Mini 754 - Frogs Mafia Game, Set and Match.

scotmany12 · Post Post #1100 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2009 4:31 am

Much rather lynch Xyl over Izzy.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1101 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2009 7:22 am

scotmany12 wrote:Much rather lynch Xyl over Izzy.

Who's your third choice (presumably after me and lazarusmoth)?

scotmany12 · Post Post #1102 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:10 am

Xylthixlm wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:Much rather lynch Xyl over Izzy.
Who's your third choice (presumably after me and lazarusmoth)?

Sensfan. I don't believe for a second that he is legitimately trying to read this game.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #1103 (ISO) » Sun Jun 21, 2009 11:03 am

curiouskarmadog wrote:
SensFan wrote:
curiouskarmadog wrote:I have played with Sens before...even if he does post...dont expect much.
You realize I have half a mind to requesti replacement right now, right?

--

why, am I wrong? you usually just post in a sentence or two....at least in every game i have ever been in with you. I am not saying you dont have stuff to say...I am just saying to not expect any long or numerous posts from you.

scotmany12 · Post Post #1104 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:35 pm

Just remembered that at deadline, whoever reaches 3 votes would be lynched first. Despite having at least one day left to discuss, xyl switches to izzy, basically saving himself incase he reaches 3 votes. Despite trying to get people to vote for CKD, he totally drops it simply to save himself. His switch from CKD to Izzy when there was still time left makes me truly believe that xyl is scum.

Unvote, Vote: Xyl

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1105 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:42 pm

Wait, we don't need a full majority to lynch at deadline?

Shanba, your ruleset sucks. Get with the cool mods.

scotmany12 · Post Post #1106 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:46 pm

Xylthixlm wrote:Wait, we don't need a full majority to lynch at deadline?

Shanba, your ruleset sucks. Get with the cool mods.

Not buying this for a second. Pretty sure you would read the rules, and you claim to have read day 1, which you would realize that archon was lynched without a total majority.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1107 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:49 pm

Shanba wrote:
FINAL Vote Count:
(of day 1)

6:
Archon
(TSQ, izzy, ckd, MacavityLock, dahill, kloud)

3: dizzyizzyb13
(Raging Rabbit, Gorrad, MBF)

1: Gorrad
(scotmany12)
Not Voting:
Citizen Karne, Archon

Nope, didn't notice it.

Shanba, while I'm complaining, you should have the number of votes to lynch in your vote counts. Thanks.

scotmany12 · Post Post #1108 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:51 pm

Shanba wrote:
Vote Count:

4: Archon
(TSQ, izzy, ckd, MacavityLock)

3: crywolf20084
(Raging Rabbit, Gorrad, MBF)

1: Gorrad
(scotmany12)
Not Voting:
Citizen Karne, kloud, dahill1, Archon

4 to lynch (majority of a majority) at deadline, which is first time I check the thread tomorrow. I'm on GMT+1, for reference. Checking for prodding.

I'm guessing you didn't notice that either then.

scotmany12 · Post Post #1109 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:52 pm

Shanba wrote:Deadline for Tuesday the 23rd of June.

Substantially similar to the last Vote Count:

2: curiouskarmadog
(scot, Xyl)

2: Dizzyizzyb13
(MacLock, CDB)

2: Xylthixlm
(izzy, ckd)
Not Voting:
SensFan

4 to lynch, 3 to lynch at deadline. If there is a tie at three votes, then there is a no lynch.

Prodding MacavityLock.

Or that, which was just posted on the last page. And i see shanba contradicted himself. Cool shanba.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1110 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:53 pm

I didn't even read Shanba's posts, actually. I just filtered to each of the players' posts and read them that way.

scotmany12 · Post Post #1111 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:53 pm

Regardless, putting izzy at 3 votes still saves yourself from being lynched if you also reach 3 votes.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1112 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:54 pm

Hmm... the one on the last page... I swear that wasn't there when I read it

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1113 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:00 pm

scotmany12 wrote:Regardless, putting izzy at 3 votes still saves yourself from being lynched if you also reach 3 votes.

So I should have left my vote where it was and ... what? Waited for a nolynch at deadline? I happen to have two votes on me, so I'm not allowed to move my vote?

MacavityLock · Post Post #1114 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:01 pm

Shanba wrote:
4 to lynch, 3 to lynch at deadline. If there is a tie at three votes, then there is a no lynch.

Shanba wrote:14) At deadline, a majority of a majority is sufficient to lynch. For example, with 12 players, 7 would lynch normally and 4 will lynch at deadline -> the player with the most votes over four is lynched. However, if there are two players on the same number of votes, the player who reached the tie level first will be lynched.

Yeah, this is definitely a contradiction in the ruleset. By Rule 14, Izzy would be our lynch by hitting 3 votes first. By the rule posted in the votecount, we'd have a No Lynch. Clarification please!

scotmany12 · Post Post #1115 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:12 pm

Xylthixlm wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:Regardless, putting izzy at 3 votes still saves yourself from being lynched if you also reach 3 votes.
So I should have left my vote where it was and ... what? Waited for a nolynch at deadline? I happen to have two votes on me, so I'm not allowed to move my vote?

You did it yesterday, when there is still a whole day to discuss today. Instead of trying to convince people to vote for ckd, like you should do as town, and only switch when that becomes futile, you just give up and say izzy will be good enough. Your switch was scummy.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1116 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:17 pm

And my switch was scummier than everything ckd has done? Really?

scotmany12 · Post Post #1117 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:29 pm

You act as if that is the only scummy thing that you/RR has done. That switch put you above ckd on my suspicions.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1118 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:38 pm

Fine. I was hoping that MacavityLock or ChannelDelibird would vote curiouskarmadog so I could switch back, but I guess that's out now.

scotmany12 · Post Post #1119 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:44 pm

Xylthixlm wrote:Fine. I was hoping that MacavityLock or ChannelDelibird would vote curiouskarmadog so I could switch back, but I guess that's out now.

How exactly is switching to the person that they want to lynch supposed to get them to switch to CKD?

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1120 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:48 pm

ChannelDelibird wasn't voting. MacavityLock expressed some support for a CKD lynch. Anyways, I'd made my argument for lynching CKD; were

you

trying to convince them other people to join the wagon?

scotmany12 · Post Post #1121 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:51 pm

Xylthixlm wrote:ChannelDelibird wasn't voting. MacavityLock expressed some support for a CKD lynch. Anyways, I'd made my argument for lynching CKD; were
you
trying to convince them other people to join the wagon?

I made my reasoning for my vote on ckd known a while ago. And CDB was voting for izzy. Now can you please answer my question. How is switching your vote from CKD to izzy supposed to get people who are already voting for izzy to vote for CKD.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1122 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:57 pm

scotmany12 wrote:I made my reasoning for my vote on ckd known a while ago.

Wow, and I already made my reasoning for my vote known too. Your suggestion that I should just keep repeating myself is batty.

scotmany12 wrote:How is switching your vote from CKD to izzy supposed to get people who are already voting for izzy to vote for CKD.

It doesn't, obviously, but I was still hoping they might do so spontaneously. I guess it's not likely given the deadline rule.

scotmany12 · Post Post #1123 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:00 pm

Xylthixlm wrote:
scotmany12 wrote:I made my reasoning for my vote on ckd known a while ago.
Wow, and I already made my reasoning for my vote known too. Your suggestion that I should just keep repeating myself is batty.

Never said you should keep repeating yourself. And I didn't switch my vote in the manner that you did.

Xylthixlm · Post Post #1124 (ISO) » Mon Jun 22, 2009 2:05 pm

scotmany12 wrote:
Xylthixlm wrote:So I should have left my vote where it was and ... what? Waited for a nolynch at deadline? I happen to have two votes on me, so I'm not allowed to move my vote?
You did it yesterday, when there is still a whole day to discuss today. Instead of trying to convince people to vote for ckd, like you should do as town, and only switch when that becomes futile, you just give up and say izzy will be good enough. Your switch was scummy.

I can't tell whether you think further convincing would be futile. You think I'm scummy for switching instead of arguing, so it seems like you think it's not futile; but you stopped arguing, so it seems like you think it is futile.

The only conclusion I can reach here is that you think I'm more persuasive than you are.