Animal Crossing Mafia: Game over
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Aieee... I want one so badly nowac1983fan wrote:
yes, really.Lowell wrote:
Haha. Really?ac1983fan wrote:i still think we should hurry up and give the bells to someone... so we can actually staart discussion... as a side note, i bought an orange box, and id suggest that no one buy it.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Give 1 Bell to Lowell
Unvote, Vote AC1983fan
A confirmed innocent will get killed tonight if that person is named - which means it can't be used later to help us narrow down scum. The gap in logic that would cause you to think that decision would benefit town shows so many errors of judgement that there is no way you could be town.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
While Lowell was dumb for coming out so early, without a counter-claim, you pretty much have to assume he's town. Simply because any real cop could counter-claim and then get protection every night - seeing no claims yet - I'm about 85% sure he's legit.Cloud wrote:
I highly doubt a net is going to provide any protection. I don't see it being used much in self-defense these days.Lowell wrote:Also, I'd still kindly request someone who believes me to give me one more bell. Should our doc turn out to fall for the ac/IH plan of "I don't trust the claim!" I could be dead tomorrow and you'll all be sorry. I'd like to find out if the net can offer any protection.
--
Lowell not giving us his innocent now isn't going to do any harm. If he were to give out his innocent, the mafia would have someone to target. When it comes down to outing mafia, a list of living innocents is going to be more useful then a bunch of dead innocents.
All the more reason if Lowell is lying, as we won't be fooled by his false innocent. Unless, of course, we decide to lynch Lowell's innocent in order to prove the validity of Lowell's claim. However, we should be more concerned with lynching mafia then deliberating the authenticity of Lowell's cop claim.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
IH it's rather simple, your scenario doesn't make sense. It would be tragic for the cop to not come forward at this point if Lowell was fake claiming. Since no one has counter-claimed, its rather safe to assume Lowell is the cop (albiet not necessarily an intellegent one). At this point, assuming no counter claim, all the discussion of discrediting Lowell right now is just distraction and not beneficial for town.
Questioning his claim at first, good town skepticism. At this point? Scummy behavior trying to lynch an unclaimed power role.
Believing in Lowell, if he's fake claimed, is really bad - and any intellegent townie cop would have counterclaimed already in order to stop Lowell from getting bells. At this point its pretty obvious scum weren't ballsy enough to risk one of their guys to have a chance at getting the Cop lynched, and Lowell is pretty confirmed.
You're pretty confirmed too, since you're trying to use craplogic to pit the town against the cop.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
You're kind of frustrating But in order to understand this:ac1983fan wrote:why would he get nightkilled? the innocent doesn't have to claim, so the mafia wouldn't know if he were a powerrole or not! what is the motivation behind killing them? ughh...
Confirmed innocents are very important to town, when properly revealed near the end of the game they can be used to drastically narrow down whocan'tbe mafia.
A cop can be used to both find mafia and confirm innocents. When the cop claims this early however, the doctor can't save any of the confirmed innocents. This means that if the mafia kill off every confirmed innocent every night then we are greatly reducing our numerical, informational, advantage.
Lets look at the different scenarios:
12 person game - cop claims day 1, there is a doc, 3 mafia who are good at avoiding lynches -cop names all of his townies he finds each day - townies are A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,and I, mafia are J,K, and L
Day 1 - cop verifies 'A', to be town. Town lynches 'B'
Night 1 - mafia lynches A
Day 2 - cop verifies 'C' to be town. Town lynches 'D'
Night 2 mafia lynches 'C'
Day 3 - Lynch or lose - and no one is close to knowing who the mafia are only 50/50 chance at hitting a mafia member through a lynch.
12 person game - cop claims day 1, there is a doc, 3 mafia who are good at avoiding lynches -cop doesn't name confirmed townies- townies are A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,and I, mafia are J,K, and L
Day 1 - cop knows I is town, Town lynches A
Night 1 - Mafia lynches B
Day 2 - cop knows H is town, Town lynches C
Night 2 - Mafia lynches D
Day 3 - Lynch or losebut, today Cop says "I and H are clear, I'm G" leaving only 4 people "unconfirmed" 3 of which are mafia. This means a 75% chance at hitting a mafia member through a lynch.
Additionally, confirmed townies are a larger liability to mafia (even if they are vanilla) because they tell the truth, and town can trust them. Even if they didn't claim, if one of them HAS an ability and they reveal information it will be 100% trusted giving the town an edge, why would mafia allow such a useful and powerful person to stay alive?I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
You're advocating the lynching of a townie, to prove the pretty proved cop? I can sort of see a point regarding the sanity- but that will likely work itself out when someone is killed that Lowel has investigated.IH wrote:No, it either confirms Lowells sanity, or else if the person is something neutral, we know Lowell is lying.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Lowell, I'm pretty sure you're the cop. I think you had a really dumb idea, which no one liked, and felt you needed to defend yourself. Day one it doesn't take much to incite a lynch.Lowell wrote: Can we just agree thatI'm by no means "confirmed" but the doc should protect me tonight? How's that?
The truth is, a real cop should have counterclaimed. Although we'd be in the same situation as your dumb premature claim, we'd be down one mafia. Since no one has come forward, I think you're pretty confirmed as town.
I think the doc should protect you (or not WIFOM is good in this case), but I think you've still put the doc in an awkward situation. And we better hope to hell that mafia doesn't have a trackerI'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
For all your completely unnecessary noise, I DID NOT say he was cleared - all I said was that I was pretty sure he was the cop. And why are you trying to keep perpetuating this rediculous idea that there are two cops?StallingChamp wrote:
Again, stop being dumb. I think a cop countering now would have been not too bright. Either we lose a cop to get a mafia, or 2 cops are outed Day 1...Since people still are not getting it, I'll make it clear:Yamahako wrote:
Lowell, I'm pretty sure you're the cop. I think you had a really dumb idea, which no one liked, and felt you needed to defend yourself. Day one it doesn't take much to incite a lynch.Lowell wrote: Can we just agree thatI'm by no means "confirmed" but the doc should protect me tonight? How's that?
The truth is, a real cop should have counterclaimed. Although we'd be in the same situation as your dumb premature claim, we'd be down one mafia. Since no one has come forward, I think you're pretty confirmed as town.
I think the doc should protect you (or not WIFOM is good in this case), but I think you've still put the doc in an awkward situation. And we better hope to hell that mafia doesn't have a tracker
LOWELL IS NOT CLEARED AT ALL. TREAT HIM LIKE ANYONE ELSE.IGMEOY. And if you're trying to say something sneaky and feel like its really important, I would recommend not being so stupidly obvious about it.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Yeah, unless there's serious interest in lynching lowell, or if more scum want to come on board with the "let's hear the list of innocents you've gotten" I think we can pretty much drop the subject. It's been very helpful to see where people lie on certain matters, but its not really helpful right now.Kison wrote:
I see it more as an attempt to move on for now. The past few pages have been repeated arguments.IH wrote:Seriously, he has repeatedly said "We should just leave Lowell alone, he's almost assuredly the cop, cause there is no counterclaim!" That's pretty much treating someone as cleared.
But IH, your OMGUS vote is noted.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
All you stated was that you think that I consider Lowell cleared, when I've stated all I am is pretty sure he's the cop. That's your *reason* for voting me? Even if I did think lowell was 100% cleared, you feel that would be basis for a vote? Just trying to clarify...IH wrote:
Do you ever read the entirety of what I write? I have stated why I have voted you, and it was most definitelyYamahako wrote:But IH, your OMGUS vote is noted.notan omgus. You're attempt to unsubstantiate it with bad reasoning has been noted.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
I agree with everything you're saying. These are all excellent reasons why a mafia member would be remiss to claim cop. Which is why I find it less likely that lowell isn't the cop.IH wrote:WROWNG WROWNG WROWNG!
No the whole point was to validate it down the road. If he actually IS the cop, then it's an added bonus that we know his sanity.
The cop can reveal innocent or scum
the scumcannot in certainty do this. All of the possiblities I'm about to list are possible.
1.A cult-A cult is where someone calls a cult leader brings in a town into his scum group everynight. They cannot kill.
2.A second scum group-Sometimes there are more than one group of mafia. If there is a second group of mafia, they will not work with his mafia, so he now has a problem revealing his investigation results until they have become confirmed.
3.An Sk (or two)-An Sk, or serial killer, is a killer who works alone, thats not in the group. He wins when EVERYONE but him is dead.
4.a miller-If he reveals someone as innocent, and that person comes up as a miller, then that cop is lying, as a town miller shows up guilty on investigations.
Any one of these could be avoided if he waits to claim results, in which people will become more and more confirmed. The only people that he can out safely and without a problem as a cop is his own team, and I doubt he wants to do that to much, because he will eventually be counterclaimed, and he will cripple his own team.
I still don't see a reason to give the MAFIA free innocents to kill that have nearly zero repercussions with regards to what they've said in the game. If someone dies, you can read through the game pretending you're mafia and try to see who would have wanted that person to die - maybe someone tried a mini-wagon on that person, maybe there was some subtle tension, whatever it was that made the mafia want to choose that kill. If Lowell announces his innocent that person will die. And there will be NOTHING we can glean from that night kill. You're basically cutting the amount of SOLID information we can use to nail scum in HALF.
IF you give a crap about my opinion - we need to hear a guilty from Lowell to test him. THEN we can work with his list. Until then we are endangering townies. Also, until he gets a guilty, we don't have to hear from his list and can just treat him like a townie since innocents will only be helpful if we are trying to lynch one.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
I wrote:IF you give a crap about my opinion - we need to hear a guilty from Lowell to test him. THEN we can work with his list. Until then we are endangering townies. Also, until he gets a guilty, we don't have to hear from his list and can just treat him like a townie since innocents will only be helpful if we are trying to lynch one.
Looks like we are on the same page... wait a minute...Cloud wrote: So what I propose with Lowell - Ignore him until he gets a guilty.
Buh what?!Cloud wrote:Moving on,Vote: Yamahako
Opinions are just that, opinions. They aren't anything substantial, and there's no way someone should vote based on early opinions. Suggesting we should vote off our supposed cop is no way to go about making a successful lynch.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
What?! I think you need to re-read I've NEVER said I was in favor of lynching the cop. I said that if you thought Lowell was lying then you should vote him - because he's either scum or the cop.Cloud wrote:We might agree, but that doesn't change the fact that you thought it was alright to vote off our claimed cop. Not to mention you voted IH for the sake of following the bandwagon and without providing any reason.
I made it pretty clear that I was voting IH because he was trying to out an innocent. But I guess you would have missed that... seeing as how you're not bothering to read very well.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
I first started throwing suspicion toward IH in post 168, but I was voting AC1983fan because he was supporting IH's idea.
I switched my vote from AC1983fan to IH in post 191 because AC1983fan insinutaed that he had an ability - I even said "sigh" because I hate it when town gives so many good people for scum to choose from. And as I had mentioned earlier in the thread, I was suspicious of IH.
Looks like there's 5 votes on me, and 10 or 11 to lynch? I still don't understand my wagon at all, but I think there's lots of people who aren't posting :-/I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
If Lowell is not the cop, then whyIH wrote:
First attempt to try and convince everyone that Lowell is confirmed from a lack of counterclaim.Yamahako wrote:While Lowell was dumb for coming out so early, without a counter-claim, you pretty much have to assume he's town. Simply because any real cop could counter-claim and then get protection every night - seeing no claims yet - I'm about 85% sure he's legit.
wouldn'tthe best case scenario be for the real cop to counter claim? We'd bag us a scum right off the bat and confirm the cop all in one swoop. Additionally, what good would it do for scum to try and claim cop preemptively at this point in the game? No one yet has given me a reason why it would make sense for Lowell tonotbe the cop under these circumstancesotherthan it was an absolutely horrific time to claim.
From my perspective, logically, it does. I'd like to think I'm pretty good at sorting out the causes for people's actions. So while I wouldn't personally have chosen to act the way Lowell did, I can't come up with a scenario that would lead Lowell as a scum to claim cop in the way that he did.IH wrote:
Second attempt by discrediting the person with the same exact argument used in the previous post. A lack of counterclaim on day 1 does not confirm someone.Yamahako wrote:IH it's rather simple, your scenario doesn't make sense. It would be tragic for the cop to not come forward at this point if Lowell was fake claiming. Since no one has counter-claimed, its rather safe to assume Lowell is the cop (albeit not necessarily an intelligent one). At this point, assuming no counter claim, all the discussion of discrediting Lowell right now is just distraction and not beneficial for town.
Questioning his claim at first, good town skepticism. At this point? Scummy behavior trying to lynch an unclaimed power role.
Believing in Lowell, if he's fake claimed, is really bad - and any intelligent townie cop would have counterclaimed already in order to stop Lowell from getting bells. At this point its pretty obvious scum weren't ballsy enough to risk one of their guys to have a chance at getting the Cop lynched, and Lowell is pretty confirmed.
You're pretty confirmed too, since you're trying to use craplogic to pit the town against the cop.
I gave the 2 worst case scenarios, obviously there could be a large number of variations to either of these plans. I have no idea how I got the number of people wrong, thanks for pointing it out. I think I saw "21" (it being a 21 person game, not 20) and did a bit of dyslexia there. Regardless, I still think I pretty clearly illustrated the benefit of keeping confirmed townies out of the view of the mafia. No one has show me yet why that is wrong. But here's the thing, in scenario one the cop is tested, but you still can't trust the cop - he could be mafia "finding" innocents. In scenario 2, at least, its far more likely to be a townie then a crazy mafia trying to with with a strange scenario. The only way to "test" a cop decisively is for the cop to get a guilty verdict.IH wrote:
Your scenario's are if the cop only hit's innocents. You don't go to lylo after three mislynches, you're not counting in any possible roles such as roleblockers, this is not a twelve person game. This is aYamahako wrote:~Snip Snip~
Lets look at the different scenarios:
12 person game - cop claims day 1, there is a doc, 3 mafia who are good at avoiding lynches -cop names all of his townies he finds each day - townies are A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,and I, mafia are J,K, and L
Day 1 - cop verifies 'A', to be town. Town lynches 'B'
Night 1 - mafia lynches A
Day 2 - cop verifies 'C' to be town. Town lynches 'D'
Night 2 mafia lynches 'C'
Day 3 - Lynch or lose - and no one is close to knowing who the mafia are only 50/50 chance at hitting a mafia member through a lynch.
12 person game - cop claims day 1, there is a doc, 3 mafia who are good at avoiding lynches -cop doesn't name confirmed townies- townies are A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,and I, mafia are J,K, and L
Day 1 - cop knows I is town, Town lynches A
Night 1 - Mafia lynches B
Day 2 - cop knows H is town, Town lynches C
Night 2 - Mafia lynches D
Day 3 - Lynch or lose but, today Cop says "I and H are clear, I'm G" leaving only 4 people "unconfirmed" 3 of which are mafia. This means a 75% chance at hitting a mafia member through a lynch.
Additionally, confirmed townies are a larger liability to mafia (even if they are vanilla) because they tell the truth, and town can trust them. Even if they didn't claim, if one of them HAS an ability and they reveal information it will be 100% trusted giving the town an edge, why would mafia allow such a useful and powerful person to stay alive?
20person game. Not only that, but you can't trust the cop at that point! You haven't tested him! You have no idea if he is actually scum just trying to get the town to mislynch!
Lynching was probably the wrong word to use, I apologize for the misrepresentation. I view the exposed townie as being someone to die.IH wrote:
Never did that.Yamahako wrote:You're advocating the lynching of a townie, to prove the pretty proved cop? I can sort of see a point regarding the sanity- but that will likely work itself out when someone is killed that Lowel has investigated.
I did simply forget my vote was on you already.IH wrote:her*hisnext post is unvoting, and then voting me.
His vote was already on me.
This is a scumtell of her*himtrying to show that IH is really suspicious, so I'm voting him at this time, even if my vote is already on him.
That's because I feel its dangerous to out townies from a cop I trust.IH wrote:
After all of this, he seems to have revised after all a little bit of arguing that Lowell MUST be the cop, but that he's pretty sure. Even after all of the counterclaim issues, it's still brought up.Yamahako wrote:Lowell, I'm pretty sure you're the cop. I think you had a really dumb idea, which no one liked, and felt you needed to defend yourself. Day one it doesn't take much to incite a lynch.
The truth is, a real cop should have counterclaimed. Although we'd be in the same situation as your dumb premature claim, we'd be down one mafia. Since no one has come forward, I think you're pretty confirmed as town.
I think the doc should protect you (or not WIFOM is good in this case), but I think you've still put the doc in an awkward situation. And we better hope to hell that mafia doesn't have a tracker
Perhaps a false dilemma, but its not a false point to bring up. He's either the cop orIH wrote:
If you say you're pretty sure he must be the cop, then you're pretty sure he's either cleared or a lying townie.Yamahakp wrote:For all your completely unnecessary noise, I DID NOT say he was cleared - all I said was that I was pretty sure he was the cop. And why are you trying to keep perpetuating this rediculous idea that there are two cops? IGMEOY. And if you're trying to say something sneaky and feel like its really important, I would recommend not being so stupidly obvious about it.
False dilemma. I have to be sure that he is the cop or that he is not at this very moment. My vote needs to follow as such.Yamahako wrote:Actually, if you don't think Lowell is the cop, then VOTE him. Because he's either the cop or scum - quit pussy-footing around it and put your vote where your opinions are.
scum(not a lying townie). I think its fairly obvious if he isn't the cop he should be lynched under lynch all liars. If you don't trust him, yes, there are alternatives to test him - but only a guilty verdict can do an adequate job of testing him. And in general a cop is trusted unless there's a counter claim. But I still can't see a scum scenario where they would premptively claim cop on day one. I also don't think anyone is trying to lynch lowell today so its a non-issue.
What you haven't explained is how if Lowell is the cop, him naming a townie does us any good vs. if he's scum. Giving the scum a baggage-less kill doesn't help us at all. Day 2, with 2 innocents (or luckily a guilty verdict) puts us in a better situation.
I hope I have explained enough on why I believe Lowell to be the cop. I understand that my trust of him makes you think I am scum. But I think you've gotten your wires crossed again, if I were scum I would want to be more skeptical of the cop and cast doubt on him. I would especially want to do that in this environment where a large portion of the players are casting doubt on him because it would let me blend in better. I'm not doing that, I'm voicing my opinion even in the dissension of the town trying to get my point across, and trying to keep potential innocents from being killed. I completely accept that I could be wrong about Lowell, however I don't feel that makes me mafia.IH wrote:Vote:Yamahako
I believe.... he knows to much. Allow me to explain. The only people who would want to be this sure of Lowell being a cop are people who would know his aligment. If he is town, then he's not going to lie, so he's probably the cop. If Yamahako is scum, then he's going to be PRETTY SURE of someones alignment (Barring the things I've mentioned Prior) So Lowell being the cop at this point would actually make me more suspicious of Yamahako.
I'll make my post about other things in the game in a moment here. If you have more questions I'll gladly answer them.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
bah hit submit too early:
This is one thing I've noted. First, not everyone can post that. At leastRand wrote:GreenLiquid wrote:BULLETIN BOARD
From Day 1
"IH is scum! - The PO"
Should we take this with a grain of salt or consider it? Since anyone can post this it's a risk.Icouldn't have posted it. Another is - if Lowell is the cop and got an innocent, then this is obviously a message from scum - which means IH is more likely innocent. However, if Lowell is scum, then perhaps the real cop can only give his results through the board? I don't know what to make of it all thought.
I don't like this though:
As IH said, the cop won't know if someone has a power role. Neither will scum know if an "innocent" has a power role. So this is some really bad logic, I might almost call it flapdoodle (but I'm not cool enough to).Regardless, there is absolutely no reason Lowell cant claim who is his confirmed innocent-UNLESS that innocent has a power role. Scum are unlikely to waste an NK on someone who is a confirmed vanilla townie, and if they do, all well and good, because we get another night with all our power roles!I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
It's always a WIFOM scenario with doc and mafia. But the doc should always protect the cop as far as everyone involved is concerned.Battle Mage wrote:how does your scenario benefit the town? It would be much better if the Doc DIDNT protect the cop, and the scum DIDNT attack the cop. However, because they are wary of this scenario, it is likely that the scum will target the Cop, and the Doc can protect. Its a vicious cycle, and i want everyone to be clear of the scenarios-ESPECIALLY the Doc.
The real issue is this: Is the far-off chance that the mafia is going to attack the person you think they are worth the risk of not protecting the cop which would be the most likely scenario?
There are 5 possible scenarios:
Doc protects Cop - Mafia targets Cop - best case scenario for us
Doc protects Cop - Mafia targets someone else - we lose someone who is probably less important than the cop, they could nab cult or sk too which wouldn't be bad
Doc protects someone else - Mafia targets cop - worst case scenario, we lose the cop
Doc protects someone else - Mafia targets same person - the chance of this happening goes up and mafia is worse and the doc is better, but its still not a good chance.
Doc protects someone else - mafia targets a different someone else - we still lose someone (unless cult or sk again..)
So is the incredibly small chance that the doc will save someone the mafia is trying to kill worth the chance of losing the doc? That's the WIFOM, isn't it?I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Obviously you wouldn't take either person at face value if there WAS a counter claim. But given the strangness of Lowell's claim I would be skeptical of him if anyone else had come forward.Kison wrote:
I have to say I immensely dislike this logic. A counter-claim could very well be scum trying to kamakazi to get rid of the cop. As you say it, any counter claim would denounce Lowell as 100% positively scum. That is horribly wrong.*Yamahako wrote:If Lowell is not the cop, then why wouldn't the best case scenario be for the real cop to counter claim? We'd bag us a scum right off the bat and confirm the cop all in one swoop.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
I think the bulletin board kinda clears you if lowell is the cop :-/ I thought I said that already...IH wrote:Speaking of the bulletin board...
I don't understand why Yamahako would bring up the board if he is "pretty sure" about Lowell being the cop. Only he would have known my alignment, and he has explicitly told us he has an innocent.
I feel happy with a yama lynch at the moment.
Part of my role involves putting things on the bulletin board as well, which is the only reason I'm curious about it... but I can only put one word at a time on it. That's as much as I'll say - but I'm town :-/I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
I wrote a word on the board last night. I don't know how helpful it is either :-/ I figured if I could only write one word, I'd write the biggest one I could think of.Jules wrote: Yamahako – The one thing that stood out was the part where he said he could write on the bulletin board but only one word. It brought to mind a thread I read a couple of months back in the Mafia Discussion forums where someone suggested two roles, one where the town had a “media reporter” who could produce a message such as we have on the bulletin board, and a “propagandist” on the mafia side who could add/change one word of the message. Don't know what everyone thinks about that. I don't see that a role that can write one word can be of too great an advantage to the townI'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Rand Althor wrote:Vote count please.Vote Rand AlthorSeriously, you need to read, there's been like a grand total of 3 changes since the last vote count. You've posted nothing content wise since you voted me which seemed like some crap bandwagoning and very little before that. It seems like you're posting just so people don't think you're trying to lurk your way through day 1. If the odds are we hit a townie day one anyway - I'd rather it be an inattentive townie. I'd vote Ubertimmmy, but you're super-scummy in addition.
I think its something like:
Yamahako (4) - StallingChamp, Cloud, IH, PBuG
Rand Althor (3) - Toaster Strudel, kison, ~N9V~
ac1983fan (2) : OverTheUnder, ChannelDelibird
Lowell (1) - Ubertimmy
Ubertimmy (1) - Jules
Toaster Strudel (1) - theopor
Or:
Yamahako (4) - StallingChamp, Cloud, IH, PBuG
Rand Althor(4)- Toaster Strudel, kison, ~N9V~ ,Yamahako
ac1983fan (2) : OverTheUnder, ChannelDelibird
Lowell (1) - Ubertimmy
Ubertimmy (1) - Jules
Toaster Strudel (1) - theopor
This now. Don't yell at me too much if its wrong, I'm really tired.
[/b]I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Because earlier you thought you had a reason, but you've consistantly not been paying attention this game. Not responding to a large amount of information that's being discussed after days without posting to ask about a vote count that was simply 2 (maybe 3) changes different from the previous mod vote count (only two pages back) screams lazy to me.Rand Althor wrote: All I wanted was a vote count which makes you go 51-50 on me and vote me. Why didn't you do it earlier.
Seriously, WHY did you want a vote count? Now that I showed you what the vote count is, are you going to contribute in any real way? Have you added discussion or insight into the game state? No? I thought not. Your request for a vote count was simply a tactic to make it look like you're paying attention to the game until night - when your real work will begin.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Did youIH wrote:Why isn't Yamahako dead yet? Did anyone READ post 371? Did anyone notice he voted someone for asking for a VOTECOUNT?!?readmy explination? See how he still hasn't made a vote, or made any attempt to contribute to the discussion? Actively lurking is scummy - I think I pointed that out. The request for a vote count wasn't my reason for voting- the timing, my interpretation of its intention, and Rand's response to my attack are why my vote stays where it is.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
IH wrote:Still a stupid reason, that explanation didn't do anything for me, especially since the stimulus is from a votecount. Had you previously asked him to contribute or called him on it til just now?I wrote: Rand Althor wrote:
Vote:Yamahako I don't like you trying to lynch the cop and your defence is weak.
I've NEVER wanted to lynch the cop, OMG?!does nobody have basic reading skillsI wrote: Rand Althor wrote:
A good question is to ask if Lowell posted that before he claimed.
Unlikely considering he's claimed that he found an innocent night one.You really need to read a little more carefully.
Yeah I think I commented on it. Can you show me a post where he commented on information acurately? He isn't paying attention to the game, he hasn't posting anything remotely regarding the game currently that wasn't incorrect or lazy (vote count when only 3 people had voted since the last one). I guess my question is if you weren't misguided in your vote attempts on me, why WOULDN'T you be voting for Rand?I wrote: Rand Althor wrote:
Vote count please.
Vote Rand Althor Seriously,you need to readI'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
I'm pretty sure I've been commenting on a good portion more of this game than most people...Battle Mage wrote:oh yes, because 'QFT' is far more helpful!
I find myself in the same position as Lowell at the moment. The inactivity means that i havent seen anyone do anything scummy recently, so my vote on Kison has to stay for now.
if we could get some more discussion, that would be great.
and don't give me crap for agreeing with someone when you exemplify the behavior that was being admonished!!I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
You posted, basically, to say that you didn't have anything to say. That was pretty much what IH was talking about. Then you said you wanted more discussion without adding any.Battle Mage wrote:Get your facts straight first. Show me a post in which i requested time to catch up.
I wasnt 'giving you crap', i was implying that you had no right to criticise other players for making spam posts, when you were a culprit of the exact same thing.
BM
WHY do you think Kison is a good lynch? Why don't you feel some of the front runners in votes are the right lynch choices?I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
The real question is, did he intend it as a statement of fact? If I was lynched and came up as a town player (which I would), would that invoke lynch all liars?~N9V~ wrote:
Hmm, how do you know this? Are you the real cop, and Lowell is lying? Or do you justPBuG wrote:Yamahako is scum. Please lynch him.assumethat he is. There is a huge difference, and it could help us out greatly.
For what its worth, there are town reasons to want to speed up play. An inactive game tends to need more replacements. Replacements tend to either die as townies, or make us lose connections with previous statements from scum (and vice versa, but generally its not in our favor). Keeping the game lively lets more people stay active and interested. A stagnant town is more likely to quick lynch on crap logic to keep the game moving.
That being said, there's a huge difference in speeding play up, and rushing through the day.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
TS appeared out of it in the beginning of the game (real or planned is WIFOM). So I don't think its damning evidence. I'll re-read specifically for TS before I pass judgement, but I don't think he's the best wagon for today.Toaster Strudel wrote:
The "voting the cop" was an error. I had missed the claim. Scum wouldn't give themselves away voting cops anyway.Jules wrote:unvote, vote TS
Ok, having read up on TS, I'm going to switch my vote there. Voting the cop stands out more than anything. Ubertimmy is still high on my list but there seems to be more chance of a response from TS
That's, like, the weakest reason for a vote, ever.
Methinks you're trying to deflect attention away from your scumbuddy Yamahako. With help from your scumbudy theopor_COD.
You're not very good at it. Try to be more subtle next time.
vote: Jules
But TS, This is a terrible OMGUS vote. You're climbing high on my potential scum list. I don't see how this could be a deflectionary tactic - and I see how you're trying to tie you're OMGUS with crap logic. Even if it was a "simple mistake" it was incredibly thick... you didn't just miss the CLAIM, you missed the change in focus.
Actually, I'm not sure - and I don't have time, but I think you claimed you thought you were voting to give him bells, but are now claiming you missed the claim... This might be a LAL thing - I'll be able to look more into it tomorrow...I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
[quote="Toaster Strudel, post 131]I thought we were voting for bells... We're not voting for bells? I didn't want to lynch the cop, I wanted to give the bells to the cop!
unvote[/quote]
Post 131
[quote="Toaster Strudel, post 132]vote for BELLS: Lowell I am confused... [/quote]
[quote="Toaster Strudel, post 430]The "voting the cop" was an error. I had missed the claim. Scum wouldn't give themselves away voting cops anyway.
That's, like, the weakest reason for a vote, ever.[/quote]
Lynch All Liars?Unvote, Vote Toaster StrudelI'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
EBWDPToaster Strudel, post 131 wrote:I thought we were voting for bells... We're not voting for bells? I didn't want to lynch the cop, I wanted to give the bells to the cop!
unvoteToaster Strudel, post 132 wrote:vote for BELLS: Lowell I am confused...Toaster Strudel, post 430 wrote:The "voting the cop" was an error. I had missed the claim. Scum wouldn't give themselves away voting cops anyway.
That's, like, the weakest reason for a vote, ever.
Lynch All Liars?Unvote, Vote Toaster StrudelI'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
I'd recommend using less direct statements. 'YamahakoPBuG wrote:
Are you stupid, or just pretending to be? No, I'm not the fucking cop. I believe(d) Lowell.~N9V~ wrote:
Hmm, how do you know this? Are you the real cop, and Lowell is lying? Or do you justPBuG wrote:Yamahako is scum. Please lynch him.assumethat he is. There is a huge difference, and it could help us out greatly.isscum', implies a fact. Not Yamahakomightbe scum, orI thinkYamahako is scum, but Yamahakoisscum?
If you don't want people questioning your meaning, then don't be so obviously obtuse. That statement of fact implies something that you're now denying. I don't see how you have a reason to be so hostile when its a legitimate question given the wording of your statement.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
First you say that you were voting Lowell to "give the cop bells". Then later you claim you were voting Lowell because you "missed the cop claim ". One of those things cannot be true and therefore is a lie.Toaster Strudel wrote: Lynch all liars? Uh? Where's the lie? There's no lie. To claim that t's a lie, is a lie! To lynch all liars, lynch Yamahako.
vote: Yamahako
I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Its not a simple matter of symantics. Voting him because you missed that we had changed from voting for bells to voting for lynch is completely different from "I missed the cop claim." I don't feel as though it can be dismissed as simply "a long time back in the game" I feel this is a legitimate scum slip. Either one is bad enough on its own, but together they scream "I want to be lynched!"Toaster Strudel wrote:
Maybe I what would be more accurate is that I missed that the vote had switched from "bells" to "lynching." Regardless, I did not doubt Lowell's claim, and I didn't intend to vote for him for "lynch" I wanted to vote for him for "bells." I am sorry if my second statement was contradictory, but this happened a long time back in the game, and I am playing many games, so the details were fuzzy.Yamahako wrote:
First you say that you were voting Lowell to "give the cop bells". Then later you claim you were voting Lowell because you "missed the cop claim ". One of those things cannot be true and therefore is a lie.Toaster Strudel wrote: Lynch all liars? Uh? Where's the lie? There's no lie. To claim that t's a lie, is a lie! To lynch all liars, lynch Yamahako.
vote: Yamahako
I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Where's the fallacy in my logic? Voting for the cop because you "missed that we were voting to lynch" is scummy. Voting for the cop because you "missed the claim" is scummy too. Contradicting your reasoning behind you defense is scummy. All of these things add up to something that can be so simply explained away. It doesn't matter that any one of those things may be misinterpreted as a townie's accident, its the fact that there are three glaring problems that has me voting for you.Toaster Strudel wrote: The fact that I did not recollect correctly, doesn't change the actual event. It's not a slip, especially not a scum slip.
Are you being stubbornly illogical on purpose? In other words, is it an act, or does it come naturally?
And it is a slip, even if you are town and misremembered or misquoted something its still a slip.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Its not reaching. It's very simpleLowell wrote:FOS Yama
I was certain of your innocence a few pages back, but this latest argument looks like reaching. Maybe there's a case against TS, but this isn't it. I'm no longer convinced of your innocence.
The fact that you're going so far out of your way to attack anyone who has even vaguely threatened me makes me think you're just trying to get on my good side-- and that makes me suspiciuos.
1. TS votes the cop after we switch from voting for bells to voting for lynch - he claims he missed switch. He specifically refers to Lowell as the cop.
2. TS defends him self by saying he missed the cop claim.
Both of these individually are scummy. He picked up some votes for the first one. On their own either one is not necessarily something that would deserve a lynch (although day one it doesn't take much).
When you put the two together you get
3. TS lied about he reasoning for voting Lowell.
That's a serious mistake. This is like someone misquoting their claim. Lynch all Liars exists for a reason. Its to help townies breed a culture of tighter play, and be more deliberate in what they post. It's also a good method of catching scum. Townies on the whole are more careful. Personally I don't see too much difference in the explanation of her vote to account it for a mere forgetfulness. I think its a legitimate scum slip.I'm suspicious - in every sense of the word.-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ
-
-
Yamahako Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1271
- Joined: March 14, 2006
- Location: Mesa, AZ