Deadline in three days, 2 votes on me. Bleh. I'm finding it very hard to understand why people are voting me. However, best I roleclaim early so we have time to discuss rather than a snap decision.
I'm Sable. I make costumes each night and send them to a player of my choice. Apparently some players may not like them.
n1: cloud targeted Jules
n2, 3: I targeted CDB (If you look at my posts I am wondering at this point wheter I gave CDB a double vote. I made a comment on something being interesting or somesuch. This was also one of the reasons I was suspicious of YB). I reckoned CDB was town, and thus giving him things was a good idea.
n4: my target was determined randomly (as I was away) and hit acfan.
My target's are not notified when I target them, which tells me it's not an inventor type role. I have no idea what it actually does, but I'm leaning towards "nothing" currently.
In addition, I was told that there was a Mabel ingame and that Mabel was pro-town. This information is useless since the death of Kison, though, who was Mabel.
Grek: first off, you don't explain why that is anti-town. The reason is that it's not. I take the evidence and draw a logical conclusion. Note that I don't even rule it out completely. I state that it is unlikely. Certainly, attacking acfan is unproductive at this time.
I refute the idea that I was more likely to be lynched than HH. At the time you switched your vote, there were no votes on me and only Tar had expressed suspicion on me. By contrast, many people had expressed suspicion of HH on previous days.
Tar: I just noticed
Tarhalindur wrote:Unvote[/b\
I see only two good options here: Shanba, and Grek.
Shanba: I still feel that the case against Shanba is valid - also, note the defensiveness when I started bringing pressure against her.
(As an aside, I am male.)
Stating a case is valid does not make it so. I disputed the points in your case and explained why this is wrong. In return, you state that I am defensive. This is awful, awful logic. Calling someone defensive is the ultimate in catch 22 logic. If someone doesn't respond to your case, you use it as a (imo, valid) point against them. If they do respond, you call it defensive. And that then repeats the cycle: do they respond to allegations of defensiveness and have the other player say "see! Told you he was defensive." or do they just ignore it and have the other player say "aha! You ignored one of my points. Diescumdie!". It's absolutely terrible.
Bleh.
Unvote Vote: Grek