Prophecy Mafia - Over

Porochaz · Post Post #825 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2007 3:07 pm

I started at the very start of day 2: Nov 30th
Fairielord started:Oct 18th.

Point no 2 = FAIL

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #826 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:03 pm

Bookitty wrote:Maybe I'm missing something important here, but why would you play deliberately scummy if you were vanilla townie?

I said his play was lacking...what do you think that is scummy versus lacking.

Bookitty · Post Post #827 (ISO) » Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:05 pm

Tarhalindur wrote:Also, I'm a bit curious why I haven't come under fire until now, especially since I've been acting in a way I consider scummy and CKD is in the game. Call it meta if you will, but failure to vote me when I'm being scummy isn't what I'm used to from CKD.

He said he was acting in a way HE considered scummy. Hence my question.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #828 (ISO) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:38 am

ahhh, I see....well, I see a normal Tar play..

Tar, why are you playing in a way you deem scummy?

Lowell · Post Post #829 (ISO) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 3:43 am

I'm here. Not paying much attention at present. Will make a triumphant return soon I'm sure.

FaerieLord · Post Post #830 (ISO) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:15 am

@Poro. Do you really think I was playing the game? Jdodge asked me to replace, I said yes. I left it there to decay. Jdodge often asks me to replace, and I often do this :/

Also, @oman. Read yesterday. See who started the case. I'm just often very reluctant to vote, as expressed yesterday.

JDodge · Post Post #831 (ISO) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:02 pm

Iammars replaces DrippingGoofball.

Porochaz · Post Post #832 (ISO) » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:42 pm

I'm sorry I view someone is "playing" a game when it is announced they are, not when they decide to post. It's like being introduced into a game of charades, you are asked to join to make up team's then just sit there silently for a while whilst other people are guessing then shout something out at the last moment. Your still playing arent you? Your just not saying anything... Same here. I view you as having played the game since JDodge said Faerielord replaces... I don't really see how you could say anything different.

(Also apologies for the game choice, I was trying to think of a good game which would fit the analogy which both sides of the atlantic would get...)

Iammars · Post Post #833 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:12 am

Hello all. I'll be reading the thread now.

Gorrad · Post Post #834 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:24 am

Hello, Mars. Say hello to Major Tom for me, will you?

FaerieLord · Post Post #835 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 6:58 am

Different view on things. I won't try to argue because nobody can win an argue about a definition of words. But to me, a lurker isn't a player. He's just a bystander with his name written down

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #836 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 11:37 am

What are we doing in this game?

Flameaxe · Post Post #837 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:48 pm

Lynching Tarscum.

Iammars · Post Post #838 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:01 pm

Guys, this thread has a higher percentage of spam than rajrhcpfreak does. This is not good.

FOS: Flameaxe, UltimaAvalon Oman & pickem's replacement

They looked like the biggest contributors. Spam in a mafia thread is not good, and a mod should never have to post a rule like JDodge did. When a deadline is on, the discussion should be on who we're going to lynch, not on lynching butter.

However, they have to wait as we need to lynch Tar. Admitting to trying to act scummy is not good.

Flameaxe · Post Post #839 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:07 pm

That is a stupid scumtell, no joke there.

Flameaxe · Post Post #840 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:09 pm

PS. Open your eyes just a tad, buddy.

Iammars · Post Post #841 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:13 pm

Flameaxe wrote:That is a stupid scumtell, no joke there.

Why?
If performing an action would hurt someone trying to perform a town action, then the action is against the town. Agree?

Flameaxe · Post Post #842 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:14 pm

But does an anti-town action instantly mean scumz? Nope. Ur also very dum.

Iammars · Post Post #843 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:17 pm

Flameaxe wrote:But does an anti-town action instantly mean scumz? Nope. Ur also very dum.

No, it doesn't instantly mean scum, but it does push the person who performs the action up on my scumdar.

Flameaxe · Post Post #844 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:18 pm

Your scumdar is retarded.

Iammars · Post Post #845 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:19 pm

How is punishing people for performing actions that go against the town retarded?

Flameaxe · Post Post #846 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:22 pm

A lynch for spam is a retarded lynch. Therefore, you(and your scumdar) are retarded.

Iammars · Post Post #847 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:24 pm

Flameaxe wrote:A lynch for spam is a retarded lynch. Therefore, you(and your scumdar) are retarded.

What is your reasoning for lynching for spam being a retarded lynch?

Flameaxe · Post Post #848 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:25 pm

Spam is spam, not scum. Spam != Scum, basic spelling laws apply.

Iammars · Post Post #849 (ISO) » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:33 pm

Spam makes it harder for people to go back and reread the thread/replacements to come in and get active quickly. This is an important part of forum mafia, going back and reading what other people said. Spam adds useless posts that break the flow of reading the thread, making it harder for people to read the thread.

Also, pertaining more to the now, spam posts break the momentum of the conversation that's currently happening, stopping the town from getting good discussion.

Why spam is bad is short form:
Discussion = good
Spam = breaks/stops discussion
Stopping a good action = bad
Spam = Stopping a good action
Spam = bad