heuristically_alone ISO
, Part 2:
heuristically_alone WIFOM posting:
In post 271, heuristically_alone wrote:
Just want to uselessly point out that I don't think Floof and Bins are scum together, because mafia have day talk, so I think Bins would have noticed Floof being from Ontario in the scum forum first.
The premise of this town-town interaction theory is far-fetched [
does heuristically_alone go out on a limb here, and town read two slots for no great reason, other than a cheap buddy tactic?
] WIFOM would say one or both the Floof-Bins slots are town-aligned.
heuristically_alone shares his reads (
post 281):
"As for Jack, I don't have enough information yet from him to really say for me what he is, but for now I'm leaning on town."
This does not make sense. Null is null, there is no reason for heuristically_alone to town lean read Jaack. A read for the sake of a read? [Note to self: check Jaack's interactions with heuristically_alone].
"I think anyone voting him as an easy vote at the beginning makes for possible scum players, (Keyser, tool, floof for example)"
heuristically_alone scum-reads myself, toolenduso and Floof as possible scum for voting Jaack early. [Check if heuristically_alone follows up this suspicion on toolenduso/Floof].
"Robert has been really inactive as well, and I don't have a read. If what bins said in 239 is true about mafia being quiet this game, it could be a reason why"
This reads like, "I'm not scum-reading Robert2424, but will happily vote Robert2424 if his wagon gains momentum. But right now, I'm not going to do anything". Why doesn't heuristically_alone push Robert2424 now, if there is possibility of Bins' logic being true? Fence-sit noted.
"I'm pushing Bins onto my scum side of the spectrum for now"
Let's see how/if heuristically_alone pushes Bins.
"I'm thinking town at this point. More of a gut feeling"
This feels like an easy town-read to me. heuristically_alone town-reads xyzzy for making "quite a few posts done that seems to be generally seeking more information from players and challenging players on their spots and it just feels pro town to me" - these look like generic reasons to town-read a player ('Player A is asking questions, Player A is acting pro town, Player A is town').
"I have a little suspicion towards tool. Also like Keyser, posts clarifying posts but lacks giving some original content to help town."
heuristically_alone draws suspicion on toolenduso. Name drops me in there too - let's see if heuristically_alone acts on this "little suspicion".
heuristically_alone uses Dunnstral as a trump card again in his scum-read of Zachstralkita:
"Why are you so eager to get Dunn on the wagon? I think that Dunnstral's line of thinking could be considered a threat to the mafia and would want him destroyed".
heuristically_alone identifies Floof as a
"suspect of mafia for voting Jack".
"If this is an earnest request, then it makes Jake town"
- this town-read of Jake from State Farm is illogical.
After toolenduso defends me, toolenduso continues his unsupported
'Keyser-is-posting-no-original-scum-hunting-content'
narrative:
In post 283, heuristically_alone wrote:I don't see how an RVS from another game has anything to do with reading how he plays as scum or town. And why did he become pretty obvtown?
Just by posting a lot of commentary of what others were saying?