1. >implying you know a goddamn thing about my scum meta
2-5. Really bad opinions
6. Time was not running out (7 days remained at the time of Hermy's statement) and BA was not in danger of being lynched.
7. The context is different. In mine, my top scumread dies
first
, and Hermy dies next. In MD's context JK (later correct to KJ) dies next. So then who dies
first
? Presumably himself. So then the question came to me, why would town ever agree to be lynched first? They know themselves to be town. It's like as bad as self-hammering as town.
8. Can you explain how this even remotely relates to a point I've made against Hermy.
Lord of Lynch protect us. For the Night is dark and full of scum.
Noir Mafia, a 13p bastard Mini Theme delayed until further notice.
Whatever. Don't care enough if you guys aren't gonna sheep the obvious one in the first place without me confirming it to you. I have role related information that Hermy is mafia. Now lynch her.
And that is as far as I will delve into a claim - absolutely no more information is being revealed other than that she is mafia and I have information to back that up.
I am having issues with my new hearing aids and my fiance NS took them into the office today, hopefully it is something they can fix right there and not have to send into the shop, I am using a cheap amplifier I got off of Amazon and it is better than nothing, but I still get pretty worn out without at least a proper hearing aid in my right ear. That is why I am listed V/LA
In post 652, projectmatt wrote:Whatever. Don't care enough if you guys aren't gonna sheep the obvious one in the first place without me confirming it to you. I have role related information that Hermy is mafia. Now lynch her.
You could work on your psychology/people skills...You must know that you're approach this whole day has been "Lynch Hemry, cos I say so". You expected everyone just to follow without questioning?
You've reached that age, Listy. 24, 25...Your muscles give up, they wave a little white flag of surrender and without any warning at all, you're suddenly a fat bastard...
Anyway, although I don't agree with his approach, what Matt says makes sense. I looked at Mini 1489 yesterday, where he was town. He is completely different there - much more confused, much bigger contributions, more analysis and general scum hunting. So I was gearing up to vote for him.
However, town PR's often play very different to their "normal" selves. And he is certainly playing with sufficient ego for him to be a PR.
Obviously, if is a bizarre scum gambit, we lynch him tomorrow.
VOTE HERMY
You've reached that age, Listy. 24, 25...Your muscles give up, they wave a little white flag of surrender and without any warning at all, you're suddenly a fat bastard...
Well, I'm playing with a big ego on this day because this person is confirmed to me. Likewise, if I can get the mafia lynched without having to out my role and potentially get nightkilled - that is a victory for all of us, is it not? My town game is friendly but a certain amount of assertiveness is required in order for me to confidently get a person lynched, which is my goal. With that being said, it's pretty retarded to think I would lie about that kind of claim.
I suspected Hermy yesterday and pushed for her lynch. However, I explained my logic properly back then because it was not confirmed to me that the player was actually mafia and I wanted to have my rationale perfectly known to everybody in the game. Now that I know for certain that Hermy is mafia, it seems counter-productive to provide a rational case on why she is mafia as it should be plain to see. This is why I am resorting to pushing confidently and with rudeness because it is the play required to get Hermy lynched without actually outing what I am but since that fell through things are different.
In post 604, Skelda wrote:nd those Hermy votes came in way too fast. I'm fine with a Hermy lynch, but seriously no one was for lynching Hermy yesterday and the fact that people are just leaping on it today seems strange. I also find it strange that BA unvoted as soon as Gramr did, but once again, a discussion for when BA can talk.
So you were ok with a hermy lynch, but wanted a bit more time and discussion.
So we haven't much more time or discussion, I'll grant you that, but we have had some game changing info.
My point being: why woud you NOT vote for hermy, when ProjectMatt has confirmed your suspicions?
You've reached that age, Listy. 24, 25...Your muscles give up, they wave a little white flag of surrender and without any warning at all, you're suddenly a fat bastard...
@ Matt - yeah, I believe you, hence I'm voting Hermy. Bizarre gambits do happen though, so it had to be said.
You've reached that age, Listy. 24, 25...Your muscles give up, they wave a little white flag of surrender and without any warning at all, you're suddenly a fat bastard...
In post 663, smargaret wrote:And yeah, that would be why I sheeped. Obvious role-related information was obvious.
Oh really
In post 601, smargaret wrote:moz - because I connected the dots. Also, Hermy didn't do hardly anything yesterday, and that deserves some pressure.
I'm happy with a RachMarie wagon, though.
That was the reason you gave before. It didn't look like you were sheeping matt at all or had a clue.
Skelda looks to be protecting his partner that's really suspicious. I had a town read on you before but the way you acted when he was calling hermy scum. The fact you had a slight scum read on her yet you kinda chainsaw for her in post638.
Rachmarie is still null and the reason she isn't posting is because her hearing aid broke and has been causing her allot of discomfort. I wouldn't put her high on the priority list.
I knew a claim was coming after post 623 or else i was adding matt to my vi's list
I would like to say this turn of events KJ is likely town. I hate being wrong but when I am I admit it.
In post 604, Skelda wrote:nd those Hermy votes came in way too fast. I'm fine with a Hermy lynch, but seriously no one was for lynching Hermy yesterday and the fact that people are just leaping on it today seems strange. I also find it strange that BA unvoted as soon as Gramr did, but once again, a discussion for when BA can talk.
So you were ok with a hermy lynch, but wanted a bit more time and discussion.
So we haven't much more time or discussion, I'll grant you that, but we have had some game changing info.
My point being: why woud you NOT vote for hermy, when ProjectMatt has confirmed your suspicions?
I'm not against a Hermy lynch, I really just want projectmatt to give a more complete list of reasons before I jump on board. Which he hasn't. Nor has he attempted to. And sorry, I feel as though I've missed something, what game-changing info?
In post 659, projectmatt wrote:I suspected Hermy yesterday and pushed for her lynch. However, I explained my logic properly back then because it was not confirmed to me that the player was actually mafia and I wanted to have my rationale perfectly known to everybody in the game. Now that I know for certain that Hermy is mafia, it seems counter-productive to provide a rational case on why she is mafia as it should be plain to see. This is why I am resorting to pushing confidently and with rudeness because it is the play required to get Hermy lynched without actually outing what I am but since that fell through things are different.
Oh, did you claim Cop? Sorry, must have skipped that post. I believe you. What is Hermy at? Cause if she's at L-1, I don't want to hammer until we are ready.