Been reading a couple isos since I haven't really been thrilled with my vote on LLD, and the Agar/Bunnylover cross is getting more interesting to me than the Toog/Vezok cross. I'm getting good vibes from Starbuck, but maybe that's just because I like BSG.
Bunnylover wrote:Alright, everyone we are lynching Reckamonic today and will test if they need to be lynch tomorrow.
Pretty much your first post in the game, and you're saying if we don't lynch Reck, we will try to lynch him again tomorrow. I think you've already been poked about this but it still bothers me. At the time, this could have easily produced a failwagon that would end day1 pointlessly.
Bunnylover wrote:I disagree with this. Scum are more then likely not a class that players can pick (according to other people like the Lich King could be scum), which mean they don't know any kind of bonus town would have unless its in their fake claim.
I just have no idea why you would assume Scum are more likely to be a class players can't pick. I think someone might have already poked you about this too.
Bunnylover wrote:A fake day kill on a person who is a PGO just seems so unlikely that it was setup.
I can't remember if we had day chat during OoT =/.
This is why you lynch all liars, because lieing causes WIFOM =/.
Wait. You remember the nature of your fake PM in OoT, but you can't remember if you had day chat?
Bunnylover wrote:I'm more then sure
their
have to be another one who can settle this before Vezo gets on.
Please, just once, use "there" instead of "their". Sorry I had to say it.
Bunnylover wrote:
I'll unvote him to prevent a quick lynch.
Unvote
I'm not sure there really was a threat of a quick lynch at this point, and... what? If you believe he's scum, then why hold off on the lynch? If you aren't sure if he's scum or not, wouldn't you want to keep the pressure on?
Bunnylover wrote:
And what Vezo is saying about the catch is that it doesn't have the "Reck thing like every other claim. This means you just joined a wagon you have no idea why it has started.
Your vote on Agar is that you claim he didn't understand Vezok's claim, and I have read both your critique and his vote like five times now and I just don't understand where you came up with that.
Bunnylover wrote:
Its pretty much opportunistic scum bandwagoning.
Most of the people joining the Toog wagon is doing so because of what Vezo has posted.
I think Agar had said he agree with that, but then goes off on something that Vezo wasn't even talking about which was the "catch".
That means Agar is just joining the bandwagoning just to get someone lynched.
Basically:
Here's the reason Toog is been voted.
Agar explains his vote which has nothing to do with why Toog is been voted.
Agar just joined a wagon he has no understanding of which makes me view him as scum.
I have to agree that Agar was pretty much just flat bandwagoning, which CAN be scum, but can also just be... well, band-wagoning.
I'm not sure Agar's post was really commenting on the catch as an explanation for his vote; I think the entire explanation of his vote was "nice catch Vezo" or whatever he said.
I also don't like the way Agar basically tunnels on Vezo and then after his one catch flips around and joins with him, but right now I'm not liking the trend in your posts toward ultra-sensitive positioning Bunny. I'll give you a chance but right now my vote is gravitating toward you.