Updating. Typing as (re)reading
From CK post 285
Citizen Karne wrote:
Citizen Karne wrote:
Do random votes really count towards anything anyway? How is a random FoS any different? I suppose it prevents speedlynching a little. I really can't see any difference. If you want to make a big deal about me not voting, well that's silly. This is how I play. Deal with it. If you want to call me scum because of it, go ahead. I'd love to see your argument on how it makes me scum in this game as opposed to other games where I have been town. I do not think it is at all anti-town, either. It certainly does not inhibit my ability to discuss intelligently.
My FoSes are, for all intents and purposes, votes.
Speaking of FoSes that are, for all intents and purposes, votes, I dislike Gorrad's play so far. His second post seems to me like he is trying to stay out of the focus. His retraction of his analysis of TSQ seems as though he is backing out of a possible confrontation for the sole purpose of not getting into an argument with a player rather than simply mixing up people in his head. (I don't feel as though I am expressing myself accurately, but hopefully you understand me.) With whom did you confuse TSQ in your head, Gorrad?
Also, his posts in response to Haterade strike me as overly hypocritical cheap shots to try and gain town points by advocating for discussion.
Is this good enough? Here I am asking Gorrad a question about an action I consider scummy and looking for a response to help me form an opinion
Also, why does neither my analysis of the game nor various back-and-forths not count as scumhunting (I'm assuming you couldn't have overlooked those, but if you did by all means tell me)? They prompted discussion and certainly helped me (and I'm sure others too) formulate opinions on people in the game. Maybe we just don't consider the same things scumhunting. If not scumhunting, they certainly helped move along the game and provided solid content, neither of which I think of as anti-town. Why do you think I'm more scummy than, say, Gorrad?
The question to Gorrad is scum hunting I guess, but back and forths about you lack of votes/use of FoS is hardly scum hunting. That is reacting to people attacking you. Analysis…also is just your opinion and has nothing to do with scum hunting. I think you are more scummy than Gorrad because of your play. The way you maneuver or at least leave yourself open to maneuver. I appreciated your stance on everyone without being asked to do it, but something with your recent posts are sticking out.
crywolf20084 wrote:Arch srsly, You sound all depressed and blaaaaaah and like this game has no interest to you. Liven up could ya??
TSQ had his computer stolen..So did Haterade. Though Haterade, but he wasn't here prior to that. Kloud is a different story. I asked him to post once but he hasn't yet. Hrmmm...
Unvote/Vote: Kloud
Policy vote. though its for the exact same thing i was doing
God I hate this post too.
Cry you never answered my questions...you have been lurking here but posting everywhere else...so, given your logic on voting kloud, why shouldnt I return my vote on you?...
--------
ML post, 294 is a very good one
mikeburnfire wrote:
2) How do you know all frogs are vanilla?
What makes you think they aren't?
fishing?
MBL, however does have a point about the claim being risky.
scotmany12 wrote:Guys, this whole argument is distracting us from lynching Gorrad. MBF and Dahill should join forces and help bring down the scum gorrad.
“Hi, I am posting just to post”
Not a helpful post.
kloud1516 wrote:
curiouskarmadog wrote:welcome farside, good to be in a game with you again..
question, what do you think of this comment for CK in reference to CW?
Been waiting for anyone to comment on this..but no one has yet....
still comfortable with my vote on CW however...for now
CitizenKarne wrote:curiouskarmadog wrote:crywolf20084 wrote:I too am LA due to the fact I work tonight, tomorrow, Friday, and Saturday...along with two art projects that desperately need working on because its due on Monday. I may need replacing...I dunno how much I can catch up with...I will try.
9 pages is not that much...you seem to be active everywhere else..why?
If she truly is active elsewhere, then this lurking is very disturbing to me.
FoS: crywolf20084
Why exactly were you waiting for others to respond before doing so yourself? What does waiting for others to notice something accomplish? Why bring this up when farside "replaces" in, when it was something you had felt needed to be addressed (as you state above) before?
I was curious who was scum hunting and who might comment on this first..and then who would agree after… Trying to find links and connections to people….or on the flip side, see who attacks who and why. As it stands no one did, until I commented on it. I wanted to see how Farside’s view of CK differed from MBF’s (or lack thereof)..also, I was tired of waiting.
MBF vs. ML’s debate on mason.
I think that if Cry has a mason partner and that partner had anything important to bring to the table right now..he/she would. Cry is either scum or mason…maybe both, but I am doubting it. I believe Cry’s claim….I also think that Cry is probably new to the game. I think that the partner coming out right now will hurt us more than help us…If Cry is indeed telling the truth, at this point, Cry’s claim has nullified the usefulness of role. My biggest problem was Cry’s attack of that partner….did you ever explain why you thought it might be a good idea to lynch your partner?
