In post 627, ika wrote: In post 619, Mist7676 wrote: In post 615, ika wrote:mist same question: if font is town whos next?
samne for me
I'd probably start looking at my null reads a bit more closely. I'm pretty sure scum lies between at LEAST one of you, so I'm feeling confident. I'm feeling like both of you are riding on the coattails of your past games instead of actually playing this new game. Font, you are using your experience as helping town to clear yourself as town. That's not how this works sweetie. But thanks for pulling a scum card!
I'm still waiting for a case on me actually.
You asked for a case on you? Sorry then.
My case on you rests mostly on the fact that you were trying to role fish a lot, and it was really bothering me. You've made a good impression by getting font lynched though, so thanks for that <3.
In post 678, fontisian wrote:Grib, have you gone blind? You should have told me! I would have been there for you.
Citrus: No, he's talking about mist's sleeping of hiplop.
I'm not sheeping hiplop, try again.
In post 660, MadCitrus wrote: In post 659, fontisian wrote:Oh, please tell me you're not doing what I think you're doing.
It is your responsibility. Make shit up if you have to. You failed it.
Why the fuck would you say something like that out loud. Seriously, give me one good reason town would say what you just said.
VOTE: fontisian
This vote seems opportunistic.
In post 686, fontisian wrote:Since scum has almost certainly figured it out, here's the deal.
I am the priest. Citrus is my acolyte and wants me to clear hiplop, instead of lynching him because he thinks hiplrearop is likely town. Now he's being an anti town ass about his failed winking and forcing me to claim.
Now that I get what Citrus was trying to point out about hiplop (which I'm not sharing), we are not lynching him today.
Instead, I would like to lynch Mist, for the way he's been sheeping hiplop, or ZZZX.
Unvote
Vote Mist
Tl:Dr
I'm the priest, Citrus is going to back me up and let me get shot tonight, and we need to go back to hunting scum.
bwhahahaha, I had this lined up in my multi quote, but I'm laughing at this post again. 1) So that entire conversation was some type of cryptic exchange? Because that's kind of against the rules; good luck.
In post 696, Unsight wrote:I don't like font's claim for 2 reasons.
- The setup doesn't say that the Priest knows the identity of the Acolyte. Acolyte knows the Priest but not vice versa.
- The most optimal thing a scum can do on the way out in an open setup is claim the most powerful town role because it would force a counterclaim.
REQUEST MOD CLARIFICATION ON PRIEST ROLE
This needs to happen before any more discussion imo.
UNVOTE: fontisian
*high fives again*
In post 701, MadCitrus wrote:You know, you very nearly got me there Fontisian. Like already-typing-a-post got me.
Were you going to go along with the claim but then decided against it? That's how I'm interpreting this post..
In post 707, Rubicon wrote:I want to know what Mist, Honey bee and ZZZX think about this revelation.
Look above ^
In post 748, fontisian wrote:Citrus, I am never going to forgive you for this.
You told me he was your priest to my fucking face. I trusted you and acted to salvage the situation. I'm done. Fuck you.
Damn this aggression.