Prophecy Mafia - Over

Flameaxe · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:51 pm

Vote: Bubka

Bandwagon to victory team asshat!

Flameaxe · Post Post #14 (isolation #1) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:41 pm

Meh, nothing better to start of some discussion than a reaction from someone that just got bandwagoned on page 1.

Flameaxe · Post Post #17 (isolation #2) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:03 pm

Flameaxe wrote:
Vote: Bubka
Bandwagon to victory team asshat!

He didn't start nuffin.

Flameaxe · Post Post #22 (isolation #3) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:45 pm

Grawr! I challenge you to a duel! Go Charizard, onward to victory!

Flameaxe · Post Post #24 (isolation #4) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:49 pm

wait...nvm..

EX-LAX, I CHOOSE YOU! ATTACK WITH YOUR DOUBLESHIT!

Flameaxe · Post Post #28 (isolation #5) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:55 pm

I'M NOT USING CHARIZARD ANYMORE, CHECK BOTTOM OF LAST PAGE.

Flameaxe · Post Post #31 (isolation #6) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 6:34 pm

I...heard you liek Mudkips Lazy....is this true?

Flameaxe · Post Post #46 (isolation #7) » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:20 am

Unvote, Vote: Lazy.

Obvobv Mudkip luvin' scumz!

Flameaxe · Post Post #67 (isolation #8) » Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:08 pm

Blue/Red were amazing. None came close (except maybe yellow).

Flameaxe · Post Post #124 (isolation #9) » Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:47 am

Lazy wrote:The following people haven't posted since 4th of October:

2. Kakeng
9. UltimaAvalon
10. Masked Jedi
11. rite
12. Flameaxe
13. xyzzy

Could we get them replaced or could they possibly speak up?

*cough*There is this funny thing called V/LA*cough* Also, asking for a straight up replacement seems kinda harsh, no?

Starting a quick re-read. Jdoudge, can we get a voute c'nt?

Flameaxe · Post Post #125 (isolation #10) » Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:52 am

Might as well jump on the bandwagon as well...I see no harm in it as of now.

Unvote, Vote: Kanaga

Diesimilarnamedscumdie!

Also, (this is just an idea I'm rolling off here...don't get all pissy at me for it...) due to the fact that this is an open setup, massclaiming MIGHT be an option to move day 1. I think that this should be considered for an idea to find teh scumz.

But I dunno...just a thought I'm throwing out there.

Flameaxe · Post Post #130 (isolation #11) » Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:44 pm

I WANT to be lynched for saying ONE suggestion...in which I clearly stated was only that.

I'm pro-massclaiming (Pie's Soldiers! Huzzah!) for all open setups. I think if used correctly it can be very pro-town, and help out very nicely.

Over-react more please.

Flameaxe · Post Post #149 (isolation #12) » Tue Oct 09, 2007 12:13 pm

UltimaAvalon wrote:Why is everyone FoS'ing Flameaxe? If we all hate him so much for such an arbitrary issue, we should kill him.

Because all the scum realize how retarded the case is.

Flameaxe · Post Post #151 (isolation #13) » Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:40 pm

I didn't push anything. I offered it as a suggestion that, as I stated IN THE ACTUAL POST:

QuotethOfMyself wrote:massclaiming MIGHT be an option

If you haven't noticed....I like to capitalize things for EMPHASIS.

Flameaxe · Post Post #152 (isolation #14) » Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:41 pm

Lazy wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:I WANT to be lynched for saying ONE suggestion...in which I clearly stated was only that.

I'm pro-massclaiming (Pie's Soldiers! Huzzah!) for all open setups. I think if used correctly it can be very pro-town, and help out very nicely.

Over-react more please.
I don't think that's overreacting, I feel the same way.

A mass roleclaim is one of the lamest things to do at this point. It isn't how mafia should be played.

Massclaiming can be very helpful if people aren't fucking retarded and do it right. That is TOTALLY not lame. And to correct you: it isn't how you THINK mafia should be played.

Flameaxe · Post Post #154 (isolation #15) » Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:59 pm

And where might these stats be? My point was that he is attacking me because my opinions of play vary from his. If you had a brain, you MIGHT be able to see that.

Flameaxe · Post Post #156 (isolation #16) » Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:03 pm

My extreme aggression has nothing to do with pressure whatsoever. It's how I am. I'm aggressive, I don't like being nice to people that I feel don't deserve it. Also, what pressure are you talking about? Someone giving me shit about an idea doesn't count as pressure to me.

Get a better case, scum.

Flameaxe · Post Post #159 (isolation #17) » Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:21 pm

/Doesn't trust his 'best odds' at all. But whatever.

Flameaxe · Post Post #161 (isolation #18) » Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:48 pm

Well fuck man. How the hell am I supposed to trust it WHEN YOU DON'T EVEN SHOW HOW THE FUCK YOU GOT THERE? RE-TAKE THE SECOND GRADE MORON.

Your post read:
"Blah blah blah, we shouldn't massclaim.

Here, have a pretty number with a percent to go with it so it seems like it has meaning."

Plain and simple.

Flameaxe · Post Post #163 (isolation #19) » Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:52 pm

The "Obv. better than your school" School.

Flameaxe · Post Post #167 (isolation #20) » Wed Oct 10, 2007 3:37 am

foolinc wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:
Lazy wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:I WANT to be lynched for saying ONE suggestion...in which I clearly stated was only that.

I'm pro-massclaiming (Pie's Soldiers! Huzzah!) for all open setups. I think if used correctly it can be very pro-town, and help out very nicely.

Over-react more please.
I don't think that's overreacting, I feel the same way.

A mass roleclaim is one of the lamest things to do at this point. It isn't how mafia should be played.
Massclaiming can be very helpful if people aren't fucking retarded and do it right. That is TOTALLY not lame. And to correct you: it isn't how you THINK mafia should be played.
Really, cause the stats say otherwise. Might tell everyone why you think that we're wrong?

It's obviously important to others.

Also:

Stark wrote:I put that in there only to illustrate the bad idea of mass-claiming.

Flameaxe · Post Post #178 (isolation #21) » Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:05 pm

Chef Brian wrote:@Flameaxe: Why are you so.....asshat-y?

Uhm...when am I not? I'm on the team for a specific reason, ya know.

Flameaxe · Post Post #190 (isolation #22) » Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:04 pm

PEG...you should know Mith runs an IP check of game players beforehand...

Flameaxe · Post Post #193 (isolation #23) » Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:11 pm

Woo! Go MMPR!

Flameaxe · Post Post #205 (isolation #24) » Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:53 am

From what I've heard around town, Lowell is usually a lurkin' fewl.

Flameaxe · Post Post #213 (isolation #25) » Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:51 pm

foolinc wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:From what I've heard around town, Lowell is usually a lurkin' fewl.
If this is the case then..

Oman wrote:Lowell lurking is no big tell.

That was my point.

Flameaxe · Post Post #215 (isolation #26) » Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:36 pm

Gotcha.

Flameaxe · Post Post #218 (isolation #27) » Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:53 am

<2 Votes: Just 1 or two votes
>3 Votes: Official bandwagon status.

Thats my rule of thumb for all games. Of course the size of the bandwagon that will really start to draw attention, and possibly be criticized, changes between games. Your thoughts of 5 seem about right, maybe a bit more, depending on the basis of the bandwagon.

Yarr.

Flameaxe · Post Post #226 (isolation #28) » Sun Oct 14, 2007 6:39 am

He shouldn't need to. Personally, I picked up on it easily.

Flameaxe · Post Post #230 (isolation #29) » Sun Oct 14, 2007 7:07 pm

I counted, and I think thats his 7th vote switch...

Flameaxe · Post Post #248 (isolation #30) » Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:44 am

The fact that he lurks in all games he plays.

Flameaxe · Post Post #250 (isolation #31) » Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:15 am

Oman wrote:Lowell lurking is no big tell.

Flameaxe wrote:From what I've heard around town, Lowell is usually a lurkin' fewl.

Yes.

Flameaxe · Post Post #257 (isolation #32) » Mon Oct 15, 2007 12:49 pm

The secret slime word is...

Unvote, Vote: Bubka

...

(Great television + Great vote = Great Win.)

Flameaxe · Post Post #273 (isolation #33) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:34 pm

So yea....go Rockies.

Flameaxe · Post Post #275 (isolation #34) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 5:51 pm

Orly? We should make a fan club thread.

Flameaxe · Post Post #278 (isolation #35) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:14 pm

Holy shit, no way.

Flameaxe · Post Post #281 (isolation #36) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:19 pm

NO FUCKING WAY, THIS IS TOO FUCKED UP.

(should be obvious whats fucked up here)

Flameaxe · Post Post #284 (isolation #37) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:21 pm

When did you graduate?

Flameaxe · Post Post #288 (isolation #38) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:27 pm

I was a freshman in 05-06. Lawlz. I work for Vista Vision now though.

Flameaxe · Post Post #290 (isolation #39) » Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:31 pm

Sweet.

Flameaxe · Post Post #299 (isolation #40) » Thu Oct 18, 2007 6:18 am

Lazy wrote:
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Megapost about UltimaAvalon[/b]
That post made my day and I'm not going to feel sorry about this:

Unvote

Vote: UltimaAvalon

-Blatant following noted.-

Flameaxe · Post Post #310 (isolation #41) » Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:10 pm

Lazy's vote wasn't much better of a vote you know...

Flameaxe · Post Post #313 (isolation #42) » Thu Oct 18, 2007 3:56 pm

It wasn't off-topic for that long. Bad excuse, imo.

Flameaxe · Post Post #318 (isolation #43) » Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:04 pm

Ha, I'm in that too, and it's still ongoing. Stop referencing it, breaking rules is teh lamez.

Flameaxe · Post Post #320 (isolation #44) » Thu Oct 18, 2007 5:08 pm

/reference Prophecy Mafia.

Pwnt.

Ps. Happy Birthday again, you leaky assfaucet (...I know.)

Flameaxe · Post Post #328 (isolation #45) » Thu Oct 18, 2007 6:44 pm

Mastermind of Sin wrote:
Oman wrote:Was that the mini Vollkan Vigged me D1 in?
Nope. That was my 100th game!

Scumtell.

Flameaxe · Post Post #331 (isolation #46) » Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:52 pm

MoS is good people.

Flameaxe · Post Post #339 (isolation #47) » Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:36 pm

I know why! I know!

Flameaxe · Post Post #345 (isolation #48) » Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:59 am

Flameaxe wrote:I know why! I know!

I do.

Flameaxe · Post Post #347 (isolation #49) » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:14 pm

Sit here, most likely.

Flameaxe · Post Post #351 (isolation #50) » Mon Oct 22, 2007 3:12 am

Plus, it isn't important to the game, so I will sit here and giggle at it for now.

Flameaxe · Post Post #358 (isolation #51) » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:39 pm

UltimaAvalon wrote:Why hasn't bubka been lynched yet?

Do you realize that you aren't even voting Bubka? We should work on changing that, because he does, in fact, need more votes as of now.

Flameaxe · Post Post #360 (isolation #52) » Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:55 pm

That should cover it, really.

Flameaxe · Post Post #387 (isolation #53) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:09 pm

Hey guys, Tar is gonna wagonhop again, watch.

Flameaxe · Post Post #390 (isolation #54) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:16 pm

Nevar.

Flameaxe · Post Post #393 (isolation #55) » Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:35 pm

foolinc wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:Nevar.
Don't be such a Debby downer.

Nevar.

Flameaxe · Post Post #401 (isolation #56) » Fri Oct 26, 2007 12:08 pm

Mert wrote:Hi, my name is Mert and I am your local friendly replacement hero.

Before I start reading up etc, a quick ask for clarification - the title says there is a deadline, yet I can't find one of JDodge's posts saying when the deadline is for - can someone tell me or, moreover, can I ask the mod to consider moving it back while myself and Xyzzy's replacement get up to speed?

More from me shortly

Wry Halo Thar.

Also

Fos: d_o

for still having nothing to add.

Flameaxe · Post Post #404 (isolation #57) » Sat Oct 27, 2007 11:24 am

And I wasn't even happy with that post. You basically said things already stated. We knew Tar is a wagonjumper...

One post doesn't get you out of doing much else. Better yet, One post on one player REALLY doesn't get you out of doing anything else.

Flameaxe · Post Post #414 (isolation #58) » Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:59 am

foolinc wrote:
Kakeng wrote:
bubka wrote:Sorry I have been off for a long time. Guess I've messed up on this game already - have too much to catch up.
But don't lynch me guys! I'm basically a good person at heart. Honest!
Are you a jester or what?
If this wasn't a open setup, I'd be thinking the same thing.

I wouldn't.

Flameaxe · Post Post #417 (isolation #59) » Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:25 pm

No u.

Flameaxe · Post Post #425 (isolation #60) » Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:43 am

Guys, Xyzzy isn't in the game anymore. Time to celebrate!

Flameaxe · Post Post #435 (isolation #61) » Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:02 am

Who said anything about role fishing? Pushing a claim at L-1 != role fishing.

Flameaxe · Post Post #460 (isolation #62) » Fri Nov 02, 2007 3:26 am

Bubka needs to die now, Oman. Get your vote there now, kthx.

Flameaxe · Post Post #485 (isolation #63) » Fri Nov 02, 2007 12:07 pm

Kakeng wrote:The roles are:

1 Mafia GF
1 Mafia Doc
3 Mafia Goons

1 Jailkeeper
1 Cop
1 Super-backup
1 Vig
1 Miller

1 Survivor

10 Townies

Cool, try helping the actual game more. We all knew the setup (or at least where to find it).

Unvote.

Flameaxe · Post Post #507 (isolation #64) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:08 am

Kanaga wrote:I think right now we need a deadline extension, since we are stuck with no big suspects.

Bubka's claim seems ok to me, but it is gonna suck if we lose a doc now. I guess we will have to confirm it later. It strikes me as a very good Mafia Doc claim.

Did you seriously not suspect ANYONE other than Bubka? Really? /sigh...

Vote: Kanaga

Flameaxe · Post Post #508 (isolation #65) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 9:09 am

pickemgenius wrote:
unvote:

vote: kakeng

Quietly pushing the bubka wagon throughout, without getting on.

Srsly.

Flameaxe · Post Post #512 (isolation #66) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 2:25 pm

I twisted nothing. All you said is that there were no 'big suspects' (which your definition was terribly scummy and I will get to that shortly).

You made a SMALL case on someone? JOY, WE ARE SO GLAD YOU ARE BEING SO FUCKING HELPFUL. WE NEED MORE PEOPLE TO MAKE SMALL CASES ON PEOPLE BEING A -BIT- SUSPICIOUS! EVERYONE QUICK!

Thirdly, the way you determine big suspects is so fucking scummy dude. You consider someone to be a big suspect, BECAUSE MORE THAN 2 PEOPLE ARE VOTING FOR THEM?! Way to be a follower, way to be.

And because only having three points isn't cool: You think PEOPLE are suspicious, but everyone else hasn't DECIDED ON SOMEONE who is the MOST suspicious. Jesus fucking christ you are the most worthless (not to mention scummy as hell) person in the entire game. Grats.

Flameaxe · Post Post #517 (isolation #67) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 3:52 pm

Vote: Mert adds Ouman to his avatar.

Do I hear seconds?

Flameaxe · Post Post #519 (isolation #68) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:04 pm

I like that plan.

Flameaxe · Post Post #521 (isolation #69) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:10 pm

Flash is my guess.

Flameaxe · Post Post #523 (isolation #70) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:13 pm

I'll try to make something in class tomorrow if I haev time.

Flameaxe · Post Post #525 (isolation #71) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 4:15 pm

Lulz.

Flameaxe · Post Post #527 (isolation #72) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 5:27 pm

I have that too...I guess I could do it. I made your avatar an asshat stamp ouman, but it isn't working.

Flameaxe · Post Post #530 (isolation #73) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:13 pm

I don't think what I said was wrong at all. Why does my post mean jack shit to you, just because I didn't admit that I was wrong (when I wasn't at all). I thought that your play was terribly scummy, and went after it.

I will not calm down, thats how I am. Fuckin' deal pussy. (OMG BAD WORDS/PERSONAL ATTACKS=SCUM, right?)

you... wrote:Onto your second point. I think that there is an issue if we don't have more then two votes on anyone with just two days left (with the exception of Bubka who people were unvoting). You took my words out of context. I didn't think we had big enough suspects to make a lynch in two days, which is why I asked for a deadline extension. The definition of "big suspects" changes with two days left. This is where I think you were twisting my words.

I didn't take jack shit out of context. I can't take something out of context WHEN THERE IS NO FUCKING CONTEXT. I am not fucking twisting any of your damn words AT ALL. Retard.

My vote stands. Diescumdie.

Flameaxe · Post Post #532 (isolation #74) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:18 pm

I love games with no language rules, don't you peg?

Flameaxe · Post Post #534 (isolation #75) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:46 pm

Dude, the Broncos suck.

Flameaxe · Post Post #536 (isolation #76) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:52 pm

I forgot to move people around...again.

When do you think the coach of Nebraska is gonna get fired?

Flameaxe · Post Post #538 (isolation #77) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:58 pm

We should talk about reality TV. The new Amazing Race started tonight, seems a bit better than the last season so far.

Flameaxe · Post Post #541 (isolation #78) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 6:59 pm

OUMAN I'M TRYING. GET A NON-GIF AVY FOR ME TO USE AND YOU SHALL RECEIVE.

Flameaxe · Post Post #546 (isolation #79) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:01 pm

That would work, Ouman.

In the meantime:

Flameaxe · Post Post #550 (isolation #80) » Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:07 pm

Everyone should claim predictions right now.

Flameaxe · Post Post #557 (isolation #81) » Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:28 am

BUT IT'S SO EASY TO DO IT!

Flameaxe · Post Post #560 (isolation #82) » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:09 pm

Adding a letter to someone's name is trolling? What the fuck planet are you from?

Vote: Parkay,

by the way. :p

Flameaxe · Post Post #562 (isolation #83) » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:20 pm

Right...because I'm CLEARLY scum for voting my spread-on-bread-and-dip-in-pasta scumbuddy, right?

Flameaxe · Post Post #564 (isolation #84) » Mon Nov 05, 2007 2:36 pm

Anyway, this isn't Paula Deen mafia, so that's enough butter for one day, lets lynch Kanagascum.

Flameaxe · Post Post #568 (isolation #85) » Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:58 pm

Reasons are dope.

Flameaxe · Post Post #576 (isolation #86) » Tue Nov 06, 2007 4:20 am

I've never played with DGB or Mert (I played in a Mert-modded game a while back, but that's it.)

You guys are seriously retarded. No joke there.

Flameaxe · Post Post #584 (isolation #87) » Tue Nov 06, 2007 11:43 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:I've never played with DGB or Mert (I played in a Mert-modded game a while back, but that's it.)
Does Toaster Strudel ring a bell?

Orite. I played in one (ongoing) game with TS. Go check out my play there.

Flameaxe · Post Post #585 (isolation #88) » Tue Nov 06, 2007 11:44 am

Mert wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:I've never played with DGB or Mert (I played in a Mert-modded game a while back, but that's it.)

You guys are seriously retarded. No joke there.
I never said I'd played a game with you, I made an observation based on your conduct in this one.

Rather than calling us retarded, why don't you try and prove us wrong and provide a decent alternative suspect? Or maybe you can let us know who you find scummy and why. Or y'know, anything that helps the town.

Read my posts. I've already made this clear. Durr.

Flameaxe · Post Post #593 (isolation #89) » Fri Nov 09, 2007 5:03 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:
curiouskarmadog wrote:
vote FaerieLord
Trying to derail the Flameaxe wagon?

Maybe it's realizing the wagon on me is total crap, and is going after someone who is actually scummy? Yea? Mhmm.

Flameaxe · Post Post #602 (isolation #90) » Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:55 am

Why does UA have 2 votes?

Flameaxe · Post Post #604 (isolation #91) » Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:59 am

Amen.

Flameaxe · Post Post #607 (isolation #92) » Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:54 pm

Tarhalindur wrote:94 hours until deadline?

Any lynch > no lynch, so I'll vote first and post reasons later (though "vote leader with an impending deadline" is, IMO, a valid reason for voting).

Vote: Flameaxe

Well damn, isn't this just a totally retarded most. Find scum, not wagon leaders.

Flameaxe · Post Post #611 (isolation #93) » Fri Nov 09, 2007 4:13 pm

DrippingGoofball wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:Well damn, isn't this just a totally retarded most. Find scum, not wagon leaders.
Please vote for FaerieLord or yourself - whichever one you find scummiest.

Now now, you know damn well that a selfvoting player doesn't help anyone...I'm perfectly happy with my vote for right now.

Flameaxe · Post Post #614 (isolation #94) » Fri Nov 09, 2007 8:07 pm

Srsly.

Flameaxe · Post Post #620 (isolation #95) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:30 pm

FaerieLord wrote:Pity you don't like my playstyle DG and Lowell. I'm not going to change it for you.

Besides, one can always read the posts and the content in them. Content > Votes

Problem is...there isn't much of either really.

Flameaxe · Post Post #625 (isolation #96) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 5:58 pm

Everyone is still a possibility. Duh.

Flameaxe · Post Post #631 (isolation #97) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:45 pm

UltimaAvalon wrote:
JDodge wrote:The Church feels that pinpoint accuracy is a tool of the devil.

JDodge wrote:he Church prides itself on its pinpoint accuracy.
Wait.......what?

Ha, I pointed that out to him this morning actually.

Flameaxe · Post Post #634 (isolation #98) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 7:37 am

Who you think is scummy and why*.

Flameaxe · Post Post #637 (isolation #99) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 4:18 pm

Yeah...because I was being SUCH a bad boy. I know. [/sarcasmatretardedpeoplez]

Flameaxe · Post Post #640 (isolation #100) » Mon Nov 12, 2007 7:23 am

Yes, we are expecting you to do that. PBPAs are what we like to call 'contribution'.

Flameaxe · Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:45 am

You lie, I am not on your wagon. Get yo facts right.

Flameaxe · Mon Nov 12, 2007 10:51 am

Tarhalindur has been on just about every single wagon in this entire game (excluding his own) and I believe the discussion on it has passed.

Personally, I think all of his vote hops are opportunistic, and he just kinda seems to be moving with the towns thinking for the most part. All of his own targets were stretches, and usually based on something very small, at times not even scummy at all.

Flameaxe · Post Post #672 (isolation #103) » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:48 am

My metagame on Ouman: If he claims NK immune miller vig, he is the SK.

Flameaxe · Post Post #707 (isolation #104) » Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:58 pm

Original Roll String: 1d19

1 19-Sided Dice: (13) = 13

Flameaxe · Post Post #708 (isolation #105) » Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:58 pm

Vote: CKD

Flameaxe · Post Post #710 (isolation #106) » Thu Nov 29, 2007 5:07 pm

Phate wrote:
Vote: BBM

Effective, really.

Flameaxe · Post Post #719 (isolation #107) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:21 am

FaerieLord wrote:Why cant we be happy with a Tarh lynch?

Because the dice roll doesn't agree with that.

Flameaxe · Post Post #725 (isolation #108) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:40 am

DrippingGoofball wrote:You know who rolls dice on Day 2? Scum.

vote: Flameaxe.

You know who else does? Me. But you already knew that.

Flameaxe · Post Post #730 (isolation #109) » Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:50 am

Butter is still scum guys, why isn't he dead yet?

Flameaxe · Post Post #741 (isolation #110) » Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:27 pm

I'm not the only one that does it. Take that DGB.

Flameaxe · Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:24 pm

FaerieLord wrote:Can we get back into day 2?

This is day 2. Stop doing acid.

Flameaxe · Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:30 pm

Unvote, vote: phate

Lynch all liars.

Flameaxe · Post Post #762 (isolation #113) » Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:59 pm

:Harhar:

Flameaxe · Post Post #765 (isolation #114) » Wed Dec 05, 2007 3:14 am

No, this is Patrick!

Flameaxe · Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:26 am

unvote, Vote: JDodge

Viva la resistance!

Flameaxe · Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:49 am

FaerieLord wrote:@Poorchaz. I'm pretty sure I said that I wanted to take up the tarh wagon again. And besides, what do you want me to say when everything that has been posted in this day is spam?

More spam.

Flameaxe · Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:50 am

Porochaz wrote:Well Im sure the what happened during the night wasn't spam, my vote on UA wasn't, I mean hell, lets start this discussion... What do you think of what happened last night? What are your feeling on the no-lynch that occured yesterday? Who is your main suspect now? Who do you think is town? Do you think the amount of spam is connected with scum? Do you want people to do a PBPA? Do you think its scummy voting for the mod? Is it bad to do a dice roll for day 2? What are your thoughts on that? I mean Im asking a barrage of questions like this because these are ones I can think immediately off the top of my head that could be used to strike up a mafia related conversation... that YOU couldve started... if you dont like the lack of content in these posts, DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. Instead of whining... so Im asking you, and anyone else who wants to answer... choose 1/2/them all/somewhere in between and answer... lets get a debate going amongst all this mod voting and the like...

...and I missed my chance to say

THIS IS SPARTA!!!

No, this is Patrick.

Flameaxe · Post Post #787 (isolation #118) » Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:07 pm

Yaus Bookie!

Flameaxe · Post Post #791 (isolation #119) » Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:39 pm

Phate wrote:I'm getting sick of the spam too. I find it possible that at least some of the spam is a scumtactic.

Who agrees? Why or why not?

Show me some proof and I'll consider agreeing. It better be some pretty damn good proof too.

Flameaxe · Post Post #793 (isolation #120) » Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:36 pm

But does it make one scum?

Flameaxe · Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:58 am

Unvote: Butter, Vote: Tarhalindur

FoS: Butter.

I know you are still there...

Flameaxe · Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:59 am

Bookitty wrote:It is a toss-up on which is scummier, but I dislike Sir Tornado's play more.

I've actually seen this from SirT before, so I personally wouldn't try to go off of just this.

Flameaxe · Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:53 pm

Ha! Hahahahahaha! THAT'S a good one, Phate!

Flameaxe · Post Post #810 (isolation #124) » Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:16 am

Lynchin' some scum.

Flameaxe · Post Post #812 (isolation #125) » Sun Dec 09, 2007 9:20 am

Or Tar...

Flameaxe · Post Post #816 (isolation #126) » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:20 am

El capitan de 'bandwagon'.

Flameaxe · Post Post #837 (isolation #127) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:48 pm

Lynching Tarscum.

Flameaxe · Post Post #839 (isolation #128) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:07 pm

That is a stupid scumtell, no joke there.

Flameaxe · Post Post #840 (isolation #129) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:09 pm

PS. Open your eyes just a tad, buddy.

Flameaxe · Post Post #842 (isolation #130) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:14 pm

But does an anti-town action instantly mean scumz? Nope. Ur also very dum.

Flameaxe · Post Post #844 (isolation #131) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:18 pm

Your scumdar is retarded.

Flameaxe · Post Post #846 (isolation #132) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:22 pm

A lynch for spam is a retarded lynch. Therefore, you(and your scumdar) are retarded.

Flameaxe · Post Post #848 (isolation #133) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:25 pm

Spam is spam, not scum. Spam != Scum, basic spelling laws apply.

Flameaxe · Post Post #850 (isolation #134) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:39 pm

Or you could not fail at reading as much, because clearly you are. A good reader can easily bypass spam in a thread, you obviously did not. Head out of ass now please. Having your head up your ass is terribly anti-town. Please become less anti-town.

Also, nice set of 'equations' there, but you still missed where Spam = Scum, sorry.

I have an idea, lets wagon me up and lynch me. I'm completely serious here. Lynch me so Mars here will feel like a total dumbass.

Flameaxe · Post Post #852 (isolation #135) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:48 pm

And your content is way better.

Flameaxe · Post Post #854 (isolation #136) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:00 pm

Hooray, another contentless post. You and the person you have replaced have done the exact same things, contentwise. Try better, scumbag.

Flameaxe · Post Post #856 (isolation #137) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:02 pm

I wouldn't mind a Mars lynch. In fact...

Unvote Vote: Mars

. This is a much better play. Diescumdie.

Flameaxe · Post Post #858 (isolation #138) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:04 pm

Go ahead, I won't stop because silly little Mars has a policy against it.

Flameaxe · Post Post #860 (isolation #139) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:10 pm

I do what I do for a reason. Always. Even playing anti-town like this. I'm sorry that you need to bitch about spam like this.

Flameaxe · Post Post #861 (isolation #140) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:11 pm

Also, policy lynches are terribly anti-town, don't you know that by now?

Flameaxe · Post Post #863 (isolation #141) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:19 pm

Then actually scumhunt please. I have seen absolutely nothing of the sort so far. You have done exactly what your predecessor has done: Complain and pressure those who committed the act of spamming, and then go with the crowd on Tar. I really like my vote, if you can't tell.

Who the fuck are you to tell me my reason is a bad one, when you don't even know the reason in the first place? The way I play and scumhunt is different than yours, deal with it. I don't play the norm. Who the fuck cares? (You, clearly...)

Flameaxe · Post Post #865 (isolation #142) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:27 pm

Its funny being told I'm not scumhunting from one who has done nothing of the sort.

I'm not hurting the town at all, I'm arguing against your retarded scumtells that result in little or no actual scumhunting. Going after someone who spams is like going after someone who is lurking. Easy targets. How about some more opinions.

(Still need to diescumdie.)

Flameaxe · Post Post #866 (isolation #143) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:28 pm

Also, if you think I am hurting the town so much, why not just vote me already? I know you already know I am town because I'm not your scumbuddy, but just come on and commit a little!

Flameaxe · Post Post #867 (isolation #144) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:33 pm

Because 2 wasn't enough:

SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM

Hey, am I scum yet?

Flameaxe · Post Post #870 (isolation #145) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 4:52 pm

Except going after spammers ISN'T the right thing to do, especially because you haven't commented on anyone else, or even those spammers and what they've done beyond that. I really hope you aren't planning on pushing a lynch just based on spam. I will say that spam can contribute to someone being scummy, but that alone just doesn't work. (Yes, if you can't tell, this is a paragraph asking for a bit more analysis on the rest of the players. You haven't really touched on many people since you joined, much like DGB.)

PS. My post and your reading of it ("Nuh-uh") simply doesn't work. Sorry for hurting your feelings with a good dose of liquid truth (now in black raspberry flavour!).

Oh what I meant to say way: "So I make a point back, and you say "You are so immature, lets try to grow up here!" Very smooth. I expect that from...well, I did expect it from you.

In closing, this is a game. I know that I personally play a game because it is (what people usually refer to as) "fun". Some people (like myself at the time of the 'incident') find spamming such as what occurred to be fun.

To close my closing, try to have some fun. But before doing that, you should watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqhfLTsEeZg

Flameaxe · Post Post #871 (isolation #146) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:02 pm

Iammars wrote:
Flameaxe wrote:Also, if you think I am hurting the town so much, why not just vote me already? I know you already know I am town because I'm not your scumbuddy, but just come on and commit a little!
Because I think that Tar is scummier than you. You're tied for second on my list ATM. There are things more scummy than spamming, but after Tar and you + the other spammers, there isn't much else that I saw that was scummy. However, if it comes down to lynching the spammers, here's my order:
Flameaxe
UltimaAvalon
pickem's replacement
Oman
How was the order decided? Gut mainly, plus who is more likely to contribute positively in the future.

So...you have absolutely NOTHING to comment on beyond people spamming and that Tar is scummy (thats the end of that comment)? 35 pages and NOTHING AT ALL? Reaaaaly? Now I know why I'm at the top here. I know all!

Flameaxe · Post Post #872 (isolation #147) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:03 pm

Triple posting fun:

I changed my mind, this game isn't really mafia so you can't actually scumhunt. Thanks Ether!

Flameaxe · Post Post #875 (isolation #148) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:33 pm

And as for your "SPAM" post, that was completely unnecessary and shouldn't have been posted in the first place, and detracts from the argument in the first place.

It was completely necessary, and I would totally do it again. Only problem, I respect the mod of this game and wouldn't do it because he is the mod.

In most games, you're right. Pushing a lynch based on spam usually is a bad idea and won't go through. However, this game has been defined by spam. When the moderator has to add a rule to the game's rule set in the middle of the game telling you to stop spamming, there's something seriously wrong.

Defined by spam, yes. This is true, BUT its not all spam. I am growing weary of your constant "Oh there was other stuff, but lets keep our eye on the spammers" argument.

No, I've got more to comment, but you happen to be on now so being able to get a whole bunch of posts with argument with one of the players I consider scummy is a good thing. If UltimaAvalon was on I would be arguing with him right now.

A) What does me being on have anything to do with you commenting on other players in the game? You don't need someone to be there alongside you to make sure you don't fall off your bike (with obvious training-wheels) to comment on a player.
B) UA is yet another one on your 'spammer' list. Lets keep moving away from all of those 'non-spammers'! I agree entirely!

However, I did find less people scummy in this game than I normally do. We don't have 35 pages of content, just 35 pages of posts. I think you underestimate how annoying and detracting spam can be, especially for someone who doesn't like their spam and their mafia mixed.

Hmm...you find players (omit: Spammers/Tar) scummy in this game? Even only a little? I HAD NO IDEA! YOU KNOW WHY? BECAUSE YOU HAVEN'T BOTHERED TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THEM. Yes, there is spam, but spam is not, IS NOT, an excuse to get by without commenting on players that aren't easy targets or leading wagons.

I don't know about you, but I don't like my mafia mixed with constant excuses and attempts to slip-by. Spam wouldn't bother me in a re-read, I don't find it annoying at all. I see people having fun the way they choose. I suggest you actually try and focus on a re-read, who knows what you might find in between those spam posts.

Flameaxe · Post Post #876 (isolation #149) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:35 pm

I play the game for fun too. (and for other reasons, but that's a story for my college application essay) I'm glad you find spamming fun. However spamming hurts the mafia game because it makes it not fun for everyone else. I'm glad you feel like making the rest of the town have less fun so you can have more fun. That's great for you, but the rest of us is kinda pissed about it, including the mod.

Highly opinionated statement from someone who has trouble reading a game with derails.

Flameaxe · Post Post #879 (isolation #150) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:56 pm

You are a butter voter, thats all.

Flameaxe · Post Post #882 (isolation #151) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:15 pm

B was stating that you are completely tunnel visioned towards the spammers, and were, and still are, nearly ignoring every other player thus far. This bothers me with every additional post you ignore it.

Flameaxe · Post Post #883 (isolation #152) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:19 pm

C) I don't think you understand what I'm trying to do. I'm focusing on you right now because you're one of the biggest people that sticks out in my mind as scum and we can get a lot of game-related text out quickly, giving the game a nice jump start, which it needed ever since it bogged down in spam. Unfortunately, tonight's debate is coming to an end as I need to get to bed, but a lot was put out today, which was good. Will I argue against other people? Yeah. But I can't get a lot of information out right now by attacking UltimaAvalon.

I'm not asking you to attack anyone, I'm asking you to post some actual opinions, not just 'oh they spammed, so they need pressure'. That is what you are continually doing in this game. Why is that so hard to comprehend?

This is the first time I have dealt with you in a game and have seen you have respect for someone.

JDodge has gained my respect over the course of games I've played with him. And your comment came from one other game, which I didn't have respect for most of the players, including yourself (which I still have zero). Even better, that game is still ongoing! Woo!

Flameaxe · Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:10 pm

Skipping it is terribly anti-town.

Flameaxe · Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:21 pm

I will kill you. Policy lynches are uber-dumb.

Flameaxe · Post Post #894 (isolation #155) » Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:13 pm

Hooray!

Flameaxe · Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:05 pm

I miss PEG...

Flameaxe · Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:51 am

Ha, I get it. Damn you primate!

Flameaxe · Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:56 am

You fail, thats why.

Flameaxe · Post Post #919 (isolation #159) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:23 am

Skruffs wrote:
Vote : UltimaAvalon

Just the first post was enough for me.

His...self vote? Better yet, his lack of one?

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:06 pm

No it isn't Oman. We must lynch Tar.

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:14 pm

I'm never wrong. Except when I'm wrong. Tar is the lynch, trust me.

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:17 pm

How about this: "Tar is scum."

Better?

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:19 pm

You're*

Incorrect usage causes your statement to be invalid.

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:21 pm

I will reply the same way I did back in N417:

Flameaxe wrote:Cutting is bad, and no matter how depressed you are, you shouldn't do it.

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:28 pm

I'm telling you that you are scum, not miller. This is an open setup remember?

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:29 pm

With a miller...
yay reading...

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:29 pm

Oman wrote:Was that a horrible attempt at claiming you're a miller or insinuating you're a cop with a guilty on flameaxe?

Either way, he's scum. Lynch all Millers.

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:37 pm

You should claim.

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:41 pm

Could have sworn I was voting Tar...

unvote, Vote: Tar

.

No hissyfits, just claims.

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:44 pm

Porochaz wrote:Tar is lynch -1, so you may want to stop and consider FL instead... YAY!!!

You may want to stop and consider BUSSING YOUR FUCKING BUDDY!

WHAT NOW?

Flameaxe · Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:52 pm

Flameaxe wrote:Could have sworn I was voting Tar...
unvote, Vote: Tar
.

No hissyfits, just claims.

Uhh...yeah. I wanna hear the scumbag claim.

Flameaxe · Post Post #951 (isolation #172) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:02 pm

=====================================[]

Flameaxe · Post Post #955 (isolation #173) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:05 pm

You're useless. Stop posting all these bullshit active lurking posts.

Flameaxe · Post Post #957 (isolation #174) » Fri Dec 21, 2007 1:14 pm

He's scum. Over usage of the miller possibility. Constant-vote hopping. Being useless. Following the crowd (even on his own lynch). Need more?

Flameaxe · Post Post #965 (isolation #175) » Sat Jan 05, 2008 7:56 pm

First.

Flameaxe · Post Post #968 (isolation #176) » Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:05 pm

Protown. This is an open setup so you can check the document in the first post for all the roles.

Flameaxe · Post Post #983 (isolation #177) » Tue Jan 08, 2008 1:04 pm

Phate wrote:lurk much?

Sorry for double post, by the way.

Annoy much?

Flameaxe · Post Post #986 (isolation #178) » Tue Jan 08, 2008 3:39 pm

Skruffs wrote:Flameaxe is also likely scum.

Ur a dummy mcdummy head.

Flameaxe · Post Post #994 (isolation #179) » Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:12 pm

Well said, Gorrad.

Flameaxe · Post Post #995 (isolation #180) » Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:12 pm

Also (off topic, sorry JD) Gorrad, were you the one who PM'd me about Wintereenmas Mafia a while back?

Flameaxe · Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:30 pm

Hey guys. What's up?

Flameaxe · Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:42 pm

Cool. Who should I vote and why?

Flameaxe · Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:27 am

Skruffs wrote:
vote flAmeaxe

I love traps!

Uhm. Ok. Care to elaborate at all?

Flameaxe · Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:14 pm

Skruffs wrote:I suppose I should have scrolled up.

Unvote, Vote: Gorrad

I thought you were the one who had claimed to have set a trap. Plus I still don't like your first post of the day.

Well...

I don't like your avatar, so ha.

Flameaxe wrote:First.

What's wrong with my first post of the day? I claimed first of the day proudly!

Flameaxe · Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:51 pm

Skruffs wrote:What have you done, since then?
Let me guess, you will also try to claim the last of the day, right?

I don't know yet.

Flameaxe · Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:11 pm

UltimaAvalon wrote:
Confirm Vote: Gorrad

How dare you trust other people in a game of Mafia.

Seriously, what the hell man?

(Yellow)

Flameaxe · Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:06 am

Vote: Xpom

I vote because I care.

Flameaxe · Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:45 am

Hey.

Butter?

Flameaxe · Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:27 pm

Aw man, this is unfair. Is everybody voting for me because of what the person whom I replaced did? I understand if I'm implicated as such, but man, that stinks. I don't know how I'm supposed to defend his actions, which makes this bandwagon kind of stinky, in my opinion.

No clean slates. You are in fact a new player, but the role has stayed the same.

Yes you should claim.

Flameaxe · Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:55 pm

Phate wrote:Xpom is town. This is a scum-driven wagon, and I will have no part in it.

This is good posting...

...
...
...
...
...
..
..
..Yeah...

Flameaxe · Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:57 pm

I mean, COME ON. All Xpom has done is display typical newbie behaviour - someone decided it would be fun to fuck with the new guy and tell him that you don't have to reread threads you replace into. He mentioned that, and BOOM! L-2. This looks way too much like a newbietown lynch, and we should not be lynching off the newbies for being newbies, let alone on D3. FaerieLord was admittedly scummy, and I don't have a problem with BooKitty's vote, but all of the last four speedvotes were scummy, especially Gorrad's and Cow's.

A) But how does that make him town, exactly? That was what I was referring to.
B) Bookie's vote/reasoning most likely swayed a lot of people.
C) You say Faerielord was scummy, but earlier you say:

Xpom is town.
This is a scum-driven wagon, and I will have no part in it.

Funny thing is, Xpom is in fact...FL. Contradictions are cool.

Unvote, Vote: Phate

Flameaxe · Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:00 pm

Phate wrote:Conveniently, though, you've jumped onto the easiest lynch with no reasons that Xpom can defend against, or indeed, any reasons other than "FL was scummy, I agree with what was being said, Xpom hasn't contributed anything (although contradicting that last point, I'd completely forgotten about this game). So I'll vote him."

No. Diescumdie.

Flameaxe · Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:24 pm

Phate, A and C has got to be the worst logic jump I've ever seen, and makes me feel better about moving my vote.

Flameaxe · Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:40 pm

Phate wrote:Cow, multiple people jumping on someone's wagon in a short time period isn't
necessarily
scummy. But when they all provide no reasoning or, in your case, hollowly echoing other people, it is scummy.

Way to completely miss the point.

Flameaxe · Wed Jan 30, 2008 1:09 pm

Mastermind of Sin wrote:
Vote: UltimaAvalon
I thought I already made it clear how scummy he is, why is he still alive?

Because you are still creepy.

Flameaxe · Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:00 pm

Skruffs wrote:Flameaxe is still good. ^.^ But I'm ambivalent.

What do you mean by "good" exactly.

Flameaxe · Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:08 am

So why are you voting UA?

Flameaxe · Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:08 am

Add it up! Also, why am I good for the noose? What have I done that is so scummy? Why can't you piece things together?

Flameaxe · Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:18 pm

Xpom Telo wrote:I don't like Flameaxe's posts at all. He is not being helpful or worthwhile at the moment. More analysis will come up later.

Stopping lurking just to spew horseshit. Good play here, thats for sure.

Still waiting on 'Pants.