Mini 817: Chosen (Game Over!)
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
[sarcasm]Yeah, that's not overselling me at all there.[/sarcasm]
Good day everyone. There's not much to look at so far so I'm essentially caught up. Given the special game features it seems to me as though it should be worth knowing what experiences everyone has with other players that started the game. Could everyone please give a list the other players in the game that you've played with or modded in the past using experience with nadroj15 rather than myself?
I recognize a good portion of the the people here and I'm looking forward to the game.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
I suppose that I should probably answer my own question (though the reasons that I'm asking can't actually apply to me as a replacement after the game has started) just so that people know who I have expectations of coming in.
I have played with Archon, afatchic (very briefly), MiteyMouse, Nuwen and PapaZito in the past. I have modded a game for AshMC1984.
Archon, I already like your play better in this game than I did in NG 751. It's good to see that you're picking things up. Do you stand by this statement?
-Zorblag R`LyehArchon wrote:I haven't played in a few months...?-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Troll be happier talking like this but Troll knows that some no care for it much. As a rule Troll drops the character when Troll be replacing into games but Troll do be most happy to waive that if those in this game would like Troll to.TCD wrote:Disappointed that Zorblag doesn't write in third person in games.
You replaced into Immunity Mafia for a very short time. I think you posted twice in the game.afatchic wrote:Anyways, I have modded Archon. And i guess played with Zorblag if you say so. Sorry, but i don't exactly remember that game. Must have been real brief, as you said.
I asked if you stood by it as looking at what your post history it seems that it was a month ago that you last played rather than a few months (your last game posts were in the beginning of June) but so be it. Perception of time can be off fairly easily.Archon wrote:Yeah, I stand by that statement. It's the truth. I kinda had a Mafia-meltdown, as I fell behind in too many games, and then asked for replacements for all of them and left, occasionally checking back to see if it was my turn to mod.
Remind me, as I have a bad memory; didn't we have some sort of fight/accusation galore against each other?
I don't think that we particularly clashed in the game we played together. I replaced in fairly late and although I accused you of not providing anything useful you didn't get drawn into that. Others had done the same throughout the game and your focus mostly stayed on those that had done it previously.
Nuwen, you're the only one who hasn't said who they've got experience playing with in the past. I realize that I could look at everyone else's responses and get the information. I could also take a look through all the games everyone has played. I'd still like to have you comment on your own if you don't mind overly.
As for Papa Zito's vote for Nuwen, I don't know what his reasons were but I could pretty easily see myself casting an initial vote on Nuwen for fairly particular (if pretty weak) reasons. It wouldn't be because I was particularly sure she was scum yet but rather because I see a few very minor things that have happened that make her more likely to be scum than what I've seen from others and it would be a place to start. For now I'm interested to see what Papa Zito had in mind and to see if it matches at all. I'd also like to see who Nuwen has played with or modded in the past.
To avoid looking like I'm just trying to follow Papa Zito's lead on Nuwen here's an abbreviation of the first sentence of the reason that I would give if I were voting for Nuwen right now:
T K T N H T T T T L A A P G A S I H V P A T S O G D O H B I O G W H M # W H R A S W K.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Nuwen, I'm sorry to hear that you're going through that. Hopefully you'll get things sorted shortly.
OK, now we've seen Papa Zito's reasons for voting Nuwen. Here's what I would have said if I were voting for Nuwen prior to this (the first sentence is what my abbreviation went with):
Troll knows that Nuwen has taken the time to look at Archon’s previous games as she identifies his voting patterns at the start of games despite only having been in one game with him (Mini 734 where he replaced after she was killed.) In this particular game the mafia would have had a strong reason to take a look at other games people have played in when deciding who to exclude from being the chosen. Further, Archon’s play in Troll’s experience be that of scum bait and him be a likely candidate not to be exluded as the chosen should him be town. Votes for him at the start of the game will inherently be suspicious to Troll.
I used Troll-speak to make it slightly harder to guess what it was I would have been saying but there wasn't that much danger of it in any case I suspect.
Having said that, I'm not going to vote for Nuwen, that would just have been my reasons and they wouldn't have impressed me much.
I don't think that we should assume that those people have played with are unlikely to be the chosen one. I think that the scum would probably have excluded people who are harder to lynch and that if we look at anything we should be trying to decide who that would be. Who people have played with gives us at least a place to start for guessing how people might have evaluated each other's play but we need to look at more than just that. I was also seeing how closely the lists people reported would match what I came up with when I looked through everyone's games on my own. Here's what people reported ignoring responses of Zorblag and Hohum:MiteyMouse wrote:I've been thinking about what Zorblag said and the connections that we all have had to each other before this game. It's very likely that one of us that have played a lot with others in this game are probably not the choosen one. That might narrow it down a bit. As, we want to keep that person alive....having them alive is a big asset to us.
afatchic: TDC, Archon
Archon: afatchic
AshMC1984: Archon, BloodCovenent
BloodCovenent: Papa Zito, AshMC1984, Archon
MiteyMouse: Papa Zito
Nuwen: No response
Papa Zito: nadroj15, BloodCovenent, MiteyMouse
TDC: afatchic
This is what I got by looking through the games:
afatchic: Archon, TDC, Nuwen
Archon: BloodCovenent, AshMC1984, Nuwen, afatchic
AshMC1984: Archon, BloodCovenent
BloodCovenent: Archon, AshMC1984, Papa Zito, Nuwen
MiteyMouse: Papa Zito
Nadroj15: Papa Zito
Nuwen: Archon, BloodCovenent, TDC, afatchic
Papa Zito: BloodCovenent, MiteyMouse, Nadroj15
TDC: afatchic, Nuwen
One reason that I wanted Nuwen to chime in before I did this is that no one claims to have been in a game with her which is odd as apparently I found 4 people she's played with or had modding interactions with by one party or the other.
I'll take another look at the differences between the self reports and what I found and see if I'm counting anything extra but before I do that I'll let anyone that would like to comment on the two lists.
@BloodCovenent: Why would you cast a vote for MiteyMouse saying that you'll see what her response is directly after she says that she'll be V/LA for the next 5 days?
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Actually, another question for everyone in the game: If you had to choose any 4 of the following players to exclude as the chosen who would you pick and why?
Archon
AshMC1984
BloodCovenent
afatchic
MiteyMouse
nadroj15
Nuwen
Papa Zito
TDC
Those were most likely the players that the mafia chose between when making their decision. Two of them are mafia and the lists that people give won't take that into account but I'm interested in hearing who people think they would want to make sure wasn't the chosen.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
I made a post earlier that was deleted but which TDC was talking about when he said:
I think that he was agreeing with my assumption that those excluded from being the chosen were determined by the scum after Archon and afatchic had replaced in:TDC wrote:The "Makes sense, I guess" was directed at the Troll.
After Archon and afatchic had confirmed (at least to the mod) there was a 24 hour wait time before the game started. I'm assuming that this was to give the mafia time once they saw the player list to make their plans though it is only an assumption on my part.
I'd love to have the mod answer TDC's question from Post 112 to help determine who we should be looking at here as it's a very good question to ask.
afatchic, did you have anything else you were planning on talking about when you said that you were planning on posting more yesterday evening or was it just the reasons that you gave?
Thank you Papa Zito and TDC for your answers. BloodCovenent, take your time as I'd like to hear your informed answer rather than something rushed. I still want to hear from everyone else.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
BloodCovenent, that method is fine but I do still want to see what you'd come up with as a list of four players after taking experience into account.
Mod: If Archon and Nuwen haven't been prodded could you prod them? I know that MiteyMouse and AshMC1984 are V/LA so I won't ask for them to be prodded yet.
Done
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Welcome to the game Herodotus and Raivann. As you're replacing in after the game started we know that even if you're scum you didn't take part in the process of deciding which four players to exclude from being the chosen but just so that we've got more to work with I'd love to hear your thoughts about which four players from the following list you would have picked were you scum not to be the chosen and very briefly the reasons why:
Archon
AshMC1984
BloodCovenent
afatchic
MiteyMouse
nadroj15
Nuwen
Papa Zito
TDC
To everyone, Mini 780 - Chosen has just ended. The setup for that game is almost identical to the one that we're using here. If people have time skimming through and seeing how it effected the game would be something that I recommend.
I'm approaching this game with a similar attitude to how Albert B. Rampage approached that one. So long as we never lynch the chosen, the town can't lose this game. It'll be good to lynch scum if we can but town wins even if it mislynches every single time so long as the chosen is still around.
In that game they didn't spend much effort in the first couple days figuring out who the chosen was likely to be; I think that they should have and I'm trying to do that now. If others think that this is a poor plan I'm happy to listen to arguments that I'm being an idiot here.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
I don't expect to figure out who the chosen is right away. Mostly likely we won't be sure until they get mislynched or the game ends. What we can do today is rule out likely suspects and those we do rule out will be the better lynches. Clearly we should be scum hunting at the same time and looking for scum everywhere, but especially the first few days of the game we should be lynching scummy players who also have a fairly low chance of being the chosen. As the game goes on I suspect the WIFOM will build up and it will get harder to take advantage of this principle.
When we do hit scum we'll have their list of people they would have excluded as the chosen as well as their actions to look at when deciding both who their partner is likely to be and who the chosen is likely to be. I don't expect the list that the scum will end up giving to be the least bit honest but if they have to give reasons now we're tying them down to particular viewpoints that we can test against how they react to the rest of the game as it happens.
For the no lynch idea, I view that more as a last resort that we can use if we get down to a place where we're not sure about who is likely to be the chosen and we don't have a good feel for who is scum. Town can always force a draw in this game by not voting so long as the chosen is alive. I often play games not to lose rather than to win so I did think about simply recommending that the town always vote no lynch. The eventual reason that I didn't was that there is a general site rule that we're supposed to play to win. I'm taking that to mean that as long as acting gives us a reasonable chance of winning rather than losing we should do that instead of taking the draw through inaction.
If I do get killed before end game I suppose I should let everyone know that I have no trouble with town voting no lynch and going for the draw if they aren't pretty sure they can get the win. I just think that right now we aren't at the stage where we have to play defensively as we do have the advantage going into the game so long as we can determine a set of people who almost certainly aren't the chosen.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
For the record, I'm writing Archon's play off as a null tell as, like I said, I consider him to be scum bait when he's town. That means that I'm automatically excusing any omissions he made about people he played with because I don't think that he was aware enough to give an accurate list. I do think that the no lynch vote by Herodotus is a bit scummy as even though the lynching dynamic is not the same as in a typical game I think we can do better, but I also think that Archon was particularly likely not to be excluded from being the chosen so I'll have no interest in voting for Herodotus on day one.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
So here I also see no lynch as bad for the town in that it doesn't make the town more likely to win than a well debated lynch would. I don't have any problem with people not voting yet; I'm holding off till I hear the answers to my questions. What I don't like is that you've voted no lynch there which is probably a worse play for the town than simply withholding your vote given my current take on the setup.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Ah, and I guess I should add that I find Herodotus to be competent based on previous experience. If it weren't for that I'd just call the no lynch vote anti-town. When a competent player makes it I find it scummy. In this game it's less clear that no lynch is the wrong play but I still think that it is and that given what I've said about strategy thus far today competent players shouldn't be voting no lynch. If anyone gives an argument to the contrary for any of the points there I might change that opinion.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
If town never lynches then they can't lose. If town never lynches then they can't win. Assuming that town wants to win rather than simply draw it's in their interest to lynch scum. At the start of the game the information provided from mislynches is much more valuable than just letting scum kill whoever they want other than the chosen to get to the same stage. If we can rule out people as likely chosen ones it's in our best interest to lynch at the early stage of the game so that we've got a better chance of winning by lynching at the later stages of the game.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
I do think that the lists have value even though Nuwen was in the other game. Unless Nuwen was scum in this game her being in the other game doesn't change anything at all. Even if Nuwen was scum (and Raivann is now) the four players that Raivann lists will give us information later on to look at when determining if he was trying to manipulate us.
Herodotus, again, if we never lynch then the mafia can eliminate townies until they're down to the point where there's one townie and the chosen one left in addition to themselves. If they then don't choose to night kill any more we're at a draw. Unless the town chooses to kill at some point the mafia never have to lose. I think that it's much better for the town to get information from the lynches to use in a possible end game situation provided that we can be fairly certain that we aren't lynching the chosen than it is to simply let the mafia kill whoever they find most useful to kill to get us there.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
If we're going to try to win we have to lynch someone at some point. There is a danger that we'll get it wrong and lynch the chosen but that's why I'm saying we should both spend today trying to figure out who is least likely to be the chosen and lynch who among them is the most scummy. In 780 I know that Nuwen was town and I recall that on day one of the game she advocated playing the game as though it were mountainous. I was hoping that she would respond to my questions as that would have given me more information to work with about her reactions to the setup before and after having been in it a while.TDC wrote:If we lynch someone we're pretty sure is not the Chosen (based on being hard to lynch) and that person ends up actually being the Chosen, I think it would point into Nuwen's direction.
Of course anyone could've read along with that game (or perhaps come to that conclusion without doing so), but she was actually there.
At least, it would rather speak against a scum team consisting of two relative newbies.
I think that the best play for the mafia would have been to exclude those that were least likely to be lynched given how they play in other games; I have to start somewhere and I know that were I making the decision that would be my primary deciding factor. There is WIFOM to be taken into account but if the mafia were pretty sure they could get someone lynched I think that would overwhelm anything else they might use when making their decision especially as the setup is as new as it is.
If we do end up lynching the chosen then we'll have to make a careful evaluation of the entire state of the game. It could be that Raivann, as Nuwen's replacement, will be the most suspect at that time but I think it will depend a fair amount on what has gone down since then.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
BloodCovenent, how about afatchic instead of ClockworkRuse if that's who the mafia had to look at?
Also, your endgame scenario there isn't quite right. If we've still got the chosen in the last four players then the mafia have to lynch them and cannot lynch the other townie or we lose. Knowing how the dynamics for this game works is going to be vital for everyone that ends up in endgame so I want to make sure everyone is clear on what could happen.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
No, not really, I said that wrong. The mafia have to lynch the townie who isn't the chosen. If they don't then we win. I could also have been intending to write they lose but I don't remember. It's a slip and I apologize for the confusion. Make of it what you will.Papa Zito wrote:
ORLYZorblag wrote: If we've still got the chosen in the last four players then the mafia have to lynch them and cannot lynch the other townie or we lose.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
BloodCovenent wrote:I Understood what you meant. The scum must lynch the chosen one in order to win, correct? And that might be difficult. So what happens if it comes down to two scum and 1 townie after that day lynch?
If it's just the chosen and the mafia then the chosen can't be lynched and the town wins is my interpretation. If it was one non-chosen townie and two mafia then the mafia would win.The rules wrote:13. The Chosen One can't be Nightkilled or Endgamed; it can only be lynched while there are still townies alive.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
That's essentially what I expected you to say.
Right now I'm pretty sure that Herodotus is town based on what he said to the mod in post 164. That's great as he's replacing Archon who I think was likely to be a potential chosen. I strongly recommend against lynching Herodotus at any point.
I do think that AshMC1984 is potentially the chosen one so I'm not at all interested in lynching him today. I think that Nuwen was unlikely to be excluded from being the chosen one as she is a strong player in general and isn't all that likely to be lynched as town.
I gave some weak reasons that I would have considered for voting for Nuwen earlier. Given that any lynch of a non-chosen one is a reasonable move in this game, that someone I think is town finds Raivann suspicious, and that I found Nuwen's play slightly scummy earlier I'm going to go ahead and
Vote: Raivann
I hadn't said it before, but my list of players to exclude from being the chosen one (and hence those that I think are least likely to have that role now) would be MiteyMouse, Nuwen, Papa Zito and TDC. Nuwen, TDC and Papa Zito all impress me with the towniness of their play in general and I think that MiteyMouse often comes across as fairly townish no matter what her role is. My fifth choice would be BloodCovenent as he's not been lynched in any games that I can find as a pro-town player in the early stages of a game. I think that the scum would have gone for lynchability over anything else when making their choices. afatchic is more lynchable in what I've seen than any of the five players that I listed. Archon was scum bait. AshMC1984 plays reasonably in the games that I've seen but he does get lynched. nadroj15 had no record to speak of so he would rank behind the other five in my list.
Of MiteyMouse, Papa Zito, Raivann and TDC Raivann currently seems like the best lynch to me.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Even if that were still true it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. Experience certainly doesn't always lead to wins and in this case there is a much stronger reason than normal to keep the less experienced players who were here for the start of the game around. In any case, the replacements that we've had have already changed the dynamic some. With the setup that we're using I think that replacements hurt the scum much more than they normally do.afatchic wrote:Zorblag- Your plan of lynching the non-chosens seems good, except for the fact that we will most likely be losing our most helpful players. Most of the players you named, are the ones with more experience and likely to be more helpful in the long run. I think it will have its pro's and con's. I do believe that if we stick to lynching to non-chosen candidates, we can't lose, which is a good thing. However, it will leave a very inexperienced group left to win it for us. I don't know, i am still having mixed feeling about what strategies we should take when playing this game.
The prime example I can site here would be Archon being replaced by Herodotus. Archon might have been scum but I also think that he wouldn't have been a good candidate at all to keep around because the scum hoped that he would be replaced. For one thing they'd have had no way to know that it would be a more experienced player subbing in and if they could get him lynched the first day they wouldn't have had to worry about it at all.
The scum would have every reason to want to bury is in WIFOM. Further, I'm pretty sure that most scum would think that they could do better than simply a random selection. Even if they didn't rule out all four choices to make tracking it back to them harder they know they'll get at least one night kill. If they could be at all sure they wouldn't want to put up with even one town member for too long they would be better off making sure that they'd be able to lynch them if they needed to; exluding someone as the chosen does that.AshMC1984 wrote:@Zorblag - I would randomly generate in much the same way roles are assigned. This would prevent us from being buried in WIFOM.
Unvote; Vote: Herodotus
The last game I played with Archon, he was replaced early and flipped scum when his replacement died. I don't think he likes playing scum.
Other's have commented on how your argument for Archon being scum isn't compelling. Not only do I agree but I've tried to give reasons not to lynch Archon or his replacement. Did you think that I was completely wrong or did you not notice what I said?
First off, I wasn't part of the game when the choice was made. Even if you're just going to make the choices at more or less random you should make them from players that might have been excluded.Raivann wrote:I could give you a list but it is pretty much random because I dont know...
Zorblag
afatchick
Nuwen
Papa Zito
The idea is good as long as scum excluded the players they thought were the best. They could have done the exact opposite, no?
As for the scum being worried that we would try to outguess their choices and pick unexpected exclusions for the chosen one I don't think we have to worry too much about that. The scum would know that there's still going to be a fair amount of chance invovled at the end of the process anyhow. Like I said to to AshMC1984, they know that everyone they pick will be someone they can nightkill if needed. That should be much more useful to scum than trying to throw the town off the track by making suboptimal choices when they can't even be sure that the town would even follow up on this sort of questioning.
As for the whole quicktopic and whether we've got one, I'm not going to make any assumptions one way or the other. I've played plenty of games here that had them and plenty that haven't. I suppose I'll go look to see what hohum has done before as a mod but it shouldn't matter too much. I think that it's pretty clear from the way the scum PM is worded in Post 1 that any replacement scum will at least know who the chosen one is; everything else they can work around without too much trouble including reasons they might have excluded players from getting picked.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Welcome to the game Special Ed. Out of curiosity, is it mostly MiteyMouse's code idea (which I'll talk about next) and the impression that I'm smart that are your reasons for suspecting me? Does it matter that I'm pretty sure that the only player now in the game who has played with me when I was scum is MiteyMouse?
Not really. In that game I needed to get information from Albert B. Ramage about whether he wanted me to bus him on day two of a game in which he looked somewhat suspicious so I used that method of getting information from him as it was a simple way for him to lie which would be a reason to go through with the bus or tell the truth which would be a reason to hold back. Unless you're worried that I'm scum trying to decide whether or not I need to bus a Herodotus or Papa Zito partner on day one I don't think it should be that troubling. I do ask questions that I can verify in most of my games regardless of alignment.MiteyMouse wrote:
Zorblag...should this worry me? Let me explain to everyone else here what I mean. In Newbie 749, the Troll was replaced in and he was Scum with Albert B Rampage. He asked almost the same question to Albert who, was his Scum partner. He explained it in his post game analysis as a way to get a message to Albert. I'm not ready to vote for you yet Zorblag but, it is noted!Zorblag wrote:Herodotus, do you have any experience with Papa Zito? Same question in reverse to Papa Zito.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh
Well, that one wasn't really a slip as I'm happy enough with how I said it; we probably have a quicktopic for this game that the scum are able to look at, replacements or otherwise.TDC wrote:
Second slip of that kind. Does this happen often to you?Zorblag wrote:I meant we as a game there.
The first one was a slip. I do makes slips in my typing from time to time. Most of the time people don't notice them (or at least don't bring them up) but I've been know to mix up the days I'm talking about, mix up cop and doc, mix up paranoid and naive and so forth. When I'm typing quickly it happens more often.
As for the worry that I'm taking control of the game I suppose I should take it as a compliment but really all that I'm trying to do right now is make sure that we're all fully aware of the implications of the setup. Others hadn't seemed inclined to do so before I got here so I'm going about it in a very blatant way.
We've had answers from most about who they would have exluded and why:
afatchic:TDC,MiteyMouse,nadroj15,Papa Zito. (TDC to avoid them being the chosen, the others could have been chosen at random)
AshMC1984: Would randomly generate to avoid WIFOM
BloodCovenent:ClockworkRuse,MiteyMouse,Nuwen,Papa Zito(Papa Zito based on play, Nuwen based on amount of experience and the others also on experience to a lesser degree?)
Herodotus:afatchic,MiteyMouse,Nuwen,TDC(based on impressions of experience and skill)
MiteyMouse:Papa Zito,afatchic,BloodCovenent,TDC(Papa Zito for skill, afatchic for recognition, the others at random)
Papa Zito:afatchic,Nuwen,TDC,MiteyMouse(Nuwen and TDC for being veteran players, afatchic for being active and drawing at least one night kill, MiteyMouse as others see her as town in general)
Raivann:Zorblag,afatchic,Nuwen,Papa Zito(random as he doesn't know the players in the game)
TDC:Papa Zito,BloodCovenent,TDCand one ofNuwenornadroj15(MiteyMousewould be the alternate choice if that list contains two scum; Papa Zito, BloodCovenent and TDC were chosen based on lack of getting lynched as town. nadroj15 as a wildcard because of a very limited sample of games)
Zorblag:MiteyMouse,Nuwen,Papa ZitoandTDC(overall townie feel for their typical play;BloodCovenentwould be the next choice based on his record of being lynched as town)
If I've got those wrong for anyone please do correct me.
It's noteworthy that although some said they were picking randomly their lists were still usually similar to those that were chosen for a reason. Of the lists and reasons given I'm most suspicious of AshMC1984 (as I said, scum would have no reason to want to eliminate WIFOM) and Raivann for giving a "random" list that looks so similar to the other lists people have given previously. That's a bit too neat given the other suspicions that people are voicing at this point but it absolutely helps the town now to try to participate in this process now to force the scum to try harder with their justifications so that we can look at them for flaws later if they flip.
Of the rest I think that afatchic gets some credit for giving his list first but I'd like to have seen more reasons from both him and MiteyMouse.
Here are the number of exclusions by game spot (this counts the choices of ClockworkRuse and Zorblag though I don't think that ClockworkRuse would have been one of the choices and I know that I wasn't as I joined the game after it had started):
Herodotus: 0
Special Ed: 0
BloodCovenent: 3
Zorblag: 3
afatchic: 5
MiteyMouse: 6
Raivann: 6
Papa Zito: 6
TDC: 6
I'm counting everyone that made the top four or tied for a spot or was given as an alternate. I didn't expect afatchic to show up as often and, frankly, I expected nadroj15 to show up less as someone with only one full game played on site. Other than that it's not too surprising.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Raivann, I continue to think that based on game dynamics alone that Herodotus is one of the worst lynches we could make, especially on the first day. Interestingly enough (given the connections people are seeing) Special Ed would be another lynch there's no way I could get behind today just because I think there's too great a chance for him to be the chosen.
I asked it here because I was establishing who had connections with other players in the game at the time and something struck me as interesting about how Herodotus and Papa Zito were interacting. The game that MiteyMouse is talking about was NG 749 (and the place where I explained what it is I had done was Post 1007 in the second paragraph.)Herodotus wrote:@MM:
Pointing out the part about Troll's question for me and PZ was good. Is there anyone else from that game in this game, or just Zorblag and yourself? Could someone link to it?
@Troll:
Why did you ask that question?
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
We should be doing a combination of hunting for scum and trying to avoid lynching the chosen. The information helps because it gives us a more limited list of what I think are reasonable lynches than we would otherwise have. Even taking into account the scum potentially lying to throw off the lists (which I think they would do fairly selectively rather than for the whole list) there are solid enough trends there that the scum simply couldn't have forced the sort of pattern we ended up with. For today I think that I'm only interested in lynching one of MiteyMouse, Papa Zito, Raivann and TDC. Of those the one I think is scummiest thus far is Raivann so that's where my vote is.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
That's interesting. I don't recall particularly pushing for a Nuwen/AshMC1984 scum pair before you'd made your first post (I don't think that I have now though I've said more about it since). The reasons that I gave for voting Raivann or Nuwen (whoever was playing it at the time) involved Nuwen's vote for Archon when she should know better given the setup. I'm pretty sure that OMGUS as a reason to want to vote me in particular isn't that convincing to me.Special Ed wrote:As I think on it, a great deal of my suspicion was OMGUS. To be honest, I read the game before getting my role, I was expecting to find myself being a Scum. I fully expected Ash to have seen the pressure mounting and deciding to opt out instead of staying and fighting.
As I said earlier, I'm pretty sure based on the role PMs we can see in post 1 the mafia already knows who the chosen is. Beyond that, if I'm trying to send a coded message with this question then I've got to be doing it either using a system that the scum came up with before I joined the game (unless there's day talk allowed in which case sending messages in game is ludicrous) or it has to be simple enough in the available context to get an unambiguous point across like the situation MiteyMouse was referring to.Special Ed wrote:It seems quite plausible that you may have been trying to convey a message to a Scum buddy in this manner as well. Either who you'd like to see lynched or who you might think is the Chosen One. It does strike me as you sending a message. Or else why ask one specific person about one other specific person?
As for asking particular players that question, as I said, I was trying to establish connections and Herodotus had just replaced in after I had gone through the process. That and the play right at the time made the question worth asking in particular.
If we never lynch the chosen one we can never lose. I'm happy putting as much of the effort into determining who that is as I have given that others don't seem to be doing it. I am still looking at what people are doing and trying to find scum but I'm not going to let a major game mechanic go unexploited because we didn't pay enough attention to it.Special Ed wrote:Also, your list making does seem to detract from Scum hunting. It's really been a large portion of the focus of this game. Now, maybe there are interesting comments in how people chose to talk about this or avoid it, but I really don't think it should guide our scum hunting. There's a 22% chance of anyone being Scum no matter where on the list they fall. I'd hate to exclude or include people simply because of a list created by a group that includes our Scum.
Actually, the lists are a bit helpful strictly in terms of scum hunting as well. Taking a look at Raivann's list, she gives me as one of her responses. I was not on the list that I asked her to choose between as I wouldn't have been one of those the scum was choosing between (I joined after the game started.) As MiteyMouse said, there's a reason to think that the scum would put the chosen on their list. As I said the mafia should have knowledge of who the chosen is based on their PM. That Zorblag showed up on Raivann's list increases her chance of being scum slightly (based on the fact that if I am the chosen and she knows it she would want to list me.)
Further, and probably more than that, if Raivann flips scum my chance of being the chosen goes up. Of course that's relying a bit on what I think is likely a bit of a dearth of experience for Raivann.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Hmm, actually, in an attempt to put 2 and 2 and 3 together to make sure I get 7, Special Ed, how did you learn about the opening in this game? Who in the game do you have previous experience with? I have reason to think that you must be familiar with hohum from another context (the other place(s) you play mafia springs to mind) and I wonder if you don't know MiteyMouse from somewhere as well. It doesn't help me decide if you're scum but it helps me get my bearings with you.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
OK, that connection between MiteyMouse and Special Ed does make things clearer, thank you.
@afatchic, I hope that I didn't come across as dismissive of your play when I said that I didn't expect you to show up on that many people's exclusion lists. I can be an ass without realizing that I'm doing it. I simply didn't think that many people would find you a poor candidate for a lynchee given what I saw when I looked at your games. You don't strike me as overly hard to lynch which is what I think that the scum would have been trying to avoid.
As for how much I expect the scum to lie about their lists, I can't be sure about it but I suspect that they would have motivation to give lists that were mostly accurate. Those that were excluded would have been excluded because the scum wouldn't want to deal with being forced to lynch them. Those that most people say would be on their exclusion lists should be the people the town should be more inclined to consider lynching if we're paying attention to the game dynamics. Other than possibly including the chosen on their list the scum don't have any motivation to lie about the bulk of who they listed.
It looks like Special Ed and TDC are the only ones who aren't voting at this time according to the last vote count. TDC just unvoted; I wonder who his top suspect is at the moment and why he's not voting. Special Ed just joined the game; I'd like to see a reasoned vote when he feels he's had the chance to get caught up. The votes that people cast at this stage in the game are valuable down the line for analysis so I like to see where people are willing to commit.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
With the new rule that lynches are mandatory I'm not quite sure how a non-majority at deadline (which is up to the mod's discretion) would be dealt with. I expect that if we do get a deadline imposed rules will be given. As for your vote being meaningless if it's not for Raivann, I disagree. If you vote for someone other than him it will be something we can look at in future days. Further, if you make any sort of case you might sway other voters beyond yourself.
My history here can be found by looking at my wiki entry (there's a button linking to it at the bottom of this post.) I've played in 11 completed games and two abandoned games with this and one other that are still ongoing. I've played about 9 games elsewhere online and a fair number live. Here day one varies a fair amount. A good portion of my experience here actually involves replacing into games past day one. Given that, I'd say that day one often results in scum-bait getting lynched rather than scum. I'm not sure what you're looking for in particular but I'd be happy to answer more particular questions if you've got them.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
We've got a deadline now. It's a week away so there's plenty of time left. I think it should be clear to everyone that it's better for us to lynch someone before we reach it but just in case, here's the reason. If we can be pretty sure we won't hit the chosen today then any lynch we choose is better than a random lynch which we know won't hit scum but might be the chosen one. If things go well then we'll hit scum but even if we're wrong we're in better shape with the information from the votes than we would be otherwise.
I don't want a quick lynch of Raivann now; if anyone is thinking of hammering please give some warning as I've got a thought about the game mechanics that I want to share as close to the end of the day as possible (so that the scum have less time to use it) that is probably obvious but which I want to be sure everyone hears going into the rest of the game.
BloodCovenent, I think I could guess why your vote is for MiteyMouse right now based on what you've said but I wonder if you could give a condensed version of your current reasons. She's probably my second choice after Raivann right now though for me that's not because I think she's particularly scummy so far this game (her play meets my expectations of play from her as either town or scum) but more because I think that she's a safe (i.e. almost certainly non-chosen) lynch and I don't have any reason to think that she's town just now.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
MiteyMouse, I've got some reason to think that you're about now and looking at things. You've said that you're happy with your Papa Zito vote for now. Does that take into account his chances of being the chosen or is it just based on the cuddling that you think he's been doing with Herodotus? Is it something else altogether? Do my answers to your questions about how to use the information about who people would have excluded as the chosen seem reasonable to you?
TDC, I like the attention to detail that you're showing with the game rules. I'm a bit nervous that you might be taking what I'm coming up with about who might be the chosen too readily without making sure that it makes sense (I'm doing my best with it but I could be wrong.) How much is the concern that scum would try to game the lists I'm composing enter into your assessments? Right now who would you say on your own are the least likely to be the chosen (apparently Raivann makes that list based on your vote.)
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
From context I assume that BigBear is BloodCovenent? Like I said earlier I think that MiteyMouse is playing the sort of game that I'd expect her to as either town or scum based on previous experience with her. I agree that she hasn't done much to help us figure out what's happening but I do appreciate her comments on me even though they're off base. My hope is that she'll take a look at others with the same sort of attention to little details. For now I'm keeping her as neutral in terms of my read.
afatchic, I look forward to your thoughts this weekend then. School (or RL in general) clearly comes before the game. I'm interested in hearing why you're voting for BloodCovenent now given that the read that you gave on him in your PBPA was neutral. Is he scummy enough for you to be sure that he isn't the chosen at this time?
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
No, I'm not using scare tactics, just my ability to read. The random lynch I'm talking about would be the random kill resulting from our not lynching. By the rules the moderator posted:Papa Zito wrote:Saying things like a random lynch "won't hit scum but might hit the Chosen one" is a scare tactic. And it's also factually incorrect: a random lynch is twice as likely to hit scum as it is to hit the Chosen.
If we don't lynch then a townie will die at random and it might be the chosen. Unless I read that wrong there's no chance that scum would get killed in that situation.hohum wrote:Been lots of discussion about deadlines. To clear a few things up if I do decide to set a deadline and that deadline comes and goes I will lynch one of the living townies at random. The random pool of townies will include the chosen one.
Lynching the chosen takes away guaranteed town win if we ever do it. It's strongly in our interest to make sure that we don't lynch the chosen the first day. I think that is more important than trying to make sure that we lynch scum on day one as finding scum is inherently harder at this point than avoiding lynching the chosen. If you disagree I'm happy to discuss it with you. If the chosen gets lynched we're down to a mountainous game and the limited sample of mountainous games this size or smaller here on MS don't indicate that this favors town at all. With the chosen still in the game we've got a serious advantage. I aim to keep that if it's at all possible.
Sorry, I can't do that. My scum reads right now in this game all involve the chosen one as it's an integral part of the game. I'm not willing to ignore a major part of the game when deciding who is likely to be scum.Papa Zito wrote:Ignoring the Chosen issue entirely, can you please give a list of who you feel are most scummy at the moment? TIA.
If you mean what scum tells I've gotten including the possibility of the chosen my list would be Riavann (Nuwen), AshMC1984 (though not particularly Special Ed) and afatchic.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
BloodCovenent, one example of town winning a 7:2 game doesn't show that town is more likely to win that setup. Further, the F11 setup is not the same as a mountainous setup even if it doesn't have power roles. The scum interactions the first couple days before they determine that there are no power roles are different than they would be if they knew that there were no power roles from the start. The F11 setup with no town power roles is actually slightly better for the town given the lack of information on the scum's part than a pure mountainous game.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
AshMC1984 was doing things that struck me as potential scum tells. I haven't seen you give off scum tells in particular. With Nuwen and Raivann I find both of their actions troubling. If AshMC1984 was either the chosen or scum then you are as well but that doesn't mean that the two of you have given similar tells.Special Ed wrote:
HOw could Ash be Scum or Chosen but I'm less so?Zorblag wrote:If you mean what scum tells I've gotten including the possibility of the chosen my list would be Riavann (Nuwen), AshMC1984 (though not particularly Special Ed) and afatchic.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh
It's fine with me if you're watching us. It doesn't look like I'm going to convince you that the message idea doesn't make sense so I'll stop trying but I do want to make sure that you're also paying attention to what others are doing in the game. What else has happened thus far that seems suspicious to you?MiteyMouse wrote:With Hohum confirming that the Scum cannot talk during the Day and Zorblag replacing in, the few messages that I saw about Herodotus with Papa and Zorblag don't look good to me. I have to think about this some more. I don't think that the messages were to confirm bussing but, something else. I'm watching you boys...
The goal here is to win the game. On that priority list I can win the game if we accomplish either 1 or 2. We can win if we lynch all the scum whether or not we keep the chosen alive. We can win if we keep the chosen alive whether or not we lynch the scum. We can win if we both lynch the scum and keep the chosen alive. I don't care at all which of the three routes we end up taking as long as it's one of them.Papa Zito wrote:I put "Keep the Chosen Alive" below "Lynch Scum" on my priority list.
Papa Zito's Priority List
1. Lynch Scum
2. Keep Chosen Alive
3. Keep Self Alive
See?
I'm worried about Zorblag putting so much emphasis on #2 and not enough on #1. A couple people have mentioned it and I'm starting to agree, this is starting to look like a distraction.
Other than the work that I'm doing and the responses to it that others are giving I don't see that much effort from others to keep the chosen alive so I'm going to keep at that. It should be easier day one to make sure we don't lynch the chosen than it is to make sure that we lynch scum; I'd love to do both but I'm not overly concerned if we don't as long as we don't get it wrong and take out the chosen right at the start.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Papa Zito, I do think that you're being old fashioned here, to a point that means that you're not trying to use the optimal strategy in the game. I also think that a tendency many players have is to assume that the standard operating procedures are the best way to go in most games even if there's extra information to be gleaned in the game dynamic that would indicate otherwise. An example from personal experience would be Open 111 (in New York) where people had very negative reactions to my suggestion of a partial claim early in the day to take advantage of what we knew about the distribution of roles. The arguments people gave then mostly boiled down to the idea that asking people to claim early in a game is normally a bad idea and so it must have been in that situation as well. Given that I'm not finding your reluctance to adapt to the game situation to be a particular scum tell but I do hope you'll get over it as the benefits we get in this game should even more apparent than the ones from the change from standard play I was pushing in Open 111.
The ice cream and bubble gum analogy isn't particularly appropriate. The chosen one mechanic is intrinsically part of this game from the get go, not just some sort of extra feature that we'll get at the very end. The scum have to take the chosen into account while they play the game if only because eventually they have to make sure the chosen gets lynched. That extra information about the scum's motivation from play is something that we can use down the road to help catch them. We do that by making sure we're all aware of the chosen and not lynching them early in the game. We don't stop trying to find scum, but we also don't blindly do things in this game which has a dramatically non-standard dynamic just because that's the way we usually do things.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Special Ed, there is certainly a benefit to using a random order, some sort of popcorn system or a voting system to determine how lists like the one I was asking for are given but they all cut down on the speed with which the information gets out there and I didn't want to tie up the game like that. As it was, I think that people made their lists after I asked for them with their next couple posts in all cases. I don't get the impression that anyone was stalling. Although scum might have held out on posting theirs till towards the end simply by not posting at all, all that I was looking for for immediate use was a general shape of who people thought would be excluded as the chosen and I got that.
Beyond that we will be able to look at when people gave their lists and who is on them when we learn alignments. If it turns out that scum held out till the end then we'll know they were more likely to have been trying to blend in. If they went early then we'll know that they couldn't have been doing that.
If everyone who's not voting for Raivann could currently make their strongest case for anyone else they choose that would be great. We don't want to be risking going to deadline without a lynch so if we're going to shift our attention we should start doing that as soon as possible.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Papa Zito, it looks like we are going to disagree here and so be it. The chosen mechanic adds an entire new path by which the town can win and has the potential to break this game open for us. In any case, for now we've got someone who you find suspicious and I find both suspicious and unlikely to be the chosen. I suspect that the difference in philosophy doesn't have to complicate things at this time.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Special Ed, your description of what you're expecting from Mitey Mouse is surprising to me based on the two games I've played with her here (Newbie Game 749 and Newbie Game 791.) Could you link me any games where she did post all the time and respond to everything?
As for the communication tell that she's using against me, the context is as follows (and I discussed it a bit earlier): I replaced into NG 749 to a scummy looking partner. I needed to try to figure out whether he wanted me to bus him so I put up a PBPA which found him scummy and then asked if he and MiteyMouse had any previous experience when I already knew they were in an ongoing game together. The only communication that was supposed to happen there was that he could lie to me if he wanted me to bus him and then later claim that because the game was ongoing it wasn't really a lie. It was taking advantage of a marginal case about experience that people have and an ongoing game. It turns out that he didn't even notice that from his end. He was just trying to give me as many reasons to bus him as he could as that was his plan from before I had replaced in.
Taking this and thinking that I'm somehow using the same format of question to pass information in this game or set up a code assumes that I don't learn that it doesn't work for communication even in an ideal situation when the recipient isn't expecting it, that my partners here would be more sophisticated than a long time, subtle player in Albert B. Rampage and that I've got some information that I want to know or think I can pass on by getting a yes or no answer to a question that I would know would be no this time if I had looked it up prior to asking (and there's no way that town or scum should have motivation to say they've got experience with another player when they don't.)
If people want to respect my ability to deceive to the degree that they'd be willing to go for all of that then I don't know what I'm going to be able to say to help myself here.
As for the quote button, Herodotus's answer is as good as anything I could give. I always quote by hand so it doesn't come up for me.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Yeah, I figured out based on some things said in another game and the general speech patterns (and the avatar) that it must be Mandi. Thus far I'm on day two of Superheroes and I don't see the play you describe at all. I need to finish the game and take a look at one of the ones you listed where she's town though.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Hmm, I've now read through both Hamlet and Superheroes (well, skimmed and looked at what MiteyMouse contributed anyhow.) I think that there is a difference in contribution in those games from what I've seen here but that it seems to be in the end game. For both games (one as scum and one as town) the contribution the first couple days was much more in line with what I've seen here. Any leading of the town in both cases came towards the latter half of the games and I would not describe early game posting in either case as frequent or addressing everything that came up.
I wonder if Special Ed would care to comment on that?
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Yes, it was annoying which is why I only did it for two games; one scum and one town.
I didn't look at Labyrinth but what you're describing there does not sound like what I saw in the other two games. I think it was Superheroes where she largely lurked through the first 4 or 5 days and was only active in the 6th (and was then lynched right away in the 7th.) Hamlet she did start to take a more active role in the 3rd or 4th day but that seemed to be because she was a vig that got cop information from someone else or some such crazy dynamic. She was almost obligated to help direct the town with that role. The first couple days she wasn't any more active than she has been here so far as I saw.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
No, in this game weBloodCovenent wrote:Regarding PZ's thoughts on playing the game like any regular newbie game, isn't a bad idea, but Having Zorb's thoughts, and his worrying about the Chosen is also good. The hard part is finding the balance,because if we can't kill scum, then we can't win. That's why worrying just about the chosen one isn't enough in itself.It almost feels that we haven't done that much scum hunting, due to this whole "chosen" idea looming over our heads. But, anyways, more scum hunting to come day 2.canwin if we don't kill the scum. That's why the chosen dynamic is such a big deal. So long as we never lynch the chosen one we win at the end whether we've caught scum or not. Scum hunting is still good but avoiding lynching the chosen is equally good in this game and I'm pretty sure doing the latter helps do the former anyhow in the.
Both TDC and Raivann listed themself among those they might exclude. TDC also gave more than just 4 options and gave reasoning for his choices. I don't think that it particularly benefits someone to list themself so I didn't bring it up earlier.
As for why I'm voting for Raivann, here's what I initially would have said:
Past then Raivann has kept his vote on Herodotus after the discussion that there's been about the chosen, the list he gave had the issues I brought up, I think it's pretty unlikely Raivann is the chosen and others I agree with suspect Raivann for other reasons. It's enough for me to put my vote there.Zorblag wrote:Troll knows that Nuwen has taken the time to look at Archon’s previous games as she identifies his voting patterns at the start of games despite only having been in one game with him (Mini 734 where he replaced after she was killed.) In this particular game the mafia would have had a strong reason to take a look at other games people have played in when deciding who to exclude from being the chosen. Further, Archon’s play in Troll’s experience be that of scum bait and him be a likely candidate not to be exluded as the chosen should him be town. Votes for him at the start of the game will inherently be suspicious to Troll.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
OK, here's one last thing to keep in mind about the dynamic for the rest of the game. The scum have a lynchee, the chosen. They have to get that person lynched. When it gets to the end of the day if there's someone who hasn't been attacked at all there's a good chance that they are not the chosen. That doesn't mean they should get lynched if that's the only case against them but if you think someone has been acting scummy and no on has been attacking them at all you can be pretty sure they aren't the chosen. If the chosen does act scummy the scum have every reason to try to get them lynched based on that.
Here's something the mod said in the other chosen game that was run after everything was over that illustrates how you can use this point:
(actually, I'll post it in a second in case twilight ends while I'm grabbing it.)
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
Remember that in endgame if you're sure you're not the chosen a self hammer is actually good for the town. This is very non-standard and normally town should never hammer in LyLo. Remember that this game is fundamentally different when making your choices.Incognito wrote:I think ekiM made a good choice by killing ABR -- I'm almost positive that if ABR was left alive during Day 4, he likely would have self-hammered since I think he pretty much concluded that he wasn't the Chosen One since nobody really attacked him despite doing some fairly questionable stuff. It didn't lead to a scum win in the long run, but at least it prolonged the game and still gave scum a chance to win.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
I'm not sure how scum could avoid someone deciding that they're not the chosen in a LyLo situation. They get to act however they want but they don't get to choose what conclusions others come to.
If someone is going out of their way to attack everyone then that'll be a better candidate than normal for scum in this game. That on it's own should make it harder for scum to avoid the sort of situation that Albert B. Rampage was in.
-Zorblag R`Lyeh-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle
-
-
Zorblag Troll
- Troll
- Troll
- Posts: 4057
- Joined: September 25, 2008
- Location: Under a bridge in Seattle