Mini 1500:Narnia- The Lion,the Witch,and the Wardrobe Mafia

smargaret · Post Post #700 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 2:44 am

VOTE: RachMarie

Let's make this happen today.

PeaceBringer · Post Post #701 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 2:49 am

vote Rach Marie

then re-evaluate...
Matt- you had right call on Hermy...
JKLM is 2nd suspect Imo...
behind him killer jester

Garmr · Post Post #702 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 7:45 am

I personally read Rachmarie as Null on the alignment chart. But still that's because she hasn't really contributed anything to the thread. I'm happy to lynch her today but I would prefer to hit scummier read.

@Peace I can understand Jklm read and rach to, but what about killer jester. I think this is the first time you mentioned him?

@Jklm The BA push early day 2 looked suspicious but this caught my attention as i just glanced over isoing him now.

In post 625, JKLM wrote:VOTE: RachMarie

So he's a sub right?

He spends his first real post distancing from the mislynch. This could be a real good scum move, it's sets up himself for easy mislynch target day 2. It could be genuine, but an odd thing happens: very few posts as of lately. Day 2 has been around for a whole, where is he?

He's making a classic "I'm gonna check on ISOs and stuff later" (with no results) I would say he's prob trying to flaky by

I realize these are kind if weak

BUT
If he really is scum it will probably be VERY IMPORTANT in giving us
information to go off of. If he is sum, than BA is certainly not scum a all. At. All. Which I'm willing to say I COULD be wrong.

All in all:
this will be the most informational lynch.

Ok you admit your arguments on rach are weak so I'm not going to press to hard on that which I could. But what really raises my curiosity to no ends, is the bolded bit. Tell me, how does a rachmarie lynch prove BA wasn't scum if she had been lynched day 2 and flipped scum or vice versa. We now know BA was town when he was alive but can you give us a reason so we can understand your previous line of thought. Also how is voting a lurker a informational lynch. Getting rid of lurkers because they lurk is only acceptable if there is no obvious scum.

A.

In post 675, JKLM wrote:Crap idont feel good about a hermy lynch, I think
he
may be town

B.

In post 678, JKLM wrote:Killer I feel that isn't really safe logic, I always find that scum try to control lynches like how you are. It's possible they could both be scum, they could both be town.

Now examples A and B are near the end of day 2. Matt pretty much claimed cop and your saying don't trust him he could be busting a buddy.
Do you still doubt Matt?
What compelled you to believe Hermy was town?
Bonus question:What made you think Hermy was a man?

mozamis · Post Post #703 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 7:54 am

Quick post pre-ciggy. Still keen on voting for JKLM. We need to be slight;y careful though as its only 5 to lynch. Rach I could go for I guess, although we need her to post more.
@Peace - why is JK your 2nd suspect?

killerjester · Post Post #704 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 8:13 am

yo matt what's the latest

mozamis · Post Post #705 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:11 am

Ok, well I'm gonna go with what I said at the end of yesterday and

VOTE JKLM

He said he wanted MD lynched. Didn't vote for him. Said he wanted Hermy lynched. Didn't vote for her. Appearing to scum hunt, without actually doing so.

JKLM · Post Post #706 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 1:11 pm

VOTE: Mozamis

Yeah thanks for revealing you scummyness. Misrep is not a good thing. Tsk tsk.

PeaceBringer · Post Post #707 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 2:14 pm

In post 703, mozamis wrote:Quick post pre-ciggy. Still keen on voting for JKLM. We need to be slight;y careful though as its only 5 to lynch. Rach I could go for I guess, although we need her to post more.
@Peace - why is JK your 2nd suspect?

Because I am fairly certain Rach Marie is scum. Same as why I woulda had Hermy as #2 yesterday. Rach is my # 1 suspect, period. There is nothing that has altered that. JK looks awfully scummy. killer jester is beginning to know as well.

PeaceBringer · Post Post #708 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 2:15 pm

In post 702, Garmr wrote:@Peace I can understand Jklm read and rach to, but what about killer jester. I think this is the first time you mentioned him?

yes. as been null, now lean BGish...

RachMarie · Post Post #709 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 5:18 pm

Umm peeps I am working on catching up I was V/LA til yesterday

projectmatt · Post Post #710 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 6:09 pm

stuff tomorrow (or later today depending on your timezone)

killerjester · Post Post #711 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 8:45 pm

Or now. That's good for me.

mozamis · Post Post #712 (ISO) » Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:12 pm

In post 710, projectmatt wrote:stuff tomorrow (or later today depending on your timezone)

Yeah, any investigation results?
@ JK -thanks for the OMGUS lol. In what do you feel I misrepped you? You said you wanted to lynch MD, weren't on the wagon. Likwise with Hermy.

smargaret · Post Post #713 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2013 11:06 am

RachMarie, you joined the game on October 9. You went v/la on October 21. Today is October 25. The ONLY content you have provided is about mnemonic's claim.

Night 1 happened prior to your v/la. While I understand you've been having issues, the issues can only explain so much - you haven't even voted yet! Add to that the fact that Honig was scummy as heck, and barring results from Matt, you need to go today.

Garmr · Post Post #714 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2013 12:25 pm

Again what's with people ignoring my questions.

VOTE: jklm bad jklm ignore my questions then omgus moz.

@Better cough up some content quick rach.

Garmr · Post Post #715 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2013 2:45 pm

ebwop - dads laptop is meh and ran out of batteries. Back home now through so I can type the whole message.

@Rachmarie better cough up some content rach. You've had plenty of time to gather some Intel. The only reason I have you as null since you been vla but your first post day does not inspire confidence. You could of took a litte extra time to give us some thoughts Reads,votes,events ect in your first post but instead we got "a but guys I was on vla excuse."

JKLM · Post Post #716 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2013 7:06 pm

I swore I responded to that.

Stupid drafts,

I'll do te whole thing again but it'll e shorter I guess...

JKLM · Post Post #717 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2013 7:18 pm

Oh see I missed the claim I guess, I was more concerned that I missed hammer on a guy I thought was town.

Idk why having an open mind about people's alignments is such a scummy thing, a close minded town is just as dangerous as a waffley town/scum.
I wasn't sure if he was scum as much as I though BA. Dot make t look like I pushed for mD without voting, I had fricking already addressed that. BA WAS SCUMMIER TO ME. THAT WAS WHERE MY VOTE WAS. If you could stop misrepping me that's e nice thanks.

I like how I distance myself from the hermy lycnh AFTER it happened, and that labels me as scum. It makes no senses because it was AFTER the hammer, it would have been so easy to say "crap I should have voted him myself" if I KNEW HE WAS THE GODFATHER BEING SCUM. Jiminey cricket, i don't see how you could all miss that.

And here's more good for thought:

BA WAS KILLED.
I know that talking about night actions is taboo but that's shit because scum can just do whatever and hide behind in front of WIFOM.
But if I was scum, WHY WOULD I KILL BA IF HE WAS THE ONE I WAS TUNNELIG AS SCUM?

This is terrible logic. He was plenty scummy on his own and very nearly got himself lynched before hand. WHY THE HELL WOULD I KILL HIM IF I WAS SCUM?

USE YOUR HEAD PEOPLE. PLEASE. We just got a scum down, so let's please go on and get anoter.

If I was scum as well I would HAVE VOTED RACHMARIE WHO I WAS ALREADY VOTING YESTERDAY. God. I swear you Guys make no sense anymore.

On that subject, all of my reads focused on the fact that BA was scum. When he flipped, everything I had was scratched, so I have to start over. IM SORRY THAT TRYING TO PROPERLY HAVE ACCURATE READS ON PEOPLE IS SUCH A SCUM THING FEEZ GUYS

blehhhhhhhh

Garmr · Post Post #718 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2013 9:45 pm

@JKLM
Oh my fudge how hard is it to answer a simple question? How was a rachmarie lynch connected to BA alignment anyway. What post show this or reason that came into your head???????????????

mozamis · Post Post #719 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2013 11:52 pm

UNVOTE

I'm unsure about JK. He might be scum, and I might re-vote him, but WE MUST NOT LYNCH ANYONE UNTIL MATT GIVES US HIS INVESTIGATION RESULTS.

Garmr · Post Post #720 (ISO) » Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:13 am

Well there's 2 votes on rachmarie as well moz. What do you think of that wagon.

mozamis · Post Post #721 (ISO) » Sun Oct 27, 2013 1:39 am

yeah maybe I'm being overcautious, it's 5 for a lynch I guess. Just want to hold off until Matt gets back to us.
My problem with the Rach wagon is I didn't find Honig that scummy, so lynching Rach amounts to lynching a lurker. I never mind that, since scum often do lurk. But, yeah I'm on the fence atm. To be clear, if the day was ending now I would vote for either Jk or Rach. But since it isn't, I'm gonna wait and see.

PeaceBringer · Post Post #722 (ISO) » Sun Oct 27, 2013 2:12 am

In post 721, mozamis wrote:yeah maybe I'm being overcautious, it's 5 for a lynch I guess. Just want to hold off until Matt gets back to us.
My problem with the Rach wagon is I didn't find Honig that scummy, so lynching Rach amounts to lynching a lurker. I never mind that, since scum often do lurk. But, yeah I'm on the fence atm. To be clear, if the day was ending now I would vote for either Jk or Rach. But since it isn't, I'm gonna wait and see.

Moz, face it, you haven't had the best reads, as you do not trust me, even though I currently trust you. The reason for Rach has really nothing to do with lurking. It has to do with the death of the one person that can read Rach well when they post. Just because you do not find someone sucmmy, does not mean they are not and vice versa vis a vie your suspiscion of me.

JKLM · Post Post #723 (ISO) » Sun Oct 27, 2013 5:29 am

In post 625, JKLM wrote:VOTE: RachMarie

So he's a sub right?

He spends his first real post distancing from the mislynch. This could be a real good scum move, it's sets up himself for easy mislynch target day 2. It could be genuine, but an odd thing happens: very few posts as of lately. Day 2 has been around for a whole, where is he?

He's making a classic "I'm gonna check on ISOs and stuff later" (with no results) I would say he's prob trying to flaky by

I realize these are kind if weak

BUT
If he really is scum it will probably be VERY IMPORTANT in giving us information to go off of. If he is sum, than BA is certainly not scum a all. At. All. Which I'm willing to say I COULD be wrong.

All in all: this will be the most informational lynch.

Garmr · Post Post #724 (ISO) » Sun Oct 27, 2013 9:59 am

JKLM you don't get it

In post 723, JKLM wrote:
In post 625, JKLM wrote:VOTE: RachMarie

So he's a sub right?

He spends his first real post distancing from the mislynch. This could be a real good scum move, it's sets up himself for easy mislynch target day 2. It could be genuine, but an odd thing happens: very few posts as of lately. Day 2 has been around for a whole, where is he?

He's making a classic "I'm gonna check on ISOs and stuff later" (with no results) I would say he's prob trying to flaky by

I realize these are kind if weak

BUT
I
f he really is scum it will probably be VERY IMPORTANT in giving us information to go off of. If he is sum, than BA is certainly not scum a all. At. All. Which I'm willing to say I COULD be wrong.

All in all: this will be the most informational lynch.

I want this bit explained because the top explanation doesn't really link Rach to Ba at all.