Past Ages Mafia - Game Over

Brandi · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:07 am

Oh, ok :B

Empking · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:14 am

Brandi wrote:I didn't self-vote O_o But ok~

I was talking to Ort, you were just to change my vote.

Brandi · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:21 am

Its easy to confuse me ^^;

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:34 am

Get a room, relationship challenged heads!

raider8169 · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:40 am

Raging Rabbit wrote:Get a room, relationship challenged heads!

Im sure they already have a room, the problem is that the rest of us are forced to be in said room with them.

populartajo · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:38 am

I think I am happy with my vote.
Why ortolan is so sure Empking is town?

Kmd4390 · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:45 am

populartajo wrote: Why ortolan is so sure Empking is town?

I think a better question is why vote him if you are so sure he is town?

Brandi · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:08 am

^ I think they are just playing around with eachother... not being serious

KaleiÐoscøpe · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:11 am

ortolan/empking (2): MavLock/popu, Santos/BSG
raider/Brandi (2): Kmd/Braeden, ortolan/empking
Narsis/forbiddanlight (1): raider/Brandi
MavLock/popu (1): Shadowgirl/RR
Shadowgirl/RR (1): Budja/UROE
Kmd/Braeden (1): ani/Slicey

Not Voting (2): Narsis/forbiddanlight, julien/lawrence

populartajo · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:27 am

Brandi wrote:^ I think they are just playing around with eachother... not being serious

I would think that at first glance but I know ortolan and he is a serious guy. Am I right, ortolan?

raider8169 · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 5:34 am

populartajo wrote:
Brandi wrote:^ I think they are just playing around with eachother... not being serious
I would think that at first glance but I know ortolan and he is a serious guy. Am I right, ortolan?

I dont see how they were not playing around unless he was trying to say his second head was scum.

Not sure if scum partners are paired together or not but it would make sense if they are not as the portal just merged people together. Seemed to be more random then anything.

ShadowGirl · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:13 am

Hn. Interesting mechanics.

Unvote. Vote: forbiddanlight

For modding a game I'm dead in. ;D

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:13 am

I'm pretty sure the distribution's random, makes no sense for it to be anything but. What we need to figure out is whether we want to lynch based on who's the single scummiest player, or lynch a pair where both heads are somewhat scummy (unless the scummiest player has a scummy partner, in which case problem solved).

Brandi · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:15 am

Hmm, actually if it is random as RR suggests, then "self-voting" can be VERY pro-town.

Kmd4390 · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:16 am

Raging Rabbit wrote:I'm pretty sure the distribution's random, makes no sense for it to be anything but. What we need to figure out is whether we want to lynch based on who's the single scummiest player, or lynch a pair where both heads are somewhat scummy (unless the scummiest player has a scummy partner, in which case problem solved).

I'd say the most likely individual player to be scum should be lynched while keeping in mind who their second head is.

For example, if one player seems like they absolutely have to be scum, lynch them. But if their partner seems overly protown, maybe we leave them for tomorrow when we are playing basically a different kind of game.

Brandi · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:19 am

Would a cop investigating their second head count as them trying to investigate them self?

Raging Rabbit · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:19 am

Brandi wrote:Hmm, actually if it is random as RR suggests, then "self-voting" can be VERY pro-town.

Only if you're overwhelmingly sure your partner's scum, which I doubt ort is after 2 pages of playing.

Yes to Kmd's post.

Brandi · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:21 am

Well I was just saying for in general. Not relating to Ort/Emp. Cause' I'm pretty sure they weren't being serious~

Kmd4390 · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:21 am

Brandi wrote:Would a cop investigating their second head count as them trying to investigate them self?

I doubt it.

Empking's Alt · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:28 am

Raging Rabbit wrote:I'm pretty sure the distribution's random, makes no sense for it to be anything but. What we need to figure out is whether we want to lynch based on who's the single scummiest player, or lynch a pair where both heads are somewhat scummy (unless the scummiest player has a scummy partner, in which case problem solved).

I'd go with "player with exceptions."

MacavityLock · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:30 am

MacavityLock wrote:
Mod
, just to be sure, no guarantee that our 2nd head is same alignment?

[quote="KaleiÃ

MacavityLock · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:31 am

EBWOP: I agree with Kmd's 64, not 54.

Lawrencelot · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:32 am

Hi all.

Vote: ortolan

. He confuses me.

Too bad I don't know my second head. I'm Dutch and male, what about you?

raider8169 · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:35 am

MacavityLock wrote:
MacavityLock wrote:
Mod
, just to be sure, no guarantee that our 2nd head is same alignment?

[quote="KaleiÃ

Empking · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:37 am

I'd go with "player with exceptions."

Me.

First person to see claims. We then check if we consider it enough to take away the bandwagon.