Past Ages Mafia - Game Over
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
I'd say the most likely individual player to be scum should be lynched while keeping in mind who their second head is.Raging Rabbit wrote:I'm pretty sure the distribution's random, makes no sense for it to be anything but. What we need to figure out is whether we want to lynch based on who's the single scummiest player, or lynch a pair where both heads are somewhat scummy (unless the scummiest player has a scummy partner, in which case problem solved).
For example, if one player seems like they absolutely have to be scum, lynch them. But if their partner seems overly protown, maybe we leave them for tomorrow when we are playing basically a different kind of game.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
I'd say only the scummy player needs to claim, but I don't want to see a power role lynched just for being attached to a scummy player, so I guess both should claim. Or maybe the scummy player should claim and the second head should answer "yes" or "no" to claiming without adding anything that the scum can use.MacavityLock wrote: Actually, now that I think about it that brings up an interesting question. When we're close to a lynch, how should we deal with claims? I think it makes sense to formally decide this before we get near a bandwagon that would allow scum to manipulate claim process based on who likely lynch will be.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
I was waiting for this.Raging Rabbit wrote: On a more serious note,unvote vote UROEfor suggesting a no lynch. UR, what makes you think we'll stay in any game type for longer than one day? Even if it were true, don't you think we're much better off going into d2 with some info, even at the price of a possible mislynch?
The no lynch is a valid discussion in a game like this. The normal consensus is that no lynch Day 1 is always bad. Easy for scum to jump on someone for that.
Unvote, Vote Raging Rabbit
As for the discussion itself, I am slightly against no lynch because it gives the scum a free kill. I can see the merit behind it because a double mislynch obviously isn't great.
I really don't expect another double headed day. But no, if it were to happen, no lynch a second time would be terrible. Assuming only one anti-town faction, but both heads dying via NK, that's 4 dead townies with no chance of hitting scum.Raging Rabbit wrote: Um, what's to be unsure about? Suppose we do have another two-headed day tommorow - would we really be better off if we no lynched today? We'll be in more or less the same position we're in right now. What would you suggest then, another no lynch?
Actually, with that in mind, let's look at today. No lynch would give us 2 dead townies assuming both heads die and no chance of hitting scum. Any other killing roles makes it possible that 4 townies die at night. This is true regardless of what happens during the day. If we lynch someone, two people will die. So at worst, a lynch gives us 4-6 dead townies. At best, 2 dead townies, 2 dead scum (or even 4 dead scum in there is a second killing role and two pairs of attached scum). A no lynch still gives us the chance of cross-kill or vig-kill if there are other killing roles, but if not, we can't hit scum at all.
I think lynching is the right move today.
The reason for a no lynch would be that we wouldn't have to sacrifice a possible townie to lynch scum, and we could just lynch the same scummy player tomorrow.Raging Rabbit wrote:Oh, I thought that was somehow part of your hypothetical situation in which a no lynch would be good. So, if the game works like we all think it does and we switch to another system tommorow, why no lynch?
Please clarify the bolded.Raging Rabbit wrote:I guess the idea looks pretty appealing seeing all the support it's getting, so I'm not sure how much of it tell it was of UR to suggest it, but no lynching is a terrible idea. It really doesn't matter what game we'll be in tommorow, giving the scum a free night and starting tommorow with close to no info far outweighs the disadvantage of a slightly more dangerous d1 lynch.
Ort, yes you said you were joking, but it doesn't tell us 100% that you are being truthful. It is up for judgement. And Emp voted Brandi twice in a row to move your vote off of him. His actions are justified regardless of your intent.
Wish my other head would post more...KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
I disagree with a no lynch. I'm with you there. But it's worth discussing, and to vote UROE for bringing it up looks like jumping on the first thing you see.Raging Rabbit wrote: It's not a valid suggestion, for reasons I already detailed and Lawrencelot just explained very well. Your analysis arrived to the same obvious conclusion, as well.
There are certain games where it is worth discussing. I'm not sure I've seen one where it's a good idea, but the discussion coming up isn't exactly scummy.RR wrote:I would say a no lynch d1 is always bad for the town, but given the nature of this game it's easier for scum to throw the idea around and hope the town will bite.
Yes, a double-scummy-player lynch is ideal. Yeah, I pretty much agree with most of this.RR wrote: ...which is a bad argument. Sacrificing a possible townie to lynch a prime suspect is vastly superior to doing nothing. And, of course, we're likely to find a pair of two players we consider scummy, which throws this argument out the window. Maybe if we only had one suspect paired with a very protown looking second head I would see this as a legitimate argument, but even then it's a rather poor one.
Ok, I wanted clarification on the "looks appealing" thing. So you meant that it looks like townies are agreeing with the idea, NOT that it was tempting because other people were agreeing with it. And you are on UROE for specifics, not just because he suggested the no lynch, correct?RR wrote: Many people supported no lynch, I doubt all of them are scum. Therefore, the idea apparantly has serious appeal (probably based on the scare element of two townies possibly dying today), which means UR suggesting it is likely misguided rather than scummy. However, reviewing UR's posts, I dislike how the suggestion was very tentative - he kept checking to see if the town supports it, while I'd expect a townie genuinely convinced of the idea to actually vote no lynch - and also how his last post is a two liner calling Santos (who supports no lynch) a moron and saying nothing about my counter arguments.
Unvote
I think I follow what you are saying, and actually agree with quite a bit of it.
Even after his last post?Braeden wrote: I agree with my other heads vote right now, and will get back on later with a post that is a little more substantial.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Is Crush Mafia a game you consider normal?ortolan wrote:same; I never self-vote in a "normal" game as a result.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
I see how it could break a rule in the other game, but I'm going to keep quiet on that...UnofficialRulerOfEveryone wrote:I recognize that, I was still assuming you were saying that comparing my play was breaking a rule.
Really, search it if you want to see what he is talking about.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Ort's vote on Slicey seemed acceptable to me. The fact that Emp was so quick to change it could mean Ort voted his (Emp's) scumbuddy.
Super Bowl bet. Dahill picked it and it has to stay up for a month.BSG wrote: @KMD
Why that avatar???
Tajo is playing his typical Day 1 IMO. Throw out opinions, but not a lot of reason. Doesn't mean town. Doesn't mean scum.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
He had a decent reason to vote.Empking wrote:
Why am I scummy for moving his vote but not him for moving my vote?Kmd4390 wrote:Ort's vote on Slicey seemed acceptable to me. The fact that Emp was so quick to change it could mean Ort voted his (Emp's) scumbuddy.
How does someone play differently just because they replace into a game instead of playing from the beginning?ShadowGirl wrote:
I think I'm using that expression right...Kmd4390 wrote:
Why?ShadowGirl wrote:but considering he was in as a replacement and not from the beginning, I'll take it with a grain of salt.
Anyway, read what I wrote.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
You can still take meta from where heShadowGirl wrote:@Kmd: I'm not saying they're completely different playstyles, but depending on when he replaced in - middle or at the end, there's a lot of situations that he wasn't there to experience and to more accurately get a meta on him.wasthere.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Braeden wrote: Someone asked me what I agreed with KMD about ages ago that I changed my mind about. I believe it was concerninghisvote on RR. I agreed with it until he made a post that convinced me otherwise. KMD also unvoted after that post.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Well Braeden does seem pretty scummy. I'll admit that. But that's my second head, so I'm against the lynch. Even if Braeden is scum, there are other scum in the game who I'd rather lynch. But yeah, I can see myself going after Braeden tomorrow.
Vote Animorph/Slicey
See both sides, but never take one. This accomplishes a few things. First, you look active. Second, your stance isn't scummy because you don't have one.Slicey wrote:I'm kind of torn between No Lynch idea. D1 NL's are almost always bad because then we have very little to go on D2. However, if we lynch, we have to possibility of losing 4 townies (two on the lynch and two at night.)
I'm more in favor of a lynch, but I'm not throwing the NL idea out the window.
"Ort is stupid", not "Ort is scummy" or "Ort isn't necessarily scum".Slicey wrote:Ort is stupid for thinking odd means scummy. >___>
I'm not really getting any scum vibes from anybody. A little from ort, but not for any real reason other than that he's rubbing me the wrong way. >_>
No scum vibes? "A little" from Ort? But no real reason?
Still fence-sitting.
You say you can't find anything, but you have small things to start on. You said you have a little on Ort for "rubbing you the wrong way". If this is true, look at his posts and see if you think he is scum. You even say Emp's vote change is scummy. That's both heads of a pair. If both are scum, that would be an awesome lynch. 2 scum lynched in 1 day.Slicey wrote:I can see why people may think I'm not pro-town because I really haven't done much. Problem is, I can't really find anything. Emp changes Ort's vote from me to Santos is kinda scummy, but other than that, I got nothing. Santos hasn't done anything really scummy, IMHO.
I feel like KMD hasn't posted much content in his last few posts. Makes it seem like he's playing, although he kinda isn't.
No vote for now, cause I wanna see what my other head has to say.
And then no vote because you are waiting for your other head? If you have opinions, expand on them and do something. If your other head disagrees, he has the power to change your vote.
So basically, Slicey is sitting on the sidelines throwing out very small suspicions and letting Animorph think for him. Well, let's see what Animorph has done this game...
Literally, this. One post.animorpherv1 wrote:hai all.
vote: Empkingfor voting "me"
So between the two, we have a hardcore lurker paired with someone who is fence-sitting, apparently scared to push any opinions, and wanting the hardcore lurker to do everything for him.
I think this is a good pair to lynch.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Ok, I didn't see that Animorph had been replaced. I still think Slicey is a better place to look than anything else right now though.
Slicey,
You said you were "torn" about no lynch. I don't see anywhere in your posts that suggests you were pushing it.
If you thought something was off about Ort, you should have posted it. You still should post it. No one will agree with you blindly. You need to present your case.
Vote stands.-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-Posts "opinion" on No Lynch without posting actual suspects or anything else with content.BSG wrote:@KMD
I'd like you to put your main points against Slicey (Ani/IT) in your next post. Something like:
-Reason 1
-This
-And not to forget that.
You make lots of points in that post, so it would be nice to just see the main points.
-Lack of stance with "torn" comment regarding No Lynch.
-Fence-sitting
-Calls Ort "a little" scummy. Doesn't back it.
-Small jab at Emp for vote change. Later says he found nothing in Emp's post history.
-"waiting" for other head.
Looked at this to see who Slicey's other head was:BSG wrote:@Lawrence and KMD
How come you missed that Ani was replaced by IT?
[quote="KaleiÃKMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
I hope this isn't a serious question. If it is, you should know the answer already if you are town. You should be able to assume the answer regardless of alignment.Santos wrote:Slicey, since you claim townie, do you know your partner is 100% town as well?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Slicey wrote:
Yeah...no. >_>Kmd4390 wrote:Appeal to emotion.
Yeah.Slicey wrote: cause you guys are about to lynch (probably two) townies. >_>
Just /in'd.BSG wrote:Why? Would you like to see her again
Of course I know . School and such. I don't know when she gets back, but I think soon as we're having a holiday in less than a week. You know, you could have just PM'ed her as she gets online once in a while (she's having her turn soon at modding and she's in one mish mash game if I'm correct).
But I think that you'll be one of the first who will know when she gets backKMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Still supporting a Slicey lynch. I don't think BSG is scum. I'm on the fence with Ort, but leaning town.
Also, Emp, pay attention:
Santos wrote:BSG is a female, fyi.Santos wrote:I guess mentioning BSG is a female is an understatement.
Anyways...Empking wrote:Personally, I'm on the fence with BSG.Herubs me the wrong way, gut really.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
populartajo wrote:KMD, whats the case on Slicey?
Also add the early claim and the AtE.Kmd4390 wrote: -Posts "opinion" on No Lynch without posting actual suspects or anything else with content.
-Lack of stance with "torn" comment regarding No Lynch.
-Fence-sitting
-Calls Ort "a little" scummy. Doesn't back it.
-Small jab at Emp for vote change. Later says he found nothing in Emp's post history.
-"waiting" for other head.
I think my play depends on the other players in the game more than it depends on alignment. I try to play the style as scum that I would as town though.Slicey wrote: Also, KMD, I have a question for you (not really game related and you don't have to answer it if you don't want to): Do you think you play differently when you're scum as opposed to being town? A simple yes or no answer would suffice.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Lawrencelot wrote:I've become less sure that ort or empking is scum (I do want to hear from ort why empking is obvtown), and this also counts for slicey. Unvote. I don't like populartajo's play in this game, butI'm not sure if it's scummy.Santos is the only of the 'big wagons' that i like, but he's attached to BSG so I'd rather wait with Santos till later.
Vote: populartajofor now.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
You should know what.UnofficialRulerOfEveryone wrote:
What?Kmd4390 wrote:UROE, that need to be posted in thread why exactly?
Same as UROE. Stop. Now.Slicey wrote: Yes, but I'm treating as if Ort was Emp's scumbuddy just because Ort is afraid that Emp will act scummy. I'm not saying that Emp is 100% town, I just think he's town, that's all.
I also considered the fact that he may be a town power role. But I still think there's a higher chance of him being scum.
I knew that was going to be worded poorly. >_____>
julienvonwolfe, if you didn't like lawrencelot's vote, then why don't you change it? >_>
WHY ARE WE DISCUSSING THIS.Lawrencelot wrote:Well UROE did say what I didn't want to say. Since it's out there: I think ortolan is either scum/independent, or town with a good role. That is why I don't want to lynch ortolan/empking, it may cost the town a lot.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Don't tell the scum who you think the power roles are. I can't believe 3 players are discussing that.UnofficialRulerOfEveryone wrote:Why should I not be allowed to post my views on the game in-thread?
This is mafia, you aren't the mod, quit telling me what I can and can't do.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
What makes you think that?populartajo wrote: Because inexperienced scum wouldnt try to direct the game from the grave.
No idea. Mod never answered. I assume plurality lynch.ortolan wrote: How do we know Slicey's going to get lynched without a majority, anyway? Where are the rules on deadline votes?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
You make it sound like a mastermind plot to name off a couple of players as scummy.populartajo wrote:
Think about Slicey and think about his behaviour all this game. Do you really think he would be able to generate the amount of WIFOM in only 1 post if he were scum?Kmd4390 wrote:
What makes you think that?populartajo wrote: Because inexperienced scum wouldnt try to direct the game from the grave.
KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
Do you think that only scum generate WIFOM?ShadowGirl wrote:
Seems you're generating some WIFOM of your own, Tajo.populartajo wrote:
Even though we are facing different situation and obv different players, I would like a not ongoing game to comment with more freedom.UnofficialRulerOfEveryone wrote:I am willing to argue that point, see ongoing-NG 707. (No specifics, seeongoing)
Think about Slicey and think about his behaviour all this game. Do you really think he would be able to generate the amount of WIFOM in only 1 post if he were scum?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
What are your thoughts on Slicey, Ort, and Emp?forbiddanlight wrote:
I kinda stopped checking sometime because NOTHING CONSTRUCTIVE was happening. Thusly, I forgot the game.
Not so sure about this...
Why haven't you had any thoughts on the game so far? (If you had thoughts, I doubt for would "forget" about the game...)KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
I did. She seemed more protown than anyone else IMO.Empking wrote:
QFTKmd4390 wrote:
Better yet, vote like normal and when a majority is reached, BSG kills the "lynched" player.Lawrencelot wrote:Good idea, let's just vote like normal and BSG can use that information to form his opinion.
Who voted BSG?KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
The whole point in not quicklynching is to get discussion. We weren't going to get that yesterday, so quicklynching was fine. Also, convincing people with a case wasn't going to happen. I personally voted Santos as a policy lynch. Everyone was pretty much ok with lynching him. We couldn't get a real read on him. And if he was town, he wasn't helping. I was fine with lynching him and lynching him quickly.
Raider, I disagree about BSG doing what she wants. The power should be with the majority of the group. Of course she has the power to say otherwise, but I'd prefer playing this like a normal day. We don't know what kind of rules we'll have in future days, so when we have the chance to play a normal day, we should do it.KMD is the coolest dude who ever lost a bet to me - vonflare-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008
-
-
Kmd4390 I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- I lost a bet.
- Posts: 14493
- Joined: July 2, 2008