Mini 1500:Narnia- The Lion,the Witch,and the Wardrobe Mafia
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
UNVOTE: Broken Aquarium
VOTE: PeaceBringer
I get the feeling your going to do that -I won't do any reads thing on day 1 thing again-. You could of just said "it's a rvs because I don't feel like I can make a read or something any explanation is better than none." I don't mean to sound mean but can I ask what do you get out of mafia.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
UNVOTE: Peacebringer
VOTE: mozamis
I don't think a blendy a cheerful posting style is a valid scum sign. Skelda at least provided a reason to his vote and this makes me more inclined to think his town. You also jumped on the peacebringer wagon with out giving any reason what so ever then vote someone because of it.In post 65, mozamis wrote:Well then Shane, you probably won't like this either:
VOTE SKELDA.
His post was way too "blendy", friendly and cheerful. Certainly, when you compare him and Peacebringer, its much more likely that he is scum than Peace. Peace annoyed me by being unhelpful, but it takes gutsy scum to play like that. Scum far more likely to play "nicey nice" like Skelda.
Yes, I have moved my vote around a bit, but I dont see that as a bad thing. It gets reactions going, conversations, and its better thn sitting on the fence.
But out of all my votes, most confident about Skelda being scum.
The rvs was slightly confusing but i can't really give scum points for that. His reason for voting JKLM was because he joked about himself being scum and looked like a tryhard scum. I don't see try hard scum in JkLM's posting, I see someone mucking around trying to get reactions out of players with that, but that's just me.
Mozamis is my top scum read at the moment While I don't have have a top town read since no one has reached that point yet. Skelda,Honig and JKLM are starting to lean town.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@Mozamis He still provided a better reason than you through. But I will acknowledge that you gave a reason. Still your plays so far have been a bit iffy.
@Project Matt I'm going to call you out through and ask why did you Vote Mozamis with out listing any reasons. I would actually like to hear some insight on how the game is going.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
UNVOTE: mozamis
The Initial reason I voted him was that weird Skelda vote and the fact he voted peace with little reason. But everyone else thought Skelda was scum at the time so I can understand a vote now. I still think Skelda is town through.
I can answer mnemonicdevice post 106 when he says interesting and unvotes since i think the conversation was between me and him.
I think it's a response to me to saying that matt was being sarcastic saying he was scum by saying yes in post 25 to Mnemonic post 20. Mnemonic was under the impression in post 93 that matt said yes to being town in a one word answer. Through that is a pretty bad reason for a serious vote in the first place.......
The reason i think it was a serious vote was he also called out skelda in post 59 and didn't change his vote. Also post 93 gives me the impression he is still clinging onto that reason. Also like someone said before seemed to lack caring for someone being Lynch one this early in the game.
VOTE: Mnemonicdevice-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
(Off topic) hey skelda if dogs go woof and goats go bleat
WHAT DOES THE FOX SAY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jofNR_WkoCE-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Does anyone else get the feeling that there's going to be some big twist in this. I mean the mod is posting these weird images. With the vote count sometimes.
>> it's just flavor sweets, no impact on real game. Additional short stories are common with VCA's for theme games, its been known practice on ms.net and you could see mostly this style on large theme games. <<-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 166, smargaret wrote:
This is interesting, considering you did much the same thing in voting Mozamis without listing a reason.In post 69, Garmr wrote:@Mozamis He still provided a better reason than you through. But I will acknowledge that you gave a reason. Still your plays so far have been a bit iffy.
@Project Matt I'm going to call you out through and ask why did you Vote Mozamis with out listing any reasons. I would actually like to hear some insight on how the game is going.In post 67, Garmr wrote:UNVOTE: Peacebringer
VOTE: mozamis
I don't think a blendy a cheerful posting style is a valid scum sign. Skelda at least provided a reason to his vote and this makes me more inclined to think his town. You also jumped on the peacebringer wagon with out giving any reason what so ever then vote someone because of it.In post 65, mozamis wrote:Well then Shane, you probably won't like this either:
VOTE SKELDA.
His post was way too "blendy", friendly and cheerful. Certainly, when you compare him and Peacebringer, its much more likely that he is scum than Peace. Peace annoyed me by being unhelpful, but it takes gutsy scum to play like that. Scum far more likely to play "nicey nice" like Skelda.
Yes, I have moved my vote around a bit, but I dont see that as a bad thing. It gets reactions going, conversations, and its better thn sitting on the fence.
But out of all my votes, most confident about Skelda being scum.
The rvs was slightly confusing but i can't really give scum points for that. His reason for voting JKLM was because he joked about himself being scum and looked like a tryhard scum. I don't see try hard scum in JkLM's posting, I see someone mucking around trying to get reactions out of players with that, but that's just me.
Mozamis is my top scum read at the moment While I don't have have a top town read since no one has reached that point yet. Skelda,Honig and JKLM are starting to lean town.
Read this again I listed 2 to 3 reasons why I voted Mozamis vote
1.his reasoning was bad on the skelda vote
2.Not giving reasons for the peace bringer wagon vote. (First time i read his vote it I didn't see it as reason as it was so short.)
3.His vote on JKLM also looked a bit iffy to me.
There is 3 reasons you can find in that post alone off the top of my head.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Oh that reminds me I mentioned this in post 129 mnemonic ignored it.In post 173, Broken Aquarium wrote:
Who? Why unvote and not vote or otherwise pursue these 'scummier' people?In post 126, mnemonicdevice wrote:Once I realized that there were more scummy people than him, I unvoted.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
The fact he reads people as scum while he already just unvoted someone is iffy in itself. Even if you read that as null he hasn't even tried to question the people he thinks are scum. Look at his post they are either defending himself or just filling the room up with fluff. Bad reasoning for a actual vote when he did have a reason, fluffing the place up.
The reason he actually had matt as a serious pressure vote. Was because Matt said yes to be scum as a joke. Even through mnemonicdevice thought Matt said yes to being town and even if that's what matt meant. It still wouldn't of meant anything as it was a useless question to ask in the first place place. "Are you scum "
As proof his vote on matt was serious.In post 126, mnemonicdevice wrote: My vote on projectmatt stayed as a pressure vote, while there wasn't anyone I thought to be more scummy. Once I realized that there were more scummy people than him, I unvoted.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
That's interesting going back and looking at it we have three opposing wagons the mnemonicdevice wagon and the HonigBear wagon. Early game I had Honig as null leaning town and even through he is defensive he has does quite a bit of scum hunting and his posts are detailed and that's why I'm more willing to keep him around than mnemonicdevice. Mnemonic is the other side the coin he seems to be the complete opposite of Honig he has made little to none scum hunting effort and just shrugs everything off with out having any defense that make sense the tone of them through sound like he doesn't care about being lynched. This is the only thing people can say about him being town is the way he defends himself by his tone alone. To me there's many reasons why someone would care about being lynched. It could they are town, they are bored of the game and don't care or they are really good at faking they don't care.
So Who's more likely to make a scumslip in day 2.
Someone who posts actively gives allot of reads and content and gets overly defensive.
or
Some who's posts little, who's reasons are blaggh and doesn't give a decent defense and the only reason people think his town is because of the way he doesn't care.......................................
That's why i see Mnemonic as the better lynch.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@JKLM That's a bit strange being on a wagon then unvoting it when it slows down a little and then saying it was scum driven. I also don't really understand why a wagon slowing down would be scummy through. Doesn't that happen when you reach L-2 to stop people from hammering. Also can you list reasons why MD would be town from his posts alone.
Also are you suggesting a policy lynch for anti town behavior on Peacebringer 10 pages into the game.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@jklm
Finally someone challenges me, people have been afraid to challenge me all game and I was wondering when someone would. *cracks neck*. It's a good post because he actually he has listed his points instead of listing no points at all. I never said I agreed with all his points that's why I didn't unvote him. If we encourage players to list their reasons we can get better reads out of them. This encourages more 1on1s where scum have the hardest time coping.
Please list all of Mnemonic points as well he points out not just one. You make it sound like that was the only thing in his case as well. You can see just by looking at his he does raise one or two good points like his 1 and 4 even through the rest are meh. Even through I still think Skelda is town. I really wanted to see a good back and forth between mnemonic and skelda.
Also If you want to talk about buddying what about you and aquarium. His latched on to your last few votes pretty much copying you with out reason and not once have you ever thought to questioned him. Actually in post 123 it seems like you are coaching him. Saying it's a bad idea to go down this line subtlely
We could also get down on how you want a policy lynch halfway through the day wouldn't that be a waste of day town would get no info for it. You also seem the day to end fast calling anyone scum on a wagon that has stopped. Also didn't you say this.
Then whats the point of policy lynch on someone who doesn't speak much if you think that way? I have been starting to doubt you JKLM ever since you brought up the peace policy lynch.In post 149, JKLM wrote:You realize that since you've admitted the fact that you admitted your vote was pointless he won't really feel pressure from your vote?-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 273, Broken Aquarium wrote:
i was sheeping JKLMIn post 270, mnemonicdevice wrote:You didn't answer why you switched so quickly.
VOTE: Broken Aquarium-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Tbh I don't like either JKLM current plays or Brokens blatant scummy sheeping. But as I said before with the honig and MD debate (even through I think honig is town) High content players are more likely to slip day 2 compared to low content players and to me both look scummy at the moment. JKLM (High content) VS Broken (Low content).-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@Broken Aquarium
Well posts 211 appear genuine it list things I agree with and just gives me the impression of town. He hasn't really cracked under the pressure. Sure he may be a bit emotional at time but to me it seems like agitated town more than anything. Also I don't see the scum points made against him.
@Skelda Look at Broken Aquarium. His sheeped more than once and do you think the way his votes bouncing between the two people who's voted him. Also the way his been acting in the last couple of posts is this the way town acts under pressure.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
@Broken Aquarium
Sheeping town reads with out explaining why you agree is pretty bad also you offered nothing new to the argument. You may argue the point about omgusing is a null sign which it can be. But when you act really emotional with out listing points then quickly remove it and say your a town read again in just a couple of post. That is when it turns scummy as hell when it becomes scummy. Also the fact JKLM says the mnemonic wagon looks scummy then you magically sheep him onto his next vote. Using Wifom scenario's aren't the best for defenses as well.
Also if I was your leading scum read why did you wait for someone else to vote me. Were you that afraid that it might backfire on you if you were town you wouldn't really have anything to lose by scumhunting. This seems more like a scum motivated reason than a town one. You made no indication prior either that you viewed me as scum.In post 292, Broken Aquarium wrote:I should note here that Garmr was our leading scum read once we got a little colder on the idea of Mnemonic scum. But no one else was voting for him and we didn't have the drive to make a wagon happen. This is another reason why switching with you was easy.
I like how you showed post 211 of Honig saying that's why you think his town. Just like when you asked me why I think Honig is town and I sent a link to that post. Oh wait that's a coincidence isn't it. Also doesn't it worry you at all that you just sheeped a reason off your top scum read.
Also you think I'm scum. where are your points you have failed to make a case against me. You haven't even mentioned a reason why you think I'm scum I guess you'll sheep those reason off JKLM.
Also you pretty much been fluffing all game. It took you till 292 to make a attempt scum hunting because you are under the microscope. Even then you offer no original reasons. Your defenses are paper thin as well you can poke a hole in all of them.
Also with now you want to answer alienbro's question. This looks like some cheap attempt to get the heat off you, It's kinda pathetic you know. There's no where to run now Broken Aquarium I'm not letting you wriggle out of this.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Broken Aquarium asking a question like "what's interesting" isn't what I call scum hunting. Then you post this.
I'm surprised JKLM didn't pick your post apart since he finds the language argument as a good scum indicator. Also your white knighting reason was sheeped from him. The only thing reason that was your's was the "interesting his at lynch one" which is pretty much the only point that you make that is yours in the whole game. Everything else is sheeped or questions that aren't followed up upon.In post 111, Broken Aquarium wrote:guys, that combined with this
^ most townies react like... "why didn't you call out L-1 with your vote???" here, it seems like he's not that concerned.In post 80, mnemonicdevice wrote:Interesting. Someone is already at L-1.
and these posts where he's sticking up for others (really looks like whiteknighting):In post 30, mnemonicdevice wrote:Ugh... If it was anyone else I would vote this^ for it's annoyingness in RVS, but I know that that is just how he playsIn post 59, mnemonicdevice wrote:Nice. So 3 votes on me for no reason. and 4 votes on peacebringer. Also because of his playstyle.
I also like how Skelda just randomly jumps on the peacebringer wagon. RVS much?
From post 133 to 281 I see no signs of scum hunting either how come you stopped for so long.
How come you don't defend yourself against all my accusation. You defend yourself against one then don't reply to the whole post. If it's twisted and delusional then why don't debate every point it should be easy to shut them down if your right.
Well folks we have obvious scum
edwop just got like ninjaed by 5 posts haven't read them yet.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
So your defense is I don't have to defend against people who I think are scum. That's fucking stupid are you listening to yourself. By defending yourself against my posts you also can have the chance to pick apart my posts and ask me questions. You can then convenience others to join your cause there's plenty of reasons to defend yourself. One on One are great way to get information out of people.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
In post 323, Broken Aquarium wrote:i disagree. there is something to be said for votes without reasoning, sometimes.
i remember nacho saying that to me before. and a few of the last few games, i've kinda been on a kick, where i realize that scum are the ones who want to over explain their votes. like, they have to overly justify it... to make sure it's rock solid.
did you see my post to HERMY? i explained why i voted him (JKLM). he votes you in 262, and then in 272 does a total 180. it was odd.
if you are town playing right now, you are focusing way too hard on this sheeping thing.
alright. your post that you liked mneumonic's post on Skelda. is that enough to make mneumonic town for you?
@BA
Your focusing on the sheeping I have brought other points as well like how you got over emotional on the JKLM vote, the fact you didn't debunk any of my claims or the fact. Look at all my games I always explain myself extensively because I believe the more information you give out the easier you are to read. This is my play style through and you can feel free to look at my past games if you want. In my eyes my player style makes it harder for scum to hide and it seems to work for me. Also mnemonics still a bit iffy just you seem more scummy to me.
@ArcAngel9
Arch I want a forced replace for Peacebringer please
1.for playing against win conditions doesn't matter if his town or scum his still playing against them.
2.Do not bring outside influences into the game-Grudge He brought a grudge from a previous game into this and you can see from his style of posting here our the examples
Voting the other guy to spite me doesn't actually bring up a reason why he thinks honigs scum.
I was asking him why would he play antitown on purpose and what he gets out of it and he responded with a insult like this. I have shrugged it off to try and keep things friendly but his just got worse as the game progress'sIn post 51, PeaceBringer wrote:well garmr, you can take it and stick it up your backside
it is not schtick it is what I do and how I play... feel free to do what you are doing...
you cannot help it...
vote garmr
Here is the post where he admits to it.In post 324, PeaceBringer wrote:FYI- initial vote on Gamer was because of our "differences" the vote even on hoying or whatever the guys names is was going opposite just cause. However, the posts recently and "reasons" suggested recently make sense so there is actual reason beyond the fact I don't like him.
I believe his still doing it after this post as
Look he isn't even debating why the points are null the reason are null nor does he try. He even throws in because it's garmr it a scum thing. He has had one game with me and he doesn't even list why it's scummy if it's me.In post 327, PeaceBringer wrote:
bull puckey- sheeping is null... in fact all this stuff listed in null and just bad blah blah blah... and seeing how it is garmr, yup, scummy statement.In post 322, Garmr wrote:Broken we have been over this a thousand times. Sheeping with out clarifying why you agree is bad. Your defensive reaction after JKLM voted you was bad and you ignoring arguments as defense is bad. If your town your playing it in a very anti town way.
Peacebringer is not playing to win, his playing to spite me. If someone was about to be lynched and I said he had the slightest hint Peace would hammer that wagon. This should not be allowed in mafia. I'm sorry to bring this up Arcangel9 But anti town behavior like this I can't tolerate.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
Sorry for that outburst and thanks broken.
Rereading that all it seems like broken made some sense.
So
UNVOTE: BA
Also my thoughts remain the same mnemonicdevice
VOTE: mnemonicdevice
I do give him props through for listing points and upping his game a bit. But his cases still aren't the best. He also seems to be falling back into his no reasons low content habit as soon as the attention on him was lifted.
Also this put's him at L-1 If anyone wants to hammer please declare it.-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread
-
-
Garmr Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10482
- Joined: August 22, 2013
- Location: The Ban Thread