Open 121: Two of Four (b9) - Over! before 752

[ZazieR]

Nat replaced out of that game. Probably due to the responses. But Kmd can actually say more about this.
Anyway, in my opinion, this is a legal comparisation.

[Kmd4390]

The point on Nat is that he has an anti-town meta like Zwet does. It's perfectly reasonable to compare the two.

Did it end with the same result though?

Nat has been in games where he's been attacked like hell for his meta. As has Zwet. And Empking.

Nat replaced out of that game. Probably due to the responses. But Kmd can actually say more about this.
Anyway, in my opinion, this is a legal comparisation.

If you mean Drawn Together, it's ongoing.

[hewitt]

But are Nat, zwets, and Empking the same players. Do the have the same tendencies, the exact same flaws, and the same level of predictability? The answer is a resounding no and I think it's stupid to compare players because they all have been attacked for their gameplay. Their gameplays are different and it is silly to expect that zwets will act like any other player whether it's Nat or Empking or me or you. It doesn't matter, because none of us play the same and the stunt that was pulled was a catastrophe and that is a fact. We killed our cop, plain and simple as that.

[veerus]

Vote Count XII:

Still no replacement for BSW.

Kmd4390 (0):
BlondeSoWut (1): Empking
hewitt (2) SensFan, Kmd4390
Empking (0):
militant (0)
SensFan (1): hewitt
ZazieR (0):

Not voting (3): BlondeSoWut, militant, ZazieR

With 7 alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch

Deadline: March 25, 2008, 2100 CST

[SensFan]

the stunt that was pulled was a catastrophe and that is a fact. We killed our cop, plain and simple as that.

I don't regret doing a damn thing.

[hewitt]

the stunt that was pulled was a catastrophe and that is a fact. We killed our cop, plain and simple as that.

I don't regret doing a damn thing.

That was obvious enough.

[Empking]

Zazier: Who is the scummiest player? Why aren't you voting them?
Miltiant: Who is the scummiest player? Why aren''t you voting them?

[ZazieR]

@Empking
For me, they are: BSW, Militant and Sens.
Sens due to his hammer and not providing the reasons why he saw DCJ as scummy.
Militant for his last two posts. First he points Sens action regarding Zwet out as peculiar, but when I ask his opinion about it, he's chosing both sides. Also, his post number 4 doesn't sit right with me.
I'm waiting with my vote, till I hear something from BSW's replacement.

[SensFan]

Sens due to his hammer and not providing the reasons why he saw DCJ as scummy.

Whoops, I thought I had done that. Gimme a sec.

[SensFan]

PBPA on DCJ:

Post 0: Makes an 'I'm Town' reference (scummy)
Post 1: Doesn't random vote (very scummy)
Post 2: random votes BSW for 'trolling', when zwet has been trolling, and BSW hasn't done anything (slightly scummy)
Post 3: Comments on '3 people with 2 votes' (null)
Post 4: Misunderstands Zaz's question (null)
Post 5: Still misunderstands the question (null)
Post 6a: Claims that people on MS are too serious (summy)
Post 6b: Implies no one is vote-worthy, when he has a vote on BSW (very scummy)
Post 7: Votes zwet because "we have to lynch someone" (ridiculously scummy)
Post 8a: Says he wants to lynch zwet, then if he flips Town, go after people who wagoned zwet (ridiculously scummy)
Post 8b: Calls the back-and-forth between (presumably?) zwet and I "childish arguing," claims he's voting to avoid being "stuck on Day 1 forever." (slightly scummy)
Post 8c: Calls his vote on zwet fucking RANDOM (ridiculously scummy)
Post 9: Argues that he's not going to adapt his way of playing, even know he knows MS is different from 'where he's from'. (slightly scummy)

The kicker for me was definatively 8c.

[veerus]

Vote Count XIII:

Still no replacement for BSW.
And now militant has asked for replacement too.

Kmd4390 (0):
BlondeSoWut (1): Empking
hewitt (2) SensFan, Kmd4390
Empking (0):
militant (0)
SensFan (1): hewitt
ZazieR (0):

Not voting (3): BlondeSoWut, militant, ZazieR

With 7 alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch

Deadline: March 25, 2008, 2100 CST

[Kmd4390]

See my sig.

I'll catch up next week.

[hewitt]

PBPA on DCJ:

Post 0: Makes an 'I'm Town' reference (scummy)
Post 1: Doesn't random vote (very scummy)
Post 2: random votes BSW for 'trolling', when zwet has been trolling, and BSW hasn't done anything (slightly scummy)
Post 3: Comments on '3 people with 2 votes' (null)
Post 4: Misunderstands Zaz's question (null)
Post 5: Still misunderstands the question (null)
Post 6a: Claims that people on MS are too serious (summy)
Post 6b: Implies no one is vote-worthy, when he has a vote on BSW (very scummy)
Post 7: Votes zwet because "we have to lynch someone" (ridiculously scummy)
Post 8a: Says he wants to lynch zwet, then if he flips Town, go after people who wagoned zwet (ridiculously scummy)
Post 8b: Calls the back-and-forth between (presumably?) zwet and I "childish arguing," claims he's voting to avoid being "stuck on Day 1 forever." (slightly scummy)
Post 8c: Calls his vote on zwet fucking RANDOM (ridiculously scummy)
Post 9: Argues that he's not going to adapt his way of playing, even know he knows MS is different from 'where he's from'. (slightly scummy)

The kicker for me was definatively 8c.

I don't think Posts 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 9 are scummy.

[SensFan]

You'll notice I said 3, 4, 5 are null.
You'll then notice I said 2, 9 are slightly scummy.
You'll then learn than 'I'm Town!' posts are scummy.
You'll then be told that I consider truly random voting (not nor random voting) just about the scummiest thing someone can do.

[hewitt]

I did notice you said that they are null and I agreed obviously. Again, I noticed that you said they were slightly scummy and I obviously disagreed. I don't find that post to be scummy. And I don't care if you consider not random voting or whatever you mean (because that last point you stated totally does not make sense, not nor random voting?) because not random voting isn't scummy so that was a ridiculous reason to vote for someone.

[SensFan]

And I don't care if you consider not random voting or whatever you mean (because that last point you stated totally does not make sense, not nor random voting?) because not random voting isn't scummy so that was a ridiculous reason to vote for someone.

So the fact you and I disagree on what is scummy is reason for you to call my post 'ridiculous'?

For fuck's sake, I've talked in MD about how and why random voting, or not voting at the beginning of the game, is very scummy to me.

Note: Random voting is not to be confused with 'random' voting; the latter is perfectly fine.

[veerus]

Vote Count XIV:

Primate replaces BlondeSoWut immediately. Thank you!

Still looking for militant's replacement.

Kmd4390 (0):
Primate (1): Empking
hewitt (2) SensFan, Kmd4390
Empking (0):
militant (0)
SensFan (1): hewitt
ZazieR (0):

Not voting (3): Primate, militant, ZazieR

With 7 alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch

Deadline: March 25, 2008, 2100 CST

[Empking]

I agree with SF on the RVing thing and 0 is a major scum tell in my eyes.

[hewitt]

And I don't care if you consider not random voting or whatever you mean (because that last point you stated totally does not make sense, not nor random voting?) because not random voting isn't scummy so that was a ridiculous reason to vote for someone.

So the fact you and I disagree on what is scummy is reason for you to call my post 'ridiculous'?

For fuck's sake, I've talked in MD about how and why random voting, or not voting at the beginning of the game, is very scummy to me.

Note: Random voting is not to be confused with 'random' voting; the latter is perfectly fine.

Okay well what is your definition of random v. 'random'. And I don't see you talking in this game about why not random voting is scummy. So why is it? And Empking do not answer for him I know your opinion of why and it sucks so I'm not asking you I'm asking SensFan.

[Empking]

And I don't care if you consider not random voting or whatever you mean (because that last point you stated totally does not make sense, not nor random voting?) because not random voting isn't scummy so that was a ridiculous reason to vote for someone.

So the fact you and I disagree on what is scummy is reason for you to call my post 'ridiculous'?

For fuck's sake, I've talked in MD about how and why random voting, or not voting at the beginning of the game, is very scummy to me.

Note: Random voting is not to be confused with 'random' voting; the latter is perfectly fine.

Okay well what is your definition of random v. 'random'. And I don't see you talking in this game about why not random voting is scummy. So why is it? And Empking do not answer for him I know your opinion of why and it sucks so I'm not asking you I'm asking SensFan.

Do you honestly not know?

[hewitt]

Oh wait, I'm going to pull a Empking.

Active lurking, who does that last post contribute to scum hunting Empking?

[sekinj]

hi guys! I'm replacing militant!

[Empking]

Asking a question.

[hewitt]

Asking a question.

Is the sky blue?

I just asked a question, so am I being helpful too?

[Empking]

Asking a question.

Is the sky blue?

I just asked a question, so am I being helpful too?

No as it was rhetorical.

TY Sekinj.