...I think Unsight is scum as well fontisian. You're really off your game. And you know good and well that you doing well is an equally good indicator of either Town or Scum for you. Stop with the melodrama.
In post 850, Atum wrote:...I think Unsight is scum as well fontisian. You're really off your game. And you know good and well that you doing well is an equally good indicator of either Town or Scum for you. Stop with the melodrama.
In post 850, Atum wrote:...I think Unsight is scum as well fontisian. You're really off your game. And you know good and well that you doing well is an equally good indicator of either Town or Scum for you. Stop with the melodrama.
Grib, why zzzx over ABR? I'm fine with either in all honesty but ZZZX reads slightly more town? idk ABR seems like he'll be useless all game but zzzx is trying
You softclaimed. Either on purpose or on accident. If you misunderstood, that's perfectly fine.
Because ABR reminds me of a person I played with recently who acted in a similar fashion and he turned out to be town. I'm a little hesitant at going after the blatantly scummy player.
Hiplop You realize that if you're pretending to not be the priest and we lynch someone else who isn't knowing to protect you, you're going to end up shot and have fucked us over greatly.
grib, the thing is he does this every game. It isn't a this-game thing. It's always. Its virtually impossible to read him because he never does anything
In post 615, ika wrote:mist same question: if font is town whos next?
samne for me
I'd probably start looking at my null reads a bit more closely. I'm pretty sure scum lies between at LEAST one of you, so I'm feeling confident. I'm feeling like both of you are riding on the coattails of your past games instead of actually playing this new game. Font, you are using your experience as helping town to clear yourself as town. That's not how this works sweetie. But thanks for pulling a scum card!
I'm still waiting for a case on me actually.
You asked for a case on you? Sorry then.
My case on you rests mostly on the fact that you were trying to role fish a lot, and it was really bothering me. You've made a good impression by getting font lynched though, so thanks for that <3.
In post 678, fontisian wrote:Grib, have you gone blind? You should have told me! I would have been there for you.
Citrus: No, he's talking about mist's sleeping of hiplop.
In post 659, fontisian wrote:Oh, please tell me you're not doing what I think you're doing.
It is your responsibility. Make shit up if you have to. You failed it.
Why the fuck would you say something like that out loud. Seriously, give me one good reason town would say what you just said.
VOTE: fontisian
This vote seems opportunistic.
In post 686, fontisian wrote:Since scum has almost certainly figured it out, here's the deal.
I am the priest. Citrus is my acolyte and wants me to clear hiplop, instead of lynching him because he thinks hiplrearop is likely town. Now he's being an anti town ass about his failed winking and forcing me to claim.
Now that I get what Citrus was trying to point out about hiplop (which I'm not sharing), we are not lynching him today.
Instead, I would like to lynch Mist, for the way he's been sheeping hiplop, or ZZZX.
Unvote
Vote Mist
Tl:Dr
I'm the priest, Citrus is going to back me up and let me get shot tonight, and we need to go back to hunting scum.
bwhahahaha, I had this lined up in my multi quote, but I'm laughing at this post again. 1) So that entire conversation was some type of cryptic exchange? Because that's kind of against the rules; good luck.
You told me he was your priest to my fucking face. I trusted you and acted to salvage the situation. I'm done. Fuck you.
Damn this aggression.
The fuck? "Opportunistic vote" for her increasingly PSA's on her holy reads? And then "cryptic exchange" - when it was transparent as fuck? Stupidest things in this thread for 200.
In post 695, fontisian wrote:I hate your post 689 and am considering lynching you over it.
This post is giving me pause. A level of consistency with the gambit that I'm not sure she'd achieve as scum.
What would you expect her to do at this point if she were scum?
Rubicon, why didn't you answer this specific question before Font returned? Grr
Spoiler: Font's Explanation
In post 796, fontisian wrote:Honey bee: Here's a quick summation: Citrus defended hiplop without giving me the slightest reason why and kept asking me to do something that I didn't understand, and told him I didn't understand.Then hiplop claimed holy, I realized that Citrus knew hiplop is holy (and is most likely his acolyte) and somehow expected me to realize this earlier/back off. Citrus and I yell at each other for a bit. I then fake claimed priest to save hiplop's idiot ass and ask Citrus to back me up (calling Citrus the acolyte and referring to old games to make the fact that I'm faking to save hiplop clear to him). Citrus then assumes I'm trying to trick him somehow, and goes on a sanctimonious rant about how this was all a test.
Everyone else then assumes I was trying to out the already outed priest, and decides I must be scum (because logic, how does it work?). Oh, and our priest is a moron with an inflated opinion of his knowledge of the game.
Idiocy aside, the scum team is among Mist, ZZZX, Stigmata and ABR, with an outside chance of Rubicon. Make sure you test hiplop's priest claim down the line and lynch him if he claims anything other than holy. Everyone else is town. I sincerely hope you all ignore my reads and go for a loss.
Sanctimonious rant?
Let's see. Why don't I ask Town!Font what she would have done? With the assumptions Fontisian is stuck on, that I'm holy for holy Hiplop.
Town!Font: Knowing noone is dead yet, if a town is mislynched they would control the Angel's protection. Since I have a priest read on Hiplop that I've announced left and right, it's vital that we have someone controlling the Angels tonight. With no dead scum, they can't curse, and the Priest will live regardless of Citrus's dumbass, since I've announced left and right he's Acolyte.
That's some great analysis Town!Font! But what would Scum!Font be secretly plotting in her Private Topic?
Scum!Font: Wonderful, as I've announced left and right I have pegged both of the holy players already! Now my highest priority is staying alive for today and reaching my coven chat. It's too bad Citrus didn't play along for a day, that fake!claim looks really bad. And neither of them is confirming holy. I should put scum in the best position possible and make sure if they aren't holy, the real holy's claim. How would I do that hmm...
Spoiler: More Font quotes
In post 840, fontisian wrote:Hiplop, you're either holy or scum. Everyone knows this. Denying it for the sake of appearances is meaningless.
If you didn't want to be outed as holy, you shouldn't have claimed holy.
In post 849, fontisian wrote:Atum: Unsight will be reporting my towniness soon anyway, so maybe you'll consider my reads then.
Why do you think I'm scum again? Leading too well? This game has been an exercise in idiocy.
Honey bee: I want to lynch Mist, Stigmata and ZZZX in that order. If hiplop is counterclaimed by the acolyte, I would lynch him.
tl;dr Town Fontisian would be concerned about keeping the Priest alive from her PoV, while Scum Fontisian would want to ensure the holy's are outted and try to survive the day.
Also Font - asks Rubicon to join her on a wagon on Stigmata but doesn't place her vote there? Then claims she wants Mist lynched first?
Translation: Distancing from Stigmata + Buddying with Rubicon.
Conclusions: Scum!Fontisian + ~Scum!Stigmata + ?. Rubicon, welcome to the Town Block.
Town: Unsight, Ika, Hiplop, Mist, Rubicon.
Scum: Fontisian. ~Stigmata
PoE: Albert B. Rampage, ZZZX, Honey Bee, Grib, Atum
stigmata/font scum makes sense. he randomly called stigmata my "buddy" and it was totally out of left field. That sounds like scum trying to check the boxes of distancing.
Town font wants to lynch scum and protect hip scum font wants to divert protection to clear shot hip I don't really get why its damning its all wifom please explain.
Scum Fontisian wanted me to go along with the Priest claim as her Acolyte.
(From her PoV for all this) we're holy together. Clear shot on Hiplop per the mechanics for N1. Then I'm basically tied into her fake holy claim. She then either coasts the rest of the game as the "Priest" (never getting night killed) until people finally realize Priest has survived way longer than it should, and then I'm considered scum with her for going along with her fake!claim gambit. One of her scummates could claim Acolyte on Hiplop and boom - Font and the scummate look unaligned AND it helps push getting rid of me via lynch instead of night-kill.
So she basically removes both holy's AND gets a mislynch on one AND prevents a single Priest check from coming to light AND prevents letting a town!GD know.
I literally can't think of a better way for the game to play out for scum. And god forbid she's DOB or something on top of that. Like she would have pretty much single-handedly won the game for scum. IF I played along. She's smart enough to plan that far out.
But why would she think that you'd even play along in the first place if she's scum and you're town???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Like. For a scum!plan sounds way too convoluted and backwards to ever have a hope of going through.
