if you have seen my posts, where is my vote and why?
to be clear, this is coming from this post.
In post 116, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Being defensive and emotional is indicative of scum,
In post 126, Wake1 wrote:In post 115, KatieB wrote:other way around, buddy.
Hrm...
The plot thickens.
In post 128, curiouskarmadog wrote:also....
In post 116, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Being defensive and emotional is indicative of scum,
is utter fucking bullshit.
I play emotional..I play hot. I am telling you I do this now...most likely I am going to get fucking super pissed in the game and get angry and emotional (thus my title) am I scum?
MM, are you telling me you have never seen town get emotional or defensive?
In post 103, KatieB wrote:I'm scumreading Wake for focusing on silly stuff like how much fluff should be allowed in a game
In post 129, KatieB wrote:@ ckd- you're still on your randomvote for ollie. You might be pushing him for not posting,but I dont like the pushand I dont see how it's relevant.
In post 131, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 128, curiouskarmadog wrote:also....
In post 116, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Being defensive and emotional is indicative of scum,
is utter fucking bullshit.
I play emotional..I play hot. I am telling you I do this now...most likely I am going to get fucking super pissed in the game and get angry and emotional (thus my title) am I scum?
MM, are you telling me you have never seen town get emotional or defensive?
I said it is indicative, I didn't say it is a 100% indicator. More often than not, scum get emotional and defensive when wagoned more than town do.
In post 134, curiouskarmadog wrote:In post 131, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 128, curiouskarmadog wrote:also....
In post 116, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Being defensive and emotional is indicative of scum,
is utter fucking bullshit.
I play emotional..I play hot. I am telling you I do this now...most likely I am going to get fucking super pissed in the game and get angry and emotional (thus my title) am I scum?
MM, are you telling me you have never seen town get emotional or defensive?
I said it is indicative, I didn't say it is a 100% indicator. More often than not, scum get emotional and defensive when wagoned more than town do.
have you ever seen scum support a vote based on "X is emotional and defensive"...(for your reference, I love to meta).
In post 135, curiouskarmadog wrote:better question...or question 2.
as scum, have you ever based a vote on "X is emotional and defensive"
In post 133, curiouskarmadog wrote:soooo...if you know where/why my vote is, why are you asking if everyone is here?
In post 132, Wake1 wrote:was never the one focusing on "silly stuff" like how much fluff should be allowed in a game. If you recall, I was answering questions towards me about that. Maybe Luca is right about you misrepresenting things in this game. I gave fair warning about misrepresentation.
In post 110, KatieB wrote:I mean, he voted Lapsa for 'fluffposting more than Anen' and 'poorly justifying his vote on Anen' which happened before Anen had even posted, and was pretty clearly a RVS vote. Even if Lapsa had done any of the things Luca was talking about, none of them would be alignment indicative.
He's scumreading me for calling Lapsa probtown, but dollars to doughnuts if I hadn't clarified that my feelings are as strong as p5 allows, he'd be scumreading me for having feelings too strong for day 1.
He's scumreading me for not hopping to answer him (which is not indicative of scum), scumreading me for a misunderstanding of my feelings on my suspects (even if his thoughts were accurate, this would not be indicative of scum), for 'not making any sense' (which is not indicative of scum), and for being dismissive of his reasons for scumreading me (which he hasn't yet presented.)
Pretty obviously scum looking for a day1 mislynch that involves a lot of words but not reasons. As soon as everyone has posted, I'd be glad to turbolynch him.
p-edit: but not having any reasons for scumreading me totally doesn't make his vote OMGUS. Totally.
In post 134, curiouskarmadog wrote:have you ever seen scum support a vote based on "X is emotional and defensive"...(for your reference, I love to meta).
In post 142, MonkeyMan576 wrote:You have a lot of opinions about how people react to you specifically, but you don't seem interested in finding scum outside of Katie discussion.
In post 144, KatieB wrote:In post 142, MonkeyMan576 wrote:You have a lot of opinions about how people react to you specifically, but you don't seem interested in finding scum outside of Katie discussion.
What?
In post 141, KatieB wrote:In post 132, Wake1 wrote:was never the one focusing on "silly stuff" like how much fluff should be allowed in a game. If you recall, I was answering questions towards me about that. Maybe Luca is right about you misrepresenting things in this game. I gave fair warning about misrepresentation.
Rightyou did spend a considerable amount of time talking about it, when IMO you should have brushed it off. It's a really weak suspicion, but it's there.but