Mini 471: End.
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Oh what's this I see?
NabakovNabakovwrote:
It was all fun and nonsense until a few votes drop on Adel. Ohh crap now it's mildly serious time, scumbuddy Adel is in trouble, gotta get worked up and point at Albert. Adel then follows her scumbuddy Nabakov's initiative and votes for Albert accusing him of "jumping on a wagon without reason". Strangely enough, Nabakov's previous "Wagon: Teh Scummz who are they again Pickem?" didnt seem like it was jumping on a wagon without reason to Adel =/Ok, it's mildly serious time, guys.
Pickem, I will unvote you if you can make a single post without caps lock.
Final Fos: ABR for dropping the third vote on Adel. If we lynch her now, we don't get any diagrams later.
How's this for a mildly serious post? =P
Vote: Adelfor being scum, also her complexe diagrams are meant to confuse the town..
FoS: NabakovNabakovfor being Adel's scumbuddy
FoS: CrashTextDummiefor being a lurker AKA sleeping in mafia mansion while his buddies are "out at work" apparently having a hard time escaping my wrath!!-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Oh what's this I see?
NabakovNabakovwrote:
It was all fun and nonsense until a few votes drop on Adel. Ohh crap now it's mildly serious time, scumbuddy Adel is in trouble, gotta get worked up and point at Albert. Adel then follows her scumbuddy Nabakov's initiative and votes for Albert accusing him of "jumping on a wagon without reason". Strangely enough, Nabakov's previous "Wagon: Teh Scummz who are they again Pickem?" didnt seem like it was jumping on a wagon without reason to Adel =/Ok, it's mildly serious time, guys.
Pickem, I will unvote you if you can make a single post without caps lock.
Final Fos: ABR for dropping the third vote on Adel. If we lynch her now, we don't get any diagrams later.
How's this for a mildly serious post? =P
Unvote: CrashTextDummie
Vote: Adelfor being scum, also her complexe diagrams are meant to confuse the town..
FoS: NabakovNabakovfor being Adel's scumbuddy
FoS: CrashTextDummiefor being a lurker AKA sleeping in mafia mansion while his buddies are "out at work" apparently having a hard time escaping my wrath!![/b]-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
@Nabakov: I see where you're coming from, and to be honest, I didn't previously post after 100% analyzing the situation. I just read the thread, noticed people suddenly get all serious after having made equally "stupid meta-game moves" and not get serious until a specific person gets targeted, and then both of them turning the attention to someone else... Meh, at the very least, I wanted to see how you guys were going to react.
My vote's staying on Adel for now, my gut feeling is still there, and if you ever get nervous about 4 votes on Adel, well there are a couple of others that can take out their votes on her ( votes under "stupid metagame reasons" ) mine's staying.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Here you are trying to put FULL responsibility on me for whatever happens to you. It takes SEVEN votes to lynch you, you only have FOUR. Do you realize that out of those four votes, if you take out all the random and silly voting, only mine stays as a "valid vote"? If I was in your spot I wouldn't get too nervous if you were town because of that. Besides, if the random voters keep their vote on you, you still need THREE more votes to get lynched. I really don't see this happening anytime soon.Adel wrote:
Here he is trying to relieve himself of responsibility when I turn up town.kravhen wrote:@Nabakov: I see where you're coming from, and to be honest, I didn't previously post after 100% analyzing the situation.
Once again, you are making my blowing my vote out of proportions and making it look horribly outrageous. I did not put the hammering vote on you. I also did not put you at Lynch -1. I put a fourth out of seven vote on you. And not any kind of fourth vote. This fourth vote is really the first valid one after 3 bandwagon votes. So just because there was a silly bandwagon i was supposed to not vote for you, or wait until the bandwagon dissapears before doing so? No way a silly bandwagon's getting in the way of my gut feeling that picked something up about you and made me drop one little valid vote.Adel wrote:
When silly & random voting yields a bandwagon, there is something fishy going on. Placing a forth vote on someone on page two means that you are awfully willing to see a quicklynch based upon two or three posts from most people. How could you possibly be confident of someone's alignment on page two? Oh, that is right, if you are mafia than you know everyone else's alignment.kravhen wrote:I just read the thread, noticed people suddenly get all serious after having made equally "stupid meta-game moves" and not get serious until a specific person gets targeted, and then both of them turning the attention to someone else... Meh, at the very least, I wanted to see how you guys were going to react.
Don't get me wrong though, if there was a 6-vote bandwagon on you, I wouldn't have voted. 6-vote bandwagon is ridiculous though.
If there was a 5-vote bandwagon, I probably would've had a bit of a hard time putting you at Lynch-1. Dont know what I would've done if that happened.
My move may have been reckless and unusually offensive especially for page 2, but hey, at least I'm getting responses/results I wanted out of it. At least now you know, Adel, that you are under my loop. Weigh carefully every word you speak as they are going to be analyzed letter by letter. Be paranoid.Adel wrote:
With a vote that wasn't based upon solid analysis, on a player that said "what is with this wagon?". Page 2 is still randomness, yet you are willing to not only hop onto a silly wagon, but you are also willing to try to turn it serious and deadly, while avoiding responsibility for it.kravhen wrote:My vote's staying on Adel for now, my gut feeling is still there, and if you ever get nervous about 4 votes on Adel, well there are a couple of others that can take out their votes on her ( votes under "stupid metagame reasons" ) mine's staying.
unvote Albert B. Rampage vote:kravhen-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Yes Village Idiot is an actual role, it's actually more deadly and dangerous than the mafia itself! It does not kill during the night, but it SUCKS YOUR BRAINS OUT DURING THE DAY AND MAKES YOU WEAR SOCKS WITH SANDALS! I also think Pickem is a VI lolz so lets vote him!camisade wrote:Is Village Idiot an actual role? Or is it just someone that's stupid? [/noob]
Cause pickemgenius sure acts like one, no offense.
...
Just kidding. Chill Adel. Don't start quoting the hell out of this reply.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
@Nabakov: Don't say chill, dude =P I'm completely and always chill. I'm surprised to hear that I have gotten on the defensive so fast, what post are you referring to when you say that? What's more interesting is that from my point of you, it was you and Adel that first got "defensive fast".
I will continue to claim my vote is valid. I don't think you get what valid means here =P Obviously my "confusing diagrams" reason wasn't serious, mildly intended as a joke after I really went and took a look at them. I thought that'd be clear especially after the long post that follows my vote for Adel. Unless you skipped to my vote, then you read the reasons why I voted.
Don't say my vote was stupid. My vote created 3 pages of discussion so far and it wasn't a "OMG ADEL FUXKZ U STILZ" vote. I wanted to see Adel on the defensive, and I did. Heck, she threatened me with her birthday, something I have never seen before. Also once again the mention of evil me turning this wagon into something "serious and deadly". Ridiculous. I'm not going to repeat myself on that issue.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
@Nabakov: You might be right on the first part when you say you would've gotten worked up no matter who would have gotten 4 votes. As for my overdefense, well it was meant as a counter to Adel's own overdefense quote post. That is why i don't see my posts being any more defensive than Adel's. The last part was meant for silliness and could make a mafia nervous, I thought.
I would've lost a bit of interest in Adel a while ago if she didnt react the way she did. Especially after the silly ending mentioned by Nabakov, I got a reply that basically meant "Yo kid i was born in the 70s, i cant be scum, show some respect, im older therefore better than u at wagonz yo". It just gets more interesting and fun with each of her reply.
Now I'llUnvote: Adelbecause that seems to be what some of you are waiting for. I also want to use this opportunity to shift some focus to those who still have their votes on Adel. For all we know they could be scum that placed their votes first disguised in randomvoteness and patiently waiting for lynch. Or they could be scumbuddies that think Adel's identity is compromised and dont dare defend her =P
Still too much is possible. I want to hear more from the silent ones. If you don't know what to say, then comment on the whole me VS Adel saga, tell us what you think. Talk.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
You spoke as if you had just read the line starting with "Vote:" because you took "for being scum + complex diagrams" as the reason for my vote and called it random and metagaming. ( And if it was the sole reason, it would be random alright ) I've told you that already:SirTornado wrote:Really? Let me remind you why your voted for Adel:
In post 43, kravhen wrote: wrote:
Vote: Adel for being scum, also her complexe diagrams are meant to confuse the town...
If that wasn't metagaming or random, then what was it? If that was metagaming (or even random) then why are you saying others should take their votes off her because they are "stupid metagame reasons"?
I do notice I wrote "take a look at the whole thread"... I think I meant take a look at my whole post since you just reffered to my vote line and the silly reason next to it, without referring to the rest of the post above the vote line at all, which iskravhen wrote:SirTornado you just quoted my vote: because she's scum... Take a look at the whole thread and you might find out what sparked the feeling in me that she's scum..
There's a reason for the confidence. It's how I play. My theory is voting with extreme confidence that the votee is scum can not only throw the scum off balance and overwhelm him and make it more probable to react unusually and being paranoid, but it somehow helps me see things clearer when I have a clear target as opposed to when my target is a group of people towards whom I have mixed feelings of uncertainty.kravhen wrote:It was all fun and nonsense until a few votes drop on Adel. Ohh crap now it's mildly serious time, scumbuddy Adel is in trouble, gotta get worked up and point at Albert. Adel then follows her scumbuddy Nabakov's initiative and votes for Albert accusing him of "jumping on a wagon without reason". Strangely enough, Nabakov's previous "Wagon: Teh Scummz who are they again Pickem?" didnt seem like it was jumping on a wagon without reason to Adel =/
Does that make a slight bit of sense?
Now I shall quote myself for great justiceStill too much is possible. I want to hear more from the silent ones. If you don't know what to say, then comment on the whole me VS Adel saga, tell us what you think. Talk.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
I'm unvoting because it seems as long as my vote's there, the focus stays on me and Adel. It doesn't mean she's off of my suspicion list, I just want to hear from the more silent ones from now. For all we know, there could be scum among them taking advantage of not being in the spotlight.
I also never said I unvoted to take the suspicion off of me. If you wanna quote me, quote me right. "I want to question the people who did the exact same thing you did" ? Who else has done what I did? Why do you suddenly come out of lurking mode when time has come for you and fellow lurkers to enter the questioning room?-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
@Nabakov: I don't think it'd be good for her appearance if Adel proved/used her wagoning skills after blaming me for creating a "serious and deadly" wagon =P
The mod is away until sunday isn't he? Hmm... As soon as he's back there's a prod going to CTD and if that ho has been lurking for 5 pages then comes up "sup guys uhh im voting BZ cuz i hate zebras lolz" I'm lynching him. ( devil smiley )-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
...
It annoys me that as long as I was attacking Adel, the thread was lively and people were adding to the fire and now that it's over, no one has much to say. That makes a bunch of the quiet ones look scummy.. as if they were enjoying the duel as it kept focus off of them and were counting on it to provoke a mislynch.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
camisade wrote:
Is it because I called you Village Idiot? Sorry, I was just confused because all your posts had been really weird, but your posts since CTD showed up have been good. I'm feeling really overwhelmed, because no Mafia game (on other sites) I've ever been in has had this much activity.pickemgenius wrote:
Heh, hasn't said much, ofcourse Patrick hasn't said much (he will though) and CTD hasn't been able to post a bunch, and from what I've seen from him doesn't post a shitload anyway, so that's why for now.Blue Zebra wrote:
Is there a specific reason you voted camisade, pickem?
And @ Albert B. Rampage, I think krahven was acting pretty scummy. He said that his vote stayed on Adel because of his gut-feeling, and that his vote was the only valid vote? I really didn't get that,
"only valid one" meant sure it was the fourth vote, but it was the only justified one after 3 silly/random votes...-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
I was annoyed. If he read the thread then he should know. I also would replace all the times I said "valid" and say "justified" instead... I used valid because of lack of a better word ( T_T yes call me grammar noob ) until that other person said it.Adel wrote:Why did you feel like you needed to justify it at the time you made your post?
@camisade: Did Adel's defense seem any scummy to you? What does your gut pick up about her?-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Hah, I hope not, that'd be bad for town and I'd feel bad for you guys heh. I'll be careful with what I say then, perhaps I've been talking more clumsy lately, sure don't want to turn into a village idiot.Adel wrote:I don't think me voting for kravhen is accomplishing much right now, but I am awfully sure he will dropping enough scumtells over the next ten pages that he will end up the lynch for today. I think CTD needs to start posting in a hurry though.unvote:kravhen vote:CrashTestDummy
P.S.: Yes, SirT, someone saying or hinting he is town doesn't score any points and doesnt mean anything at all. I know that. Don't quote this reply plz, first Adel, now you with the multi-quotes. My brain hurts =[-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Also as Nabakov said, I'm starting to wonder about the people who try hard to keep "town's focus" on me. I can understand some of you interpreting my unvote as trying to escape the spotlight. If I was in your place I probably would've thought the same. But would a scum put himself in the spotlight in the first place? ( Ok I'm still relatively new, but is this last line what people call a WIFOM? ). Either way, I'm more interested in those who just try reallll hard to keep me in the spotlight.
FOS: SirT-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
*points FoS*Who is trying really hard to keep you in the spotlight?
Adel, what do you think about this whole spotlight thing? If you were scum and never "in the spotlight with me", how do you think you would react to my unvote as an attempt to shed some light on the other players? How would you feel about it?-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
@BlueZebra:I see it as an attempt to manipulate my image by quoting lines from everywhere, one by one, and
dropping an analysis on each of them SEPERATELY, as if they had nothing
to do with each other, without looking at them as a whole.
Pick em, slap em in the right order, slam a short analysis
that takes for granted that the quotes can only be scumtell for sure.
I gotta admit my playstyle isn't the most stable around, I also posted alot, that's probably
gotta make it easier to multiquote and put puzzle pieces together to form a malicious image.
That's what I think. At least, as opposed to a quiet, "uncontroversial" player.
@Adel: Do you really think I am scum or are you trying out my "tactic" I mentionned a few pages ago? =PAdel wrote: I think you are scum. I am trying to find out who the other scum are. I'll let you know when I think someone is scummier than you are.
Your suspicion doesn't bother me right now. I've had a good time annoying you 1vs1 but after activity
picked up came the time to stop acting solo and as Team Town. So sure, keep me wherever you wish
on your scumminess list, just as long as you also keep looking elsewhere as I am. It's best for the town.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
If there's one quality I can give Adel is that she is good with words. Probably much better than me, but this constant pressure and aggressivity makes me want to slam my vote on her again. Thankfully my reasonable side stops me from doing so. My next vote will be on scum, I guarantee it.
Also, Adel you can claim all you want about helping town or others not helping with that overconfident attitude of yours, all you really do is subtlely tell me that you, wagonmaster that you are, plan to get me lynched today yet don't want to appear too responsible for it by saying I will "dig my own hole" in the next pages or whatever. To be honest I put my gut feeling away for a while but I still don't feel a protown vibe for you. You don't feel like an ally. I don't think this town will fall for your wagon, but if they do, then your horrible bandwagon mislynch ( in 3 other games? ) streak will grow.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Neither do I. If she's scum the attention on me is probably convenient for her. Although her vote isn't on me, she still keeps mentioning "my demise". Maybe Adel wants a few votes to fall on me but doesnt wanna be the first one to start it?Erotomachia wrote:
...and don't understand why Adel came to that conclusion.
Either way, if Adel turns out scum I'll be very proud (and impressed) of my gut feeling-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
omg you finally agree with me <3Adel wrote:Why don't you try commenting on other players or events? That would be more informative. No one is voting for me, and nobody is voting for you- we should just move on. Our opinions on each other are known to all, and aren't having much effect.
Let's hold hands and go scumhunting together <3
I'll have a post about how I perceive the others coming up soon-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Adel: You should already know what I think =P But I want to say that there was a point when I really wanted to focus on others for a while and scratch you off my list, that is until you started losing your cool. Made it seem like you couldn't take having some suspicion on you because you have never been scum yet, and now you finally are and really really wanna kill tonight cuz its fun right? I've considered such a possibility, along with the chance that you may have snapped because you felt personally offended, and threw a personal offense back at me (birthday AKA im older than u punk grr i cant take that a kid is ruining my game, and threats of being able to lynch me)
ABR: Albert's been one of the most quiet ones, not because he hasn't posted a whole lot, but most of his posts have been without much content. mostly fun facts, puns, rap rhymes and questions directed at others. I dont feel he's taking anyone's side. Simply put, I'm not getting any scumtells from him. In fact, i'm not getting any kind of tell from him except that he might be an infamous "active lurker".
BlueZebra: He feels pretty pro-town to me. On top of that he sometimes was the only one to understand my most complex, poorly written and shaky posts to know where I was coming from. He's around, reading, asking questions, doing a townie's job, and seems unbiased. ( He pointed out which parts of my posts felt scummy, which has helped me try and formulate better and understand why some of you suspect me. )
camisade: He doesn't have that many posts and some of you might be tempted to call him a lurker, but for now I prefer to think he's a newbie ( look at join date ) and is most comfortable observing for now. When I looked my scummiest, he pointed it out. Same for Adel when she lost her cool and posted the famous birthday post and all that. He isn't taking sides.
CrashTextDummie: Not sure if he was away or if he was lurking, but he's leaving us soon. Also he comes in late, claims he has spotted a scum after reading the game (BZ), votes for him and threatens Patrick that if he's scum, he has already lost. "Mark my words." hehe. When asked he doesn't want to explain that comment "yet". Does anyone think this is a hint at being cop?
Deadscilent: If anyone's a lurker, she certainly is. She has TWO posts people. Two posts and ZERO content. First a random vote on Ero at the beginning, then 2-3 days ago saying she'll be away from the 19(today) to 24. She has dodged conversation until this moment and now is going to be away ( still dodging ) for about a week. There's nothing more I can say about her, except that when she's back we should tie her up in the questioning room.
Erotomachia: We dont see his face much. He had a crazy week at work and then promised to post more but has only posted once in 6 days after saying so. I was tempted to say he might be scum kicking back, relaxing and enjoying me and adel's fights, but he was the first one I think to suggest we should move on for the sake of the town. I'm careful though, that could very well be scum putting up a town mask... annnd we've ventured into WIFOM territory so ill stop here.
NabakovNabakov: He started off calling me scummy while being blind to Adel's own reactions, but ended up finally opening his eyes and seeing both ways, calling Adel on her scummy posts after that. There's quite a few reasons possible for that, including the one where Adel is scum, youre the scumbuddy and you started getting careful not to be associated with Adel too much when people started understanding my position better and calling Adel on scumminess more.
Patrick: Was about the only one not to get too worked up about my 4th vote on Adel. If thats not a scumtell, then I don't really see anything scummy in his posts. He marks a good point by pointing out SirTornado's efforts on attacking me yet not committing on a vote. Isn't that "Agreeing with a movement but not actually supporting it?" hmm? He also noticed pickem's prolonged "overt spamming and chumminess" and thats probably what BZ meant by active lurking.
Pickemgenius: He has been pretty active, yet he doesn't have alot of content. He's got that huge post of is which is alot more a resumé of the game so far than it is about giving his opinion. Alot of posts but nothing that really stands out or helps town. Hey he might really be an active lurker.
SirT: Been pretty active, and especially aggressive towards me, although still pointing out odd things from pickem and adel, yet has never laid a vote nor a FoS. He claims he is a conservative voter and only makes "pressure and random votes". Not really sure what to make of that statement. You put quite alot of pressure on me quoting me 10x in a post, shouldnt such pressure be nicely coupled with a "pressure vote"? You are possibly afraid of committing to voting before a bunch of others have already done so. You also say you are always in the last ones to cast a vote. This could mean "hey i might cast the hammer vote but im not scum". Voting is town's only weapon along with talking, and not using it well could hurt town. Always voting towards the end also means you tend to vote when the lynchee has already pretty much been decided, so that your vote seems like its "just following the flow", the bandwagon.
P.S.: I feel horrible about this wall of text XD ...-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
You could be right. Sometimes people tend to consider newbieness as a factor for unusual posts, perhaps scared to lynch a newb townie. My position is split. I agree newbieness might effect one's playstyle, but I'm against the idea of using that reason too much. I'm not sure how "lynch proof" I really am, probably less than you think. No one should be lynch proof, ever, but in this case I don't really want to argue about it too much since me being "lynch proof" like you say is actually a good thing to town, since I am not scum.Adel wrote:Now when he continues to drop decent scum tells, people will be more more than likely to dismiss kravhen's posts as newbie noise and not mistake them genuine proof of scum. I think he is pretty close to lynch proof now.
I've still got my eye on you Adel, but don't feel "defeated" and that your "efforts have been in vain" or whatever, because I'm town, and your efforts at getting me lynched would only have been in vain if I was scum. Unless you are scum and your true intentions were never to get me lynched. *WIFOM alarm goes off*
/end post-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Obviously I'm still suspicious of Adel but I'm trying to look for another scummie right now, still debating whether Adel's aggressivity is either a grudge against me or she's ticked that she's been pointed out so fast.
I think the whole thing about joke votes are kinda unneeded right now. SirT is sending some scummy vibes because of the way he explained his "playstyle" and I still got my eyes on pickemgenius until he starts "beating" some people's shit, or whatever. Letting someone do shit on their own and then beating them a bit more sounds like SirT's "let them get a few votes first then hit them after".-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Hmm... Are people getting impatient?
Scum scum scum, where art thou.. mmm *focuses jedi mind*
I will be rereading a bit and try to come to a decision on who my vote should go on. I'll try to make it a definitive vote. I need to make up my mind about who's the scummiest acting / who's most likely to be a real scum.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Gee another replacement... And tomorrow deadscilent's back. I think we should make sure to point the spotlight at deadscilent for a while. All these replacements and people going away make it hard and confusing to get a good read on people and associating the previous person's behavior to the new. Deadscilent had been completely silent since his random vote until saying he had to go away. IMO this could very well be an opportunity to continue lurking for a bit in hopes that we elect a lynchee in the meantime.
FOS: deadscilentbecause no one can read him since he has 0 non-random posts.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Lol exactly what I thought... if everyone were "letting it unfold naturally", no one would be scumhunting and posting content. we'd all be lurking and eventually we'd die of age.Adel wrote:Haut Boy wrote: it seems that you are trying to force the spotlight onto him instead of letting things unfold naturally.thatis your scumtell against me? I don't think there is such a thing as "letting it unfold naturally".-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
did you only read the part you quoted or did you actually read my whole post? because I think I explain myself clearly enough.. You also forget he didn't post anything with content until saying he had to leave. He's the only person we got nothing on. N-o-t-h-i-n-g. Are you opposed that such a person start talking a bit about the thread all around and his opinions or are you opposed that we start to shed some light on your scumbuddy?-
-
kravhen
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
so for you it's completely out of this world that a scum LIES?
I'm not saying she lied on all her statements, but come on. Zero content. Not a single little opinion. Ok maybe she IS away until the 24th. She could still post just once or twice before leaving. I raise my eyebrow at you suddenly hopping on your horses to defend DS like that.
Yes.So you're saying since she had other shit going on that automatically we need to throw her into the spotlight for no fucking reason.
No wait, you're saying there's no fking reason? That's weird. I think any town would agree that it's for the best of the town to poke someone that hasn't talked at all yet.
Why do you think otherwise?-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Isn't it just as incredibly easy for a lurker to just say "i was busy" and "im going away"?pickemgenius wrote:kravhen wrote:
I think there is. Getting pickem to defend you is worthy enough.here is nothing gamewise that makes it worth lying about either one of those two.
Go after a "lurker" as you somehow put it is incredibly easy to do if you are scum.
I can defend whoever the fuck I want whenever I want.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
pickem chill.. even with my accusations I have still kept in consideration that she may have told the truth... I'm just voicing that there is still the possibility that she is lying... You keep assuming that I'm saying "zomg 100% scum, lets lynchgogo". On the other side, you seem 100% sure she AINT scum.
And as I've said a million times already too, without an answer from you, why did you suddenly hop on your horses and think I did this extremely horribly controversial thing when I just said we should put the spotlight on deadscilent when she's back? Why dont you agree?kravhen wrote:so for you it's completely out of this world that a scum LIES?
I'm not saying she lied on all her statements, butcome on. Zero content. Not a single little opinion. Ok maybe she IS away until the 24th. She could still post just once or twice before leaving. I raise my eyebrow at you suddenly hopping on your horses to defend DS like that.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
When have I said ZOMG SHE HAS A LIFE SCUM SCUM SCUM! ?pickemgenius wrote:kravhen wrote:pickem chill.. even with my accusations I have still kept in consideration that she may have told the truth... I'm just voicing that there is still the possibility that she is lying... You keep assuming that I'm saying "zomg 100% scum, lets lynchgogo". On the other side, you seem 100% sure she AINT scum.
When have I said this?
It sucks having people make you say things you haven't, doesn't it?
lying about being away, being busy, duh...pickemgenius wrote:kravhen wrote:so for you it's completely out of this world that a scum LIES?
I'm not saying she lied on all her statements, butcome on. Zero content. Not a single little opinion. Ok maybe she IS away until the 24th. She could still post just once or twice before leaving. I raise my eyebrow at you suddenly hopping on your horses to defend DS like that.
SHE GAINSkravhen wrote:And as I've said a million times already too, without an answer from you, why did you suddenly hop on your horses and think I did this extremely horribly controversial thing when I just said we should put the spotlight on deadscilentWhy dont you agree?when she's back?FROM LYING ABOUT BEING BUSY IRL, AND BEING ON VACATION.NOTHING
What statements is she lying about, you seem to think she is lying about something, what is it?????
Maybe she was busy.... FTW??
Wait, that means we agree with each other doesn't it? . . .pickemgenius wrote:
If she comes back and doesn't post something then I will get on her....
Spotlight = get on her
right? you thought so right?-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
You need to get your caps lock key checked out or something...
Anyway this bickering is useless... We agree on the same thing, dude.
I dont get the "you put spotlight on her NOW" thing. You make it sound like I want everyone to bitch about her while she's gone and lynch her before she's back. That's crazy. When she's back, everyone will turn one of their two eyes on her, expecting some activity at last. That's it, that's all. And don't say "IF" she doesn't post. I think even if she's a lurking scum she will post after the date she's back. The point is not to beat on her IF she doesn't post. She WILL post. The point is tolistento her.[/i]-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
Hello Spectrum!
( Another replacement =O )
I'm gonna need to take out a sheet of paper and write the names of the players and their replacements, or I'll start to get confused about who is who, and which seat was suspicious. (Mod make sure the first post is accurate as of now please?=D )
deadscilent: crashtext isn't with us anymore, you can't vote him =P
@HB: I have a question. Did you just do "show all posts by kravhen" after patrick asked you what you thought of me, or are you actually familiar with the context of the thread when I said the things you quoted?
I understand the bit about me saying my overconfidence is part of playstyle, and then saying I dislike Adel's aggressivity. Not sure it was hipocrisy, maybe. I'm not sure if Adel has a playstyle close to mine or if she dislikes that style and only reacted aggressive back as a kind of defense. Hey wait, that's right. She put on an early defense too, and possibly before I did. Missed that, HB? You probably just did "show all posts by kravhen".
Here's another question.
What do you think of Adel?-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
I'll say I was THIS close to shoving a vote on deadscilent. Seems like Adel did pick up the same thing I did and went ahead and voted. The deadline is 6 days so I still have some time to reread and really see who deserves my vote more, instead of rushing it to deadscilent and possibly change my mind later.-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
kravhen
-
-
kravhen Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 710
- Joined: June 24, 2007
-
-
-