cuz he's the only other person with numbers in his name
Mini 707: Cops and Robbers Mafia (Game Over)
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
In the middle of page three, I'm not sure yet, let me get back to you when we have a bit more content. [/rawr statment]Ether wrote:Crywolf. Who's scum?
Truthfully, i've just scanned GC's wall'o'text and have yet to actually read it. I was about to get to it when I saw this.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Okay, miss pushy. Come up with something yourself. I'm trying to do so.Ether wrote:Yeah, those walls of text suck.
You need to be producing content instead of waiting for it.
@GC: thanks for the summery..I just noticed it.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
I say you're complaining. Yes you may have contributed a little bit, but to me, being sick and studying for a very important Bio test takes precedent to this. But i'm here now and I'm not liking your pushiness.
There's a time and a place to be pushy as a townie, but right now, I think you have gone to far.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
It's only page three. Now if it was page ten and nothing has been said it two days, then you can be pushy.Ether wrote:I was not aware that you were sick or studying for a very important bio test.
I have no idea how asking a lurker to stop lurking and pointing out that I myself am not lurking is "too far."aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
You are no better than me, unless you are one of two roles. Mason, you have someone who is knowning on your side. Or Scum, then you know who you should jump onto.Ether wrote:Psh. I'm not going to let someone active-lurk up until Page 10 to the point where nothing has been said in two days.
I'm summarizing my behavior toward you: three times repeating that you should get into the game, and once getting annoyed because you had the nerve to insinuate thatI was no better than you.
And I am acting town. ^_^
How's that read?
There are some other things that you maybe a tracker/watcher/cop or some other information gathering role and you know something that I don't at this point of time.
And no, I wasn't going to active lurk up to page 10 but the way you're acting right now, on page four, is pretty much the same as you would on page 10 where there is a mass of lurkers.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Okay so the first thing that I thought was off was corporate’s vote. I’d like some reasoning before I have much to say to that.
Secondly, I do not like how Ether’s practically running the game. Whatever she asks people jump and do it.
Simpor points out a good point here:
Simpor wrote:Ether:
After voting Mizzy and having some pressure on her, he turns and defends Mizzy:
Posts a scumlist of three players (not including Mizzy) and then the next post want to have answers from her.Dislike q21's vote, regardless of Mizzy's alignment.
More Mizzy defence.No. I'm not thrilled with Mizzy, but I completely believe that her job is serious business. And she still manages to be more active than half the game. I think the focus should move to someone else for today.
You also states that your unvote of Mizzy was a mistake, implying that your vote belongs there (at least from my understanding). But Mizzy is not high up on your scumlist.. And if you don't think that Mizzy is scum, then your unvote should be correct?
I agree with Simpor here and I don’t like what what Ether had to say.
Green Crayons wrote:(Second side note: in post 129 corporate says, "im not using double standards i have a fos for cry wolf as well" I did a quick skim of the thread and didn't see where this FOS against crywolf was. Did I just miss it or is this a blatant lie?)
There’s your answer GC. I don’t necessarily believe that it was a true FOS.corporate, in 115 wrote:ok well, im pretty undecided. theres a lot of stretching going on and votes with lack of substance. also due to the lack of participation from half the game im going to hold my vote untill we get to know each other a little better.
i could put a FoS at almost everybody. but the top two on my radar are mizzy and ether, but that may be because they are two of the most vocal and that leaves more chances to misinterpet. im also skeptical about mizzys attention to limited participation, it just feels like a possible defensive move. ether, immediatley buying it and defending her is questionable.
im least suspicious of GC. GC makes sense to me.
Why?Ether wrote:vote: crywolf20084
This is prior to you asking for a prod for me.
I think Ether’s trying to get complete control of the town, and I’m not about ready to just hand it over, which makes me pretty suspicious.Simpor wrote: crywolf20084:
The first seven posts by her (I checked the gender this time! ) is no content posts but the last one is interesting
Do you believe that Ether has a power role? And by the way, Ether did ask you who you suspected in post 65 and we are now up in 135. Do you have any suspicions now?crywolf20084 wrote: You are no better than me, unless you are one of two roles. Mason, you have someone who is knowning on your side. Or Scum, then you know who you should jump onto.
There are some other things that you maybe a tracker/watcher/cop or some other information gathering role and you know something that I don't at this point of time.
My rating of everyone: (1-10 10 being scummy, 5 is neutral, meaning I could go either way or there is not much of a read.)
Tisp--5
Fuzzyman—4 Hasn’t done anything yet to make me worry other than the reaching with the names.
Mister Lolipedo-kun—5
q21—4 He’s made sense thus far
Aceagain—6 I’d like to hear from you some more.
Mizzy—6 I would like her to comment a bit more, and I don’t like her ruse about her LA-ness.
Green Crayons –3 He’s struck me the as the most town with the most sense.
corporate—6.5 Some odd moves, like to hear from him again.
Simpor –4.5 He’s pointed out something that I would like answered as well.
Ether—7 Definitely is one that’s been in my radar. I don’t like how she’s been saying “Oh lookie! I’m town. Sooo Town” and the attack then defense of Mizzy, then my vote with nothing said about me in the same post.
So I’m going to do this:
Vote: Etheraim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
I didn't vote you for it. If I was really bothered about it, I would've voted, or I would request that you get a replacement.Mizzy wrote:crywolf20084:If you think my work schedule is a ruse, how about you come work these 70-hour weeks for me?
It's pretty easy to call something a ruse without checking into it, isn't it? If anyone had bothered to look, I have posted very little in the other two games I am in, too,for the same reason.
I understand the whole 70 hours a week. That's how much I should be doing with school and work combined. I absolutely hated last week with three exams and I have one more week like that coming up on the week of the fifteenth. It sucks I know.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Hold on, I'm at school right now.
Bite me. I need my Bio class for my career. I think that it's a little bit more important than a game, but I'm caught up now am I not?Ether wrote:Why doesn't this bother you, Corporate? She actually has used this as a crutch, while still being active elsewhere on the site; in contrast, most of Mizzy's recent posts are still here on 707.
I don't like his vote without any following reasons. I said that. Read.Ether wrote:♥
Crywolf, what don'tyoulike from Corporate? Simpor, what do you like from Ped? And why the hell do you care if Crywolf thinks I have a power role?
No. You practically demanded (that's a bit harsh...) everyone rate this group of five people. Maybe its just the way I you rubbed me.Ether wrote:
So far, I think Patrick's the only person who did something because I asked him. Most of the other efforts to defend my honor is just stuff people felt like doing, which I sometimes appreciate and sometimes don't really care about. I don't think you can name a single spot where I actually called another player to my aid, aside from just to answer direct questions.Post 141, Crywolf wrote:Secondly, I do not like how Ether’s practically running the game. Whatever she asks people jump and do it.
Okay. Thank you.Ether wrote:Actually, I'm seeing a more and more strongly defined split centered around me, and I find it a bit unnerving. By voting me, you're just helping to foster this notion that I'm the most important thing in the game. ._.
Failure to answer my questions; OMGUS to avoid actual content during our enchange; lurking whilst posting elsewhere on the site. I couldn't call the mod in at that time, since you hadn't been gone for 72 hours yet.Post 141, Crywolf wrote:
Why?Ether wrote:vote: crywolf20084
This is prior to you asking for a prod for me.
Ether wrote:Post 132, Simpor wrote:You also states that your unvote of Mizzy was a mistake, implying that your vote belongs there (at least from my understanding). But Mizzy is not high up on your scumlist.. And if you don't think that Mizzy is scum, then your unvote should be correct?
At the time, the unvote was an accident. By the time Charter had me blank on the next votecount and I realized my mistake when, I didn't care enough to replace it. I suspected that my vote would be pulling a lurkerhunt in the near future anyway.Post 122, Ether wrote:Mizzy - bored now.
I don't think I'll be moving back to Mizzy after she's out of work; the Mizhate is too universal for my tastes. I find myself losing interest in q21 as well, even though he didn't, like, answer my question. It's probably just a subconscious reaction to him backing me up, but then again, I'm starting to get nervous with Ped.
48-hour alert: Tisp
Happy, Ether?aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
I don't know if I like your vote on Simpor, Ether. Truthfully, I think Ether's acting very scummy, not power-role-y.Green Crayons wrote:
Your main point, as much as I can tell from simply skimming the thread, is that Simpor asked Wolf to clarify her point that she thought you had a power role. Did I miss anything else?Ether wrote:In other news, no one's commented on my Simpor vote.
While scummish, I don't find it worthy of a vote compared to Mizzy, corp or - if I was to just look at people who were throwing out guesses as to who has power roles - wolf herself.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
There. Yeah, you're trying to understand where the town feels for them, but to me it just seemed demanding, despite the 'please'.Ether wrote:Please List {Fuzzyman, Green Crayons, q21} in order of scumminess.
I think it's just your way of speaking. It always seems to me pushing to mold the town into your ways of thinking.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
I think trying to lead a town is pretty much 85/15 scummy because the scum want to beable to convince the town who is the 'scum' without drawing much or any attention to themself or their partners. I have always seen scum try to take over the town early to try to win it as early as possible.Patrick wrote:crywolf, did you ever explain why you think leading the town is scummy?aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Muchq21 wrote:
Without drawing much attention? Leading the town and not drawing attention are mutually exclusive methods of play.crywolf20084 wrote:
I think trying to lead a town is pretty much 85/15 scummy because the scum want to beable to convince the town who is the 'scum' without drawing much or any attention to themself or their partners. I have always seen scum try to take over the town early to try to win it as early as possible.Patrick wrote:crywolf, did you ever explain why you think leading the town is scummy?scummyattention is what I meant.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Corperate PBPA (Times are EST)
Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:19 am: 1st post; He replaced in.
Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:10 pm: 2nd post. Has suspicions but notes no one yet. Says he’s gonna take notes.
Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:28 pm: 3rd post: Pokes at Mizzy’s LA-ness, asks her to replace.
Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:44 pm: #4: the odd posting begins to start. Where he places his “FOS on everyone” Specifically mentions mizzy and ether, but says it’s probably because of they’re the most vocal. Skeptical of mizzy’s posting limitation; calls it defensive; and says ether bought it quickly. Thinks GC is the most likely town.
Fri Nov 21, 2008 3:38 pm : #5: backpedals this is the post because I couldn’t find a way to recap it:
Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:01 am:#6: Responds to Ether.corporate wrote:its not exactly because they are vocal, its because they have been more vocal in less creditable subject matter which makes it hard to interpet since the ball is barley rolling. its not exactly anything specific that rubs me wrong im just observing behaviors. and im not sure how i feel about them yet.
and you, GC, are just as vocal. (congratulations, heres a cookie.) but the reason im least bothered by it is because you come across with more sound reasoning and detail. something i need to refine.
and the using real life as a way to dodge questions. hey, it may be a low, shitty tactic. but the objective is to win, and if i was scum i would use every tool at my disposal. im not trying to be unsportsman like or slanderous, but im not going to assume anyones telling the truth about anything, yet.
seems taken aback about someone meta-ing him.corporate wrote:youre reading my other games? and im a horrible person?
Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:36 pm : #7: Where he gets caught with his FOS on me. Says he thinks meta is scummy. Says we’re digging hard to get anything scummy on him (Ha) Says he’s gonna “Keep his Mafia Experience to [him]self”
Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:38 pm: #8: Practically a double post.
Sun Nov 23, 2008 5:51 am: #9: Votes for Ether. Says nothing else.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:56 am: #10: Asks if his lack of punctuation is anti-town (No, it’s not but, it’s obnoxious)
Umm…Kay. Don’t like that.corporate wrote:and to those who dont like my vote.
tough cookies.
i vote how i want.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:49 pm: #11: Plenty of sarcasm to go around in this post. He FOS’s himself
Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:19 pm: #12: Says he’s addressed the post about double standerds (I think it was an easy fall back); Is frustrated that people are pushing stretched cases on him. (I have yet to find a stretched case.)corporate wrote: of course im defensive. i dont wanna be lynched when im innocent. im a little more concerned with someone who would want to lynch someone for "bad punctuation."
Mon Nov 24, 2008 3:07 pm: #13
That’s all he said.corporate wrote:we may as well vote professor plum in the library with the wrench.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 3:26 pm: #14: Says there is no reason to be voting him, Says there is no case.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 3:40 pm: #15: Still wants to understand the case on him even though it has been told several time.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:00 pm: #16; Post number three asking about the case on him.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 4:54 pm: #17: Claims that he’s vanilla.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:16 pm: #18:
Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:32 pm: #19; Agrees with the post above him.corporate wrote: and to add insult to injury if mizzy and ether would like to vote for me ill go ahead and put the final nail in my coffin. and get this rollin to N1
Mon Nov 24, 2008 5:59 pm: #20
Oh so helpful[/sarcasm] I would really like to know his alt name.corporate wrote:
umm... noEther wrote:I have a really bad feeling about this.
Corporate. Old account name, and reasons why you're on a new one instead. Now. Thank you.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:18 pm: #21: Claims again as a n00b town this time.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 6:48 pm: #22: Another useless post.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:50 pm: #23:
Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:31 pm:#24 Quotes Mister Lolipedo-kun who says that he doesn’t have a scum read on corperate; corperate uses it for a sig and then gets yelled at for quoting something that’s from an active game.corporate wrote:no, i dont want out. i want to play. the purpose of a game is to have fun. and i am having fun. we can win this, i still dont think im the best vote for d1 though.
Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:41 am: #25: Says everyone is uptight because we told him it needed to be changed.
Tue Nov 25, 2008 3:36 pm: #26:
Okay, an actual answer from him.corporate wrote:
i dont read a game unless im in it. thats just always seemed un ethical to me. i understand alot of people disagree with me, but i feel like if your not in a game. that game is none of your business.crywolf20084 wrote:I don't want him to just 'hide.' I wish I could quote the other games he's in, but sadly they are all new games.
Example coming in a moment.
Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:01 pm: #27: Clearly says he’s choosing to play like the way he is; says he’s participating and trying to be helpful; doesn’t think making walls-o-text are fun, and doesn’t want to make the game into a chore
(Like my wall of text yet, coperate?? I’m just half way.)
Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:12 pm: #28: asks where he said he was a good player. (Let me quote it for you)
Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:26 pm: #29: Another Useless post.corporate wrote:i dont think that just because you dont like how i choose to play that makes it scummy. im participating and trying to be helpful. in the way thats fun for me. over analyzing and putting together a wall of text for everything might seem more helpful. and i do agree very much that it can be convincing. but from previous experience it can take some of the fun out of even playing.
im trying not to turn the game into a chore. its better to lose a game you had fun playing, then to win a game that felt like homework.
Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:36 pm: #30: Says his example of demands is a bit extreme
Tue Nov 25, 2008 4:51 pm: #31: Unvoted.
Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:29 pm: #32:
Tue Nov 25, 2008 5:48 pm: #33: Contentless post.corporate wrote: You call backpedaling? well, i call shenanigans!
Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:29 pm: #34:
I find this very useless and he’s trying to get people to diver t attention from him, and failed miserably. It would’ve been easier to pull out another person, and go after them.corporate wrote: alright, alright, this might sound crazy, but i got this idea. how about.... we dont kill corporate.
now i know this might sound off coming from me, but i think its a bad idea. i really trust him, i think it would be a waste of a day. especially day1. sure, he is annoying, but he is also harmless. i know this man! its just this feeling i cant seem to shake.
i say there has to be someone better to lynch. we should just keep him around a little while longer.
Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:33 am: #35: Contentless not worth noting.
Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:34 am: #36: “Polly want a Cracker?” What?
Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:02 pm: #37: Thinks that simpor had a useful comment; Explains polly want a cracker statement; says that his four-word post was more useful than 237.
Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:09 pm: #38:corporate wrote:why if youd like to see how the case evolves, why not help it evolve instead of opening yourself the door to switch wagons without doing any work?
PBPA on Simpor comming in the next couple of days.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
I chose simpor and corperate becasue they are the two most scummy in my book, I will have a conclusion post comparing the both of them at the end of simpor's PBPA, which I want to start last night and I'm doing it right now.Ether wrote:I'm annoyed and kinda disturbed that so many people are so willing to ignore Simpor.
I don't get why people do PBPs, especially in the above manner--the vast majority of that above is something I could have found just as easily by filtering Corporate, and it doesn't even have a nice summary of Crywolf's conclusions at the end. I suppose if it's a comparison she's after, that's nice...but it needn't take more than a few minutes; he only has like eleven posts and they're not that big. I'd still like her to answer the question Patrick originally posed about what games led her to state that "I have always seen scum try to take over the town early to try to win it as early as possible" in her 255.
Hmm. What led you to choose to PBP Corporate and Simpor specifically?
Don't mind q21's Fuzzyvote, especially seeing him popping in just to respond to that without commenting on current events. Having said that, I'm curious what his opinion of Tisp is, considering his stated reason.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Simpor PBPA (Times in EST)
Tue Nov 18, 2008 3:51 pm: #1; Votes for Mizzy, for her latest posting.
Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:56 am: #2: Unvotes and says the game is going fast; Says read up is coming.
Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:25 am: #3; apologizes for not posting; Notices something between Ether and Mizzy;
Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:29 am: #4: Comments on Aceagain and corperate.Simpor wrote:Sorry for not posting, busy week and busy weekend.
Reading through the game I have noticed some things, starting with Mizzy and Ether:
Mizzy:
Threats, don't want to have other people ask questions?Major FoS: Green Crayons for asking questions that weren't his responsibility to ask and in doing so indirectly protecting Fuzz, giving Fuzz easy-outs by arguing my attacks on him for him, manipulating what I said, and in the span of 3 sentences, cramming in some of the scummiest play I've seen in ages.
Any more BS from you and I'll be moving my vote.
Also when canyon argues against her post, mizzy gets a lot to do at work.. But finds time to post 4-5 posts to other questions. And have continued posting.
Ether:
After voting Mizzy and having some pressure on her, he turns and defends Mizzy:
Posts a scumlist of three players (not including Mizzy) and then the next post want to have answers from her.Dislike q21's vote, regardless of Mizzy's alignment.
More Mizzy defence.No. I'm not thrilled with Mizzy, but I completely believe that her job is serious business. And she still manages to be more active than half the game. I think the focus should move to someone else for today.
You also states that your unvote of Mizzy was a mistake, implying that your vote belongs there (at least from my understanding). But Mizzy is not high up on your scumlist.. And if you don't think that Mizzy is scum, then your unvote should be correct?
Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:58 pm: #5: Comments on myself, fuzzyman, GC, Mister Loliped-kun, and Tisp. No opinions on any of it.
Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:58 pm: #6: Rates the players. Finally has some opinions on them.
Mon Nov 24, 2008 2:37 pm: #7: Responds to Ether; Calls it a responsibility to the town to ask questions.
Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:09 am: #8:
Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:52 am: #9: A post of mumble jumbled quotes that confuse me each time I read it so I’ll quote it.Simpor wrote: I am more and more thinking about corporate as scum or useless townie.
Useless since most of his post are distractions. He started well but after his fourth or fifth post it went downhill..
And scum, well, should a townie act like this in a game? If he is a townie, then he is removing focus from the scums..
I think I finally understand it, but I’m not quite sure.Simpor wrote:
What is there to comment? No one else have picked up Ethers opinion.corporate wrote: i started well? what about all the stuff thats going on up there about you? and you bring me back into this? i think everyone already knows im an ass, captain obvious. what about you?
And her reasons where:Not all questions are pro-town. It is not a responsibility as a townie to vocally seek out power roles.- But not asking wolf who started it... that is strange, and such have GC stated:
While scummish, I don't find it worthy of a vote compared to Mizzy, corp or - if I was to just look at people who were throwing out guesses as to who has power roles - wolf herself.
She asked a question in a rude way, I made a rude response. Simple as that.And I really hate the fear-mongering generalization you put into your defense.
Ok, I have you high up on my scum list, so you are voting for me...And pretty much all Ped's done is agree with me, and I'm tied for highest on your list. So yeah.
That was a very helpful comment...corporate wrote: polly want a cracker?
Wed Nov 26, 2008 7:55 am: #10; Quotes mizzy about criminilzing people who have points against him and Simpor asks where he’s done that.
Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:37 am: #11: This is his last post, which puts him in earning of a prod.
Simpor wrote:This is the only thing in the case then:
And this is her answerDo you believe that Ether has a power role? And by the way, Ether did ask you who you suspected in post 65 and we are now up in 135. Do you have any suspicions now?
No one else was making a comment against her post so I asked wolf to see what kind of reaction I would get, she pretty much ignored my question and I didn't ask again.I think Ether’s trying to get complete control of the town, and I’m not about ready to just hand it over, which makes me pretty suspicious.
The biggest difference that I saw between Coperate and Simpor was the amount of posts, and the usefulness of the posts. Where Coperate has posted more, I counted one post that had any actual use, where there are a couple posts (that could’ve been condensed into a single post) that hold some content. IMO neither of them have helped all that much, not as much as one should be. I am happy with my vote on Coperate mostly because of his refusal to comply with a lot of things, like telling us our thoughts. His posts have slightly increased on the helpful side, but I have yet to see him really cooperate. And for his claims, I don’t buy either of them, and I don’t like how he jumped from one to the other.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
At first he was neutral because he had so few posts, but now with 10+ posts, and the usual expanse between the posts, I have a feeling with his supposed limited experience that he doesn't know how to play town.Patrick wrote:Much as I approve of pressure on Simpor, your suspicion of him seems to come out of nowhere. I've always been getting the impression you've been reading him as neutral at worst, and I don't think you've really made any points against him. What made him your second best suspect?
Thus he's earned spot number two behind my very content post on coperate.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
q21 wrote:@crywolf
In you post 276 you claim to have come to some understanding of Simpor's 9th post, but you never say what that understanding is. Could you please post what that understanding was, else it looks like that part of you post is simply there to add volume.
I believe this quote is from Ether.Simpor wrote:
What is there to comment? No one else have picked up Ethers opinion.corporate wrote: i started well? what about all the stuff thats going on up there about you? and you bring me back into this? i think everyone already knows im an ass, captain obvious. what about you?
And her reasons where:Not all questions are pro-town. It is not a responsibility as a townie to vocally seek out power roles.
This quote is from GC, I know that one for a fact.Simpor wrote:- But not asking wolf who started it... that is strange, and such have GC stated:
While scummish, I don't find it worthy of a vote compared to Mizzy, corp or - if I was to just look at people who were throwing out guesses as to who has power roles - wolf herself.
..I really don't know this one.Simpor wrote:
She asked a question in a rude way, I made a rude response. Simple as that.And I really hate the fear-mongering generalization you put into your defense.
Or this one, for that matter.Simpor wrote:
Ok, I have you high up on my scum list, so you are voting for me...And pretty much all Ped's done is agree with me, and I'm tied for highest on your list. So yeah.
As for what he was trying to say, I think he was trying to get his way out of a bit of rolefishing, because he asked me if I was rolefishing, which i was not.Simpor wrote:
That was a very helpful comment...corporate wrote: polly want a cracker?
Hope that helped.
@Simpor: Please I would love for you to clairify if I'm worng, and maybe explain why you were using these quotes?aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Simpor it helps if you do this:
Code: Select all
[quote="Name of the Writer]blahblahblah[/quote]
Its the lack of names with several different people your quoting, or at least that's how it seems.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
I chose to ignore this for a reason. Seriously, I don't like when people go spewing "Lookie at meee!! I'm tooooooown!!!!"Ether wrote:Post 292, Ether wrote:Crywolf: you have accepted that I am a pro-town towngoer who glows radiantly with towniness and has only the best interests of the town at heart (y/n). We'll go forward from there.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
I don't get it. The only thing I understood out of it was what GC said. And even when Simpor clairfied the quote tags, I am still confused on why he was quoted all of them.Ether wrote:Okay, then.
Please state your opinion of Simpor's ninth post now.
I have not ignored Patrick's posts. I have commented to them all, at least i believe so, I have to go back and . You asked the same questions, I just happened to quote Patrick.Ether wrote:Please cite the games you've played/read that gave you impression that scum are more likely to try to control the town. Do not stall any longer, and kindly explain why you have ignored my and Patrick's questioning this far. Thank you.
To the bolded: One is coming. But you're a lot harder to do a PBPA on and I'm pretty limited with my acess due to finals for my english over the next week. (thank god.)Ether wrote:I do not like that you are suddenly supposedly listening to me and expressing suspicions of the guy I've been pressuring, and are in fact not mentioning me directly despite my place on his wagon,and have PBP'd him but not me,but are not willing to vote him. This is not a question; you are not expected to respond. But you can if you'd like to.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Here is one, but the one I would love to link another one but it's still on going.Ether wrote:
You havePost 260, Patrick wrote:Can you link to completed games that made you think scum are more likely to lead the town?stillnot answered this.
Ether wrote:
So that should clear things up. ^_^Post 240, Simpor (gold is me[Ether])[Green is Crywolf] wrote:
What is there to comment? No one else have picked up Ethers opinion.corporate wrote: i started well? what about all the stuff thats going on up there about you? and you bring me back into this? i think everyone already knows im an ass, captain obvious. what about you?
Pointing out something which Corporate should comment on. Perfectly valid. This then degenerates into an utterly moronic tangent against me without a single valid point.
[/b]I agree with you here, that Simpor does go on quotes you without much of a reason...Its kinda like he thinks quoting you would make things all better.
And her reasons where:Not all questions are pro-town. It is not a responsibility as a townie to vocally seek out power roles.- But not asking wolf who started it... that is strange, and such have GC stated:
While scummish, I don't find it worthy of a vote compared to Mizzy, corp or - if I was to just look at people who were throwing out guesses as to who has power roles - wolf herself.First off, he doesn't actually address his fishing; he just tries to deflect it by asserting that Crywolf had done the same thing. But shehadn't;she was just trying to maintain some petty moral high ground over me when I was harassing her about her activity. And Ihadalready covered this in 207.
And I really hate the fear-mongering generalization you put into your defense.Actually, I don't get why he quoted this, either. He doesn't actually provide a defense against it.Ditto.
She asked a question in a rude way, I made a rude response. Simple as that.
My question about Ped was perfectly polite. My question about his fishing was ruder, because it's bad play.
Ok, I have you high up on my scum list, so you are voting for me...And pretty much all Ped's done is agree with me, and I'm tied for highest on your list. So yeah.
This is both an ad hominem and a strawman. He takes the time to highlight that I am aware that he expressed some idiot suspicion of me, and uses this to try and paint my vote as pure OMGUS. He ignores my actual point about the fishiness of his opinion of Ped.
That was a very helpful comment...corporate wrote: polly want a cracker?
Wrapping up this noble effort to improve Corporate's play.I really don't understand why coperate even said that, and why it was worth noting.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
It's the content in that game. And if Fyxxs hadn't jumped ship, he would've won for most controling scum in that game.Ether wrote:Crywolf: although I didn't read the game you linked to, I did run some calculations on the postcounts. (I can post this in full if you'd like: as a summary, the average postcount of a townie who lived to endgame was 48; the average for a scumbag was 47. You pushed up the scum average by being the highest poster; the other two scum both posted less than average. Nonetheless...I'm surprised.) This is just postcount, and it could misrepresent the amount of scum-leading actually going on, but I feel too lazy to look into that.
Er. That's not how it usually works?
You bring up vaild points, which I agree with, also Simpor last couple posts, He's jumped up above corperate in my book so:
Unvote; Vote: Simpor
@Simpor: I may not like Ether, but those are not reachy reasons. Actually they are very vaild.
@Coperate: I'm not done with you, your posts have gottenslightlybetter yes, but I would love to see exactly why you changed your vote.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
..... I refuse to go there corperate.corporate wrote:@crywolf
you mean were passed the random voting phase? :p
@Simpor: I too would like to see who you seem scummy, and the why part would be really nice.
@Ether: I don't think I'm gonna post my PBPA on you because, A) It's too long already and i doubt i'm halfway done, and B) out of the context of the rest of the posts, I think I'm starting to understand you. I'll have some thoughtsaim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
I didn't notice it, but it's not as obvious as Ether's; ie:Mizzy wrote:
No, I'm not. I wasn't convinced of the wagon then and I am less so now.Ether wrote:Mizzy, are you complaining about the derailed Corpwagon? You should come vote Simpor with us.
In cry's words: "Lookie at meee!! I'm tooooooown!!!!"Simpor wrote:If I'm lynched this day it's going to be really interesting to see what the rest of you in the town will think of Ethers posts, since I will turn up as a townie.
Cry:Why did you call out Ether's townie-talk but not Simpor's? I see you voted him but it surprised me that you were specific at Ether but not Simpor.
I do like the Simpor wagon in a way because he stinks of scum, but like corporate seemed to be, he could be another unhelpful townie. Two votes and a threatened vote worry me...the shit is rolling downhill too fast.
She said town four times in that statement, where as Simpor's is a claim to towniness that I do not believe.Ether in 292 wrote:Crywolf: you have accepted that I am a pro-town towngoer who glows radiantly with towniness and has only the best interests of the town at heart (y/n). We'll go forward from there.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Uhh..Ether, Fuzzy's vote was the hammer so thus your unvote doens't count...Rules wrote:10] Once a person has been lynched, the game is in twilight until I post the death scene. Players may continue posting anything until then. The lynch cannot be undone.
@GC First language would've worked...aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Do you even have a reason why you think i'm scum???corporate wrote:no i was not willing to hammer him. i was trying to bring attention to what i thought was a L1 situation.
i dont want to vote for him cuz i think fuzzy and cry are more scum then he is.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
>< Stupid quota. Here's aEther wrote:On a similar note:Post 413, Ether wrote:Crywolf, if you're still going back and forth on me I'm going to need those thoughts you promised.
There is not much seperating coperate and Simpor, and you just happen to be number three on my scum list because of your "Look at my Amazing Townieness" statments that keep poping up.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Okay! My other example of leading the town (In context) turns out to be scum.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... c&&start=0 Bah Finally finished. DOubt you have time to read a 50 page game though.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
QFTMizzy wrote:
How? How will just replacing help the scum? The only way it helps the scum is if he IS scum, and the odds of that, just looking at the numbers, are much worse than the odds of him being town.Empking wrote:You made a replace or lynch dichotomy. 9/10 in a game with 1 kill N0, not lynching and just replacing will help the scum.
Longer days and more information are almost always better for the town.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Sorry about the lack of posting here. I just got done with my exams today (yay!!). Prior to the end of the day my scum list was.
Clearly I was wrong with that.crywolf20084 wrote:...Nice fuzzy that jumps out at me queit a bit.
Revised:
aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Uh no. Myko asked me what my scum list was, there it is. I now havecorporate wrote:so, crywolf are you just going to pop in every few days and re arange your scum list, or what?time, it'll be a lot easier to post something.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
...I did? Doesn't matter you're not that scummy in my book. You'd be right there with GC--well..you'd replace GC in his spot and GC would jump up a little bit. He had all this to say the first day and nothing today.q21 wrote:I feel Empking is scummy. That could simply be because of the way he plays. I need to read over his play and decide which, something I'll do when I get the chance.
Right now I'd like to ask crywolf two things about her scumlist in post 607. Why am I not on it? Where would I go? Call me self-centred if you want to, but I don't like the way she's just left me out of her analysis... twice.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Anti-Town can equal Scum. Doesn't always happen that way, but it can.Emp wrote:Also Anti-Town =/= Scummy.
The above that has been bolded is mine, in which i thoroughly agree with.Myko wrote:ok, lets put in a better format
GC is town: he didn't know simpor was town, lynched him for antitown, scummy actions.
GC is scum: he saw an easy mislynch, made himself look town and lynched simpor.
Nothing wrong with the second, but also nothing with the first.A mislynch is not a scumtell: would be fun, you would have more then half of the town as scumaim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Vote: Empking
Your posts are ridiculous. I cannot believe that you think GC was only going after Simpor. He went after Mizzy hardcore for quiet a bit. Then went to corperate, myself, and THEN Simpor.
Get your facts straight.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Is this one sentence, Emp?Green Crayons wrote:Mish-mash of my thoughts.
Ether seems to think that this isn't a big deal, but crywolf totally made a jump here that I think is pretty big. The above quote is in reference to Ether's comment: "I'm summarizing my behavior toward you: ... getting annoyed because you had the nerve to insinuate thatcrywolf wrote:You are no better than me, unless you are one of two roles. Mason, you have someone who is knowning on your side. Or Scum, then you know who you should jump onto.
There are some other things that you maybe a tracker/watcher/cop or some other information gathering role and you know something that I don't at this point of time.I was no better than you." That emphasis was crywolf's in her response, not in Ether's original post. But it should be noted that this emphasized portion wasn't Ether referencing knowing more about the game. At all. She was talking about being productive and active and otherwise helpful. So from that, crywolf suddenly thinks (as seen in the pulled quote above) that somehow Ether was flaunting a power-role status. Or a lack thereof. The whole thing just seems off since Ether was talking about involvement and crywolf started talking about who has (and has not) power roles. And who better to know if someone has a scum power role or not? It just strikes me as funny (in a weird way), and I don't see how it's not as suspicious (if not more so) as Simpor taking this thread and running with it. I'll also note that she picks up this thread even after Simpor, and on 206 comments upon her thoughts re: Ether's power-role status. Because...?
The above comes from November 25th. On November 29th, crywolf does her PBP analysis of Simpor. When questioned by Patrick about her apparent heel-faced turn, her response is: "At first he was neutral because he had so few posts, but now with 10+ posts, and the usual expanse between the posts, I have a feeling with his supposed limited experience that he doesn't know how to play town." It should be noted that between her not-comfortable-with-Ether's-vote-on-Simpor stage (she thought he was only a 4.5 on November 23rd, after all) and her PBP (which notably lacked any hard points against Simpor other than a summary), Simpor only posts four times. So within the time span of four days and with four posts, she is confident to say that because of the "usual expanse between the posts" (which simple math averages one post per day during the time period where she had a change of heart) is extensive, she apparently feels that Simpor is second in line to be scum because of his apparently purposeful lack of activity. It just looks like re-positioning.crywolf wrote:I don't know if I like your vote on Simpor, Ether. Truthfully, I think Ether's acting very scummy, not power-role-y.
crywolf wrote:Add-on: And your last sentence, especially the words "and pointing out that I myself am not lurking is "too far."" is pretty much waving a neon sign saying: LOOK I'm acting town!!!
Are you really accusing someone for being too townie? Seriously, I think you infected Mizzy. Get yourself detoxed.crywolf wrote:I chose to ignore this for a reason. Seriously, I don't like when people go spewing "Lookie at meee!! I'm tooooooown!!!!"
So, yeah. I find crywolf suspicious. Somehow makes a leap that Ether is somehow alluding to the fact that she does/doesn't have a power role and faults her for it. Then she faults Ether again for contributing and wanting others to contribute, classifying it as an attempt to "control the town" ...by asking them to contribute by answering questions. Then faults Ether again for being too much of a townie. It's like she has some underlying motive for attempting to heap suspicion on Ether for no good reason. I'll note at this moment in time that Simpor has also kept Ether high on his suspicion list.
And her heel faced turn re: Simpor is super weak.
Ether: Why should I vote Simpor? I'll delve into why I can't currently buy into a vote for him, and you help me see things your way.
Your original assertion was that he was fishing for power roles... but crywolf pulled power roles out of her ass, laid it on the table for everyone to see/comment upon, and then even picked up the conversation later.
You then (post 207) say you dislike the juxtaposition of "How dare you ask me about Ped" and "I like questions," but those aren't quotes, they're paraphrased sentences and you ignore a part of his post entirely... which completely and totally warps what the post was.
You asked: Simpor, what do you like from Ped?And why the helldo you care if Crywolf thinks I have a power role? (My emphasis.)
He responded: I could ask you,why the helldo you care what I like about Ped? (My emphasis.)
If you don't see that he was mimicking your tone/word usage, you're being willfully blind. Hardly an "overreaction" (as you framed it in your post 246), at least no more so than your original overreacting in phrasing such a statement. He also responds to your question, further showing that he wasn't saying "How dare you ask me about Ped" but saying "Why do you have to be so abrasive and because I'm reacting to your perceived hostility I'm going to be abrasive right back at you." The straw-man argument re: fear mongering is shaky, simply because it was a general statement that is, generally, true.
This is the only real thing I can get behind in suspecting Simpor.Patrick wrote:What I saw about Simpor was more that he seemed to go to some length to avoid explaining why he asked the question in the first place, instead he seemed to throw it back at Ether, then pointing to crywolf with a, "but she did it as well!" type of defence (which I would disagree with anyway). He has actually answered it now, but not especially convincingly;seems kind of obvious he was asking her for a reaction. Why would it have been useful to get crywolf's take on whether or not Ether's a powerole?
Ether/Patrick: If Simpor turns up town, who should we have lynched instead? If Simpor turns up scum, who is most likely to be the scum-buddies?
Vote: crywolf, because a no vote is a wasted vote. And she's most suspicious to me at this point.
One more post I believe.aim:gochat?roomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
GlorkTheInvader: GET UP ONTO SEXY ROSS'S BACK-
-
crywolf20084 Cayke
- Cayke
- Cayke
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: August 16, 2008
- Location: No longer in practically Canada
Okay you never said anything about GC being the driving force to Simpor's lynch but you did say that
that to me seems like a person who has flippin' tunnel vision. You had your sites on GC since you came into this game. You only changed to fuzzy and clearly you've seemed to come off of him.Emp wrote: We know who isn't helping. The person who's only target is the (confirmed) Pro-town Simpor.
Empking wrote:crywolf20084 wrote:q21 wrote: