until my name turns bold,
but i've been waiting a day to be
able to post, so i think i can participate
in the conversation now .
anyways, bandwagon is a very
scumish thing to do .. just to let you know .
i think you should be more careful .
i used FoS because i'm not surePorkens wrote:Sorry, I shouldn't have quoted the bit about your name. The relevant issue is the FOS instead of a Vote. It seems to me that if you suspect that Xtomx is trying to push the wagon forward because he's scum; you'd vote for him. If you think he's town making a bad move; you wouldn't FOS him.
FOS is a useful tool, but in this case it looks like your just trying to be non-committal.
.. it's easy to tellLynchHimNotMe wrote:this somehow doesn't sound right to me...and you FoSing Xtoxm comes off as a defense of image
FoS: ZEEnon
FoS is a tool utilized by this forum .IronTurkey wrote:For the record FOSing is the most pointless thing ever. No one has any reason to be worried by an FOS as it (by it's very definition) is simply an unsubstantial accusation that could easily be better expressed through words and reasoning.
i tend to like how i type,IronTurkey wrote:Also: ZEEnon, type normal. Your "poetic" writing hurts my eyes and hampers your ability to communicate.
Sironigous, that vote for imageSironigous wrote:Actually...
Unvote
Vote: image
That's what I think....
You have the right to your own opinion .IronTurkey wrote:I am quite aware of the purpose of an FOS. They are however silly and not valuable. The same thing that is done with and FOS can easily be done with a simple question. Alternatively you could use a vote and actually pressure the person.
Be my guest and ignore my posts then,IronTurkey wrote:It actually doesn't help. You are entitled to your opinion but I'm just telling you that it makes it more difficult to read and thus less likely to be read.
i'm not so paranoid that i'm goingIronTurkey wrote:Isn't it generally more appropriate to assume that another player is scum than that another player is town?
ZEEnon wrote:anyways, bandwagon is a very
scumish thing to do .. just to let you know .
i think you should be more careful .
FoS: Xtoxm
you're are implyingPorkens wrote:It seems to me that if you suspect that Xtomx is trying to push the wagon forward because he's scum; you'd vote for him. If you think he's town making a bad move; you wouldn't FOS him.
this accusation came fairly early in the gamePorkens wrote:By saying the vote is random, you're asking us to take your word on the claim that you would have voted for whomever was last on the list.
i merely stated a fact .LynchHimNotMe wrote:first of all, what you said sounded to me like you are trying to sound pro-town
when i FoS people, it's because iLynchHimNotMe wrote:In addition, you started getting really antsy after Xtoxm's vote which to me is clearly not a serious vote. Yet you became all tense and FoSed him.
here he mentions 'explanation time' .Sironigous wrote:Sweet! Explanation time... By the way, hey guys.
it bothers me a lot whenPorkens wrote:...wow.
I'll post more later whehn
quite a lot has happened actually .zindionne wrote:not muched has changed, I really hate day ones
this IS a newbie game afterall ..Porkens wrote:
- His initial FoS seems strange to me, but that could be because I've played here a while and in the
RandomVoteStage it's just more common to see a vote.
after careful inspection,ZEEnon wrote: Sironigous, that vote for image
without ANY clear explanation
is EXTREMELY suspicious .
it appears as a bandwagon vote,
and it is also the FOURTH one .
one more, and image will easily
be lynched, and for all we know thus far,
he is an innocent townie .
Unvote.
Vote: Sironigous
.. i bet you would .Porkens wrote:I'd honestly like to see him at L-1
ironic, he placed his vote on me.image wrote:LynchHim seems to think you are scummy but not enough to warrant lynching
ANOTHER weird double standard .LynchHimNotMe wrote:this somehow doesn't sound right to me...and you FoSing Xtoxm comes off as a defense of imageZEEnon wrote: anyways, bandwagon is a very
scumish thing to do .. just to let you know .
i think you should be more careful .
FoS: Xtoxm
FoS: ZEEnon
THANK YOU for reminding me !Porkens wrote:Why did you not respond to this:
Porkens wrote:In post 38 he says "I find no use of it (FoS) either, but i'm just stating a majority opinion. This is in direct contradiction to his actions earleir.
oh sorry! i didn't remember that postimage wrote:Argh, the wall of text...
The point isn't that he placed his vote on you, it is that he removed it three minutes later since you were at L - 1.ZEEnon wrote:i guess when you place your vote on
a player, it means you don't
think they are suspicious enough to be lynched .
ughh whatever anything i say gets transformed,image wrote:Oh, and look at that! You just happened to have been one of the people who replaced into this game. Awfully convenient, isn't it? Obviously scum can replace into games, or else we'd have three confirmed townies at this point. The way in which you mentioned this seems scummy to me.ZEEnon wrote:just one question, can people
that replace into games even be mafia ?
why would the moderator suggest to start
the game regardless of the three people
being replaced, if perhaps the scum
wasn't in the game yet ?
just me thinking out loud ..
I'll live my vote on zin for the moment, though, as he still seems rather tight-lipped.
LOL LynchHimNotMe !LynchHimNotMe wrote:you summed it up very nicely there...ZEEnon wrote:in my opinion, the wholetownsseems to be working against me.
(sorry for taking so long,LynchHimNotMe wrote:[ZEE, list your scumlist for us, would you? who do you think is most likely scum?
some people don't understand sarcasm.Sironigous wrote:... it does? I just type using a lot of those...i guess '...' signified his explanation .
Why can you have a typing style (yes, you do have one) and I can't?
This:Sironigous wrote:Wait... what didn't I explain yet that you want me to explain?
Moriarty147 wrote:Sironigous: your explanation of voting image up to L-1 was surprisingly poor, as has been noted by multiple people so far and you don't seem to be actively doing anything towards scumhunting either.
..obviously he was thinking whatXtoxm wrote:I find Zee suspicious. Don't like his post style either, it's hard to read, which is anti-town.
Sir, what were you thinking when you said "that's what I think"?
Xtoxm wrote:Unvote Vote Zee
i'm sure that mafia would support a lynch ofXtoxm wrote:I still support a Zee lynch.
Porkens wrote:ZEEnon was very legitimately scummy, dropping a "serious" vote for a joke OMGUS vote.
this sounds very serious. /sarcasmZEEnon wrote:Pikachu hates you too.
Unvote.
Vote: zindionne
just because you are an IC doesn't mean that you observe every player's play style. i certainly wouldn't .LynchHimNotMe wrote:Vote: Porkens
being an IC, you should know that Xtoxm's style of play is short and yes, very annoying most of the time.
i never said that you observe every player's style.Porkens wrote:@ZEEnon: I never said that I observe every player's play style. In fact, if you read my last few posts; you'll see that A) I don't know anything about xtomx's playstyle (other than in this game) and B) I was actively arguing against his playstyle being a really valid point.
hmm.. i wonder why i posted a wall of text.image wrote:At any rate, I think so far my own guess for scum this game are ZEE and Sir. Last time ZEE had a few votes on him, he posted a huge wall of text (post 72); however, some of the claims (ie. the voting patterns) were incorrect. He makes a few incorrect statements later as well; either he is being sinister, or he is not paying close attention; either is bad for town.
still waiting for a reply. /ignoredZEEnon wrote:Porkens wrote:ZEEnon was very legitimately scummy, dropping a "serious" vote for a joke OMGUS vote.this sounds very serious. /sarcasmZEEnon wrote:Pikachu hates you too.
Unvote.
Vote: zindionne
that's the only OMGUS vote i see of mine.
perhaps you'd like to point out what i'm missing .
sorry, i think i didn't update that one into my records.image wrote:However, in post 58,ZEEnon wrote:image
vote Xtoxm
vote DIonized
vote SironigousI wrote:Therefore,Unvote: SironigousandVote: zindionne.
that isn't an incorrect statement.image wrote:As for other incorrect statements? There's your most recent one, for starters. IronTurkey points out another mistake of yours in post 88, and then you grabbed a quote from Xtoxm out of context in post 97:ZEEnon wrote:..obviously he was thinking whatXtoxm wrote: I find Zee suspicious. Don't like his post style either, it's hard to read, which is anti-town.
Sir, what were you thinking when you said "that's what I think"?
he said he was thinking, duh.
why would you vote someone if you don't think they are scum ? i find that a completely pointless thing to do .Sironigous wrote:I'm against it!
Vote: Porkens
To be honest, I really don't think you're scum though. You're just scum hunting. :S
I guess just pretend I'm going to hang you.
1. I already asked xtoxm to explain his reasons and image is voting me because of my wall of text and my accidents.Porkens wrote:1. Why are youonlyasking whyIam voting for you?
2. I'm not interested in your defense; I want to hang someone, to keep the game going, and you are closest.
3. Itriedto lynch who I think is scum; and it killed the thread.
I understand you can't hear the tone in which I want my words to be heard, but that SORRY was supposed to sound sarcastic, like SO-RRY. It's really not someone's fault if they sound pro-town. They might be purposely doing it, but if everyone sounds pro-town, does that make everyone scum? Also, wouldn't anyone get defensive on L-2 ? I believe that roles from townsperson-mafia would all defend themselves if they came up to that point. Also, please mention the 'other scattered reasons,' because i'd like a chance to explain what you are probably misunderstanding about them. Overall,Moriarty147 wrote:ZEEnon- ZEEnon on the other hand, is pegging my scumdar at the moment. Everything from overdefensiveness due to getting voted to L-2, to a possible slip here to many other scattered reasons.
In another game people took it so seriously that they brought me to L-1 for my writing style. I've decided to put their interests before my own in order to make them happy. They were really selfish. They told me it hurt their eyes, but this writing is really plain and boring to me.Giuseppe wrote:Unvote
First of all, I love ZEE's prose. It certainly makes the read more interesting, and I can certainly hear the beat it has. I am displeased that he's dropped it over the last few posts, however. I wish he would return to it.
DIonized wrote:Sironigous's 4th vote on image is very suspicious, and his "explanation post" doesn't explain his vote at all. If this were one of the real-life games I'm used to, Sironigous would be lynched by now. But for now:
StrongFoS: Sironigous
And I would appreciate an actual defense/explanation of your vote, Sironigous, not of other people's.
Everyone had a reason for voting. If you are town-aligned, you want your thoughts to be made known to everyone so that we know exactly what you think. If we see you voting for someone with no reasons at all, we can only assume that there are no reasons for your vote.Sironigous wrote:... Yeah, I don't have one. o_O... It seems like no one else had reasons for theirs either.
Moriarty147 wrote:Slightly distressed about the early wagon on image. A page 2 wagon that lead up to L-1 for reasons that were pretty much terrible and based on "gotcha"-style wording is not a very good thing to have. Definetly some scum on that somewhere.
Moriarty147 wrote:Sironigous: your explanation of voting image up to L-1 was surprisingly poor, as has been noted by multiple people so far and you don't seem to be actively doing anything towards scumhunting either.
Moriarty147 wrote:I'm most distressed atm by the lurker pair of zindionne and Xtoxm. Especially the latter, as he's supposed to be one of the ICs and therefore should be helpful, instead of not contributing anything for the most part, except for some posts which could easily be construed as very scummy.
Not quite sure if this tells us Xtoxm is innocent, or if zindionne was bussing him.zindionne wrote:FOS: Xtoxm
I dont want to vote for him yet, I would like to give him a chance to talk/claim. but if he doesnt, my vote is heading there as of now.
I find this really suspicious. He seems too reluctant to lynch him, and doesn't feel that lurking warrants either a regular FOS or a vote.Sironigous wrote:Zin is lurking. I wouldn't mind a lynch on him, but I'd much rather him be prodded/replaced first before we lynch him.
I'd FoS him, but I really don't think those do much so..
mini-FoS: ZIN
This seems like Giuseppe was looking for some way to protect zindionne. Although he may just have been worried that we lynched a power role without allowing zindionne to claim first, it comes out to me as questionable.Giuseppe wrote:I'm not sure if it'll help, but
UNVOTE
I have to go reread the rules to see if that'll save poor Zind from LHNM's idiotic hammer.
The reason why:Sironigous wrote:At the moment,
FoS: ZEEnon.
FoS: Porkens
But image didn't vote him as well. Are you selectively choosing people to suspect? Also, you need to consider that perhaps the scum was on zindionne's bandwagon.Sironigous wrote:Eh, just because they weren't one of the people who voted for Zin. ha.
How are they clear exactly?LynchHimNotMe wrote:actually, just wanted to say that i would've been a great NK, i fully expected to die ....this clears Porkens/Xtoxm by default? an IC mafia would've killed me by now
I didn't say anything because as I said, I wanted to hear more.Sironigous wrote:... But you didn't say anything.
After his lynch seemed inevitable perhaps.Sironigous wrote:...But I did vote him afterwards.
No, i'm just saying that his post brings suspicion onto him in my mind. You have no obligation to see things the same way I do.Sironigous wrote:...Are you saying town lynches are ok?
Why would youSironigous wrote:... What if you don't want the town and mafia to know your reasons?
You say that scum can be on the wagon, and yet you do not contribute to actually finding those scum.Sironigous wrote:Sure, scum could be on the bandwagon... But, let's just see where it goes from there.
Did you ask me during day one why I wasn't voting zindionne? No, I don't believe you did. So of course I wouldn't randomly throw that in.Sironigous wrote:You didn't say THAT.
I never said that it was inevitable. I said that you may have seen it as inevitable.Sironigous wrote:Inevitable?
No. Town-aligned players shouldSironigous wrote:Do these clash?
Oh look. Now that I accuse you of being scum, You decide that I am scummy. What a suprise. This only strengthens my views on you.Sironigous wrote:I am. I think you are scum.
Sironigous wrote:Were you here?
I'm serious. If you don't tell us, we can only assume you have no reasons for voting a particular player.Sironigous wrote:...not necessarily.
That is true, I forgot your vote.Sironigous wrote:Didn't I vote for you earlier?... you voted for me AFTER I voted for you...
May I use your argument?
Yes, I say 'may' because I am not you. I haveSironigous wrote:MAY have. >_>
In post 266 I mention that I went back and re-read the entire thread. I pulled out everything that I seen as questionable or scummy. Sironigous, however, has displayed the greatest amounts of anti-town qualities.Giuseppe wrote:ZEE, if you could clarify, what is the big reason you think Sir is scum right now? I'm getting mired amid your strings of quotes, and I'd like a straight answer.
When I say we, I speak for town-aligned players in general. Do you not think thatLynchHimNotMe wrote:...please refrain from saying things like 'we want to know' or 'the town needs blah blah'....