer here....still calling bullshit.crywolf20084 wrote:
B) I have disappeared for personal reasons. Sorry. I'm back for the moment.
QFTdahill1 wrote:
i, personally, find it odd that you are attacking archon for virtually the same exact thing you didcrywolf20084 wrote:Now, I have noticed you haven't said much either. You showed up. Said you read, and then had nothing what so ever to say about this game. Found it odd then and I still find it odd.
can I have a link...curious…mikeburnfire wrote:
Yes, several.curiouskarmadog wrote:MBF, you ever been in a normal game that the town no lynched day 1?
we'll see.....if gorrad is your first pick as scum, do you have a second....and why?scotmany12 wrote:
unvote, vote: Gorrad
This is a good post. Seriously though, this is now my only game so I'll be able to be more active from now on.
welcome back..thoughts?Thestatusquo wrote:Back with laptop.
Unlike cry...this checks out.Citizen Karne wrote:I am very sorry I haven't been more involved as of late but school is very hectic right now. I apologize but I don't have time now for anything comprehensive. I'll have to post tomorrow. Again, I'm sorry about this.
say what?..8 posts later..mikeburnfire wrote: I'll move my vote to Gorrad for now.I don't like how people are voting for the claimed mason on Day 1, and it's worse that Gorrad joined in near the deadlinefor some arbitrary "neighbor" comment.
Something about this is leaving a bad taste in my mouth…so what if cry is the only one close to a lynch, why does that deserve a vote from you?...to me..that seems like lynching for the sake of lynching…welcome to near the top of my scum radar..how does it feel?mikeburnfire wrote:Okay, I accept your explanation Gorrad.
unvote
Seeing as how Crywolf is the only one even close to a lynch with 5 votes, I guess I'll help it along. I'm not stupid enough to lynch just for the sake of lynching, and I hate the idea of lynching a claimed mason on Day 1. But she has acted suspicious, there's no denying that.
vote: CryWolf
werent you just voting him, because of his vote on the “mason” you are now voting for no apparent reason? Also I think it is bullshit to give your vote to someone else….when/if you lynch town, you can always fall back on “well, I gave my vote to gorrad so it cant be linked to me”.mikeburnfire wrote:Mod: since I'll be gone, I'd like to give my vote to Gorrad, allowing him to change my vote if some new information should come up. Is this allowed? I've seen it before in other games.
ML, what are your thoughts on MBF’s posts 372, 370?
If any one didnt know this at this point then they are playing the wrong game….the breadcrumbs were piled high enough….the weak attempt at a breadcrumb from Cry is one reason why I don’t feel she is the lynch today…Archon wrote:Permission accepted.
My PM says I am neighbors with crywolf.
Someone just WIFOMed all over the coats….Archon wrote:Even though I think I was already voting for crywolf, I just wanted to make sure I was (guess I was to lazy to look back a couple of posts.) Just another reason to keep my vote.
Of course, if we lynch crywolf, and she turns up town that would look bad for me... But then again, if I were scum, why would I be pointing this out? Why am I even continuing this post in the first place? I baffle myself.
Caught up…
Archon's vote and posts suck, but MBF’s posts seems super scummy.
Unvote, vote MBF…..NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
I completely missed him asking this..Gorrad wrote:
You want me to claim? My flavor's species is frog, though whether I'm a regular frog or some subspecies I won't say. The vanillas are all frogs, as you can see in the first post. This is because it's Frogs Mafia.Archon wrote:And what are you, then?
Archon...why are you asking him what he is...how can that be good for town?
unvote, vote Archon.
I intially read that as him arguing...but I think it was an attempt to fish....
MBF, dont think this is you getting off the hook..I except all questions answered.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
why must I ask the same questions over and over.Archon wrote:
I asked because he asked. simple as that.curiouskarmadog wrote:where did he ask you?...was it after you claimed, if so, how is that the same thing?
also, anwser the question...why did you ask, and how is it good for the town that he answer?
I don't see anything good in his answer, nor do I see anything bad. It could be true, or easily faked. I think it didn't really say much.
"where did he ask you?...was it after you claimed, if so, how is that the same thing?"NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
TSQ, what is your take on Day 1 MBF blasting Gorrad for voting the claimed mason...then 8 posts later voting the claimed mason?, THEN...leaving the game for a bit and giving his vote to Gorrad? Do you feel like this is town play? Why are why not? Your thoughts on his vote today (even though he is voting with you)?
Also, what scenario do you think happened that Cry Scum knew about town ducks? He claimed yesterday when we had no clue about ducks, that didnt seem risky from a scum prespective?
Does anyone know (past games) if the Mod usually gives fake claims to scum? Might look that up.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
going to make it a point to meta the mod's game...and see if he has ever done it before....this case on SHEizzyCHICKizzyHERizzyFEMALEizzyVAGINAizzyOVARIES seems like a stretch....dahill1 wrote:
but couldn't scum have been provided with this? it isn't uncommon for mods to include fake claims/flavor for scum, especially in theme games. this case seems to be clearing based on a conditional action which was based off of flavor again. as i said before, i'm not gonna be clearing anyone because of thatRaging Rabbit wrote:The fact that she knew the townie flavor in advance. We've been over this.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
sweet christmikeburnfire wrote:Okay, I've gone through the thread and have lots of notes. It's mainly just summaries of all the posts, so I won't clutter the thread.
Why I think Izzy is scum:
Crywolf instantly tried to get Archon, her neighbor, lynched
Izzy is a duck, and ducks are more likely to be scum than frogs
Izzy is a "neighbor", which are more likely than masons to have at least one scum, and the other neighbor is dead
Izzy acted like she knew ducks were safeclaims
Mainly, there is a lot of evidence against Izzy from my perspective, and little reason not to believe she is scum. TSQ said it all very well, and I pretty much agree with everything he has said. However, half of the evidence is Meta, and the other half is sketchy. I know it's not the best case against somebody, and I have other suspicions I want to follow up on. I need to do a bit more review.
confirm vote MBF
how do you know that duck are more likely scum..the only duck revealed was town.
please show where you got this "neighbor" theory from..former game..link?
if ducks were a safe claim, then WHY are they more liking scum?
this case is bullshit and is a stretch.
I think you need to "clutter" now..that is no excuse to post a bad case.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
this is a bullshit plea to make us think you dont really care about this game..if I recall...didnt you have a replacement then beg to get back into the game?mikeburnfire wrote:Sorry, everybody. I've been out of the game for a long time and I've forgotten how tedious this is. I can think of a dozen other things I'd rather be doing right now,
if MBF is not lynched today..I will be shocked.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Ok catching up, updating from about page 23..writing and opinion forming as reading.
CK does a PbP/case on MBF. I think Ck brings up good points in reference to MBF. I find it TSQ’s position quite interesting(589). Did you read CK’s post? He DID bring up points and give you the EXACT post of what he was commenting on. So instead of addressing the points made in the post he shoves it off with theory conversation….blahh..
If you are so concerned that CK is slanting his case, why are you not cross referencing the post for accuracy? Why do you think that CK could be biased? Why ARENT you concerned with why CK might be biased?Thestatusquo wrote:I don't have the time nor energy to read a very potentially biased summary of every post MBF has ever made.
.
Ugh, more conversation about game theory (how to do a PbP, by TSQ)..less talk about theory, more talk about this game. Hey TSQ, lets say for an instance that CK’s post was a case and not a PbP….what is your thoughts about his points? You seem to ignoring that post content to focus on theory bullshit….bottom line..he is town and thinks MBF is scum and this is why (his post) or he is scum throwing up a wall of words to jump on a wagon…I don’t give a shit if you personally don’t like PbP so quit smoking up the place and address the fire.
.
Gorrad(601) why do you think MBF is protown..would like reasons please…maybe throw in some posts that do it for you.
.
thats not what he did...what exactly is a case then?...going back and pulling posts that give you an impression of guilt....CK pulled all of your posts....so you are faulting him for being thorough?..bullshit.mikeburnfire wrote:
Citizen Karne, TSQ is right about your pbpa. It's unbelievably slanted against me. You went through all my posts, tried to find everything that could be construed as suspicious, and put it all together as evidence that I'm scum. It's tunnelvisioning, and it's not good. You're just doing what I've been doing. It's very hypocritical. Like so:
left field huh? your resistance to give validity to the MBF case is noted. Where (and when) exactly did the case come from..interested on your view on this.Thestatusquo wrote:
I still think Izzy is the lynch for today, and I don't like how this MBF thing has developed, sort of out of left field.
whoa where did TSQ say you are town...I must have missed that.mikeburnfire wrote:Yeah, once I forced you to. But you and TSQ, people who have once said that they thought I was town, almost let me die without saying a damn thing.
Ahh, TSQ addresses that in 614.
.
I appreciate MBF’s post (618)..except
this is crap. I am on the fence on Gorrad and think Izzy might be town. After reading thoroughly, I am seeing a TSQ/MBF connection. When/if you flip scum, will speak volumes for TSQ lack of content/theory rants today.mikeburnfire wrote:
something that I noticed is that almost ALL of you who suspect Gorrad think "I bet MBF's scum with Gorrad". Likewise for those of you who suspect Izzy. Wouldn't it be better to lynch one of them, rather than me? If I'm dead, then regardless of my alignment, you'll be trying to decide between killing Gorrad or Izzy, and if I'm a dead townie and another townie dies, then this decision could be the one that dictates whether or not the town wins. If I'm scum, you haven't made hardly any progress by killing me (because you're still split into factions). If I'm town, then not only are you undecided, but you've also put yourself in lynch-or-lose position tomorrow.
Gorrad thinks MBF claimed vanilla…I read it has him being townie..not vanilla…MBF confirms this claim.
umm, pretty sure he claimed toad.Citizen Karne wrote:Just curious mike, what animal are you?
lol, ticked you off?scotmany12 wrote: There was also something that ticked me off from CKD, but I don't remember. I'll have to look and see.
this is actually a good post....do I see a MBFscum making this comment about TSQscum at this point?....well, if he was trying to distance maybe....hmmmmmikeburnfire wrote:I am curious as to why you believe TSQ to be town. He was absent for a good portion of the game, and when he has been present he has been doing things like arguing why a pbpa is bad and asking everybody questions instead of giving his opinion on people (other than Izzy). Hell, getting his opinion about my bandwagon was like pulling teeth.
+++
I am still good with MBF being a lynch today…TSQ has risen on my suspicion list. I don’t know if he is just tunnel visioning on izzy or just ignoring the cases on MBF. Gorrad and RR being non players has bothered me..i have seen them both be more active…
Interested in hearing from both....NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
dont have time to really reply all that has been posted..and thought this was interesting
in reference to the bolded...i wasnt trying to put forth this as part of my case (which was posted pages ago)mikeburnfire wrote:
As for CKD, he's just another one of the people who say I'm scum and will do anything to justify it. His last post reads like this:
TSQ and MBF aren't suspicious of each other! They must be scum....
TSQ and MBF are expression suspicion of each other! They must be distancing...
the fact that it was a good point made me think it out....did I say "well mbf is suspicious of TSQ, proof they are distancing"..no..I said MAYBE that post would make since if he was distancing...I wasnt presenting it as proof...I brought it up, because you DID make a good post that I think was worth repeating and I dont know if youscum would say that to tsqscum...but the fact you focus on that to discredit me without addressing my case (which was posted pages ago) or anything else in the that post should be quite telling to all..also where did I say that YOU are scum BECAUSE you and TSQ are not suspicious of each other...I never said anything remotely close to that....guess you are really feeling the heat if you are blatantly lying...you are scum for many other reasons, none of which has anything to do with your interaction (or lack of) with TSQ.curiouskarmadog wrote:
this is actually a good post....do I see a MBFscum making this comment about TSQscum at this point?....well, if he was trying to distance maybe....hmmmmmikeburnfire wrote:I am curious as to why you believe TSQ to be town. He was absent for a good portion of the game, and when he has been present he has been doing things like arguing why a pbpa is bad and asking everybody questions instead of giving his opinion on people (other than Izzy). Hell, getting his opinion about my bandwagon was like pulling teeth.
Also where did I say that TSQ expressed suspicion of you?..if you read my post...one of my biggest problems with TSQ is is lack of addressing you...or blowing smoke.
again, if MBF is not lynched today...I will be shocked.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
sry maybe you missed the post.
please dont ignore.
curiouskarmadog wrote:dont have time to really reply all that has been posted..and thought this was interesting
in reference to the bolded...i wasnt trying to put forth this as part of my case (which was posted pages ago)mikeburnfire wrote:
As for CKD, he's just another one of the people who say I'm scum and will do anything to justify it. His last post reads like this:
TSQ and MBF aren't suspicious of each other! They must be scum....
TSQ and MBF are expression suspicion of each other! They must be distancing...
the fact that it was a good point made me think it out....did I say "well mbf is suspicious of TSQ, proof they are distancing"..no..I said MAYBE that post would make since if he was distancing...I wasnt presenting it as proof...I brought it up, because you DID make a good post that I think was worth repeating and I dont know if youscum would say that to tsqscum...but the fact you focus on that to discredit me without addressing my case (which was posted pages ago) or anything else in the that post should be quite telling to all..also where did I say that YOU are scum BECAUSE you and TSQ are not suspicious of each other...I never said anything remotely close to that....guess you are really feeling the heat if you are blatantly lying...you are scum for many other reasons, none of which has anything to do with your interaction (or lack of) with TSQ.curiouskarmadog wrote:
this is actually a good post....do I see a MBFscum making this comment about TSQscum at this point?....well, if he was trying to distance maybe....hmmmmmikeburnfire wrote:I am curious as to why you believe TSQ to be town. He was absent for a good portion of the game, and when he has been present he has been doing things like arguing why a pbpa is bad and asking everybody questions instead of giving his opinion on people (other than Izzy). Hell, getting his opinion about my bandwagon was like pulling teeth.
Also where did I say that TSQ expressed suspicion of you?..if you read my post...one of my biggest problems with TSQ is is lack of addressing you...or blowing smoke.
again, if MBF is not lynched today...I will be shocked.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
being prodded?..didnt know the game had started...interesting.
I still dont see Izzy as scum. The duck claim (before we knew anything about ducks) is pretty hard to swallow...for many different reasons. Also, if Gorrad knew who his mafia buddies were I dont see any reason for him to push for Izzyscum
I feel good about scot, though Raging's point about giving scum day kill(s) seems like a quick reason not to address scot. you have never seen a game that a scum variant had a day kill?
that leaves dahill, ML, and raging...going to give them a look over tomorrow....though both ML's and dahill's push for the Izzy wagon out of the gate...looks thought out.
I have only been in a game once (maybe twice) where there was a traitor...how do you tell if the traitor has been recruited or not? Also going to reread gorrad.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
OK finished the reread.
Again, feeling good about Scot. Even though I am sure that I have seen a game where scum (an SK) had a daykill or two…I am just not seeing it in this game. The only troubling thing (WIFOM) is that mafia wasn’t worried enough about scot to off him last night. As far as I can see, scot has never mentioned if his ability was one shot or not…so to me…scot seems dangerous ESPECIALLY if he just offed scum…but who knows….I think he is town.
Not liking how people are all too willing to just jump right on a Dizzy wagon…or at least exploring a possibility right out of the gate
I got an early scum vibe off CK, but felt he had sort of redeemed himself in this game appears to be scum hunting, or maybe he is just throwing shit to see what sticks. On the fence about CK
Why I say shit is because I have seen two games that killing the traitor resulted in the recruitment of said traitor. I thought that was how recruiting traitors worked and that that was common knowledge. I have not been in too many games with (effective) traitors. I was curious to see how far CK would push it or if he would let it drop if no one jumped on board…but the games seems to have stalled out.
One game is …Mini 678
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9466
the other I remember reading after a nomination one year..cant find it though and lack the time to go through pages of posts.
In this game (I was scum)..targetting the traitor for the kill recruited him. I think CK's "catch" of a slip seems stretchy.
On another note, I have seen other games that when the traitor died without being recruited he died as “Unrecruited Traitor”..having trouble finding it…but what I am wondering and would like people to comment on..is how can you tell if Gorrad had been recruited or not? Are traitors aways recruitable, if so, does the mafia usually know this? Also does anyone know if the traitor KNEW who his mafia group was?....I am really uncertain how traitors work. If gorrad DID know…then that is another point for Dizzy being town…I just don’t see a traitor bussing that hard. If anyone has experience in this, I am interested and I think it would shed a ton of light on gorrad and others.
CK have you been in any games with traitors?
That being said, what I don’t like about dahill was I think he was the first to catch gorrad’s “breadcrumb”. Now that doesn’t mean anything per say, because rereading gorrad it sticks out like a sore thumb…..so that is either a strike against (mafia looking for it having knowledge of a traitor, trying to use it agianst someone?) or a strike for (did he catch it because he is actually scum hunting trying to find anyone linked to gorrad?). Dahill is also one of those jumping on the Dizzy wagon (I am pretty sure that dizzy is town).
Dahill, I would like to hear your thoughts on ML, RR, CK, and myself…if this is a repeat question..sorry..but have you ever been in a game with a traitor?..if so, can you link please?
I think RR and ML have been under the radar….both are sticking out to me in the reread, but ML is looking townish. Even though he has mentioned suspicion of Dizzy today..he is not jumping out hitting that wagon hardcore…I like the fact that he is rereading and note the posted about CK (773)…CK has posted but has not addressed the post…(hoping it goes away?)
I would like to see CK address this.
anyway, on fence about ML, but leaning town.
RR has risen on the list. He has done absolutely nothing in this game and seems to be floating along or casting wide nets….what I find really interesting..is the only person he has seriously voted for this entire game is scot. He has thrown a lot of suspicion around and really rode MBF yesterday…but when it came down to a hammer….he made a big deal about not wanting to hammer without more validation. He continued to beat down MBF adding to the pile of suspicion..but never voted.
Why is that RR? RR, can you please update your thoughts on dahill, CK, ML, and myself?NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Ok am I caught up (majority of posts were "I am not going to be here” posts)..some things sticking out to me.
dahill's post asking to see some of my games looks false. Why do you want to see games?...if you look at my profile I list my last 10 games and every game I have ever played (though I need to update 3-4 games)...I even provided a link to a game that I was mafia (the traitor example)....I dont think i understand what you want us to think you are looking for. Why didnt you ask for me to provide you examples of (fill in the blank).
I cant fault CK for thinking that MBF was scum…I was sure he was too…so sure I thought I also knew who is scum partner was. ML’s point about the FoSes vs. votes still stand, but I think CK addressed the post. What I am concerned with today is CK’s lack of anything that isn’t defensive. Now I understand when being attacked sometimes all you have time for is your defense….but no one is attacking CK hard core, and the game is stalling so there has been plenty of time to scum hunt.
CK, I would like you hear your thoughts on dahill, ML, and RR. Have your opinions of any of these players changed throughout the game? Why? If you HAD to pick a scum group right now…who would they be? Do you think we are in lylo?
RR is still under the radar, though is current lack of posting is getting him deserved heat. Hey RR, why no love here, but you are posting elsewhere? Also would like you to address my other questions.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
you asked for a game (not a scum game)...also you asked AFTER I POSTED a game where I stated I was scum..please explain.dahill1 wrote:@CKD: lol "false"? i know you've heard of meta-ing before. i was looking for games you have been in as scum which would obviously help me to see your playstyle as scum and compare to this one. as for why i didn't look in your profile/whatnot, i'm lazy.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va