There are sooo many things I want to talk about. Arhg.
First off, bit of a nonsequitor here - Mafia is a SOCIAL game. I play it SOCIALLY. Mafia is NOT a game of chess. I just wanted to say that. Okay moving on.
This is why I'm voting for glork at the moment, and I'd like you guys to tell me where I'm wrong in my thought process or whats flawed about it.
1. Glork votes me after post
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p4092012 - he gives no reason initially, and its after Nexus voted without giving a reason. As its been pointed out be some other people, it feels disingenous, predatory, and just simply lazy.
2. So okay. I'm down with that. I understand. I think, hmm, "maybe he just thought that post was super scummy, okay - I can accept that." So I shrug it off and address Ludi/the guys who just voted for me here:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p4092199. Now, I want you to really analyze what Ludi says, and how I deconstruct what he says in my post. Is my desconstruction fair? Not fair? I think its pretty darn fair.
3. Glork takes aim and snipes with
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p4092289. Again, another pot-shot style post from Glork. Again, I am left to wonder "okay, if my post was so awful, couldn't he be arsed to at least say why?". Going back to what I was previously thinking, I thought my
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p4092199 was pretty fair. Sure it was a little smarmy, but nowhere was I being intellectually unfair towards ludi. I made my points. Again, the theme of predation from Glork continues. I am reminded about what Regfan said about my playstyle (which is pretty spot on), how scum attack me as if I'm an easy ML target. Does this not feel like a case of that right now? Are Glork actions here really town-motivated? Or is he just being lazy? Does he just not understand my playstyle yet? Is it that confusing? You'd think he hasn't been around the block at all, if you accepted that premise. Which I dont.
4. Responding to me with
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 6#p4092336 I desconstruct with
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p4092511. Is my deconstruction fair? I think so. His response was pretty vapid and empty, again it feels like scum-filler trying to FoS without consequences an easy target and pass it off as activity/scumhunting. Thats my interpretation.
5. So does Glork even respond to my post? No. Does he even respond to any of my points? Is the mighty townGlork too good to dirty himself with responding to anything I've said that actually makes sense? What does he do? This is what he does:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 4#p4092574 He pushes a subtle ad-hom attack, suggesting that I'm merely being a politician, speaking without merit. Was my post really without merit? Were my points against his post really and utterly without merit so much so as to suggest I am not worthy of a response? I can only interpret this post as a redirection, a parry, away from the real issue - the points I made in my previous post about him misrepsenting what I have said and what I'm about.
6. Based on just this experience
ALONE
, I feel I have enough for a scumGlork case. I'm not even taking into account his unecessary claim, his comments towards Tierce, and his various other subtle ad-hom attacks.
I feel I am in the right. If you feel I am in the wrong, state why if you can be bothered to read this.