Seacore wrote:Okay, there's less than 5 days left. Anybody coming on and posting "I don't like the RC wagon" isn't good enough.
You must make a case on somebody else. Preferably xvart or myself. (Preferably not myself).
Anybody who just turns up and just says "The RC wagon looks bad, I'm not convinced" is not being pro-town.
You've got me here.
I had started an impassioned wall post on Thursday night, saying that this was turning into a dogpile, that everyone's tunnel vision was feeding on itself, that every fibre of me felt that it was going to be a mislynch, yadda yadda. Then I had to get off the computer unexpectedly, and lost the post. But right now, with twelve votes on ReaperCharlie two days before, you're right that anything I post in his defence is somewhat self-serving...because the truth is that I don't have a firm direction elsewhere. With twenty-eight players, I'm having trouble deciding where to focus and apply pressure.
But like Faraday, I'm baffled by all the people saying that he's started looking scummier while under pressure. To me, it's the very opposite. Yes, his "Why would I defend Furcolow were I scum?" is ridiculous. But this really does not feel like scum flailing. I'm actually in agreement with DGB that his frustration looks very townish. I can give quotes to show what I mean if someone wants.
Admittedly, I haven't got a chance to check RC's meta. Purely by skimming the beginning of Harry Potter, I got the feeling that he was more calculated and meeker and more wishy-washy there.
But also, I get the feeling that certain people are confusing "erratic" behaviour with scummy behaviour. I think it's much scummier to avoid making waves and stay under the radar and post nothing but safe set-up speculation and Iteration #4343 of "Fate is town" than to be a raving loony. To be entirely honest, it was really starting to get to me a couple of days ago when some players were nitpicking over every sentence I made and others were just ignoring everything I said and going, "Lost Butterfly is OBVSCUM! LYNCH THEM!" If I were under as much pressure as ReaperCharlie is now, I'd probably be incoherent rage.
What I can do is spend the next few days spamming the thread with my opinions on other players. I think both xvart and Magna would be more useful to the town than RC if they're
town
, but I think both are more likely to flip scum than ReaperCharlie. I can post huge walls on either with actual quotes, but general summaries of my reasons for suspecting both:
1) xvart's jump onto RC (who should have been one of his allies against us, his top suspect) looked opportunistic as hell. I think him doubling up a ward is a nulltell, even though ReaperCharlie/El Goosuki/Baby Spice are raving about him being confirmed scum for it, but something seems fishy about his claiming not to have noticed all the discussion on warding. I also thought some of his points against Furc and me throughout the game felt false (admittedly, I think OMGUS has somewhat coloured my opinions of VP Baltar, xvart, and Trilobite this game, although they'd rung bells before they attacked us).
xvart, I'd like an answer. What exactly makes you think that Furcolow is significantly more likely to go murderer than anyone else? Do you deny that there was a lot of discussion on the merits of ward claiming before your first post (in fact, it was a huge bulk of the first page)? Also, do you still suspect Furcolow?
2) My read on Magna has been a rollercoaster this game. (I oscillate every couple of days in the QT between "OMG MAGNA IS SO TOWN" and "LYNCH THAT SCUMMY BASTARD!") But although Furc's point about Magna's post percentage was ridiculous, I've REALLY hated how Magna has been playing recently. I see what VV is trying to say about Magna's meta, even though he can't out-debate Magna. This is something that would probably best be illustrated by a huge list of quotes, but lately, Magna's attacks are feeling close to his scum play (taking actions out of context and spinning them as "textbook" scumtells, hammering people to death over minutiae, making passive-aggressive comments that seem like attempts to discredit people or score easy digs rather than genuinely shine a light on scummy behaviour). And this is more circumstantial, but some of his interaction with Fate feels like he's trying to get him on his good side.
Maybe it's just because I think virtually everyone he's attacked all game (Furcolow, Seacore, Furpants, VasudeVa, ReaperCharlie to a lesser extent) is town. But I've learned my lesson from the last time he was scum. If I think Magna is spewing crap, don't give him the benefit of the doubt just because he's acting confident in the crap he's spewing.
Magna, do you believe that VasudeVa is scum? You seem to be devoting a lot of effort to making him look bad and calling him an idiot for his play in other games. But do you believe he's scum, or misguided?
========================================================
Would anyone like me to make a case on kunkstar? I'd written something up on him a while back because I hated his stances on Furcolow all game, as well as his sheeping of xvart's idea to waste a commune on Furcolow. But then I got distracted, and finally I lost confidence in my suspicions.
I have stuff on Baltar and Trilobite, but I'll save it for another post.
I'm torn on Feysal, but I'm not crazy about his stance on RC. This in particular I hated:
I get what you mean. In my first game ever, a player decided to fake a post restriction, which he used as an excuse to insult everyone in his posts. I ended up leading the wagon on him, and he turned out to be the town bus driver. But, he was turning the game into a flame war, so I've never regretted that mislynch.
Not that I would imply the situation with ReaperCharlie was anywhere close, just that I understand why you might want him out.
It felt like he was egging me on. It's not the first time I've noticed Feysal subtly buddying up to people/defending them from weak points.
Yes, this is good enough for me. Maybe you are flailing scum, maybe just a frustrated townie, RC, but casting suspicions at those voting you and dismissing their concerns as invalid is not the right way to defend yourself.
Hey, Magna, why did you comment on Furpants_Tom's waffling over RC, but not Feysal's? What do you think of Feysal? Of kunkstar, too, while I'm at it?
I'll probably move my vote to either xvart or Magna after some discussion with Faraday, since I don't think another wagon is viable. But in the meantime...I'd like to try something.
Since Bowser has replaced out, there's no point leaving my vote on him. Read manho's ISO. Go on. Read it.
VOTE: manho
I'm not optimistic that this will succeed, but last minute lurker wagon, go go go!
====================================
Also, on the off-chance we're killed by the ritual (as opposed to murdered) tonight, might as well come out with someone.
There is a very, very high chance that at least one of the cultists is in {MagnaofIllusion, xvart, VP Baltar, Seacore, El Goosuki}. Otherwise, Faraday and I aren't the most likely Craft Fetish targets.
Oddly, I'm more suspicious of the first three, even though the latter two have been far sloppier in their play.
I might just be too egotistical in this opinion, and neglecting the people who've had experience with Faraday. So this isn't 100% conclusive.
But it's interesting that EVERY SINGLE person who was involved in ACOK Mafia heard noise (although in two cases, they were warded).
I was immediately suspicious of Magna when I heard noise, because I get the feeling that he considers me more of a threat than, say, VP does (who I suspect thinks I'm a stark raving lunatic). But in a few days, if most of the people in that category flip town, this might be a sign that one of the survivors is scum.