Mini 1595: WiFom City: The Inquisition - GAME OVER - THANKS!
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 53, Holder of the Heel wrote:/Confirm
Side note, I'm somewhat confused about people calling others Town and Scum already, I'm assuming it's not very serious, like this is "RVS" without the votes. Otherwise I'd need explanation to understand.
The town/scum thing is some meta and some very low info post analysis as far as I'm aware. However fontisian is probably scum. Something tells me you already know that though.-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
I'm more curious as to why font's first post was basically her opening from the last Witchhunt, though less abrupt and more conciliatory. I'm also still don't understand fully why town would volunteer information to the scum team, which has more in the first place.
On the other hand at least there's something interesting to talk about pre-game.-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 77, Holder of the Heel wrote:I'm not sure but I have a feeling it wouldn't involve claiming Bomber and using almost zero information to *seriously* claim people are scum and town.
Well unfortunately we've got to get information somehow so get out there and point some fingers. It's the American way.-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
You're still scum fonti, but I appreciate being at the top. No one ever puts me at the top. If you tell me your scummate, I promise not to vote you D1!-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 161, fontisian wrote:Stigmata: Atum's a different person, and is probably too scared of me to challenge me like this if he were scum. Rubicon, on the other hand, knows better.
Heel: There's such a thing as too stupid to be fake. Honey's comment falls in that category. Try to be a little less wooden when you post, won't you? We're all just people.
I ain't scared of no time lord. If I were scum, I'd kill you for that blasphemous suggestion.-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 242, Unsight wrote:In post 239, Atum wrote:Way to many nulls. Anyway, discuss.
You said your reason for voting fontisian was different from mine in Post 196. What is it?
Also, what about MadCitrus makes him scummy? Did you just want to make him orange?
I somewhat address my vote on fontisian pre-game but I will elaborate. Like I said before, the first thing is her opening to this game matching the linked WH, with a different tone and more explanation up front. She explained this as circumstances present in the beginning of that game and looking back I see that this appears to be a fairly standard opening. Still rubbed me wrong. The bigger issue now is that her reaction to me calling her scum is off. And when she got called on it (partially) the reason was garbage.
As for Citrus, for starters his town list is ugh. His clear on Unsight makes since if she's town, but at the same time scum GD is also unlikely to be too pleased to be pressed for a role claim so early on. The fontisian explanation has merit though. One issue with Citrus is the on-going Stigmata thing, especially since he's been performing some of the same behavior, i.e. doubtcasting. Plus he's pointing out the behavior but not really saying who he thinks is or is not scum. It feels like he's forcefully copying town play. But tone-wise his D1 posts have been much more aligned with the scum FM game I've played with him than the town one.
In post 250, Stigmata wrote:
In post 198, Atum wrote:Not sure about Grib, but I'd like to hear your thoughts on Citrus.
How'd you get from Point A to Point B?
Not sure what you mean with this question. Someone asked whether Grib would purposefully 'confuse' the setup in a post to make it appear as though he didn't know the number of Devils. That I wasn't sure about. The second quote from my readlist is just my read, largely based on meta, though I can't recall a Grib scum game.
@Citrus: Who does 235 address?-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 275, Honey bee wrote:
Atum, is your unsight scum read because of them not posting alot pregame?
No. My issue with the pre-game thing is that she waited until D1 and then the reason for the reveal was unconvincing. Unless there were people besides ika the that figured out her role before the reveal. Plus, fontisian has a slight proclivity towards bussing scummates, at least on IRC and I'd like to watch those interactions develop. The same thing goes for her and Citrus. If my reads were based on activity, well there aren't enough scum in game for that.
In post 283, Unsight wrote:In post 282, ika wrote:what are your reads as well, i need soemthign to do here im getting board myself
No kidding. Half the players are never here due to V/LA or just lurkage. You can only read the same posts before you start thinking "Is that scummy? Or how about that? Maybe that's a scum tell."
Atum's whole "If you could have picked a role, what would it be?" is really scummy if you look at it in the light of "Tell me what role you're not" because then it becomes a more clever bit of rolefishing. But then I doubt myself by thinking "Is that really scummy or am I just that bored I'm seeing scum tells where there aren't any?" I don't want to tunnel on the people posting just because they're the only ones talking.
Firstly, I think you think I'm more clever than I think I am. Secondly, please for the love of god tunnel me. This is sooooo booooring.
Also, fontisian has posted some more since you voted her, thoughts?-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 392, Honey bee wrote:
@rubicon: my opinion of ZZZX is that he ignored critical discussion to comment on trivial things and then laid a reasonless vote (in my eyes) on me instead of providing a real reason or vote. The fact that he ignored me again just confirms my opinion on him. What made you vote zzzx now?
The reasonless vote thing seems to be occurring quite a bit this game, is your focus on ZZZX mostly OMGUS?
In post 408, Honey bee wrote:
my opinion of you is you are scum.
My question was why you didn't talk about the gravedigger claim at the beginning of the game and talked about trivial things instead. And please explain your vote on me too.
I understand your busy ( I usually am too). I just get more suspicious when someone makes a post after i accuse them and say nothing about my read. Take your time, i just want an answer.
Now that you have a definitive scum read you should tell me 2 more!
@fontisian: How was Billy Joel? Also, has your list of scum reads developed?-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
So much yes. All the yes.-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 468, Unsight wrote:
The only thing about a fontisian - ABR - Rubicon scum team is that means Atum is not scum which just confuses me. I've had a light scum read on Atum, but every time I try to connect the dots they're just not there. It's worth ISO'ing him if you haven't ( you referring to everyone ), but I stand by the money lynch being fontisian both in terms of killing scum and getting information. ABR can be tomorrow.
The conf bias is strong in this one, I can almost taste it.
I asked you to tunnel me Unsight, what happened?-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 468, Unsight wrote:
I got the order of operations wrong on the Rubicon wagon wrong, but with the way font is going for the "Town Leader" angle as someone else put it I could totally see a Day 1 Font/ABR bus on Ribicon for early credibility. I was actually digging a Rubicon wagon and have been since Post 50 which was just plain weird but then ABR/font did their thing and that gave me all sorts of creepy crawly feelings so I've kept my vote on font.
Also what does this mean?-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 454, hiplop wrote:albert please dont be lazy. Font is scum, vote her silly man!
and thanks Citrus!
In post 465, hiplop wrote:I could go for switching to ABR. My biggest bad habit is tunnel vision. ABR has done literally nothing as far as i can tell. Jumped on an easy wagon withme (that had no explanation, either from him or others)
The thing is though, the OMGUS super-read that font developed on me just screams paranoid scum.
The change in tone here is really bad in terms of how you refer to ABR. Your explanation of why you'd be ok voting him looks like covering your bases, you're fairly defensive about the wagon on you and you keep bringing up fontisian for towncred when she flips scum.
@Citrus: If you won't tell fonti, tellmewhy hiplop is town.-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 477, ZZZX wrote:In post 449, hiplop wrote:
Unfortunately not my friend
if this isnt a scum-driven wagon I don't know what is ~_~
Post is town ^
What do you mean TripleZ?-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 482, Unsight wrote:In post 471, Atum wrote:The conf bias is strong in this one, I can almost taste it.
I asked you to tunnel me Unsight, what happened?
I did. I'm sure what you're fishing for here.
In post 475, Atum wrote:And since when do you suspect Rubicon is scum, Unsight c'mon.
My ISO should tell you.
In post 474, Atum wrote:Actually even more questions, what's wrong with post 50?
Go read Post 50. If you can't see what's wrong with it, this becomes a different conversation.
In post 473, Atum wrote:Also what does this mean?
In my Post 408, I thought ABR started the wagon and font jumped on it.
Unsight are you going to be difficult? That would make me sad. Take a look at all the times you've directly mentioned Rubicon in ISO, including quotes:
In post 194, Unsight wrote:So far I'm really not liking fontisian.
The entire pregame was basically him rolefishing and attempting to buddy withRubicon, Atum, Ika, and maybe Heel. fontisian flips scum and it's likely one of those is his first scum buddy and someone he more or less avoided is his other scum buddy.
More to come once I digest the posts made since last I read. In the meantime, I like this a lot:
VOTE: fontisian
In post 243, Unsight wrote:In post 241, fontisian wrote:Actually, calling theRubicon/ABR/Jargonaut scumteam with outside chances of ZZZX and Atum now.
What posts make you suspectRubicon?
In post 405, Unsight wrote:
In post 349, Unsight wrote:
Basically more of the same. Post 240 is says all the active people are town and the Post 241,, says the inactive people are scum. That's not scum hunting, that's covering your butt.mostly
In post 377, fontisian wrote:3. The picking at a minor wording arrangement was a way of discrediting my attack without directly engaging me. Simply put, it was a cop out.
Kettle meet pot.
In post 468, Unsight wrote:In post 465, hiplop wrote:I could go for switching to ABR. My biggest bad habit is tunnel vision. ABR has done literally nothing as far as i can tell. Jumped on an easy wagon withme (that had no explanation, either from him or others)
Ditto--minus the bit about ABR having done nothing. I really want to policy lynch ABR because I can't decide whether his play is annoying or annoyingly scummy.
I got the order of operations wrong on theRubiconwagon wrong, but with the way font is going for the "Town Leader" angle as someone else put it I could totally see a Day 1 Font/ABR bus on Ribicon for early credibility. I was actually digging aRubiconwagon and have been since Post 50 which was just plain weird but then ABR/font did their thing and that gave me all sorts of creepy crawly feelings so I've kept my vote on font.
The only thing about a fontisian - ABR -Rubiconscum team is that means Atum is not scum which just confuses me. I've had a light scum read on Atum, but every time I try to connect the dots they're just not there. It's worth ISO'ing him if you haven't ( you referring to everyone ), but I stand by the money lynch being fontisian both in terms of killing scum and getting information. ABR can be tomorrow.
Now if you're going to be tossing me bullshit, dismissive answers like this, you can have my vote for toDay.
All I'm fishing for is you getting lynched at this point.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Unsight
In post 50, Rubicon wrote:Gravedigger is usually a low priority night kill for the scum.
Let's have that other conversation. What exactly is wrong with this?
Next we're going to find where you tunnel me, here's every post in which you even appear to be questioning/attacking me:
In post 194, Unsight wrote:So far I'm really not liking fontisian.
The entire pregame was basically him rolefishing and attempting to buddy with Rubicon, Atum, Ika, and maybe Heel. fontisian flips scum and it's likely one of those is his first scum buddy and someone he more or less avoided is his other scum buddy.
More to come once I digest the posts made since last I read. In the meantime, I like this a lot:
VOTE: fontisian
In post 242, Unsight wrote:In post 239, Atum wrote:Way to many nulls. Anyway, discuss.
You said your reason for voting fontisian was different from mine in Post 196. What is it?
Also, what about MadCitrus makes him scummy? Did you just want to make him orange?
In post 283, Unsight wrote:In post 282, ika wrote:what are your reads as well, i need soemthign to do here im getting board myself
No kidding. Half the players are never here due to V/LA or just lurkage. You can only read the same posts before you start thinking "Is that scummy? Or how about that? Maybe that's a scum tell."
Atum'swhole "If you could have picked a role, what would it be?" is really scummy if you look at it in the light of "Tell me what role you're not" because then it becomes a more clever bit of rolefishing. But then I doubt myself by thinking "Is that really scummy or am I just that bored I'm seeing scum tells where there aren't any?" I don't want to tunnel on the people posting just because they're the only ones talking.
In post 468, Unsight wrote:In post 465, hiplop wrote:I could go for switching to ABR. My biggest bad habit is tunnel vision. ABR has done literally nothing as far as i can tell. Jumped on an easy wagon withme (that had no explanation, either from him or others)
Ditto--minus the bit about ABR having done nothing. I really want to policy lynch ABR because I can't decide whether his play is annoying or annoyingly scummy.
I got the order of operations wrong on the Rubicon wagon wrong, but with the way font is going for the "Town Leader" angle as someone else put it I could totally see a Day 1 Font/ABR bus on Ribicon for early credibility. I was actually digging a Rubicon wagon and have been since Post 50 which was just plain weird but then ABR/font did their thing and that gave me all sorts of creepy crawly feelings so I've kept my vote on font.
The only thing about a fontisian - ABR - Rubicon scum team is that meansAtumis not scum which just confuses me. I've had a light scum read onAtum, but every time I try to connect the dots they're just not there. It's worth ISO'ing him if you haven't ( you referring to everyone ), but I stand by the money lynch being fontisian both in terms of killing scum and getting information. ABR can be tomorrow.
This is not tunneling.
Also this was super fun to write. For clarity and repetitiveness:
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Unsight
@Anyone: Is it possible to take an entire page for one post?-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 525, MadCitrus wrote:Hmm Atum. Do you prefer to be town or scum? Can you explain your meta shift from your DLP games in a satisfactory manner? I'll even give you town points!
Grib, where areeeee youuuuuu?
I like playing scum. Citrus, this is like my third forum mafia game, I like to think I don't have too much concrete established meta. But I guess I have in the past had lower activity which is no longer the case because I'm not finishing my senior year anymore and it's the summer. Me seeming more involved might just be boredom with everything else I'm doing in RL. Anything else you'll have to specify what you assumed my meta to be and what exactly has changed. I'd like to think that this is a nice blend of IRC-DLP which I consider optimal for now.
Now give me the points. They help me breathe and give me inner strength.
In post 532, fontisian wrote:The Gravedigger claim in pregame is always optimal, as it allows the GD to drop info as we go, and increases accountability. The method of the claim can also be very helpful in determining their alignment, as it was in this case. The gravedigger, if town, is unlikely to get shot, as scum tend to be more interested in holy hunting and get some use from the gravedigger role info.
You can read more about it here: http://www.fantasystrike.com/forums/ind ... hread.9213
Grib is town because he assumed there were four witches in the game when there are actually three. What part of that statement do you disagree with and why?
Ika is town because he's a terrible, apathetic scum player. You can confirm that if you get the time to meta him.
Lynching me is stupid, because I'm going to get shot later and become confirmed town and, even if I were scum, I have a history of bussing that you can use.
Does this mean I'm not town anymore?
ABR, I think you literally made my whole day brighter. Please never change.-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
I had a lot of fun writing this. Unsight, I really want to thank you for that.
In post 540, Unsight wrote:This is really cool. This is one of those moments when you think something is going to happen and it happens and you're so proud of yourself.
I want everyone to watch the narrative as it happens:
Post 194 I vote fontisian. Buddying rolefishing, what-have-you. An early scum read and a nice place to put my vote.
Post 196 Atum agrees for reasons which come later. Good vibrations.
Post 343 comes. I read this one a few times."How are we feeling about fontisian now? Maybe a little more town now? About ready to find a new wagon?"If Atum is scum and fontisian is scum, then it looks good for him to have been on fontisian's wagon buthe's probably not willing to bus Day 1. Ilooked at this both ways, Town Atum kind of getting bored of the wagon and Scum Atum trying to softly pry me off his scum buddy. One of those just happened but I wasn't sure which.
I'm just going to dump this here for a minute for dissection and comparison:
In post 343, Atum wrote:In post 275, Honey bee wrote:
Atum, is your unsight scum read because of them not posting alot pregame?
No. My issue with the pre-game thing is that she waited until D1 and then the reason for the reveal was unconvincing. Unless there were people besides ika the that figured out her role before the reveal. Plus, fontisian has a slight proclivity towards bussing scummates, at least on IRC and I'd like to watch those interactions develop. The same thing goes for her and Citrus. If my reads were based on activity, well there aren't enough scum in game for that.
In post 283, Unsight wrote:In post 282, ika wrote:what are your reads as well, i need soemthign to do here im getting board myself
No kidding. Half the players are never here due to V/LA or just lurkage. You can only read the same posts before you start thinking "Is that scummy? Or how about that? Maybe that's a scum tell."
Atum's whole "If you could have picked a role, what would it be?" is really scummy if you look at it in the light of "Tell me what role you're not" because then it becomes a more clever bit of rolefishing. But then I doubt myself by thinking "Is that really scummy or am I just that bored I'm seeing scum tells where there aren't any?" I don't want to tunnel on the people posting just because they're the only ones talking.
Firstly, I think you think I'm more clever than I think I am. Secondly, please for the love of god tunnel me. This is sooooo booooring.
Also, fontisian has posted some more since you voted her, thoughts?
Let's go one at a time and see if we can spot the inconsistencies.
1. I guess this is a misinterpretation. Probably deliberate. I asked you to update your read on fontisian since before it was for pre-game rolefishing/buddying. But fine I can get this I guess.
2. C'mon really, if i were scum and fontisian scum, how could you say I wasn't willing to bus D1, since I've been calling her scum since pre-game? Did you stop and think about what you were writing or get too excited about the opportunity to make a townie look scummy?
3.Way to cover your ass. I think I've made it pretty clear that I'm bored as hell.
4. Let's not forget theHALFof that post you neglect to mention in your analysis
POST 364 comes right after I answer Atum with a "No, I'm happy with my vote." At this point, I start getting really bad feelings.He's not outright calling me scummy,he's making it as nonthreatening as possible, but he'sgiving fontisian the "Can we flip this around?"
So that was on page 15. I'm thinking to myself, he couldn't buddy and pry me so he's gonna have to chainsaw me. Atum is gonna start poking at me and, whatever I say, he's going to wagon me. In my own Post 468 I note that Atum hasn't done it yet. It's trending in this direction, but it's not there yet.
You can't possibly be this obtuse as town. It literally boggles the mind.
1. I'm not calling you scummy? No, that's because I called you scum all the way back in 239
2. I'm not even talking to you in 364.
This is the most legitimate thing you've mentioned thus far. The best way to find a group of scums I've seen is to force them to interact and respond for ISO. Thank you for doing so. However, at no time in 364 did I suggest that fontisian was not scum in an attempt to save her from the steadily growing wagon on her, nor did I, before that post, fail to communicate my intent to vote you.
Post 489 is the chainsaw. Prying failed, fontisian's wagon is gaining steam, and he's got to save his scum partner somehow.
What I'm getting here is that you can't actually answer to my accusations so you've committed the all too common error of attacking the person rather than the argument. This makes a great deal of sense considering the limited information the town has and the untenability of your current position. Unfortunately you are perhaps the least subtle person I've ever played with. That includes ika who while often brash can set up some interesting gambits. Go away, and if I can't get a wagon on you toDay I can at least leave my reads so the Town hangs you tomorrow.
And that's 2 out of 3. 1 left.
hiplop, and that makes 3.
In post 541, Unsight wrote:In post 540, Unsight wrote:POST 364 comes right after I answer Atum with a "No, I'm happy with my vote." At this point, I start getting really bad feelings. He's not outright calling me scummy, he's making it as nonthreatening as possible, but he's giving fontisian the "Can we flip this around?"
Actually he did straight up call me scum. He just didn't do it with a vote.
No, I did it a hundred posts back with a bright rainbow wall, listing you as a lower certainty scum mate of fontisian and Rubicon. Check a ways back, or ISO me like you've suggested for others, clearly without having done so previously.Spoiler Alert:You're one of those red names at the bottom. I have since updated that list, replacing Rubi with hiplop.
Unsight, as a learning exercise, I want you to take a step back and pretend for a moment that you aren't scum. As a member of the Town, could you look at this interaction and see at what point you stopped making any sense. Is it just me?
I will say however, that this is pretty much what I was looking for with the tunneling request. Keep it up, you're doing great!
@hiplop: At this point, hiplop virtually the only reason you might not be scum is the fact that you were so quick to comment in support of the above. I can't even see new!scum pulling that.
Does this count as being mean?
Also, color coded, how you like me now?-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
In post 508, Mist7676 wrote:In post 369, Stigmata wrote:This thread is really hard to read because Rubicon and fontisian keep speaking in riddles and they don't even answer half the shit I ask (which is not even half the shit I want to ask.)
You ask all the right questions~
Ok, I'm caught up, and I think I have a really good grasp on this game. But then again it's 4:30 in the morning and I could be totally wrong.
Either way, my scum reads right now are
1. Font
2. Grib
3. Ika
I also feel like the Hiplop wagon was scum driven, and in that case feel like Hiplop is town. I'll probably have a full reads list tomorrow when, again, it's not 4:30 in the morning.
Hey, when you've got some time, can you explain the Grib and ika reads? And nice cop out by the way, it's fun when RL works out for you like that.-
-
Atum
-
-
Atum Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 181
- Joined: July 24, 2014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-