/confirm
@Mykonian: Good to see you in this game; here's to a town/doc victory.
@Kyle: Nice to see you again; here's to your inevitable success.
Hope you guys are ready to win.
SaintKerrigan's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2115076#2115076]Post 26[/url] wrote:Why XScorpion in particular?Looker wrote:Especially you, XScorpion
XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2115147#2115147]Post 27[/url] wrote:Why me? Because Lookerscum defeated my town last game
- My thoughts on Mykonian are that he needs to vote.SaintKerrigan's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2115310#2115310]Post 35[/url] wrote:@ Looker: What are your thoughts on Mykonian?
Just because you state reasons for a vote does not mean the vote isn't suspicious. In other words, yes, your reasoning aroused suspicion. It just reads as fluff reasoning to me.
- I voted Kyle not due to his opinion of Mykonian's plan, but because he publicly expressed "I'm not putting him at L-1"Looker's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2115224#2115224]Post 29[/url] wrote:vote kyle
- I don't like how you publicly express your ability to refrain from placing Mykonian at L-1
- We're going to need competing bandwagons if this lynch is going to be accurate and worthwhile
- You basically said nothing in your last post.
Pick someone to sacrifice.
To be honest, I'm not going to vote Mykonian based on the ramifications of his plan, probably because I wasn't going to follow it anyway. I'm not going to vote him based on his competence or lack thereof as a player; that doesn't bother me because I'm going to do what I do/want regardless and I'd encourage all of you to do the same, at least until we can all agree upon someone we believe to be guaranteed Town.SaintKerrigan's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2115334#2115334]Post 38[/url] wrote:What about opinions on his plan? Part of the reason you're voting Kyle is his reaction to Mykonian. Given that, I'd expect you to have more opinion than just "he needs to vote."Looker wrote:- My thoughts on Mykonian are that he needs to vote.
- Whether the plan sucks or not is a nulltellSaintKerrigan's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2115417#2115417]Post 42[/url] wrote:4. Interesting assumption, but ok. Although I would like a simple yes or no answer in response to "Do you think Mykonian's plan is a nulltell".
Well, we already know that one of you is scum, we just have to figure out which. We're currently in the process of doing so.XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2116233#2116233]Post 47[/url] wrote:P.S. Only obv. scum speak in third person.
@Kyle, Light, & Danny: Who do you guys think should make the circle?DiscoRoboto's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2116320#2116320]Post 48[/url] wrote:I suggest doing a town-event vote for the one who makes the circle,if(and only IF) everyone (or at least a vast majority) agrees on going through with it.
We will elect a player to make the circle by majority voting, we can easily set a deadline of, say, a week (only an example).
If we go through with this I can do the votecounts if necessary.
I'm suggesting this plan because it's the closest we can get to a fair choice on the 'circle-maker'. This is pretty much the same as a lynch but in this case we actually have more chance to hit a towny instead of a mafia. Profitable? In my eyes it is.
Buddying? You sure I'm not holding a grudge against you...? You never know, I could be a xRECKONERx alt...kyle99's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2116328#2116328]Post 49[/url] wrote: Wow looker, your reasoning is awful. You voted me because I didn't put someone at L1 before the mod even announces day one has started, and your vote seems to be just to start up a competing wagon to the Mykonian wagon. Scum-buddying, perhaps?
What would be your better variation (of the idea)?Light's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2116874#2116874]Post 52[/url] wrote:we definitely need a testing strat to test our doctor skills. I'd do the circle strat only if everyone else agrees to it, otherwise we could do a 'better variation of the idea'.
- I didn't dislike it. I felt he made the least commitment.Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2117050#2117050]Post 57[/url] wrote:How so? Although I'm very sure Mykonian is scum, putting someone at L-1 after almost no discussion is madness. For this reason he FoS'd. Why do you not like this?
This implies that we're voting for Mykonian because he's stupid. No, we're voting for him because he's scummy. Quite the Strawman argument you make here.
Why? Do you think you would make a great leader for this game?
With this, I agree.SaintKerrigan's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2117066#2117066]Post 58[/url] wrote:For the record, I'm in favor of every man acting for himself. That said, I don't think Mykonian is scummy for suggesting the plans, even if they are flawed.
I don't want you to die, Mykonian.mykonian's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2117366#2117366]Post 67[/url] wrote:And the above: that is not playstyle, that is intelligence, mostly. You have made that choice conciously, which is ok, but they clearly didn't.
What about not focusing on anything at all?kyle99's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2118714#2118714]Post 73[/url] wrote:Alright guys, I still think mykonian is possibly scum. Trying to focus on only the night-action instead of scumhunting is scummeh.
Bet you never thought you'd ever say that, right?mykonian's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2119219#2119219]Post 76[/url] wrote:Practically nobody (apart from looker and StK) are seriously scumhunting.
>>>SaintKerrigan's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2119435#2119435]Post 79[/url] wrote:I think we've lost Danny...
It concerns me more that Mindgamer would actuallyDiscoRoboto's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2119480#2119480]Post 82[/url] wrote: but seriously, scumhunting = voting someone who claimed 2x scum? Don't know what to think about that.
- We've yet to receive any indication of Danny being replaced. As far as can be deduced, he is lurking.Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2120234#2120234]Post 91[/url] wrote:Danny! Danny! Danny!
Why suddenly the noise about Danny, Looker? He isn't here, he's probably going to be replaced, so why are you talking about him? Are you trying to take our attention away from something? Oh yes, you are:
In my opinion, Mykonian is scum because of his plan and everyone knows I think this. Why are you so desperate to take my attention away from this? Scumbuddies with Mykonian perhaps?Looker wrote:Mindgamer's Post 78 -Okay, very good, you have an alternate plan, so why are you still voting Mykonian? He had a plan, it sucked, you proposed a new one, and now we can move on.Vote Danny
You want to lynch scum! What a wonderful initiative! So you want to bandwagon someone who isn't even here! What?Looker wrote:Either way, I believe our play on words and bickering is distracting from the overall point - lynching scum.Vote Danny
What do you expect to gain from such a bandwagon? Pressure won't make Danny magically return. I think it's just your way of wasting our time. I'm calling a scumteam of Mykonian/Looker.
Oh, and SaintKerrigan is right. I didn't notice because I was tunneling on Mykonian, but Light has posted... nothing. Completely nothing.
Unvote. Vote: Light
I want some content. Now.
XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2120771#2120771]Post 100[/url] wrote:wtf at voting for a guy who hasn't posted anything yet. Why are you so gung-ho to lynch him?
unvote
Vote: Looker
Try again, XScorpion.Looker's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2119620#2119620]Post 89[/url] wrote:People who I'd actually like to seeVote Danny:
- Kyle
- Mykonian
~Mindgamer (I don't know about this one; L-1's kinda iffy right now)
- I don't see it as harassing, StK, and I disagree with your stance. I don't believe the time will have passed for my vote to do any good until we receive indication of Danny being replaced [or he posts more content]. Until then, my vote will remain on him.SaintKerrigan's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2122020#2122020]Post 109[/url] wrote:Happy Scumday, Looker!
I was critical on your vote on Kyle because you said he had lack of content at a time when there wasn't much content to be had. I said if there was lack of content later on in the game, then that was a valid point.
Meanwhile, I don't like your harassing of a guy who isn't here right now, isn't responding to your vote, and in all likelihood is going to be replaced. I think the time for a vote to provoke a response has passed.
Light, why are you voting for a No-Lynch? Usually, that's not a productive way to use your vote unless town comes to a consensus to vote No-Lynch. Otherwise, your vote is much more productive when it's on someone.
DiscoRoboto, do you suspect anyone other than Mykonian, and why?
Mindgamer, why did you call a Mykonian/Looker scumteam, and then vote for Light?
XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2120771#2120771]Post 100[/url] wrote:wtf at voting for a guy who hasn't posted anything yet. Why are you so gung-ho to lynch him?
unvote
Vote: Looker
As misguided as you are, I agree with you.XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2118891#2118891]Post 74[/url] wrote:I wish this were true, oh I really do. Unfortunately you are completely wrong, and it is easily possible that both of me and Mykonian are just misguided townies. If we actually knew for a fact that either I'm scum or Mykonian is, there really shouldn't be any hesitation to just kill one of us then lynch the other the next day.Looker wrote:Well, we already know that one of you is scum, we just have to figure out which. We're currently in the process of doing so.
Where were you going with this?mykonian's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2121404#2121404]Post 102[/url] wrote:It is frowned upon to play suboptimally as town to make you play better as scum. Please don't do that, and answer the question. Why would you as a good towny not tell us?SaintKerrigan wrote:But I'm not always going to be town. It's not in my best interests as a player to disclose my weaknesses. As I stated before, you are free to look up my meta, check my scum games, and see how I play then to determine my scumtells. I will not, however, tell you outright.mykonian wrote:Town doesn't mind giving this information. Please answer the question, StK.SaintKerrigan wrote:@ Mykonian: Why would I want to disclose that kind of information? Even if I did, would you believe me? If you really want to know, go meta me on my scum games and decide for yourself what my scumtells are.
Or are you scum that is afraid to give this information?
Alduskkel's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2122988#2122988]Post 117[/url] wrote:danny135 has been prodded.
kyle99's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123083#2123083]Post 121[/url] wrote:Damn, your list has color. Mine looks like a joke nowLooker wrote:Also, to rival ...
SCUM
Mykonian
SaintKerrigan/Mindgamer
Light/Kyle/DiscoRoboto/Danny
XScorpion
Looker
TOWN
After mulling it over for a while, I still think Mykonian is the person to lynch now.vote: MykonianI really think that we're going to win this game by scumhunting. Relying on night-actions could really blow up in our face.
They worked.XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123109#2123109]Post 122[/url] wrote:Yes, I could add that I'm actually not as intelligent as I pretend to be and some people are right to call me out on it.DiscoRoboto wrote:Well XScorp, see it as a compliment
Could you add anything to the conversation?
I'd normally join the Mykonian train but I'm still really suspicious about Looker's actions towards Danny.
I fail to understand how I can take your attention away from anything. I do, however, understand, and can somewhat appreciate, your affinity for the term "Straw Man". Everything is not as vindictive as you make it out to be, whether purposely or otherwise.Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123520#2123520]Post 123[/url] wrote:Town has got two tools: Voice and Vote. And. Not slash. Town is able to use them both in a different way. You don't have to use your vote to add strength to your suspicions. That's why I used my voice on Looker and my Vote on Light.
Light has posted now, but I stil don't see any original content. Almost everything he said has already been said by others. But since my vote will not change that much, I wil unvote. I will remember Light's refusal to post original content though.
Unvote
Back to Looker, yay!
I called you scum because you are trying to take my attention away from Mykonian, not because of the disagreement on the plan. Straw Man again.- Disagreements are not scum-tells. It would be more profitable to accuse me on other grounds.
Yet another disagreement.Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123520#2123520]Post 123[/url] wrote:We're not, I'm voting for more content. You're voting for nothing.I also believe your vote is baseless, Mindgamer, and as ineffective as you claim my vote on Danny to be. We're both voting for the same thing - more content
With this I agree.Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123520#2123520]Post 123[/url] wrote:Voice =/= Voteso I'd encourage you to belay your suspicions of me until you find a more adequate reason to vote.
Once again, I find it impossible to take your attention from anything, especially since you can read and, also once again, I was in no way pushing an L-1 wagon on Danny. I expressed this (and re-expressed this) already. Though somewhat, humoring, I find your sarcasm unhelpful. (LOL! LOL! LOLLL!)Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123520#2123520]Post 123[/url] wrote:I accused you of being scum for taking my attention away from Mykonian and pushing a L-1 wagon on someone who isn't here.. I did the same act however, you say. So I took my own attention away from Mykonian and I'm pushing a L-1 wagon on Light, whom is not here. YES.RE: Mindgamer's Vote On Light
- As I've already stated, I don't like the fact that he accuses me of being scum and then goes on to perpetrate the same act for which he called me scum in the first place. It's hypocritical.
You're eerily obsessed with Mykonian.Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123520#2123520]Post 123[/url] wrote:So first you try to get me off the Mykonian wagon by telling me to move on, and now you're joining his bandwagon?As misguided as you are, I agree with you. Unvote; Vote: Mykonian
Straw Mans.
Vote=Voice.
Very strange voting behaviour.
Vote: Looker
I was under the assumption that since you and Scorpion continually attack Mykonian that at least one of you was confident enough in the other's scumminess. Either way, I've already addressed this but will do so again if you remind me. I have to find the post.Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123520#2123520]Post 123[/url] wrote:
Oh btw, I'm confused. Why do we know that either XScorpion or Mykonian is scum?
My bad for believing they knew what they were doing.SaintKerrigan's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123546#2123546]Post 125[/url] wrote:@ Looker: Harass was probably the wrong term. I was in a writing mood at the time (I was writing flavor for my upcoming Open game), and I can get a little creative with my wording when that happens.
That said, your insistence that one of Mykonian and XScorpion has to be scum is, well, scummy. There is no proof that either one of them is actually scum, and I can't help but wonder whether you created that in order to try and get the wrong one lynched. I know I've used this tactic as scum before. (Free scumtell for you, Mykonian. Today's your lucky day.)
Unvote: Light. Vote: Looker.
L-2, I believe.
@ Mindgamer: I personally think your voice should back up your vote, but I think this is more of a disagreement of opinion versus a scumtell.
Are you capitalizing on the fact that I like playing with Mykonian? Because I see you're capitalizing on the fact that you came off the more townish due to your discussion of his plan.Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123613#2123613]Post 129[/url] wrote:A sane player.mykonian wrote:There is only one type of player that doesn't want to tell how we can catch him if he is scum.
So you refuse to do a meta-read on SaintKerrigan, but in the mean time you have done a meta-read on Looker?mykonian wrote:This with the defensiveness of StK of me, right in the beginning (for looker this is rather normal, seen his meta), but for StK, he has to know something, I think.
Oh, and I see completely no reason for you to suddenly defend Looker.
Looker is defending Mykonian. Mykonian is defending Looker. Cool.
Well I fail to see how You/Mindgamer=obvtown and why I should consider any of your input when none of it has been helpful. WhyXScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2125063#2125063]Post 136[/url] wrote:Worked how? Danny was prodded, but still isn't here. I fail to see how trying to get a Danny bandwagon started is pro-town in any way.
Mykonian: "I'm going to propose a plan and you refute it, k?"Alduskkel's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2125105#2125105]Post 137[/url] wrote:Looker wrote:MOD: DID SCUM GET TO USE THE SCUMTOPIC PRE-GAME?There is no scum QT. They were allowed to PM each other before Day 1 started, however.
Silly piggy, search is disabled [for performance reasons].Light's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2125251#2125251]Post 138[/url] wrote:mod: any word on replacement of danny?
He has about 20 hours from the time stamp on this post to pick up his prod and post.
myko's shift towards StK was a risky one at that. why are you now aiming StK? I guess avoiding answering a question would be abit "scummy" but it is well off confirming that they are really the scum.
nice catch. There is absolutely nothing stopping you from searching for how StK plays. Asking for someone's weakness = complete stupidity. Its like saying "Lex: Oh hello there superman, what is your weakness?" "superman: kryptonite, it hurts me when i touch it or near it". No person who is not mentally f*cked in the head would tell you his/her weakness, unless of course you were good friends.MindGamer wrote:So you refuse to do a meta-read on SaintKerrigan, but in the mean time you have done a meta-read on Looker?
!vote myko
mykonian's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2125471#2125471]Post 139[/url] wrote: Oh, and Looker is concious about what he is doing as scum. You won't catch him this way. [/color]
DiscoRoboto's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123930#2123930]Post 133[/url] wrote:Wow, just wow.
Mykonian, what did you sow to reap such knowledge from your fields of neverending wisdom and waterproof arguments?
You're not making any sense at all and it seems like you're stalling until deadline.XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2138482#2138482]Post 309[/url] wrote:In the past I have shared your argument that lynching lurkers is a good idea early on (for the exact same reasons you've listed above), but it doesn't make sense to vote a lurker when there are so many very scummy targets.DiscoRoboto wrote:Like Mindgamer knows, I like to have lurkers lynched pretty soon. Having a lurker go through until endgame is practically suicide, even if he is a townie.
My motivations on lynching lurkers is that when a lurker comes into lategame/endgame he has NO knowledge on the game (at least if I replace or join the game later on I don't have the vibes I normally have) which makes it doubtful if he will be helpful. Besides that, nobody got a read on him. Lurking isn't a scumtell per se, so lynching him would be a guess. I hate guessing in my lynches.
So if Town is willing to agree with me, let's lynch kyle.
- Despite your eagerness to exaggerate, I didn't claim it was fact that either you or Mykonian were scum.Looker's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2119620#2119620]Post 89[/url] wrote:People who I'd actually like to seeVote Danny:
- Kyle
- Mykonian
~Mindgamer (I don't know about this one; L-1's kinda iffy right now)
VOTE DANNY!
The both of you were voting each other when I made the above statement, which caused you to retract everything and say that "No, me and Mykonian could just be confused townies!" Yeah right.Looker's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2117258#2117258]Post 64[/url] wrote:Well, we already know that one of you is scum, we just have to figure out which. We're currently in the process of doing so.XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2116233#2116233]Post 47[/url] wrote:P.S. Only obv. scum speak in third person.
Looker's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2121994#2121994]Post 107[/url] wrote:XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2120771#2120771]Post 100[/url] wrote:wtf at voting for a guy who hasn't posted anything yet. Why are you so gung-ho to lynch him?
unvote
Vote: LookerTry again, XScorpion.Looker's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2119620#2119620]Post 89[/url] wrote:People who I'd actually like to seeVote Danny:
- Kyle
- Mykonian
~Mindgamer (I don't know about this one; L-1's kinda iffy right now)
Looker's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2125047#2125047]Post 135[/url] wrote:I was under the assumption that since you and Scorpion continually attack Mykonian that at least one of you was confident enough in the other's scumminess. Either way, I've already addressed this but will do so again if you remind me. I have to find the post.Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123520#2123520]Post 123[/url] wrote:
Oh btw, I'm confused. Why do we know that either XScorpion or Mykonian is scum?
My bad for believing they knew what they were doing.SaintKerrigan's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2123546#2123546]Post 125[/url] wrote:@ Looker: Harass was probably the wrong term. I was in a writing mood at the time (I was writing flavor for my upcoming Open game), and I can get a little creative with my wording when that happens.
That said, your insistence that one of Mykonian and XScorpion has to be scum is, well, scummy. There is no proof that either one of them is actually scum, and I can't help but wonder whether you created that in order to try and get the wrong one lynched. I know I've used this tactic as scum before. (Free scumtell for you, Mykonian. Today's your lucky day.)
Unvote: Light. Vote: Looker.
L-2, I believe.
@ Mindgamer: I personally think your voice should back up your vote, but I think this is more of a disagreement of opinion versus a scumtell.
Translation: "No, please, don't pay attention to us. Let us bicker in the corner somewhere out of sight and out of mind. Who knows, maybe we're justXScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2118891#2118891]Post 74[/url] wrote:I wish this were true, oh I really do. Unfortunately you are completely wrong, and it is easily possible that both of me and Mykonian are just misguided townies. If we actually knew for a fact that either I'm scum or Mykonian is, there really shouldn't be any hesitation to just kill one of us then lynch the other the next day.Looker wrote:Well, we already know that one of you is scum, we just have to figure out which. We're currently in the process of doing so.