Open 121: Two of Four (b9) - Over! before 752

veerus · Post Post #400 (ISO) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:59 pm

Vote Count XVII:

Kmd4390 (0):
Primate (0):
hewitt (3): SensFan, Kmd4390, Empking
Empking (0):
sekinj (0):
SensFan (1): hewitt
ZazieR (0):

Not voting (3): Primate, sekinj, ZazieR

With 7 alive, it takes 4 votes to lynch

Deadline: March 25, 2008, 2100 CST

ZazieR · Post Post #401 (ISO) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:18 am

Zazie wrote:I actually disagree with the case against hewitt. I don't see why scum would post upset after their partner is lynched. And I've been also a few times sure that someone was town, while everyone else saw that player as scum (see NG 684).

Still thinking this.

sekinj · Post Post #402 (ISO) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:49 am

SO you are your current suspects zaz?

sekinj · Post Post #403 (ISO) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:50 am

ebwop you=who

who are your current suspects

sekinj · Post Post #404 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:26 am

I guess everyone is on Spring Break?!?!

SensFan · Post Post #405 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:58 am

ZazieR wrote:
Zazie wrote:I actually disagree with the case against hewitt. I don't see why scum would post upset after their partner is lynched. And I've been also a few times sure that someone was town, while everyone else saw that player as scum (see NG 684).
Still thinking this.

Can you, then, maybe explain how the fuck hewitt saw zwets as being Town?

Not to mention that your post completely ignores everything that's happened today. Like the massive Appeal to Emotion.

ZazieR · Post Post #406 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:37 am

Because what he has done today doesn't strike me as scummy. Nothing that Hewitt has said so far screamed scum to me.
As for Zwet's play, I have given my comments about it. Zwet wasn't scummy, he wasn't helping due to all those attacks at the start of the game. So in my opinion, he wasn't scummy. But if you want to know why Hewitt saw Zwet as town, you should ask him, not me. And if I'm correct, he already said why.
Anyway, the day that there won't be any townie that uses AtE, I'll say how awesome you are. But right now, there are still townies who use AtE, and I think that hewitt is one of them.

Vote Sekinj

The willingness to hammer, but still not doing it.
The impression I get that she hasn't read the game so far.
Using an attack against Hewitt he can't give a defence against as she's not giving the games she's gotten the meta from.
DCJ ignoring Militant's questions.
Militant's last two posts.
And meta reasons.

Oh, and as for your question:

Zazie wrote:@Empking
For me, they are: BSW, Militant and Sens.
Sens due to his hammer and not providing the reasons why he saw DCJ as scummy.
Militant for his last two posts. First he points Sens action regarding Zwet out as peculiar, but when I ask his opinion about it, he's chosing both sides. Also, his post number 4 doesn't sit right with me.
I'm waiting with my vote, till I hear something from BSW's replacement.

SensFan · Post Post #407 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:34 am

I answered that post AGES ago, Zaz. Pay attention.

ZazieR · Post Post #408 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:37 am

It was to show Sekinj that I posted my suspicions AGES ago. I'm sorry that I forgot to erase the part about you.

SensFan · Post Post #409 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 6:22 am

Oh, sorry. I thought that you meant that was answering MY question.

sekinj · Post Post #410 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:33 am

I HAVE read the game zaz. however, re-reading a game is much different than actually being involved in it. if that is the reason you are voting me, then you can just suck it. I bent over backward trying to answer your irrelvant questions, and you come back and say I haven't read the game. that pisses me off.

If someone is about to be hammered and you disagree with it, I expect you to be making a case, not sitting back and making sure I review all your comments from AGES ago. and since it is from AGES ago, I expect a relevant answer that is UP TO DATE. now if you still have the same opinion, fine, just say so. don't throw things in my face.

also, I'm not going to hammer when one of the voters is known to be on V/LA and everyone else is mum.

SensFan · Post Post #411 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 7:59 am

sekinj wrote:I HAVE read the game zaz. however, re-reading a game is much different than actually being involved in it. if that is the reason you are voting me, then you can just suck it. I bent over backward trying to answer your irrelvant questions, and you come back and say I haven't read the game. that pisses me off.

If someone is about to be hammered and you disagree with it, I expect you to be making a case, not sitting back and making sure I review all your comments from AGES ago. and since it is from AGES ago, I expect a relevant answer that is UP TO DATE. now if you still have the same opinion, fine, just say so. don't throw things in my face.

also, I'm not going to hammer when one of the voters is known to be on V/LA and everyone else is mum.

What do you mean by 'everyone else is mum'?

sekinj · Post Post #412 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:01 am

I mean, everyone but you.

Empking · Post Post #413 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:03 am

That's because we the majority of the players want Hewitt lynched.

sekinj · Post Post #414 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:05 am

but I'm not goign to hammer while one of the voters is V/LA and the others are not giving their opinions. If I went ahead and hammered, people liek zaz woudl be voting me tomorrow for the quick hammer. no thank you. I'll wait at least on more day to make sure kmd is happy with his vote.

Empking · Post Post #415 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:12 am

You seem a bit worried about getting votes.

sekinj · Post Post #416 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:16 am

yeah, if you hadn't noticed, voting leads to death...

SensFan · Post Post #417 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:22 am

Empking wrote:You seem a bit worried about getting votes.

This.

Town's first priority is lynching Scum. Then not being lynched.
Scum's first priority is not being lynched.

sekinj · Post Post #418 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:56 am

So far we have 2 confirmed voted for hewitt. that is NOT a majority. If someone else would liek to hammer, be my guest. as for me, I'd like to verify KMD's position.

The pressure to hammer is making me re-think hewitt's scumminess in the first place.

sekinj · Post Post #419 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:56 am

clarification: the pressure to hammer is making me consider if others are more scummy than hewitt

SensFan · Post Post #420 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:17 am

sekinj wrote:So far we have 2 confirmed voted for hewitt. that is NOT a majority. If someone else would liek to hammer, be my guest. as for me, I'd like to verify KMD's position.

The pressure to hammer is making me re-think hewitt's scumminess in the first place.

Trust me. If I could hammer, I would. And I'm not sure its fair to say that KMD's vote shouldn't 'count'. I mean, he knew very well he was placing it then leaving on a week-long V/LA.

And I'm not pressuring you to hammer, just the opposite. I find it scummy that you have built up hammering to be this huge thing, and are trying to completely justify it before doing so.

sekinj · Post Post #421 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:22 am

i just want to be sure of a majority, simple as that.

Empking · Post Post #422 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:24 am

Why do you think KMD changed his mind?

SensFan · Post Post #423 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:26 am

sekinj wrote:i just want to be sure of a majority, simple as that.

You think it would be scummy to hammer without the input of everyone on the wagon?

sekinj · Post Post #424 (ISO) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:27 am

I dont' think he changed his mind. I just want to be sure that he can't come back and claim that he did, or would have given the current info.

I also wanted to see if primate and zaz were going to take any sort of stand, but by this point it is clear that they are apparently happy in their passive side-line position.