In post 89, xyzzy wrote:here are some thoughts going through the thread post by post:
4: basically my thoughts on the "this isn't an rvs vote" line are that they're either 1)a deliberate pattern that serves some purpose unknown to the rest of us or 2)a totally meaningless thing that has no intent behind it. the former seems like slight scum behavior whereas the latter would be very slight town behavior.
12: I'm getting town vibes from this--not voting during RVS isn't inherently bad, and there's at least enough content to this post to generate discussion. doing things that generate discussion early on is good and pro-town, and that's what this post does.
29: this is a good post and I feel good about iraonavp.
34: I can't believe I misspelled "Dunnstral". anyway, this was basically an attempt to ask Dunnstral whether his posts had any specific meaning without going too far into detail about what things I think that meaning might be.
38: I don't agree with the sentiment that someone's comfort level can function as a tell with any real level of precision; there are probably just as many people who do exactly the opposite as scum.
40: this was me trying to ask the same question as #34 but in a more specific manner, seeking a specific answer.
41: not directly answering a question like this feels like it could be a sign that you're trying to avoid any really specific discussion, which would be bad. on the other hand, the fact that your reply was just 3 minutes after my post is a good sign; that seems to point away from the idea that you might be acting super deliberately at this point. I think after giving it more thought I feel like this is probably a town read (although that's also influenced by stuff from later in the thread, I guess, but whatever)
46: I don't like having a vote with the implication that there's meaning behind it without going into that reasoning at all; that said, Tyler's post #50 is substantial enough that I'm fine with the lowish level of detail here.
55: this post says some worthwhile things, but I'm not sure how to feel about Keyser overall yet. also, nice gifs.
59: this post is really incoherent, but that's my cat's fault for waking me up at 4:30 am.
62: this is a good post and I trust Tyler so far.
66: I don't particularly agree with you regarding your original vote, but I like the reasoning you give for it here.
70: this is the first post from Zachstralkita that I think actually says anything significant; the rest of his posts before this one have a really low signal:noise ratio.
77: why the unvote?
81: I think I answered your question here substantially enough earlier in this post, so I'm just acknowledging your line of questioning here.
87: you're one to talk; I'd say Dunnstral is one of the better players in this regard.
---
Tyler is the player I'm getting the strongest town vibes from. Dunnstral, if your opinion of Keyser changes at any point, I'm definitely interested in knowing that. Zachstralkita has managed to talk a lot while saying very little, and I really don't like that.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Zachstralkita 
Something about this seems off to me, I think it's the fact that you voted keyser when I said I had a feeling he was maf earlier and are now following me again