Mini 1636: Mafialand Mayhem! - [Game Over]

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #4 (isolation #0) » Mon Dec 29, 2014 10:58 am

Vote: curiouskarmadog

Yay first random vote!

I'm the only curious one here.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #11 (isolation #1) » Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:51 pm

@Anen: Is that a serious vote or a random vote?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #16 (isolation #2) » Mon Dec 29, 2014 5:27 pm

I don't believe in obvious when it comes to mafia. Any question is a good question. You never know how someone will answer.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #20 (isolation #3) » Mon Dec 29, 2014 5:58 pm

In post 18, evilpacman18 wrote:
In post 16, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I don't believe in obvious when it comes to mafia. Any question is a good question. You never know how someone will answer.

Then why did you single him out over anyone else who made a presumably "random" vote?

Because I thought it might not be random.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #22 (isolation #4) » Mon Dec 29, 2014 6:28 pm

I don't know a cheetah or tiger?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #25 (isolation #5) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:00 am

In post 24, evilpacman18 wrote:
In post 19, Lapsa wrote:@evilpacman18 is that you playing piano?

Yeah!

In post 20, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
In post 18, evilpacman18 wrote:
In post 16, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I don't believe in obvious when it comes to mafia. Any question is a good question. You never know how someone will answer.

Then why did you single him out over anyone else who made a presumably "random" vote?

Because I thought it might not be random.

what of his post made it seem to you like it could be not "random." I can pick out at least two votes so far that seem like more thought went into them than his.

One could say voting based on people's posting/sleeping patterns could be considered a strategy. Not a good strategy, but still a strategy.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #111 (isolation #6) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:10 am

Katie seems to be very defensive and emotional regarding this wagon. This is indicative of scum.

Unvote:

Vote: Katie

I agree Luca's vote was not OMGUS. He clearly pointed out his reasoning. OMGUS is a defensive responce vote without any clear reasoning other than wanting to divert your own wagon.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #114 (isolation #7) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:14 am

Is star8 a Katie alt? Because star8 isn't in the game, as far as I can tell

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #116 (isolation #8) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:16 am

Being defensive and emotional is indicative of scum, because scum are more worried about their own survival because there are fewer of them than town. Town worry about scum hunting over survival.

Also, saying someone is probtown this early in the game sounds like someone trying to whiteknight their scum partner.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #119 (isolation #9) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:30 am

"playing a persona" indicates you have something to hide.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #131 (isolation #10) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:42 am

In post 128, curiouskarmadog wrote:also....

In post 116, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Being defensive and emotional is indicative of scum,

is utter fucking bullshit.

I play emotional..I play hot. I am telling you I do this now...most likely I am going to get fucking super pissed in the game and get angry and emotional (thus my title) am I scum?

MM, are you telling me you have never seen town get emotional or defensive?

I said it is indicative, I didn't say it is a 100% indicator. More often than not, scum get emotional and defensive when wagoned more than town do.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #136 (isolation #11) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:50 am

In post 134, curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 131, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
In post 128, curiouskarmadog wrote:also....

In post 116, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Being defensive and emotional is indicative of scum,

is utter fucking bullshit.

I play emotional..I play hot. I am telling you I do this now...most likely I am going to get fucking super pissed in the game and get angry and emotional (thus my title) am I scum?

MM, are you telling me you have never seen town get emotional or defensive?

I said it is indicative, I didn't say it is a 100% indicator. More often than not, scum get emotional and defensive when wagoned more than town do.

have you ever seen scum support a vote based on "X is emotional and defensive"...(for your reference, I love to meta).

Yes, I've seen both, but that doesn't disprove my statement. Katie's wagon has brought about a lot of information in a short period of time, and that alone makes it worthwhile.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #137 (isolation #12) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:50 am

In post 135, curiouskarmadog wrote:better question...or question 2.

as scum, have you ever based a vote on "X is emotional and defensive"

Not that I'm aware of.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #142 (isolation #13) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:55 am

In post 110, KatieB wrote:I mean, he voted Lapsa for 'fluffposting more than Anen' and 'poorly justifying his vote on Anen' which happened before Anen had even posted, and was pretty clearly a RVS vote. Even if Lapsa had done any of the things Luca was talking about, none of them would be alignment indicative.

He's scumreading me for calling Lapsa probtown, but dollars to doughnuts if I hadn't clarified that my feelings are as strong as p5 allows, he'd be scumreading me for having feelings too strong for day 1.

He's scumreading me for not hopping to answer him (which is not indicative of scum), scumreading me for a misunderstanding of my feelings on my suspects (even if his thoughts were accurate, this would not be indicative of scum), for 'not making any sense' (which is not indicative of scum), and for being dismissive of his reasons for scumreading me (which he hasn't yet presented.)

Pretty obviously scum looking for a day1 mislynch that involves a lot of words but not reasons. As soon as everyone has posted, I'd be glad to turbolynch him.

p-edit: but not having any reasons for scumreading me totally doesn't make his vote OMGUS. Totally.

You have a lot of opinions about how people react to you specifically, but you don't seem interested in finding scum outside of Katie discussion.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #145 (isolation #14) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:57 am

In post 144, KatieB wrote:
In post 142, MonkeyMan576 wrote:You have a lot of opinions about how people react to you specifically, but you don't seem interested in finding scum outside of Katie discussion.

What?

All of your "scumreads" are in regards to how you feel wrongly attacked.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #148 (isolation #15) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:59 am

Then who do you think are scummy outside of people that have attacked you?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #153 (isolation #16) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:06 pm

You guys are taking my statement out of context. But I acknowledge some players play emotional and defensive as town. Katie's wagon has still brought a lot more day 1 information than is typical so I like my vote where it is for now.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #182 (isolation #17) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 6:56 pm

In post 153, MonkeyMan576 wrote:You guys are taking my statement out of context. But I acknowledge some players play emotional and defensive as town. Katie's wagon has still brought a lot more day 1 information than is typical so I like my vote where it is for now.

Your entire case on Katie is that she's being overly emotional and defensive. So, if that isn't indicative alignment, why are you still voting her?
[/Quote]

That's not my entire case at all. There's also the fact that Katie's wagon has generated discussion and brought about useful information the town can use later in the game.

I'm not convinced Katie is scum at this point, but the wagon is pro-town to me. Therefore my vote stays at this point.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #184 (isolation #18) » Tue Dec 30, 2014 11:53 pm

Lapsa wrote:
In post 183, Lapsa wrote:@George:

In post 182, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
That's not my entire case at all.
There's also the fact that Katie's wagon has generated discussion and brought about useful information the town can use later in the game.

how exactly is that a part of your case on Katie?

Not so much part of the case so much as why my vote is there I suppose. You want to know what has produced the most pro-town discussion at this point and you can look at Luca and my vote.

In post 182, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
I'm not convinced Katie is scum at this point, but the wagon is pro-town to me. Therefore my vote stays at this point.

Lapsa wrote:
Luca alone is voting for Katie

how broad is wagon you are talking about?

As broad as any other wagon right now.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #187 (isolation #19) » Wed Dec 31, 2014 12:39 am

In post 111, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Katie seems to be very defensive and emotional regarding this wagon. This is indicative of scum.

Unvote:

Vote: Katie

I agree Luca's vote was not OMGUS. He clearly pointed out his reasoning. OMGUS is a defensive responce vote without any clear reasoning other than wanting to divert your own wagon.

Thanks for paying attention.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #202 (isolation #20) » Wed Dec 31, 2014 9:08 am

In post 182, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I'm not convinced Katie is scum at this point, but the wagon is pro-town to me. Therefore my vote stays at this point.

I didn't like this. Calling players pro-town on Page8? I know that I'm a slow starter but having pro-town reads that early is pigeon poop.

I didn't say the players were pro town, I said the wagon brought pro-town information because the discussion was good. Day 1 discussion is always good over a slow game where people don't post.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #204 (isolation #21) » Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:03 am

Aeronaut wrote:

That's not my entire case at all. There's also the fact that Katie's wagon has generated discussion and brought about useful information the town can use later in the game.

I'm not convinced Katie is scum at this point, but the wagon is pro-town to me. Therefore my vote stays at this point.

The Wagon is only you and Luca.

Why are you saying the wagon is pro-town instead of saying "I like Luca's reasoning"? Are you trying not to take hard stances? [/Quote]

It's not that I'm avoiding taking hard stances, it's that I don't like my words being taken out of context.

However, I do think people tend to over generalize and jump to conclusions to quickly in day 1 in a rush to lynch, which leads to many day 1 mislynches.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #242 (isolation #22) » Fri Jan 02, 2015 1:37 pm

It's day 1. Why do people expect game changing posts this early in the game?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #246 (isolation #23) » Fri Jan 02, 2015 2:30 pm

In post 245, droog wrote:
In post 116, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Being defensive and emotional is indicative of scum, because scum are more worried about their own survival because there are fewer of them than town. Town worry about scum hunting over survival.

Also, saying someone is probtown this early in the game sounds like someone trying to whiteknight their scum partner.

cereal box facts are more accurate.
hinting scum motive without saying it straight
or pompous mafia theories that mean nothing
are scummy
so youre scummy

This is the stupidest post I've ever read. I never hinted anything, I outright said it.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #247 (isolation #24) » Fri Jan 02, 2015 2:30 pm

Vote: Droog

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #249 (isolation #25) » Fri Jan 02, 2015 2:39 pm

Misrepping is indicative of scum.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #256 (isolation #26) » Fri Jan 02, 2015 3:08 pm

I was very forthright. There was no hidden motives whatsoever. Either droog was reaction posting me or he's going to do this the rest of the game which would just be scummy.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #259 (isolation #27) » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:35 pm

Yeah because his argument was really really bad. I don't care if every single player said I wasn't being clear. I was perfecly clear. I said "being defensive and emotional is indicative of scum." I don't know how to get any more clear than that. It's like if I said your pacman avatar is blue, and you say, "no it's not it's yellow.", and then I say, "but everyone else says it's blue." That doesn't make the avatar any less yellow.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #264 (isolation #28) » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:45 pm

It's very simple. Scum are more self aware in general than town.
Town, as you say, try to collaborate and collectively find scum.
Scum get defensive easily, use poor arguments, and get upset over little things(emotional).
So I don't see how I wasn't clear.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #265 (isolation #29) » Fri Jan 02, 2015 4:46 pm

I like droogs ability to multi task.

Will unvote for now.

Unvote

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #285 (isolation #30) » Sat Jan 03, 2015 9:52 am

No one is saying how I'm not explaining myself well. I think I am being very reasonable.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #290 (isolation #31) » Sat Jan 03, 2015 10:56 am

In post 287, Lapsa wrote:
In post 285, MonkeyMan576 wrote:No one is saying how I'm not explaining myself well. I think I am being very reasonable.

Hint: is neither tiger nor cheetah

Well THAT makes me scum.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #292 (isolation #32) » Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:17 am

How is your avatar related to my alignment?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #295 (isolation #33) » Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:26 am

Your the one that says I'm being unlear about your avatar and that makes me scum.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #298 (isolation #34) » Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:31 am

Evidently I have poor people and logic skills.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #301 (isolation #35) » Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:21 pm

Nevermind I am an above average poker player and my job is in technical support.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #303 (isolation #36) » Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:29 pm

Wow that is impressive.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #307 (isolation #37) » Sat Jan 03, 2015 3:26 pm

I thought it was 15 inches?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #321 (isolation #38) » Sun Jan 04, 2015 2:22 pm

Geesh, last time i unvote you, droog.

My scumreads right now are katie and lapsa. pacman and droog look town. Unsure on everyone else.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #323 (isolation #39) » Sun Jan 04, 2015 3:40 pm

You engage in frivilous arguments and are more worried about meaningless conversations than actual scumhunting.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #327 (isolation #40) » Sun Jan 04, 2015 4:00 pm

I'm not certain who is more scummy between Lapsa and Katie so I'll refrain from voting at the moment.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #329 (isolation #41) » Sun Jan 04, 2015 4:02 pm

So I am curious how you jump from me being your greatest scumread to voting with me, droog.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #331 (isolation #42) » Sun Jan 04, 2015 5:11 pm

Nope, I can assure you I am not scum. I'm just curious as to your thought process.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #336 (isolation #43) » Sun Jan 04, 2015 5:22 pm

Sounds like a personal problem.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #337 (isolation #44) » Sun Jan 04, 2015 5:36 pm

Illl, you haven't said much, what are you thinking?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #350 (isolation #45) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 6:03 pm

Changing your mind as the game progresses shows fluency of thought and is protown, as opposed to just lurking or posting bad arguments.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #354 (isolation #46) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 6:17 pm

I'm not willing to lynch anybody. I townread clown at this point. I scumread him at first because of his initial bad argument, but his play has improved quickly. Being stubborn and scumreading someone that is acting town would not benefit the town.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #356 (isolation #47) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 6:23 pm

I'm not the one who brought it up. I was just responding to how my behavior was pro-town. There's no way to respond to that that is not mafia theory.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #360 (isolation #48) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 6:46 pm

If you are interested in voting me you would vote Katie. She's suddenly absent now that no one is talking about her.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #361 (isolation #49) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 6:48 pm

voting with me that is.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #362 (isolation #50) » Mon Jan 05, 2015 6:52 pm

I'll make it easier and

Vote Katie

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #382 (isolation #51) » Tue Jan 06, 2015 3:53 am

I'll claim too. I don't want the town wasting time on my lynch. Vanilla townie.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #402 (isolation #52) » Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:20 am

In post 394, llll wrote:
In post 379, Luca Blight wrote:
In post 370, llll wrote:
In post 364, Lapsa wrote:
In post 360, MonkeyMan576 wrote:If you are interested in voting with me you would vote Katie. She's suddenly absent now that no one is talking about her.

In post 362, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I'll make it easier and
Vote Katie

Wow that is impressive.

Impressively scummy, imo.
Vote: monkeyman

Why is that scummy?

He's looking for a reason, no matter how see-through to vote for the competing wagon. Obviously trying to distract people from himself.
.

That's ridiculous. My reasoning for voting katie is much less "see through" than my own wagon.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #417 (isolation #53) » Wed Jan 07, 2015 4:36 pm

Those two statements are both assumptive and incorrect. It would be scummy of me to start a new wagon if there is a better wagon to be on, which there is. I have repeatedly stated my reasoning, which is sound.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #446 (isolation #54) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 9:03 am

Maybe because they are scum buddies, and Luca knows that Illl voting me is good way to get a town lynched.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #454 (isolation #55) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 9:57 am

Which questions was I supposedly avoiding? I probably just didn't see it.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #465 (isolation #56) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:33 am

RE: Lapsa/Katie, if two people are equally scummy, it makes more sense to wait than to vote right away and have to change your vote later.

RE: Katie being defensive and emotional, pretty much every post she has made. She is far too self aware to be town, in my opinion.

RE Scumhunting, I think I've pretty much nailed down Lapsa and Katie as scum, I'm not sure what more scumhunting I need to do in day 1.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #467 (isolation #57) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:35 am

Scum lie all the time, just because they claim to not know the vote count doesn't mean they don't know it.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #474 (isolation #58) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:46 am

(1) If you don't wait, then you just get accused of vote hopping. Voting isn't the only way to apply pressue, after all.
(2) Why do you say that regarding scum-Sthar/Kate?
(3) I am observing everyone. I think I've said who I think are town.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #476 (isolation #59) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:55 am

In post 472, Aneninen wrote:
In post 467, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Scum lie all the time, just because they claim to not know the vote count doesn't mean they don't know it.

I wouldn't be that sure about that. They might not care if none of them are wagoned, for example.
It seems that you're back to producing theoretical posts... why ?

What's wrong with theoretical posts? It gives you insight into players thought processes.

curiouskarma wrote:give me an example post (dont say every post) where you think Katie is being defensive (and clearly scummy).

Katie wrote:
I mean, he voted Lapsa for 'fluffposting more than Anen' and 'poorly justifying his vote on Anen' which happened before Anen had even posted, and was pretty clearly a RVS vote. Even if Lapsa had done any of the things Luca was talking about, none of them would be alignment indicative.

He's scumreading me for calling Lapsa probtown, but dollars to doughnuts if I hadn't clarified that my feelings are as strong as p5 allows, he'd be scumreading me for having feelings too strong for day 1.

He's scumreading me for not hopping to answer him (which is not indicative of scum), scumreading me for a misunderstanding of my feelings on my suspects (even if his thoughts were accurate, this would not be indicative of scum), for 'not making any sense' (which is not indicative of scum), and for being dismissive of his reasons for scumreading me (which he hasn't yet presented.)

Pretty obviously scum looking for a day1 mislynch that involves a lot of words but not reasons. As soon as everyone has posted, I'd be glad to turbolynch him.

p-edit: but not having any reasons for scumreading me totally doesn't make his vote OMGUS. Totally.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #479 (isolation #60) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:06 pm

(1) That's not true at all, town get misrepped all the time, like right now.
(2) No one said that Katie alt-posted on purpose.
(3) I'm not sure what you mean.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #481 (isolation #61) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:17 pm

I didn't ignore him, I gave a post like he asked. You abviously have no intention of improving your posting.

Vote: Lapsa

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #483 (isolation #62) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:23 pm

Because you're scum.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #486 (isolation #63) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:30 pm

Wholly less sucky than your posting.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #490 (isolation #64) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:45 pm

You're not interested in posting content, You are interested in posting bad/misleading/provocing posts.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #491 (isolation #65) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:46 pm

@Lapsa also you apparently have a post restriction that you're not keeping. Plus this is a mini normal and I don't think post restrictions are allowed.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #495 (isolation #66) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:57 pm

In post 494, Lapsa wrote:
In post 491, MonkeyMan576 wrote:@Lapsa also you apparently have a post restriction that you're not keeping. Plus this is a mini normal and I don't think post restrictions are allowed.

Monkey
what's a post restriction?

http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?tit ... estriction

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #497 (isolation #67) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:05 pm

I wouldn't know, I don't have access to your role pm. But you're acting like you have a post restriction, which should not be allowed in mini normals, and no, if you did have one unfortunately there is no cure.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #499 (isolation #68) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:08 pm

Posting youtube videos, making comments about avatars, how should I know?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #502 (isolation #69) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:15 pm

I don't know, I'm guessing based on your behavior.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #505 (isolation #70) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:22 pm

I think he's just trying to confuse people and distract from scumhunting.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #507 (isolation #71) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:26 pm

I never said I was confused, I said you were trying to confuse people, more misrepping.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #508 (isolation #72) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:36 pm

The Lapsa wagon/lynch needs to happen, I know I'm not the only one fed up with his antics.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #510 (isolation #73) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:44 pm

You're not applying any pressure on anyone, you're just being a disraction.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #513 (isolation #74) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 2:34 pm

An OMGUS to top off your scumminess. You haven't even accused me of being scummy, yet you are voting me. Lynch Lapsa please.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #519 (isolation #75) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:19 pm

@Lapsa, just get lynched.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #521 (isolation #76) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:31 pm

I've already stated my case, I'm pretty sure there is no confusion.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #528 (isolation #77) » Thu Jan 08, 2015 4:47 pm

That doesn't mean he's town or he's going to be useful town, but given that, I'll

Unvote:

for now.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #543 (isolation #78) » Fri Jan 09, 2015 7:42 pm

So you admit my wagon is bad but you still vote for me? That makes sense.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #545 (isolation #79) » Fri Jan 09, 2015 8:24 pm

I assure you, I'm town. I have a tendancy to look scummy in early phases of the game I think because there's not a lot of actual content to comment on, I don't like to create content and confront people just to look town.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #550 (isolation #80) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 7:33 am

I would switch to laps if others get off my wagon. My wagon has scum written all over it. Really, lynch ing someone for discusdiscussing theory?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #554 (isolation #81) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 11:16 am

In post 552, llll wrote:
In post 551, droog wrote:Even if monkey is scum
I wouldn't want to be on the wagon

An odd sentiment.

Not really, day 1 lynches are more often town than scum, especially if you lynch the first wagon you come across.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #556 (isolation #82) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 12:50 pm

You're clearly twisting his words, and failing to recognize the point he's trying to make.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #558 (isolation #83) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 2:35 pm

In post 557, llll wrote:I'm quoting his words, not twisting them. I certainly want an explanation from droog.

You really think that he meant if that someone was literally confirmed scum he wouldn't vote for them?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #560 (isolation #84) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 3:24 pm

You don't have to be a mind reader to know the difference between literal and figurative.

@Ill: Do you think that day 1 leads to scum lynches in a majority of cases?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #562 (isolation #85) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 3:43 pm

Illl=Disinterested scum and partners with Lapsa.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #564 (isolation #86) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:13 pm

Okay, hello OMGUS!

Vote: Illl

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #565 (isolation #87) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 4:18 pm

In case I am wrongly lynched:

Town:
Me
Droog
curiouskarmadog
Wake88
Luca Blight
Anenian
evilpacman18
Drake Crusader
Gendaberry

Scum:
KatieB
Illl
Lapsa

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #571 (isolation #88) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:15 pm

Illl is really fishing to try to make droog look scummy. I'm telling you Illl, Lapsa, and KatieB are scum and if I'm wrong you can lynch me tomorrow.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #573 (isolation #89) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:24 pm

Well, that's convincing, I'm wrong. No really good reason why. But you sure are intent on making probable town look scummy.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #575 (isolation #90) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 6:40 pm

I have applied pressure. You've blatantly misrepped droog and you're buddying with lapsa, who is obvscum. Good enough for me.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #578 (isolation #91) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 8:17 pm

In post 576, Lapsa wrote:
Monkey
why are you voting lessobvscum?

I never said Illl was less obvscum. All the scum are equally obvious to me.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #580 (isolation #92) » Sat Jan 10, 2015 8:41 pm

i picked the one that had the obvious OMGUS.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #604 (isolation #93) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:06 pm

That's a bad reason not to change your vote, if you think lapsa or Ill is scummier than me.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #606 (isolation #94) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:11 pm

Katie wrote:So let's see. Katie's scum for:
1. having opinions inside the first 100 posts.
2. not jumping when Mr. Anime whistles
3. OMGUS
4. not making sense (to mr. anime)

I know where my vote's going! This is so exciting!

p-edit clearly

For clarity, I'm scumreading Luca first because of his terrible vote on Lapsa, then his terrible OMGUS on me. I'm scumreading Wake for focusing on silly stuff like how much fluff should be allowed in a game, and Anen because he wasn't just posting fluff, he was looking for things to talk about that were irrelevant to the game. Like, instead of discussing the game.

I mean, he voted Lapsa for 'fluffposting more than Anen' and 'poorly justifying his vote on Anen' which happened before Anen had even posted, and was pretty clearly a RVS vote. Even if Lapsa had done any of the things Luca was talking about, none of them would be alignment indicative.

He's scumreading me for calling Lapsa probtown, but dollars to doughnuts if I hadn't clarified that my feelings are as strong as p5 allows, he'd be scumreading me for having feelings too strong for day 1.

He's scumreading me for not hopping to answer him (which is not indicative of scum), scumreading me for a misunderstanding of my feelings on my suspects (even if his thoughts were accurate, this would not be indicative of scum), for 'not making any sense' (which is not indicative of scum), and for being dismissive of his reasons for scumreading me (which he hasn't yet presented.)

Pretty obviously scum looking for a day1 mislynch that involves a lot of words but not reasons. As soon as everyone has posted, I'd be glad to turbolynch him.

p-edit: but not having any reasons for scumreading me totally doesn't make his vote OMGUS. Totally.

Any time she posts anything with content it is about how terrible everyone's reads on her are. She hardly ever posts anything about anyone else.
---------------

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #609 (isolation #95) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:36 pm

Vote: Lapsa

This seems like our best chance at actually lynching scum today.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #611 (isolation #96) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:38 pm

@Curious, if you change your vote to Lapsa, that will make the two wagons equal in size, and maybe we can pick up a few more votes to get the lynch. Especially if Pac and Wake decide to go with us(which they should).

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #613 (isolation #97) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:39 pm

In post 610, Lapsa wrote:
In post 583, Lapsa wrote:
Monkey
and what's obvious about me that makes me equally obvscum to
DominoBars
?

In post 604, MonkeyMan576 wrote:That's a bad reason not to change your vote, if you think lapsa or Ill is scummier than me.

In two hours—should nothing change—I'd quite like to discuss
Monkey's
absence regarding #583.

Your lack of content in your posts, your refusal to scumhunt, your buddying with Illl, etc.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #615 (isolation #98) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 2:52 pm

I didn't, I just posted re Katie.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #618 (isolation #99) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 3:00 pm

I gave an example post.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #619 (isolation #100) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 3:01 pm

Lapsa and Ill are both providing poor content and buddying up. Katie is being over reactive and not focusing on anyone else. Lapsa seems to be the best lynch option, although the scum think I am.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #622 (isolation #101) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 3:05 pm

@Illl: There's nothing wrong with switching votes between people that are consistantly on your scum list. Yes, I want a lynch that's not me, because I know I'm not scum. If you would join the lapsa wagon and stop buddying with him then vote switching wouldn't be necessary.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #624 (isolation #102) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 3:06 pm

In post 621, Wake1 wrote:Lapsa's annoying in general. Him being gone would be nice, but would that be best for Town?

Dunno about Sthar. He's being over-reactive? In what way? Not sure if that's normal for him.

I'd prefer not to focus on Katie and focus on Lapsa, but I've posted my case on Katie.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #625 (isolation #103) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 3:07 pm

In post 623, Lapsa wrote:
In post 618, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I gave an example post.

exactly

why are you telling that only now?

why that's not on #606?

instead you ignore
DoucheDog
and once again state it's all of
my
posts

In post 599, curiouskarmadog wrote:He said all of her posts, i asked him for one in particular and he has again not provided one.

In post 606, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Any time she posts anything with content it is about how terrible everyone's reads on her are. She hardly ever posts anything about anyone else.

I'm not ignoring him and I'm not saying it's all of her posts. You deserve to be lynched on your misrepping alone.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #645 (isolation #104) » Sun Jan 11, 2015 4:50 pm

lapsa's insistance that no one him a case on them when we have more than enough is getting old. Meanwhile, you're voting on me and you don't even know why.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #698 (isolation #105) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 9:11 am

Vote: Wake88

His endday play was pretty suspicious, specifically the way he relied on other people's explanation of cases rather than doing his own research.

MonkeyMan576 · Thu Jan 15, 2015 10:06 am

scum, since it sets a precedent that he doesn't have to come up with his own ideas.

MonkeyMan576 · Thu Jan 15, 2015 10:13 am

presumably scum, since presumably they are the ones that killed them(unless there was a serial killer AND scum was roleblocked/doctored).

MonkeyMan576 · Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:47 pm

That's why I'm voting wake and not you.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #707 (isolation #109) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:17 pm

Wake, here is the specific behavior I am talking about, an overreliance on other players opinions and information.

In post 408, Wake1 wrote:I've got a lot to read up on.

Anything noteworthy?

I will have time during the first half of tomorrow.

In post 617, Wake1 wrote:I have limited time.

Do we have anything pertinent as of yet? Very brief summaries of the latest highlights would suffice. Not reading 25 pages of Day 1 speculation.

In post 637, Wake1 wrote:So, why vote Lapsa?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #709 (isolation #110) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:47 pm

In post 708, Wake1 wrote:And? I've got a life outside of Mafia, so pardon if I ask a handful of questions to help me catch up. And what's wrong with 637?

I want to know what your problem is with asking questions to get caught up to speed instead of getting bogged down by sloughing through muck. Don't know about you, but time is precious, so whining about me asking if anything important happened yet isn't wrong at all. You know better. If that's what you think passes for an excuse to vote me, you are sorely mistaken, and I will rip you apart over it until you acknowledge your reasoning here is crud.

My problem is that it's lazy and anti-town. What if the people you are asking for help with are scum?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #712 (isolation #111) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:26 pm

In post 710, Wake1 wrote:
In post 709, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
In post 708, Wake1 wrote:And? I've got a life outside of Mafia, so pardon if I ask a handful of questions to help me catch up. And what's wrong with 637?

I want to know what your problem is with asking questions to get caught up to speed instead of getting bogged down by sloughing through muck. Don't know about you, but time is precious, so whining about me asking if anything important happened yet isn't wrong at all. You know better. If that's what you think passes for an excuse to vote me, you are sorely mistaken, and I will rip you apart over it until you acknowledge your reasoning here is crud.

My problem is that it's lazy and anti-town. What if the people you are asking for help with are scum?

If I had all the time in the world then yes it'd be lazy. I do not, and I don't think it's too much to ask the other twelve players to give a brief summary. If anything's lazy, it's refusing to even provide a sentence or two i response when you have more time than the person asking. BS on it being anti-Town, BS on it being scummy, and BS on it being lazy. I'm not asking everyone to provide walls of text doing my own work. I'm asking the other players (not all, but at least one) to help me catch up with a sentence or two. What's so difficult about it? Are you trying to fabricate reasons to cast suspicion on me? I think the route you're taking is horrible if you're Town, because if you're Town we are a team, and we help each other out if we are able. There's a chance that one of the people providing a response is Scum, but hey, that's the risk you take in a game of Mafia. People don't suddenly stop asking others for reads because, *gasp*, the person being asked could be Scum. I am not liking this new direction from you, and am now more eager than ever to question the motives behind your actions.

Wow, you don't like a direction where you're being scumread, that's a surprise.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #717 (isolation #112) » Thu Jan 15, 2015 8:42 pm

In post 715, Aeronaut wrote:
In post 709, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
In post 708, Wake1 wrote:And? I've got a life outside of Mafia, so pardon if I ask a handful of questions to help me catch up. And what's wrong with 637?

I want to know what your problem is with asking questions to get caught up to speed instead of getting bogged down by sloughing through muck. Don't know about you, but time is precious, so whining about me asking if anything important happened yet isn't wrong at all. You know better. If that's what you think passes for an excuse to vote me, you are sorely mistaken, and I will rip you apart over it until you acknowledge your reasoning here is crud.

My problem is that it's lazy and anti-town. What if the people you are asking for help with are scum?

Yea, Wake works in a hospital, treating patients, etc. That's a highly unpredictable profession, so it's not unfathomable that he'd have periods of a lot on his plate.

Having said that, Wake, If you could maybe give a reads list or something at SOME point this dayphase, it'd probably help us out some.

But I'm more interested in why Monkeyman is focusing on Wake for this. I posted little to nothing in the last week. I'm studying for finals. You're not targeting me. Why is this?

Yes, I do think that's bad at well, but I saw more content in your posts overall.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #725 (isolation #113) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 6:05 am

My wagon didn't make sense yesterday and it still makes no sense.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #727 (isolation #114) » Sat Jan 17, 2015 9:55 am

Because there's no case on me.

MonkeyMan576 · Sat Jan 17, 2015 10:43 am

That makes sense.

MonkeyMan576 · Sun Jan 18, 2015 12:33 pm

Maybe scum are trying to lurk their way to a win?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #745 (isolation #117) » Mon Jan 19, 2015 6:42 am

I can go with this. That switch was pretty supsicious.

Vote: Illl

MonkeyMan576 · Mon Jan 19, 2015 10:01 am

In post 746, droog wrote:I would definitely lynch monkey
...if I felt like it

I thought he was scummier than Katie
But I didn't like his wagon at all
So.

If my wagon was scummy what makes you think I am scum?

MonkeyMan576 · Mon Jan 19, 2015 11:44 am

apathy is going to kill town in this game, I think.

MonkeyMan576 · Mon Jan 19, 2015 12:27 pm

In post 750, curiouskarmadog wrote:WTH? why is it every time a wagon builds on MM, another wagon pops up for little reason and speeds forward with little regard? Why do I have a feeling that IIII is going to flip town?

In post 745, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I can go with this. That switch was pretty supsicious.

Vote: Illl

but this fucking switch isnt? and if it was so suspicious why didnt you vote him when the day started?

no I am not buying this bullshit.

No, it's not, because Illl and Wake are both scummy. You seem hyper focused on me rather than trying to have an open mind and finding scum.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #761 (isolation #121) » Tue Jan 20, 2015 8:14 am

Pretty suspicious to be replacing out when there is pressure on you.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #764 (isolation #122) » Tue Jan 20, 2015 9:38 am

All i know is that I've seen a lot of players resplace out when they are scum.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #768 (isolation #123) » Tue Jan 20, 2015 9:54 am

Yet you don't have a case on anyone else, that alone is suspicious.

MonkeyMan576 · Tue Jan 20, 2015 12:21 pm

In post 774, curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 768, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Yet you don't have a case on anyone else, that alone is suspicious.

how so?

also why are you ignoring my direct questions?

Town should be looking at more than one person, because there is more than one scum.

As for the questions, I may not have seen them with all the crap around them, maybe you can point them out to me again.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #782 (isolation #125) » Tue Jan 20, 2015 8:37 pm

In post 771, curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 766, curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 764, MonkeyMan576 wrote:All i know is that I've seen a lot of players resplace out when they are scum.

provide to me that last game that you saw this happen in this way.

Newbie 1248 - Crabbyman and SaraAdvent both replaced out as scum as the same character.

In post 772, curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 750, curiouskarmadog wrote:WTH? why is it every time a wagon builds on MM, another wagon pops up for little reason and speeds forward with little regard? Why do I have a feeling that IIII is going to flip town?

In post 745, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I can go with this. That switch was pretty supsicious.

Vote: Illl

but this fucking switch isnt? and if it was so suspicious why didnt you vote him when the day started?

no I am not buying this bullshit.

That's what happens when you have more than one scumread, which is the actual townie perspective.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #786 (isolation #126) » Wed Jan 21, 2015 1:28 pm

You already have one town lynch and I don't think you can afford a second. This wagon is all kinds of wrong.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #805 (isolation #127) » Thu Jan 22, 2015 6:54 pm

I still don't see what I've done that's not townish. There are several people that are more scummy than me.

MonkeyMan576 · Thu Jan 22, 2015 10:07 pm

I'm used to people saying I act scummy when I'm not scum, so I understand acting scummy and being scum are two different things.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #811 (isolation #129) » Fri Jan 23, 2015 3:13 am

Practically every game I play in. I'm fairly often mislynched as town.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #813 (isolation #130) » Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:00 am

In post 812, curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 805, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I still don't see what I've done that's not townish. There are several people that are more scummy than me.

I think he is asking you this, scumbag.

why would he be asking you what people in other games say you are scummy?

Calling me scum over and over again doesn't make it more true. He probably is interested in my meta. Maybe *gasp* he has an open mind.

MonkeyMan576 · Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:28 am

I'm not avoiding it at all.

MonkeyMan576 · Fri Jan 23, 2015 11:57 am

When did I say analyzing the kill is useless? iirc I said most often scum kill players in a way that benefit scum.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #836 (isolation #133) » Sat Jan 24, 2015 9:51 am

There isn't one. That's why no one is showing one. karmadogs tunneling is increasingly bad.

MonkeyMan576 · Sat Jan 24, 2015 10:23 am

Let me correct myself, there may be a case on me if you nitpick hard enough, but there are way scummier players(Wake, EPM, curiouskarma)

MonkeyMan576 · Sat Jan 24, 2015 10:52 am

I see no meta case on me, other than "trust me"

MonkeyMan576 · Sat Jan 24, 2015 12:03 pm

I'm null on EPM, he's fence sitting and not making any hard reads, but he's not as scummy as others.

MonkeyMan576 · Sat Jan 24, 2015 12:51 pm

In post 854, Aneninen wrote:Druuge:

278, 403, for example. Also 477.

The key sentence:
"in his town-game his post were a bit longer and usually contained "straightforward" reads and interactions and in his scum-game he had short posts, many of them full of with theoretical content."

And I don't like the facts that (1) I've mentioned it at least twice before yet you're asking the same question again, (2) others voting for MonkeyMan should be asked thorougly too and it's not happening, as far as I can see and (3) I''ve asked a question twice and you haven't answered it yet.

MonkeyMan: who are your scum reads now?

Wake and karmadog, and then probably either EPM or Katie.

MonkeyMan576 · Sat Jan 24, 2015 12:56 pm

he's tunneling me without any good reason too, and he has no other reads.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #863 (isolation #139) » Sat Jan 24, 2015 2:41 pm

If he has he hasn't made them very previlant.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #875 (isolation #140) » Sun Jan 25, 2015 6:30 pm

There's a difference between defending yourself and being hyperdefensive and concentrating on yourself at the expense of others.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #881 (isolation #141) » Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:52 am

In post 878, KatieB wrote:Minor emergency at home, sorry. It never rains but it pours.

I'll catch up tonight, but I don't anticipate having anything significant to say until we get our other replacement.

There's not enough content to have something to say?

FOS: Katie

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #896 (isolation #142) » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:22 am

People are really suggesting that Lapsa was acting townish now? That's all kinds of crazy.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #898 (isolation #143) » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:32 am

All you've done is point out your own OMGUS.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #899 (isolation #144) » Tue Jan 27, 2015 9:36 am

@Mod can we have a day extention since we've had the people replacing out and inactivity?[\b]

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #913 (isolation #145) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 1:31 pm

I'm only focusing on CKD because he's tunneling.

Ill is still the best lynch and I'm not wanting to start a new wagon with the short time left in day.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #919 (isolation #146) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:26 pm

What's wrong with the Illl wagon?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #923 (isolation #147) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:30 pm

So basically part of your case is trashing my vote on Illl, but you admit that Illl is probably scum.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #928 (isolation #148) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:38 pm

Yep, CKD is tunneling me.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #930 (isolation #149) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:40 pm

How is Illl probably town?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #932 (isolation #150) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 2:42 pm

In post 924, curiouskarmadog wrote:
In post 923, MonkeyMan576 wrote:So basically part of your case is trashing my vote on Illl, but you admit that Illl is probably scum.

also add lying, where did I say IIII is probably scum? where? I think he is probably town.

also if your next post doesnt answer this question I have not going to remove my vote from you all game.

4.) He said Wake was scum because he left the game (couldn’t handle the pressure?). I asked him (3 times) to provide a game where he developed this theory. He gave a newbie game (that he was in) from 2012. Really? This is the game you have based this bullshit theory? He has been around since 2008. If MM was really trying to find scum, why didn’t he meta Wake to see if this was a common problem with his other current games? (Hint: it is a common problem). No, instead he just throws that crap out there to see if it will get started. MM, why didn’t you see if Wake was having problems in other threads?

Because I tend to focus on current gameplay over meta.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #935 (isolation #151) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:25 pm

In post 934, llll wrote:Just looked over the thread - my scumreads are Monkeyman, Droog, Katieb. sthar logged in about 6 hours ago, but KatieB hasn't been posting.
Gendaberry and Wake look townish to me. I like Gendaberry's questions - he's trying, but should post a bit more frequently.
@Reticent, I like your style.

Guys, are we really going to let ScumkyMan weasel away another day? Come
on
. We have to lynch someone, and it really shouldn't be me.

Yeah, it really should. The case on you is solid and the case on me is inherently flawed. CKD is criticizing my vote on you when there is no towncase on you.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #937 (isolation #152) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:41 pm

In post 936, Reticent wrote:
In post 932, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Because I tend to focus on current gameplay over meta.

This is a pretty convenient way of dodging the issue of lacking meta to support your case.

In post 934, llll wrote:@Reticent, I like your style.

<3

VOTE: MonkeyMan576

I'll settle for this. Or maybe I'm just joining this wagon because droog hates it.

You did see the end of day one where Illl said I was obvscum and then switched over to my wagon at the last minute?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #942 (isolation #153) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:51 pm

Droog = Town. Like that he is willing to defend against bad arguments.

Reticent = Pretty accurate to me, what is your take?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #944 (isolation #154) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 6:53 pm

No he's town because he's defending against poor arguments.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #946 (isolation #155) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:17 pm

That's what I meant, yes. The Lapsa wagon. Still scummy, especially at the last minute and since it caused a townlynch.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #948 (isolation #156) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:19 pm

In post 947, Reticent wrote:So he is both scummy for voting for you
and
for switching to someone else?

Well, since I know I am town, yes. But the switch is the important part.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #950 (isolation #157) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:21 pm

Is that sarcasm? Or are you going to switch your vote?

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #952 (isolation #158) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:28 pm

You haven't explained how Illl is town in general or how you shouldn't be held accountable for switching your vote at the last minute to a wagon that includes someone who is your biggest scumread and then causing a townlynch.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #954 (isolation #159) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:53 pm

He called me scum specifically in 582 and 586. He didn't use such strong language repeatedly to anyone else, so it's a safe leap. Then he mysteriously switched his vote close to the last minute to a wagon that ended up leaving a town dead. No one else that switched at the last minute scum read me so heavily.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #956 (isolation #160) » Wed Jan 28, 2015 8:11 pm

because I figured the town would be smart, but if you're not going to listen to the best case that's on you. Plus obviously the replacements didn't even know he c reason for the I'lll case before voting me.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #975 (isolation #161) » Thu Jan 29, 2015 9:00 am

Now CKD is trying to bully Katie into lynching town.

I hope during Day 3 we get to lynch CKD regardless.

MonkeyMan576 · Post Post #977 (isolation #162) » Thu Jan 29, 2015 9:57 am

No, you're still my preferred lynch for day 2.

MonkeyMan576 · Thu Jan 29, 2015 12:16 pm

If droog and I were really scum partners do you think he'd be defending me this hard? As said before, I am lynchbait so if I get lynched and flip scum that puts him next in line. Him sticking his neck out for me is as townish as it gets.

MonkeyMan576 · Thu Jan 29, 2015 8:00 pm

You guys are really not thinking straight are are falling prey to the "throw $hit to the wall and hope something sticks" strategy.

MonkeyMan576 · Thu Jan 29, 2015 9:35 pm

In post 1015, llll wrote:I just figured out the 576 - you were born in May 1976, right, Monkey?

Correct.

MonkeyMan576 · Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:25 pm

My goal when I was on the noose was to look as scummy as possible so that my scummates would look more town when lynching me. Constantly accusing CKD and llll of being scum without having any real basis or reasoning, etc.

MonkeyMan576 · Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:28 pm

Droog more so than Pac, but yes.

MonkeyMan576 · Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:56 pm

it's all part of the game, as far as I am concerned. I've had to play with it as town, lots of times. You have to learn to sort through the crap.

MonkeyMan576 · Thu Mar 05, 2015 11:25 am

I didn't get an email, should I be offended?