Vote: Looker
Light (2) - SaintKerrigan, Mindgamer
mykonian (1) - DiscoRoboto
danny135 (1) - Looker
Looker (1) - XScorpion
Mindgamer (1) - mykonian
Not Voting (3) - danny135, Light, kyle99
With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch.
It is frowned upon to play suboptimally as town to make you play better as scum. Please don't do that, and answer the question. Why would you as a good towny not tell us?SaintKerrigan wrote:But I'm not always going to be town. It's not in my best interests as a player to disclose my weaknesses. As I stated before, you are free to look up my meta, check my scum games, and see how I play then to determine my scumtells. I will not, however, tell you outright.mykonian wrote:Town doesn't mind giving this information. Please answer the question, StK.SaintKerrigan wrote:@ Mykonian: Why would I want to disclose that kind of information? Even if I did, would you believe me? If you really want to know, go meta me on my scum games and decide for yourself what my scumtells are.
both if possible.mykonian wrote:do you propose trying to protect the townies, or do you propose to kill the scum?Light wrote:hey guys. just finished reading (although only briefly skimmed through some) @_@
I don't have a better variation in mind, looker so i can't comment there.
After reading, i conclude that we should all go our separate ways for night 1. this circle thing proves to benefit the scum, and we don't want that do we? myko's 2nd and 3rd revisions aren't great either, there are still significant flaws in it.
(sigh) Like I said before, you are free to look up my meta and determine my scumtells from that.mykonian wrote:It is frowned upon to play suboptimally as town to make you play better as scum. Please don't do that, and answer the question. Why would you as a good towny not tell us?SaintKerrigan wrote:But I'm not always going to be town. It's not in my best interests as a player to disclose my weaknesses. As I stated before, you are free to look up my meta, check my scum games, and see how I play then to determine my scumtells. I will not, however, tell you outright.mykonian wrote:Town doesn't mind giving this information. Please answer the question, StK.SaintKerrigan wrote:@ Mykonian: Why would I want to disclose that kind of information? Even if I did, would you believe me? If you really want to know, go meta me on my scum games and decide for yourself what my scumtells are.
Or are you scum that is afraid to give this information?
- We've yet to receive any indication of Danny being replaced. As far as can be deduced, he is lurking.Mindgamer's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2120234#2120234]Post 91[/url] wrote:Danny! Danny! Danny!
Why suddenly the noise about Danny, Looker? He isn't here, he's probably going to be replaced, so why are you talking about him? Are you trying to take our attention away from something? Oh yes, you are:
In my opinion, Mykonian is scum because of his plan and everyone knows I think this. Why are you so desperate to take my attention away from this? Scumbuddies with Mykonian perhaps?Looker wrote:Mindgamer's Post 78 -Okay, very good, you have an alternate plan, so why are you still voting Mykonian? He had a plan, it sucked, you proposed a new one, and now we can move on.Vote Danny
You want to lynch scum! What a wonderful initiative! So you want to bandwagon someone who isn't even here! What?Looker wrote:Either way, I believe our play on words and bickering is distracting from the overall point - lynching scum.Vote Danny
What do you expect to gain from such a bandwagon? Pressure won't make Danny magically return. I think it's just your way of wasting our time. I'm calling a scumteam of Mykonian/Looker.
Oh, and SaintKerrigan is right. I didn't notice because I was tunneling on Mykonian, but Light has posted... nothing. Completely nothing.
Unvote. Vote: Light
I want some content. Now.
XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2120771#2120771]Post 100[/url] wrote:wtf at voting for a guy who hasn't posted anything yet. Why are you so gung-ho to lynch him?
unvote
Vote: Looker
Try again, XScorpion.Looker's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2119620#2119620]Post 89[/url] wrote:People who I'd actually like to seeVote Danny:
- Kyle
- Mykonian
~Mindgamer (I don't know about this one; L-1's kinda iffy right now)
Because you unvoted Mykonian to "keep your options open," but I didn't notice you listing your other "options."DiscoRoboto wrote:Who I suspect besides Mykonian? Mhm... I guess that'd be Looker and Light right now. Why?
I see.DiscoRoboto wrote:Looker is mostly just vibes, so don't hold me up to that one.
I'd actually forgotten about those. Thanks for reminding me.DiscoRoboto wrote:My suspicions towards Light are outed in my reactions towards his posts.
Because part of this game is looking at who people vote, and trying to see if there's connections in there. Plus, it forces people to take a stance on someone.DiscoRoboto wrote:Saint, why are you critical towards Light's No Lynch vote? I saw it as a way to say 'I don't know who to vote right now', a clumsy way at that, but I think you're catching my drift.
The fact that he had previously called a Mykonian/Looker scumteam, but then didn't place his vote on either of them.DiscoRoboto wrote:Also, what's strange about Mindgamers vote on Light? It's just a pressure vote.
- I don't see it as harassing, StK, and I disagree with your stance. I don't believe the time will have passed for my vote to do any good until we receive indication of Danny being replaced [or he posts more content]. Until then, my vote will remain on him.SaintKerrigan's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2122020#2122020]Post 109[/url] wrote:Happy Scumday, Looker!
I was critical on your vote on Kyle because you said he had lack of content at a time when there wasn't much content to be had. I said if there was lack of content later on in the game, then that was a valid point.
Meanwhile, I don't like your harassing of a guy who isn't here right now, isn't responding to your vote, and in all likelihood is going to be replaced. I think the time for a vote to provoke a response has passed.
Light, why are you voting for a No-Lynch? Usually, that's not a productive way to use your vote unless town comes to a consensus to vote No-Lynch. Otherwise, your vote is much more productive when it's on someone.
DiscoRoboto, do you suspect anyone other than Mykonian, and why?
Mindgamer, why did you call a Mykonian/Looker scumteam, and then vote for Light?
yeh i have no suspects.RE: Light's No-Lynch Vote
- I agree, Light's vote for a No-Lynch is not in the best interest of the town and I would advise him to unvote if he has no one he suspects. Votes=/= scumhunting.
XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2120771#2120771]Post 100[/url] wrote:wtf at voting for a guy who hasn't posted anything yet. Why are you so gung-ho to lynch him?
unvote
Vote: Looker
As misguided as you are, I agree with you.XScorpion's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2118891#2118891]Post 74[/url] wrote:I wish this were true, oh I really do. Unfortunately you are completely wrong, and it is easily possible that both of me and Mykonian are just misguided townies. If we actually knew for a fact that either I'm scum or Mykonian is, there really shouldn't be any hesitation to just kill one of us then lynch the other the next day.Looker wrote:Well, we already know that one of you is scum, we just have to figure out which. We're currently in the process of doing so.
Where were you going with this?mykonian's [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2121404#2121404]Post 102[/url] wrote:It is frowned upon to play suboptimally as town to make you play better as scum. Please don't do that, and answer the question. Why would you as a good towny not tell us?SaintKerrigan wrote:But I'm not always going to be town. It's not in my best interests as a player to disclose my weaknesses. As I stated before, you are free to look up my meta, check my scum games, and see how I play then to determine my scumtells. I will not, however, tell you outright.mykonian wrote:Town doesn't mind giving this information. Please answer the question, StK.SaintKerrigan wrote:@ Mykonian: Why would I want to disclose that kind of information? Even if I did, would you believe me? If you really want to know, go meta me on my scum games and decide for yourself what my scumtells are.
Or are you scum that is afraid to give this information?
Damn, your list has color. Mine looks like a joke nowLooker wrote:Also, to rival ...
SCUM
Mykonian
SaintKerrigan/Mindgamer
Light/Kyle/DiscoRoboto/Danny
XScorpion
Looker
TOWN
Yes, I could add that I'm actually not as intelligent as I pretend to be and some people are right to call me out on it.DiscoRoboto wrote:Well XScorp, see it as a compliment
Could you add anything to the conversation?
I called you scum because you are trying to take my attention away from Mykonian, not because of the disagreement on the plan. Straw Man again.- Disagreements are not scum-tells. It would be more profitable to accuse me on other grounds.
We're not, I'm voting for more content. You're voting for nothing.I also believe your vote is baseless, Mindgamer, and as ineffective as you claim my vote on Danny to be. We're both voting for the same thing - more content
Voice =/= Voteso I'd encourage you to belay your suspicions of me until you find a more adequate reason to vote.
I accused you of being scum for taking my attention away from Mykonian and pushing a L-1 wagon on someone who isn't here.. I did the same act however, you say. So I took my own attention away from Mykonian and I'm pushing a L-1 wagon on Light, whom is not here. YES.RE: Mindgamer's Vote On Light
- As I've already stated, I don't like the fact that he accuses me of being scum and then goes on to perpetrate the same act for which he called me scum in the first place. It's hypocritical.
So first you try to get me off the Mykonian wagon by telling me to move on, and now you're joining his bandwagon?As misguided as you are, I agree with you. Unvote; Vote: Mykonian