In post 446, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Maybe because they are scum buddies, and Luca knows that Illl voting me is good way to get a town lynched.
who is they?
and why the fuck are YOU avoiding my questions...answer now please.
In post 446, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Maybe because they are scum buddies, and Luca knows that Illl voting me is good way to get a town lynched.
In post 451, droog wrote:karma, how do you feel about voting lapsa with me
either as a policy lynch for him to start making content
or because you suspect him for not making contetn
which he showed at game start he was able to do
In post 451, droog wrote:
or because you suspect him for not making contetn
which he showed at game start he was able to do
In post 448, curiouskarmadog wrote:In post 447, Luca Blight wrote:In post 445, curiouskarmadog wrote:In post 440, Luca Blight wrote:It isn't L-1 cos lll voted KatieB.
I am curious...why correct him?
if everyone was under the impression we were at -1, it might have provided some insight. So what purpose was this post?
1) Why would you assume that everyone else would have missed llll's vote?
2) What insight could we have got if I didn't mention it?
3) Why are you asking such stupid f*cking questions?
did you answer the question? what was the purpose of the post?
In post 449, curiouskarmadog wrote:if X thought MM was at -1, and hammered (out of no where) thinking it was indeed the hammer....that would have said a lot.
now quit being a dick, and answer the fucking question.
In post 449, curiouskarmadog wrote:if X thought MM was at -1, and hammered (out of no where) thinking it was indeed the hammer....that would have said a lot.
now quit being a dick, and answer the fucking question.
In post 435, evilpacman18 wrote:Anen you can't say "you'll regret lynching me" and then get suspicious of me if I decide I don't wanna lynch you -_-
In post 438, curiouskarmadog wrote:
wait arent you voting Monkeyman too? if Monkeyman flips town, this post gets scum points.
In post 445, curiouskarmadog wrote:if everyone was under the impression we were at -1, it might have provided some insight. So what purpose was this post?
In post 446, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Maybe because they are scum buddies, and Luca knows that Illl voting me is good way to get a town lynched.
In post 420, droog wrote:is that supposed to be a reaction test?
In post 455, droog wrote:lapsa is capable of
explaining votes
answering questions
follow-up to his questions (((which he calls his strength!)))
pushing on certain posts
so why isnt he anymore
In post 459, Aneninen wrote:
That's true. But, regardless of that your post can still be weird at best.
A bit more about it: (1) either I'm wrong about Monkeyman and he's town, in that case you could be a scum going for a mislynch, (2) or both of you are scum and you decided to bus him (this is not too likely though), (3) it's also possible that Monkey is scum and you're a bad-town.
In post 404, curiouskarmadog wrote:Okay I got about 20-30 minutes to attempt to catch up.
First of all, for whoever asked (or commented on it) I was asking Wake about fluff, because at the time I thought the conversation about fluff on Day 1 was silly. I was curious what he deemed scummier, a post with fluff or someone who isn’t posting in here, but is elsewhere on site. Fluff on day one is nothing. It is the majority of posts in the first 10 pages. But what Ollie was doing WAS scummy in my book.
Which leads me to the next question somebody asked (not going back all the way to find who). Do I want to lynch lurkers….short answer…yes. Long answer, no? Meaning, Ollie wasn’t just a lurker. He wasn’t posting at all here AND he was very active in other games. I find that day 1 scum DO that. They will lurk and let a shitty wagon build on someone and jump in just a little and not commit to very much so they cant be ISOed later….I recently nailed scum for doing the EXACT SAME THING. Now. It is moot. Ollie was replaced…so my suspicion might not be valid. But also my vote isn’t on him now.
Okay reading at about page 10..if there is anything before that needs to be commented on. Please repost. I don’t have time to be as thorough as I would like to be.
In post 236, llll wrote:KatieB is being super defensive right now, which seems scummy to me,
What the fuck?!
BEING DEFENSIVE/EMOTIONAL = SCUMMY IS BULLSHIT….BULLLLLLSHIT. I get defensive all the time…as town….AND as scum. I hate hate hate, when person X is being asked a ton of questions and when the post to answer those questions, people (usually scum) point the figure and say…you are being defensive. No…no they are not.
If Katie did ANYTHING scummy, it was disappearing when the heat dropped on her.
EDIT: (back to lurking, I went back to see if Katie was posting else where in this alt or her other…she/he is not..that being said, I would have found THAT scummy too)
In post 264, MonkeyMan576 wrote:It's very simple. Scum are more self aware in general than town.
Town, as you say, try to collaborate and collectively find scum.
Scum get defensive easily, use poor arguments, and get upset over little things(emotional).
So I don't see how I wasn't clear.
quote EXACTLY where Katie was being defensive. also the first two paragraphs of this post could be deemed defensive...am I scummy?
In post 298, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Evidently I have poor people and logic skills.
now who is being emotional?
That being said, what scum hunting have you done today?
In post 313, Luca Blight wrote:In post 221, curiouskarmadog wrote:also for those who are curious as to why I have issues with lurkers (who are posting else where) check out the last game I was in...it is current, so cant say more than that. might shed some light.
This comes across a little self-conscious...it's pretty obvious why lurkers are bad, so I don't see why he feels the need to justify this view. Pushes on someone who hasn't posted at all, even if they have posted elsewhere, are pretty pointless though.
did you check my last game out to see if I was lying? to see if my pov checks out? why or why not?
In post 327, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I'm not certain who is more scummy between Lapsa and Katie so I'll refrain from voting at the moment.
why?
In post 333, Wake1 wrote:Hey guys, haven't forgotten. Just really busty at the moment.
quit bragging.
Caught up on the most part…still good with my vote.
Hey Wake, why aren’t you voting someone?
In post 437, curiouskarmadog wrote:In post 417, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Those two statements are both assumptive and incorrect. It would be scummy of me to start a new wagon if there is a better wagon to be on, which there is. I have repeatedly stated my reasoning, which is sound.
can you please address my 404 post.
In post 456, Luca Blight wrote:
Why would scum:
a) Do that one day 1, thus incriminating themselves in the process
b) Hammer without checking the vote count first?
At what point would it have been acceptable to point out it isn't actually L-1?
In post 462, Lapsa wrote:it is possible that (1) you are bad-town, (2) you are bad-scum, (3) i like turtles
In post 465, MonkeyMan576 wrote:RE: Lapsa/Katie, if two people are equally scummy, it makes more sense to wait than to vote right away and have to change your vote later.1
RE: Katie being defensive and emotional, pretty much every post she has made. She is far too self aware to be town, in my opinion.2
RE Scumhunting, I think I've pretty much nailed down Lapsa and Katie as scum, I'm not sure what more scumhunting I need to do in day 1.3
In post 458, llll wrote:In post 449, curiouskarmadog wrote:if X thought MM was at -1, and hammered (out of no where) thinking it was indeed the hammer....that would have said a lot.
now quit being a dick, and answer the fucking question.
In case Luca's second attempt at explaining things to you didn't work, let me try as well. Assuming everyone is as dumb at counting as you are does not actually make it so. Dispelling confusion is helpful and helps the town. Deliberately lying and sowing confusion only helps the scum. Why in the world would you lie and try to have an accidental lynch?
If I had a second vote, I'd throw it at you.
In post 467, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Scum lie all the time, just because they claim to not know the vote count doesn't mean they don't know it.
In post 459, Aneninen wrote:
In post 438, curiouskarmadog wrote:
wait arent you voting Monkeyman too? if Monkeyman flips town, this post gets scum points.
Elaborate, please. Why would I get "scum points"? Why not Lapsa?
In post 438, curiouskarmadog wrote:In post 431, Aneninen wrote:In post 418, Lapsa wrote:I likeMonkey'sfluency of thought.
Will unvote for now.
vote: MonkeyMan576
????!!
Just why, Lapsa, why?!?
Keep producing shytty posts and shytty context for your votes and you're get lynched because of them. Possible scum or possible useless townie, that's my read on you right now.
(Reading the latest posts thoroughly and answering them will happen later; need to go to work right now.)
wait arent you voting Monkeyman too? if Monkeyman flips town, this post gets scum points.