Oman wrote:Its not the Survivor that gets me, its the townie lynching policy.
You said: He claims townie, we kill him (paraphrased). Which means that by your rules 80% of the town will be policy lynched.
Well that's certainly
an
interpretation on what I said. But read carefully what you just wrote and look for how "he claims townie, we kill him" and "let's kill all the townies" are, in fact, totally different.
Most of this town had decided he was scummiest. I had acknowledged that while I saw no real evidence of such, his lynch would be a good play due to all the juicy information his bandwagon would give us.
If he had claimed to be vanilla townie at that point, he undoubtedly would have still been the best play. People who found him scummy wouldn't have been persuaded by that enough to remove their vote so he probably would have remained the primary lynch candidate for today had that been his claim.
However, what you're suggesting is that I said I would "policy lynch" any claimed townie, which is complete nonsense. I was talking very specifically about what would happen to Bubka if he had claimed townie in this current situation with a pressing deadline, a huge bandwagon and an array of people seemingly queuing up to hammer him.
Are
you
saying that if he claimed vanilla townie he would have had a decent chance of surviving today? I'm saying probably not. You either disagree or have chosen a rather bizarre moment to misrepresent me for reasons unclear.
