[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 1134245 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Monty Python's Mafia Circus Game Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #122 (isolation #1) » Fri Jul 04, 2008 5:32 am
Postby strappado »
I'm not even sure what we are looking for. It appears we need to off the silliest though.
Sillies:
1.) Imaginality - Bruce nonsense
2.) Pokerface - nicotine obsessed
3.) Lord Gurgi - trying to sell a dead bird...yuck
I'm comfy with the Imaginality lynch today. The town needs to get rid of people through voting, and it appears that he's only capable of voting one person...who isn't even in this game. Burn the witch!
Post
Post #189 (isolation #2) » Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:43 am
Postby strappado »
Maybe poker does not actually need a cig, maybe it's just a post restriction?
Anyway, I'm honestly not sure what we're looking for here. Should we assume that the flavortext is mostly meaningless and we aren't looking for the silliest?
Doing MontyPython research and I haven't yet come across any char's that harm anyone...and all the dying in Salad Days was caused by chain reaction, not so much one person or a group of people.
I still say we get rid of Imaginality to eliminate the Bruce confusion.
Post
Post #204 (isolation #7) » Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:44 am
Postby strappado »
You voted him for a serious reason...but when he didn't react you decided to vote someone else?
Your vote hopping honestly made me not take your vote seriously. You had just unvoted someone because they didn't react, so what reason would I have to react? Especially when you give no reasons for your vote. It just seemed like another hollow vote that you'd casually drop in a post or two.
In the future, if you want a reaction, how about giving some reasons and something to actually react to?
Post
Post #215 (isolation #8) » Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:55 pm
Postby strappado »
Well now who the hell is Bruce? He's made it onto the votecount now, I say we lynch him.
Also, if you read my reasons for voting Imaginality, it wasn't simply because it was silly or annoying, that just shows that you are skimming and looking for perfunctory reasons to claim scumness. I said that if he can only vote for a player that is not in this game (i.e., "Bruce"), then he wont really be a contributing member of the town when it comes to lynchings and whatnot. I'm reconsidering my stance as there is apparently a Bruce somewhere in the game.
That said:
unvote, vote: Bruce
But IGMEOY Mirth.
You voted Iron Man but unvoted him saying that he didn't react.
You voted me with no stated reason. Someone else voted me and you say "OH yes, I'm voting her too, and notice how she hasn't responded, confirmage".
This makes me think you weren't so interested in my reaction or Ironman's reaction, you were interested in town's reaction. It looks so much less scummy when you are the one that STARTED a bandwagon than if you just hop on in the middle or near the end, right? Convenient, just keep hopping around with your votes until someone else votes along with you and then confirm your vote.
Post
Post #221 (isolation #9) » Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:49 am
Postby strappado »
Well, sorry you dont like my reasons for voting, not sure what I can say to that. Obviously, I like my reasons for voting
Sure, I'd much rather vote someone because they said something like, "Oh, my role? I'm mafi--oops oops, I mean...errrrm...I'm a notorious silly walker, yes yes, nothing to see here, move along" ...but unfortunately nothing like that has happened so I'm going with the possible least helpful member of the cast, until something better comes along.
Post
Post #228 (isolation #10) » Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:50 am
Postby strappado »
Thanks Lord Gurgi...I think
Anyway, so yeah, maybe its bad play or a stupid idea, but it doesn't seem scummy to me either and I'm, ofcourse, completely unbiased.
Gurgi - do you have leeway in your post restriction like imaginality does?
Post
Post #234 (isolation #12) » Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:19 am
Postby strappado »
Ok, but do you think it's scummy?
I, possibly mistaken (who knows), thought that we were looking for the silliest players because of the flavortext - only being able to call people Bruce and only being able to vote for "Bruce" who isn't in the game, is pretty darn silly as well as useless to the town.
So sure, you can call that bad play if you want, but I dont think it's scummy. And neither does Lord Gurgi .....so there
Post
Post #238 (isolation #14) » Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:25 am
Postby strappado »
already answered that Mirthykins. You moved on from your last "serious" vote because the person didn't react... I figured there wasn't a need to react as you'd probably just move on shortly, and that thought was strengthened by the fact that you didn't post any reason for voting me.
Post
Post #293 (isolation #17) » Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:19 am
Postby strappado »
@ Elvis & Knits - not saying voting is a bad thing, at all, but you both seem kinda jumpy, and your votes are following eachother. Maybe it's just a girl thing and I'm excluded because I'm not quite in "sync" with the bio-rhythms...meh
Anyway, I dont think Luigi Gangster warrants a vote until he's explained and answered questions.
@ Chensi - we're gonna need a little more to work with bud, anything, seriously, just talk.
Post
Post #296 (isolation #19) » Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:29 am
Postby strappado »
my bad, the girls keep getting mixed up in my head, Elvis, Mirth farside...good god, grow a penis and differentiate yourselves All women look alike to me
I think this game has more females in it than any other game I've played...shaft.ed's such a ladies man
Prolly all his time spent in the "Period" thread.
So yeah, nevermind the first part of my last post, but the 2nd still stands. I want to hear an explanation from Luigi, we could be mistaking his intentions.
Post
Post #329 (isolation #20) » Fri Jul 11, 2008 2:58 am
Postby strappado »
I believe DBE restriction, I believe whatshisface just typed backwards for the heck of it.
I dont believe that chensi hasn't picked up anything worth talking about.
Post
Post #330 (isolation #21) » Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:03 am
Postby strappado »
actually did some quick meta and see that he's not new, and that he's actually a pretty decent poster in his other games.
I dont buy it, it's an act. He even said he didn't want to random vote because he was too confused. Town has no reason to be worried about random voting, etc. That, paired with the lack of content and what I see as "feigned confusion" =
unvote
(just in case I was voting, too lazy to look back)
Post
Post #332 (isolation #22) » Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:13 am
Postby strappado »
weren't you just griping at me for wanting to lynch someone for being confusing rather than being scummy?
Seriously, I'm asking, cuz I dont remember and I'm again too lazy to look back. I know it was one of you wemmins.
I dont think there is anything particularly scummy about making a backwards post. If it was a faked restriction, sure - but we're in a goofy Monty Python themed game. So he typed backwards, doesn't seem like a huge deal and atleast it was some content.
Post
Post #337 (isolation #23) » Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:36 am
Postby strappado »
elvis_knits wrote:Wouldn't you agree that faking a posting restriction is scummy? For some people who really have a restriction, adding to confusion is not their fault. If the restriction is faked, they are adding to the confusion on purpose. And that's scummy.
...but he never tried to make us think it was a post restriction. When he first did it I figured he was just doing it for the heck of it. There was no way (unless you think he's a tard) that he'd come several posts in and try to fake a restriction, especially after all the hawkeyes out there picking apart the validity of each post restriction.
Post
Post #338 (isolation #24) » Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:41 am
Postby strappado »
EBWOP: I'm not trying to defend Luigi, I just think that his backwards post wasn't all that scummy. I think chensi's (feigned) confusion and refusal to vote, even randomly, is more scummy.
Post
Post #344 (isolation #26) » Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:28 am
Postby strappado »
Heya Muerrto!
...I also didn't realize there was a bogre in this game. I should probably pay better attention to the player list on the front page
I really dont think Luigi was trying out a post restriction, really really dont. See my post 337. I'm not saying it isn't possible that he's a scum, I just dont think typing a post backwards is a scumtell. He never insinuated it was a post restriction, other players leaped to that conclusion. This is Monty Python mafia, and a lot of people have been doing/saying/linking to funny things and acting in a way they dont normally. I dont think a backwards post is that out of place in this circus.
Post
Post #368 (isolation #31) » Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:38 am
Postby strappado »
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say a safeclaim is a role that the mod gives the scum as a non-scum claim they can make, and it's safe because nobody else has it? Or is it safe because it's actually in the game?
Post
Post #374 (isolation #33) » Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:47 am
Postby strappado »
so Darla could be scum with a different safeclaim that she didn't want to use... but what are the odds that she'd come up with a role that was actually in this game? There are a ton of different char's in the circus and only a handful of us.
Maybe they both are?
ugh...
unvote: DBE
for now. I need to think about this one some more and I'd like to hear from her.
Post
Post #385 (isolation #34) » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:20 am
Postby strappado »
I browsed through a good bit of your posts, you seem pretty confident. Your first game when you were a cop, you came out with guns-a-blazing, pretty tough player IMO
Post
Post #535 (isolation #36) » Tue Jul 15, 2008 12:33 pm
Postby strappado »
oh dear, it appears I've been inactive...apologies. I've made some changes to living arrangements and I'm borrowing an uber crappy laptop at the moment. I should be back on my cushy desktop this weekend.
I'll see if I can do some reading and posting on this thing though.
Post
Post #536 (isolation #37) » Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:08 pm
Postby strappado »
ooohkay, like I said, crappy laptop, so I did my best on a re-read (navigation is tricky) and I'll do my best with this post (really teeny keyboard, ick)
So I did mistakenly (maybe, who knows) think that we were looking for the silliest players, but I realize or atleast think that we are just going for plain old scummy and silly was just flavortext.
I'm not sure about DBE, her posts and explanations seem sincere to me, but the counterclaim is odd and with as much fun as the mod probably had making roles, I just dont see him handing out two of the same character... it's possible though, so I'm holding off on a vote. I'd be comfortable with a counterclaim lynch today though.
I'm not sure about Mirth, I've been suspicous, I still am a little bit, but she's safe from me today 'cuz there's bigger fish out there. Chenhsi has been a lurker, big time. No content, no opinions either way, nothing...and I know he's capable, Ive read his posts in other games.
I'd honestly feel more comfortable with a chenhsi lynch than a DBE lynch. Atleast with DBE, she's given me some points to ponder, she's been active, she's posted different possibilities. I think chenhsi's lack of contri is on the verge of treason towards the town.
Also - while reading Jordan's post, kinda rolled my eyes a bit and skimmed...I get a big scum vibe from him. He came in and quoted some stuff I said early on and agreed with Mirth...but I guess he either didn't read further for my explanations, or he just thought he could ride along on her coattails... I guess I could be biased though cuz I dont think I've been scummy at all. This is my first theme so it's a learning process (thought we were lynching sillies vs. scum) but honest mistakes and learning process...nothing scummy to further a scum cause. If it wouldn't help the scum in anyway, its probably not scummy, so quit latching on to my "bad play" and look for scummy stuff. I may not have the game mechanics down 100%, but I'm learning and I'm trying and, atleast in my humble and obviously unbiased opinion, I'm doing pretty decently.
Post
Post #538 (isolation #38) » Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:21 pm
Postby strappado »
well, it's not a cut and dry counterclaim. It's not like a newbie game where you KNOW there's only one doc or one cop and if someone counterclaims than one of them HAS to be scum. We dont know what roles there are, it's possible (although as I stated, not incredibly probable) that there are two french taunters. Add to that DBE's activity and actual contribution..and I although something seems off, some of her posts sound really sincere. I'm just not 100% sure on her.
lurker is much more lynchable to me because he's being obvious and unhelpful. He's posted solid content in other games so I know he's capable, but for some reason this game has been his readheaded stepchild. He's not putting any effort into it, he seems skittish at best...he's not helping us at all and the whole thing reeks of scum.
If he begins posting some content, maybe says who he thinks is scummy or posts an opinion on the DBE Spyrex stuff...or anything, just some sort of content - then he could pretty quickly drop off my list.
But as it is, I'd feel more comfortable with him because nothing makes me waiver or tell myself "Hey, self, am I being to rash here?" Whereas with DBE, there is doubt.
Post
Post #541 (isolation #39) » Tue Jul 15, 2008 1:58 pm
Postby strappado »
Hey, I'm just saying what I feel more comfortable with. It's how I feel and what I think. You can think whatever you want is valid or invalid, doesn't matter much to me. I'm just saying it as I see it.
Post
Post #599 (isolation #40) » Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:13 am
Postby strappado »
yesterdays lynch happened kind of unexpectedly, I thought we'd get more time to discuss. I hope chenhsi either starts posting or gets replaced today, those would be the polite options.
Maybe some pressure would help
vote: chenhsi
I'm confused by the Spyrex counterclaim because with the wealth of characters in Monty Python, I doubted there would be two of the same role - but I think it's possible. I think it would be a dangerous gambit for him to counterclaim as scum, I also think he seems pretty town-ish so far, although my mind could change given more time.
So in these theme games with so a vast array of characters and abilities, is it common to discuss all night actions, or play it close to the vest? What's the custom?
Post
Post #612 (isolation #42) » Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:36 am
Postby strappado »
No.
also, there's a monty python skit where someone is trying to ask for a cigarette and matches and a conversation ensues with shoddy translation books and eventually one or the other is dragged off by the police...I'm a little rusty on it though, I'd have to do some youtube searching...but that's who I think pokerface is.
Post
Post #632 (isolation #43) » Tue Jul 22, 2008 9:38 am
Postby strappado »
AWw, you were asked to cuddle with an alpaca? So, did you? I probably would have, they are so cute and fuzzy...'cept for the talons and stingers...other than that, totally cuddle-licious.
Post
Post #667 (isolation #44) » Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:43 pm
Postby strappado »
wait, hold on. Pokerface says his night action involved elvis and K7 asks him what I did last night and this is because the rest of the town missed something..and if we ask what it is then we're fishing...but you'll be able to explain it later?
whaaa?
OK, again, first theme - but aren't scum the only ones that can talk at night? Or can cult as well? Or is there another type of char that can talk at night? It seems like whatever happened between K7 and Poker must have happened during some type of nightphase communication, yes? or am I missing something ?
Post
Post #673 (isolation #46) » Tue Jul 22, 2008 2:03 pm
Postby strappado »
Oh..wait, I guess you were joking? Because you were questioning him right before my post and he hadn't said anything additional, so I think you're just as in the dark as I am and being sarcastic...?
Post
Post #706 (isolation #50) » Thu Jul 24, 2008 3:01 am
Postby strappado »
...Just waiting on the revelation. I also want to hear more about what Killa and Pokerface were talking about. I dont think there is going to be any event today that is going to make it better to come out with it, so saying "I'll tell you today, but just not right now" is 'tarded. Out with it, Spryex and Poker/seven.
Post
Post #710 (isolation #52) » Thu Jul 24, 2008 6:26 am
Postby strappado »
Mirth, why is putting words in my mouth good?
What you said = not even close to what I'm saying so your questions is hard to answer.
I'll just re-iterate and try to make clearer my meaning...
Saying "There's this intriguing mystery, and I'm going to tell you all about it...today! ...but not yet, later, just cuz" is 'tarded. I dont think anything is going to happen today that would make it easier or better to say something later. Either dont say anything at all, or come right out with it.
Post
Post #714 (isolation #53) » Thu Jul 24, 2008 7:51 am
Postby strappado »
"OH God, she said her opinion might change, Obv scum tell" lolz
"She said this was her first theme game, Obv scum tell" lolz again
The first one is too silly to even address. The second one...I could understand if I was trying to ask for leeway, but I'm not. If you were actually trying to find scum and not just convenient "scum tells", you'd notice that when I mention I'm new, it isn't as an excuse for scummy behavior or as a plea for lee-way... it's as an apology for a question I have that I'm sure is going to sound stupid. From what I've seen, newbies in these games get absolutely no forgiveness or lee-way, they just get accused of "playing the newb card" so I see no benefit to letting people know this is my first game.
@Mirth - Spryex has asked a question and is waiting for responses before revealing, that I understand. Poker has just said "later", but it doesn't appear that he's waiting on anything. Meh, it might not be scummy, but I find it annoying as hell. Ofcourse, I'm the type of person that is driven crazy by wrapped presents... I HAVE TO KNOW WHAT IT IS!!!! ARRGHGHGHGHGH!!!! So maybe it's just me being irritated by a surprise looming on the horizon.
Just tell me already!!! I hate/love suspense.
Post
Post #726 (isolation #54) » Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:42 am
Postby strappado »
Hey guys - nothing pops up from memory and and I can't find anything on a google or youtube search. Could someone tell me who "Mr. Vibrating" is/was in Monty Python? Link perhaps?
Post
Post #729 (isolation #56) » Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:40 am
Postby strappado »
Because I know he's in this game but I can't imagine what his power/allignment would be...and I dont see anyone with a post restriction that would match the role.
Post
Post #732 (isolation #58) » Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:14 am
Postby strappado »
Will everyone please chime in what they think of Spryex's bridgekeeper stuff? I'd like to hear an opinion from everyone - I think the information is important enough to warrant discussion.
Post
Post #737 (isolation #60) » Fri Jul 25, 2008 6:17 am
Postby strappado »
I'm not really looking for speculation on a powerrole, I'm looking for opinions on Spryex's post. i.e., do you think he's telling the truth about being visited, and if not, what reason do you think he'd have to lie about it.
Mirth seems to be leaning towards him lying, I'm wondering what everyone else thinks.