Open 121: Two of Four (b9) - Over! before 752

[Empking]

YAA!!!

Vote: Empking

Kill all useless players now!

OK.

Vote: Zwet

[Empking]

Is it Luck?

Sens: If you were to pick one post to exemplify Zwet's bad behaviour, which one would you pick?

[Empking]

Is it Luck?

Sens: If you were to pick one post to exemplify Zwet's bad behaviour, which one would you pick?

What about the fact that I can't find a single useful post, with any form of content, out of his 19?

That fact is a given but I'd like a post of his so I can tell what you mean rather than what I'd mean if I said the same thing. (the generalities are probably the same but the specifics might be different.)

[Empking]

This probably sums up his terrible play best, if I can only pick one:

OK, folks. Stop it. Now. I'm playing this game, it's only on Page 3, and there haven't been actions or anything important. Why are you saying all this random load of bullcrap when you don't even know anything yet?

Thank You

[Empking]

DCJ: Do you want Zwet to claim? Do you want him to be lynched?

[Empking]

You're majorly pissing me off, Sens. Stop. KMD, no it isn't, and I'd like to hear a response from Dark about his contradiction.

It's quite simple, really. There is no contradiction.
I can say I don't think yer voteworthy, but I also don't wanna listen to you arguing and such. Besides, we learn nothing if we lynch no one. If you are not mafia, then, from my point of view, it might be the ones who are abso-posi-lutely pushing for your lynch. As in, those who started the bandwagon to begin with.

Not to mention, you two are pissing me off with yer childish arguing. You are not contributing at all when yer arguing like this.
Also, the fact you haven't contributed at all that I can see is still anti-town. Though I may not like voting for you, I'm doing it so we're not stuck on Day 1 forever, like the other game I'm in.

(seriously, MafiaScum should look into shorter days, like only a 48 hour time limit like I'm used to).

Also, Zazier, jumping the gun a bit, methinks. I don't see any real reason to vote me, to be honest. Seeing as there's no "contradiction" I can see with what I've said so far.
It's called a "random" vote for a reason.

Why didn't you answer my questons.

Unvote

Vote: Dark

[Empking]

This probably sums up his terrible play best, if I can only pick one:

OK, folks. Stop it. Now. I'm playing this game, it's only on Page 3, and there haven't been actions or anything important. Why are you saying all this random load of bullcrap when you don't even know anything yet?

Thank You

Why did you require Sens do select a post?

I wanted to get a better read on what Sens thinks.

[Empking]

I don't think you needed to claim.

I don't think (if there's a real different cop) that he should counterclaim.

[Empking]

I'm at L-1, Emp. I needed to claim. Why don't you want a counterclaim?

Really, who's voting you?

I don't think a counterclaim would be good for the town. If there's a real cop who's not you they would be better off getting investigations and dying.

[Empking]

Zwet: I asked you a question.

[Empking]

Is it too difficult?

[Empking]

SensFan, Kmd4390, Dark

Who am I missing?

[Empking]

His last post wasn't useful. Your last 20 posts weren't useful.

[Empking]

He's not the most useful player, but there is use in hs posts.

[Empking]

KMD, I agree. This isn't Open, though, we don't know that we have a Cop.

Um.

Yes it is...? .

Its semi-open.

Dark: Yesw I did, also why do you play?

[Empking]

KMD: Is the number of scum more that you'd get if you picked random players?

[Empking]

Yes.

[Empking]

Its called a random vote.

How have I been following Sens?

[Empking]

Its been like 5 days since her last post on the site.

[Empking]

Vote: Blondesowat

I've basically got a town read on everybody but her.

[Empking]

Sensfan, you're very good at this game.

[Empking]

Okay does anybody else (speaking to everybody but SensFan and Kmd) find this absolutely ridiculous?

Should I direct you to examples of some of the very best players approving the idea of policy lynches?

Yes.

[Empking]

I think he should, just because he said he could.

[Empking]

I think SF's action was less scummy than BSW's.

[Empking]

Militant, what's your opinion of what you discussed in post 263?

Anyway, I'm hoping to hear something soon from the replacement. BSW hasn't said much. I don't even know which action from BSW Empking is talking about in post 262.

the answering the prods but not helping discussion.

[Empking]

Zazier: Who is the scummiest player? Why aren't you voting them?
Miltiant: Who is the scummiest player? Why aren''t you voting them?

[Empking]

I agree with SF on the RVing thing and 0 is a major scum tell in my eyes.

[Empking]

And I don't care if you consider not random voting or whatever you mean (because that last point you stated totally does not make sense, not nor random voting?) because not random voting isn't scummy so that was a ridiculous reason to vote for someone.

So the fact you and I disagree on what is scummy is reason for you to call my post 'ridiculous'?

For fuck's sake, I've talked in MD about how and why random voting, or not voting at the beginning of the game, is very scummy to me.

Note: Random voting is not to be confused with 'random' voting; the latter is perfectly fine.

Okay well what is your definition of random v. 'random'. And I don't see you talking in this game about why not random voting is scummy. So why is it? And Empking do not answer for him I know your opinion of why and it sucks so I'm not asking you I'm asking SensFan.

Do you honestly not know?

[Empking]

Asking a question.

[Empking]

Asking a question.

Is the sky blue?

I just asked a question, so am I being helpful too?

No as it was rhetorical.

TY Sekinj.

[Empking]

It was rhetorical.

[Empking]

No. I'm asking you a real question.

If you were you would've objected to me calling it rhetorical.

[Empking]

Mind telling use who they are?

[Empking]

Unvote

Vote: Hewitt

Hewitt's last posts have been unbeleivably scummy.

Sekinj: If they're just here to follow grudges or mess around (Hohum and Hewitt) then maybe. If they're trying to scum hunt then hell no.

[Empking]

I think you're scummy.

I can only remember your last AtE and the "i'm town" claim.

[Empking]

That's because we the majority of the players want Hewitt lynched.

[Empking]

You seem a bit worried about getting votes.

[Empking]

Why do you think KMD changed his mind?

[Empking]

@zaz - how can you not believe hewitt is scum and still want me to hammer? your position makes no sense. and I meant AT THIS TIME hewitt is the lynch for the day. that can obviously change, BECAUSE I'M GIVING IT THE CHANCE TO CHANGE!!! I'm USING those extra days we have.

Appreciated, in my case.

I am dubious about this lynch. I am unsure Hewitt would be taking some of the stances he is doing if he is scum, and his flailing feels more like indignant townie than losing the game scum.

I'm getting the oppisite impression.

[Empking]

I'm not sure what to say. I think we should drop it and both of you should unvote. There's nmo point having a long twilight or night.

[Empking]

The current question is when we cut to the chase and lynch empking.

Why?

[Empking]

hey guys whuts goin on in hyar

]

Unvote

Vote: Primate

[Empking]

Hey Empking nice expressing suspicion without saying why there. I am assuming you have an awesome non-hypocritical reason for voting me.

Trying to start descussion in a way that didn't involves answering the questions asked of you.

[Empking]

The mod's back. We can lynch Sekinj now.

Vote: Sekinj

[Empking]

Unvote

Vote: Sekinj

[Empking]

Yeah.

[Empking]

Primate: Do you understand why Sekinj self-voted?

[Empking]

Unvote

Vote: Primate