Disfrutemos del momento
Deadline is in (expired on 2016-05-06 16:00:00)
Note: No change from Votecount 1.03
Zachstralkita wrote:
at this point jaack and bins have basically switched places on the list.
Zachstralkita wrote:
It's not as all if you'd know. Unless you... know.
In post 186, Dunnstral wrote:I'm less inclined to believe that jaack is mafia and would rather get bin
I'm less inclined to believe any of the townies' lives are significant to you in any event.
Zachstralkita wrote:
And you're not asking any vague questions directed at specific people (but not for a specific reason, only randomly) in this game because you don't want to get strung up.
Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 242, Zachstralkita wrote:You should have done that by default. We know you saw me as scum when you voted me, no one here believed you voted me because I'm your townread, am I? He didn't explain it like an astrophysicist, either.
I disagree. I'm under no obligation to explain something as soon as I vote.
Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 244, Dunnstral wrote:In post 241, Jake from State Farm wrote:Instead of going back and forth with me on this stupid shit, I'm surprised you didn't do the most logical thing and ask me to explain in more detail why I'm scum reading him.
I pretty much did...
Oh I missed that question. Can you link me to it so I can verify this isn't you just saying false things again?
Dunnstral wrote:You haven't explained how, why, or when you got this scumread
In post 246, Jake from State Farm wrote:Oh and since we are talking. If you are town please Never do a list read again. Nobody should ever do them again. They rarely actually help town, they are a good way to fake content, and if enough people do them they give scum too much information.
Thanks.
In post 252, Dunnstral wrote:In post 250, Zulfy wrote:Vc
What's going on...? What's this Vc that keeps getting posted
In post 251, Dunnstral wrote:So when do you want to explain it... not sure why you're being so difficult
In post 251, Dunnstral wrote:Now stop your babyrage and stop deflecting questions by calling me a liar
In post 251, Dunnstral wrote:I strongly disagree with this: I think read lists are a good way to show what you're thinking and to get other peoples opinions on things, it also shows what I'm thinking at the time so if I were mafia it would be harder to wiggle my reads around so to speak
In post 199, Dunnstral wrote:In post 198, iraonavp wrote:
I don't think that is a good reason to think that Dunnstral is town-aligned. If I was using that metric to read Dunnstral I would invert it and call him scum-aligned for it, but I think the best thing to do is ignore it.
Huh? Why would I be scum-aligned and why would you be ignoring that?
In post 198, iraonavp wrote:
I think you are focusing excessively on this non-alignment-indicative aspect of Dunnstral's play because you are scum-aligned and your attempts to read players are fake.
VOTE: Bins
Something about this seems off to me, I think it's the fact that you voted keyser when I said I had a feeling he was maf earlier and are now following me again
Can be coincidence but it seems weird since you also seem to be focused on me for some reason
In post 205, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 96, iraonavp wrote:In post 82, Dunnstral wrote:I have a sneaking suspicion that Keyser is mafia but don't have anything to back that up
Same.
VOTE: Keyser Söze
The WIFOM that pours through my veins is telling meThat votetoo-bad-to-be-scum(i.e scum would at least sheep something meaty).
In post 216, Jaack wrote:Yeah, definitely not joining the bins wagon now... while I think dunn's argument has merit, I'm NOT joining a wagon with ira and tool on it.
In post 217, Bins wrote:Just the way he tries to continuously dismantle suspicion on himself by explaining himself very "Yep. This is how it is. Lmfao, back off now." (as you can see I have a Ph.D. in explaining)
In post 27, iraonavp wrote:In post 22, Dunnstral wrote:VOTE: iraonavp
Voting someone who hasn't even talked
like the mafia
This isn't an rvs vote, this is an actual read and its' not changing for the rest of the day
Robert2424 has talked, though.
This is so null but so not null at the same time if u kno what i mean
In post 29, iraonavp wrote:In post 13, Jaack wrote:In post 12, Robert2424 wrote:I'm here, just barely. I'd vote for Jake, cause I don't trust him, but I'm leaving town in a few hours.....
Not a fan of this post at all. Hesitant to vote on the first page? With literally the vaguest reason ever?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Robert2424
More vague could be just saying that he's voting for "reasons", so that isn't true.
Like I mentioned b4 pointless dismantle
Like this is how you just ruin a point by mentioned something that isn't really relevant
"Like hey but he could have been MORE VAGUE so.............. ur wrong lets discount your post."
In post 96, iraonavp wrote:In post 82, Dunnstral wrote:I have a sneaking suspicion that Keyser is mafia but don't have anything to back that up
Same.
VOTE: Keyser Söze
This is an aweful vote
this is what I was saying as my first point
In post 212, Tyler the Creator wrote:ill bite, though, why's ira town?
and if it has anything to do with too scum to be scum then that's fine ive heard that before
and why vote a lurker? this game's slow enough as is.
In post 33, Bins wrote:In post 29, iraonavp wrote:In post 13, Jaack wrote:In post 12, Robert2424 wrote:I'm here, just barely. I'd vote for Jake, cause I don't trust him, but I'm leaving town in a few hours.....
Not a fan of this post at all. Hesitant to vote on the first page? With literally the vaguest reason ever?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Robert2424
More vague could be just saying that he's voting for "reasons", so that isn't true.
I get you're trying to be cheeky, but I don't understand why you're derailing his point.
In post 258, iraonavp wrote:
That's poor logic, you will end up with fragile and distant reads if you think like this.
In post 263, Jaack wrote:In post 258, iraonavp wrote:
That's poor logic, you will end up with fragile and distant reads if you think like this.
How is this bad logic at all? If I think 2/3 players on a wagon are scum, why would I support that wagon?
Why to you keep saying that you're town? How is that going to convince anyone?
Why do you always nitpick about minor wordings and other junk as opposed to arguing against, you know, the meaning of the post?
Why are you so obviously scum?
In post 172, heuristically_alone wrote:This turned into a crazy weekend. Starting tomorrow I will be able to take this game super serious!
In post 82, Dunnstral wrote:I have a sneaking suspicion that Keyser is mafia but don't have anything to back that up
In post 34, xyzzy wrote:Dunnsrtal, can you offer any explanation for your behavior in this game so far?
In post 35, Dunnstral wrote:Probably not
In post 100, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 96, iraonavp wrote:In post 82, Dunnstral wrote:I have a sneaking suspicion that Keyser is mafia but don't have anything to back that up
Same.
VOTE: Keyser Söze
Mafia can't be this dumb, this guys town
In post 103, iraonavp wrote:I think that voting the largest wagon is a good way to conduct RVS.
I voted Keyser because I found him suspicious? I don't see what's comical about that.
In post 183, Bins wrote:HEY ANOTHER ONTARIO SCUMMER