My comments on "this time I'm town, how 'bout you" and the like were jokes, and taking them out of context is blatant misrepresentation.
It is a misrep in that you are quoting them out of context to make it seem like I said that in all seriousness as a defense/etc from serous accusations, which I didn't.
Not only does that severely weaken your case, but it also makes me prone to Not Like You (tm).
I didn't attack you at all in my post, again, misrepresentation of my statement that your
attacks
were weak. I say nothing about
you
. That's strawmanning my argument via misrep by saying I'm using ad hom when I'm not.
Bandwagoning is fine.
A quick bandwagon that grows from no votes to three votes in less than three pages with virtually no discussion about it or analysis given by those voting is not fine.
There are such things as pressure wagons, which are fine, and bandwagons to lynch, which, assuming good logic, are fine.
The logic behind the bandwagon to lynch on jmurph was terrible (I saw it as a to-lynch, though fuzzy has corrected me on that).
Me saying I'm town was in the joking phase of the game, where I was jovial.
Using my being joking as a scumtell is really bad, unless you are saying I'm serious, in which case you are misrepresenting me AGAIN.
If you want an explanation for my defending, let me show it to you this way...
Bob: U R IS SCUMZ0R!!!!!!11!one! *gives reasoning*
Joe: I R IS NOT SCUMZ0R!!!!11!!21one! *gives reasoning*
This is defending. Fully fine.
Bob: U R IS DEFENSIVE SO U R IS SCUMZ0R!!!112123412!!!ofen1!
Joe: lulfayl, defensiveness is r not scummz0rsy
Joe is correct, Bob is using a bad argument, so Joe is right, Bob is wrong, but Bob continues the attack on this.
My defending myself is to whatever degree I feel is necessary to defend myself.
My defending others when I think they are town isn't scummy.
If I didn't defend a town read, that would actually be something you could call me out on.
On the devil one, I worded that improperly. I didn't put any words in his mouth, though I did go to the logical conclusion of his words as an extension of what I saw in his logic, not what he actually said. He seems to be misunderstanding due to how I said it for me saying he said that
explicitly
when it was, in fact, logically inferred by myself.
the getting reactions point is bad.
Did you even bother checking the meta I deliberately gave you guys? :/
I gave you recently finished me-town and me-scum games for you to analyze for yourselves to make meta arguments if you so chose.
I'm actually aware of very little of my meta beyond the fact reaction fishing is my bread and butter early in the game.
Also note that I have claimed
town
but not
townie
, which are different.
Town is an alignment.
Townie is slang for VT/Vanilla Townie, which is a role.
The difference of a couple letters changes the entire message.