In post 3537, Scripten wrote:In post 3531, Izariael wrote:
It is based on his constant stalling and limiting of the exchange of information.
It is based on his voting habits, which appear to be sheer OMGUS on PeregrineV, Muffin and myself. Woe be unto those who question the mighty Thor and his infallible gameplay...
It is based on my belief that he is not genuinely scumhunting, as nearly all of his scumreads have come from reactivity rather than proactivity.
Sure, I'm game, let's do these one by one.
1. I "stalled" explaining what I meant by the word "thoughts" when Muffin thought it meant "names"
No - that is Muffin wasting time with a stupid bit of...I dunno. I also did n't stall anything, i said immediately that it wasn't what I meant. I didn't realize I needed to define the word "thoughts" I think it's STUPID AND UNREASONABLE to suggest I should have - and it would have been even more insulting, frankly. I actually gave him the benefit of the doubt by calling him scum.
2. I specifically didn't OMGUS Pere and it's silly to suggest I did - but I guess I need to address this, I probably need to ask what he means by OMGUS to see if it's the same as what I mean, I also didn't OMGUS Shiro either. SO I OMGUSed two people thus far...except I didn't unless you take the most basic meaning of the term as "voted someone who was voting him".
Sorry I slowed things down by not addressing something that is provably not true and acting as if it didn't need to be justified - how sloppy of me.
This is actually sort of the second point again, and other than that is just an empty point. What do I even say to this? I am scumhunting - so either he doesn't take what I consider to be scumhunting as scumhunting, or he does and is scum. In neither situation can I convince him I'm scumhunting - and he hasn't really shown lack of scumhunting, he's just saying it. I think if you look at my votes and questions it screams scumhunting...but...what, am I supposed to say "read my ISO?" Yeah, brilliant rebuttal there. it's a dumb and empty accusation that cannot be functionally challenged due to its empty nature. it's his opinion - other people will agree o disagree with it but *debating* it? That's stupid and wasteful.
Wow - amazing points.
How shameful of me not to have addressed the *meaningful* ones instead of just dismissing the case.
Silly, really.
Mah bad!
This is weird. Why are you asking me to do this - none of those points were impressive, non were supported by facts, and a few are blatantly incorrect if you bothered to look for the info yourself. Why do I need to waste my time addressing that?
Did my addressing it change anything?
Because all you have now is my opinion on his opinions and you *still* need to go do the research yourself and draw your own conclusions - which you were capable of doing without my providing of a detailed response.
Also - a non-detailed response, which I gave, was just as functional. I calimed the case was silly. When I got specific all I did was state *why* I thought it was silly.
But the only thing that matters is whether people think it is or is not silly - that's the info that matters. the why is just detail work if you're confused by their conclusions.
Are you confused by my conclusion that the case is silly?
Like, you think the case holds water? You think I did OMGUS on Pere? You think being dismissive is a scum only trait and town never do it? You think I'm 'stalling' in some manner that hurts town?
Meh - then say so and back up your own words. Because I didn't, it isn't, and I'm not, and this is silly.