Mini 1636: Mafialand Mayhem! - [Game Over]
-
-
Lapsa
-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-----===== Katie's jam recipe =====-----
In post 86, Lapsa wrote:@KatieB does your lack of time alternates?
In post 87, KatieB wrote:I dunno
In post 112, sthar8 wrote:.
mix all of this with 2 teaspoons of assumption that we ain't nothing more but functions of timeabcedminded-
-
Aeronaut He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7236
- Joined: September 8, 2013
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Boston, MA
Jeeeze this game is going quickly.
Hi everyone, I'm Aeronaut. I'm in 3 other games. So. That's. Fun.
Pleasure to play with Wake again, even after the thing that happened in NY175. We don't speak of such things anymore
But yea,I'll get right into it. I'm going to do it by every three pages, because if I go through and select-quote everything I'll forget what I was going to say.
Page 1-3
In post 14, Lapsa wrote:@Everyone:
What's your biggest strength at mafia game?
Answer:
I've been told that I'm good at 'following up' with my questioning.
Hmm.... Biggest strength? Well, nobody has actually told me if I'm good at anything in particular, but I guess I'd say gambiting maybe? I've only done it once, in Simple Complexity, where I claimed Gunsmith. It worked pretty well IIRC, until Titus had to come in and be a cop. That was laaaame.
In post 28, Wake1 wrote:Lapsa, my biggest strength at Mafia—in my own opinion—is twofold. Will and potential, and I daresay the ability to adapt to anything. At times I can be very forceful, and I quite like the mental swordplay that comes about now and again. Also, I tend to watch out for any players that use hyperbole, or take words out of context. Those to me scream of Scumminess, and I'm apt to tear at the throat whenever someone attempts to do so with me in these games. I've caught a few this way. Thorough, analytical reads are another strong weapon in my arsenal. Intense, unceasing curiosity and scrutiny round it out, but this doesn't mean other things are being improved upon as well. If I'm Scum you have to either NK or investigate me; very rarely as Scum do I get lynched; it's been well over a year.
Guys, I'd like to hear more from you. Please speak up and get these discussions rolling. Hearing more from you would be splendid, and, if you would, please toss out more reads and accusations. Lob some questions my way too, please. I don't bite, and will not rip your head off unless I sense you're being deceitful. From a cost-benefit analysis, you have nothing to lose if you're Town, because as Town you should have absolutely no reason to lie to me about anything in this game. Some have told me I have a very sharp sense of perception, and can usually discern traits and patterns in the behaviors of others. You have literally nothing to fear if Town, and everything to fear if Scum, so, by all means, please do engage with me.
I love Wake. Please be in all my games
In post 36, Wake1 wrote:I do know Aeronaut and Luca Blight are formidable players, and am patiently waiting for them to wade into this game. You guys don't need to be shy.
As for me, I'm simply harmless.
Ah, no, I would call myself the opposite of a formidable player. Like a generally very bad player. But hey, the only way to improve is practice, right?
In post 38, Wake1 wrote:In post 37, Lapsa wrote:In post 35, Wake1 wrote:(..) Would you be willing to give a rough estimate of how many years you've been playing? (..)
Do you, perhaps, have any slight reads on anyone as of yet? Maybe you have a bit of insider knowledge on someone's meta here?
(..) However, my memory on the details is foggy. As time wears on the memory fades ever so slightly.
you can call me Lapsa88
vote on Aneninen because of fluff
vote on Aeronaut because of doubling on you
zero insider knowledge
thing in common - can't remember losing my memory
Fluff, in my opinion, isn't indicative of alignment.
Aeronaut, under the law ofLynch all Wakes, is naturally compelled to stay the course.
Do you feel posting fluff is worthy of a vote? I wonder what everyone else thinks of this. Please do join in.
I disagree. Fluff only can hurt the town and help the scum. Good example is what happened in Completely Ridiculous Mafia. Same is true of walls and walls of text, and pointless pissing matches; at a certain point you're not changing anybody's opinion, just clouding up the thread.
46 is eh. I don't particularly like it, seeing that withholding information is bad, but it's not like he's refusing to elaborate on a vote.
Why? because he's lurking? It's been like six hours.
In post 68, Wake1 wrote:...on a side note, to be safe, I think we should assume we're dealing with a 10:3 Setup.
Setup spec is bad, Wake.
And HEEERE'S the not explaining of the vote. We're not in RVS, in case you missed the email-blast.
-More at 11-2023 W/L | 1-0-
-
Aeronaut He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7236
- Joined: September 8, 2013
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Boston, MA
Page 4-5
In post 66, curiouskarmadog wrote:In post 58, Wake1 wrote:
That said, I don't think all fluffiness should be outlawed. Some fluff is alright, so long as it stays within reason.
what is an acceptable fluff to content ratioonDay 1in the first 5 pages ?
which is more damning (in your opinion) in those first 5 pages, posting fluff or confirming but not posting in the game (but posting elsewhere on site)?
This seems like
"How much bullshit can I post without anyone suspecting me?"
In post 78, KatieB wrote:This is my third game, so no idea what my strengths are.
Lapsa is probably town.
As of right now, I'd probably wagon Luca, Wake, or Anen. Wake being the weakest vote of the three.
Is everyone here yet?
Why is Lapsa town? Why are you willing to wagon Luca, Wake, or Anen? These questions are not rhetorical.
In post 83, Lapsa wrote:In post 81, curiouskarmadog wrote:Lapsa you could save me some time though, you play so nonchalantly as scum?
I got thousand faces and they all look same
This makes me think Lapsa is also an Alt.
Or that's a movie quote and I'm an uncultured wretch.
In post 87, KatieB wrote:I dunno, does your in english maybe that post typing? <3
This was funny. Still not much of an answer though.
In post 102, KatieB wrote:Right but I'm not posting a 'case.' You are. And it's a case that nowhere ever actually suggests a scum motivation for anything I've done.
So then why are you not posting a case?
In post 111, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Katie seems to be very defensive and emotional regarding this wagon. This is indicative of scum.
Unvote:
Vote: Katie
I agree Luca's vote was not OMGUS. He clearly pointed out his reasoning. OMGUS is a defensive responce vote without any clear reasoning other than wanting to divert your own wagon.
This is opportunistic AF. Please.
VOTE: MonkeyMan567
I like Luca's vote, I don't like Monkeyman's.2023 W/L | 1-0-
-
Aeronaut He/HimJack of All TradesHe/Him
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7236
- Joined: September 8, 2013
- Pronoun: He/Him
- Location: Boston, MA
Page 6 - current
In post 138, Wake1 wrote:I don't get the feeling that being emotional or defensive is indicative of alignment. Maybe when it comes to meta, but that's typically unreliable. Misrepresentation and hyperbole, I think, are scumtells.
It's not.
In post 153, MonkeyMan576 wrote:You guys are taking my statement out of context. But I acknowledge some players play emotional and defensive as town. Katie's wagon has still brought a lot more day 1 information than is typical so I like my vote where it is for now.
Your entire case on Katie is that she's being overly emotional and defensive. So, if that isn't indicative alignment, why are you still voting her?
In post 156, Wake1 wrote:In post 155, KatieB wrote:Wake, I thought it might be indicative as the game progressed. Chill.
Oh, I am chilled good Sir, but I am now thoroughly perplexed with your faulty facade. First you create this dubious alt and slip on it, and then you try to lob a flimsy Scumread on me because you think I talked too much about the questions directed towards me in the first five pages. I would like to have more of an explanation from you on this, and you can be sure I'll be directing more questions your way in the future.
Can anyone else imagine Wake as a supervillain saying this, while petting a cat or something?
But actually, this post is Wake overreacting quite a bit. Keeping that in mind.
In post 172, Lapsa wrote:In post 169, Luca Blight wrote:but the example he gave came after his vote on you.
*yawn*
VOTE: Luca Blight
This is unhelpful.
This is more unhelpful.
In post 176, Lapsa wrote:-----===== Katie's jam recipe =====-----
In post 86, Lapsa wrote:@KatieB does your lack of time alternates?
In post 87, KatieB wrote:I dunno
In post 112, sthar8 wrote:.
mix all of this with 2 teaspoons of assumption that we ain't nothing more but functions of time
Lapsa is officially a very confused Reddit-bot.
Not sure on Katie. The alt slip is not indicative of alignment, and anyone using that in their reasoning has a golden ticket for the Bullshit Train. Someone point out her "overreaction", because I don't see that. Lapsa is anti-town AF. He's just going to sit in the stands and throw peanuts at us the whole game. The more MonkeyMan posts, the better my vote seems. Oppertunistic vote, and now he's just trying to stick to his guns.2023 W/L | 1-0-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 177, Aeronaut wrote:And HEEERE'S the not explaining of the vote. We're not in RVS, in case you missed the email-blast.
that would break my promiseabcedminded-
-
MonkeyMan576 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
In post 153, MonkeyMan576 wrote:You guys are taking my statement out of context. But I acknowledge some players play emotional and defensive as town. Katie's wagon has still brought a lot more day 1 information than is typical so I like my vote where it is for now.
Your entire case on Katie is that she's being overly emotional and defensive. So, if that isn't indicative alignment, why are you still voting her?
[/Quote]
That's not my entire case at all. There's also the fact that Katie's wagon has generated discussion and brought about useful information the town can use later in the game.
I'm not convinced Katie is scum at this point, but the wagon is pro-town to me. Therefore my vote stays at this point.-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: August 30, 2014
@George:
In post 182, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
That's not my entire case at all.
There's also the fact that Katie's wagon has generated discussion and brought about useful information the town can use later in the game.
how exactly is that a part of your case on Katie?
In post 182, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
I'm not convinced Katie is scum at this point, but the wagon is pro-town to me. Therefore my vote stays at this point.
Luca alone is voting for Katie
how broad is wagon you are talking about?abcedminded-
-
MonkeyMan576 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Lapsa wrote:In post 183, Lapsa wrote:@George:
In post 182, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
That's not my entire case at all.
There's also the fact that Katie's wagon has generated discussion and brought about useful information the town can use later in the game.
how exactly is that a part of your case on Katie?
Not so much part of the case so much as why my vote is there I suppose. You want to know what has produced the most pro-town discussion at this point and you can look at Luca and my vote.
In post 182, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
I'm not convinced Katie is scum at this point, but the wagon is pro-town to me. Therefore my vote stays at this point.
Lapsa wrote:
Luca alone is voting for Katie
how broad is wagon you are talking about?
As broad as any other wagon right now.-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: August 30, 2014
In post 177, Aeronaut wrote:at a certain point you're not changing anybody's opinion, just clouding up the thread.
@Aeronaut where is that point?abcedminded-
-
MonkeyMan576 Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7900
- Joined: November 7, 2008
- Location: Colorado Springs, CO
In post 111, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Katie seems to be very defensive and emotional regarding this wagon. This is indicative of scum.
Unvote:
Vote: Katie
I agree Luca's vote was not OMGUS. He clearly pointed out his reasoning. OMGUS is a defensive responce vote without any clear reasoning other than wanting to divert your own wagon.
Thanks for paying attention.-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
In post 178, Aeronaut wrote:Page 4-5
In post 66, curiouskarmadog wrote:In post 58, Wake1 wrote:
That said, I don't think all fluffiness should be outlawed. Some fluff is alright, so long as it stays within reason.
what is an acceptable fluff to content ratioonDay 1in the first 5 pages ?
which is more damning (in your opinion) in those first 5 pages, posting fluff or confirming but not posting in the game (but posting elsewhere on site)?
This seems like
"How much bullshit can I post without anyone suspecting me?"
so I am trying to figure out if you REALLY think that is what I am doing in this quote, were just skimming as you read, trying to be funny, or if you scum trying to paint a picture by taking a quote out of context? I know in catch up posts, people tend to not really read thoroughly, but I am curious.
please address this...for I will have follow up questions.NO YOU'RE OVER DEFENSIVE-
-
Riddleton Mafia Scum
-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: August 30, 2014
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
Riddleton Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: June 13, 2014
I'll be prodding Ollie, Drake Crusader and BP in 8 hours if they don't post by then. The rule for that is 48 hours without posting-
-
Lapsa Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3467
- Joined: August 30, 2014
abcedminded
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-