Well Thanksgiving was good, and lots of early voting, interesting, I guess you guys aren't shy about tossing around votes, that's cool.
I don't like the tone of Gorrad's posts so I am going to say he is scum and vote him, yes, that sounds excellent.
Because the voice can't be given a name, it doesn't have an identity. Pondering what the voice is about does no good day one, because we don't know what is accounting for it. I think it is a scum role because I have seen a scum role like it before called Mafia Manipulator, where scum makes the host post certain stuff. Also there is no 'reasoning' day one that is concrete, it is more about feeling it out. I don't think Gorrad's post look good, so I vote for him. Makes sense to me.DragonsofSummer wrote:Sir Chris wrote:I don't think the voice matters much right now, it can't really help/hurt is either way so early as we have no idea what to make of it. I would guess scum, though.
I haven't liked any of Gorrad's posts, they seem to really dance around any issue and aren't, how to say, impressive to me.unvote vote Sir ChrisWhy do you feel the voice is any less important than any other player in the game? Why do you think it is scum related?
Also his posts have had zero content and have thrown around suspicion on players with no real reasoning. The quoted post is good evidence of such.
I apologize if I appear a bit in and out, I am used to much short day times and it is hard to adjust to such lengthy days, something I am working on.DragonsofSummer wrote:I would like to point out that Sir Chris who has said as little (of relevance) as foilist showed up when I posted a case against him and then disappeared again. Way way way scummy.
That is all.
DragonsofSummer wrote:vote DeathnoteYou should know why! Getting me dead and all...
So basically I got voted by a guy for doing the same thing he is accusing of me doing, except he has managed to do it even worse than I am. He has posted quite literally no content in four posts, just making jokes and requesting information, and then voting for me for reasons that he honestly has no right to do so, maybe hoping that my absence would prove to make em an easy lynch target. I don't like it when I get taken for an easy target, it is just a bit annoying, especially by someone who can't even live up to his own standards of what I should be doing to be "not as scummy" it seems.DragonsofSummer wrote:This post makes me happy.Papa Zito wrote:I fight for truth, justice and the American way.
Also pizza.
---
How do you scumhunt a disembodied voice? Because just blindly assuming this is coming from town makes me twitch.
Also you scum hunt a disembodied voice by finding the microphone cord and following it to is point of origin. Duh
Also RF case on cobalt please.
Am I the only person who sees that as 'Oh, the inactive guy I was going after bites back, better hop off of him onto the next potential easy train'DragonsofSummer wrote:UnvoteThere is a subtle difference in not posting, and posting nothing of content. For now you have started participating (as you state it is your day off) and so I am inclined to believe that which you say. (I also work retail I know how the hours can be).
The reason I was attacking you is because you had made no thoughts on anything or anyone in the game imo in your posts, not because of how few you had.
The omgus on me is noted, but I like the activity so no vote on you any more.
Cobalt makes a good point about Vaya wagon, but what do you think of RF's case against her as he is the only one on the wagon who has posted one?
vote Zwetschenwasserhis activity is definitely less than the other games I have seen him in.
Not exactly. I said Gorrad didn't look good in just about the same way you said I didn't look good. Also I am glad you agree that my reason is sound, as it is the truth, but it doesn't mean your actions have been less scummy. Now you must do what I did and come out into the light more and start posting, because at the moment we have precious little from you.DragonsofSummer wrote:Ah but Chris when my main point for attacking you was that you had posted very little with no content. I at least have let my thoughts be known, and its not hypocritical because of this. The reason I left your case is because you have changed the way you are playing now with the reasoning that you have some free time today. Which is supported by the fact that you have been interacting as opposed to saying nothing.
What if we don't find him scummy. What am I supposed to do then?Gorrad wrote:Ok, I like Pokemon as much as the next teenage nerd, but it seems to me that this is absolutely the MOST off-topic we can possibly get.
This is not a challenge.
Still waiting on that claim, Dis. For those who don't want Dis to claim because 'it's wrong to claim unless you're L-2': VOTE FOR HIM! Get him up to L-2 if that's your belief. The L-2 is yet another policy scum use to hide intentions and....just read my last rant about them ><.
I believe it is;Gorrad wrote:For those of you who, like me, are geeky enough to watch Yu-Gi-Oh the Abridged Series, that last post reminds me of Marik:
IGNORE ME!
(For those of you NOT geeky enough to follow a youtube parody of a show about children's card games, in one of the more recent episodes, the villain (Marik), while incognito, shouts Ignore Me after every time he does something to tip his hand as an evildoer. This, not surprisingly, works.)
Now I want to run Yu-Gi-Oh: The Abridged Mafia. Damnit.
Notice the if, champ.RayFrost wrote:Sir Chris wrote:Eh, if people are willing to ignore it then they are tunneling too and they are bad. I don't see how I am tunneling, hard to tunnel when a lynch I find acceptable and have said as such is leading, I am just being paranoid and feel it is never bad to look at more than one person. Not to mention you saying this about your own lynch is suspect.