Nope! Tierce. You don't get to say I'm breaking the rules, when you POSTED MY SITE ACTIVITY. If you post my site activity, I'm allowed to say that I asked a question in that site activity that you posted. I'm allowed to say, please read what I posted in the site activity that you posted to prove my guilt. I don't see how you think it's appropriate to post my site activity, wagon me for it, but I'm prohibited to say what was in the site activity which you posted.
You need to take responsibility for what you did. If you are town, you started a counter wagon on me, which was the result of activity which for some reason you decided I was guilty for during a week when I was busy and for someone who reads every single game on site it should be apparent that I was, you pull up my site activity which proves nothing at all other than I logged on and posted in one game and wasn't even prodded in this one, brought in incomplete team mafia meta to use against me (seriously, did you read the team qt...did you read the discussion as someone who actually knows me thought I couldn't be scum because of bussing because it actually goes against my personality)....yeah scum meta....did you know that argument was real from my end? No, Okay.
It does not matter what you say your read on me was. As I've shown, you posted my site activity, which was a sum total of two posts in one game on Sunday night, said Oh Really and voted me. Others followed suit. You said I was posting in other games on site while this one was exploding. I didn't even read this game until today.
If you had doubts about me for whatever reasons you could have interacted with me, but you didn't. You posted my site activity and helped to start a wagon on me based on that. You don't get to now go, oh but there were secret reasons.
I didn't need to post any kind of notice here because I still posted within game expectations. It doesn't matter if for a few days I didn't post several times per day, it was pretty damn evident I was keeping up with the thread and posting on a regular basis.
But as long as we're going to play semantics, doesn't this post show that you know I'm town. I mean I can't have lingering doubts of you being scum, if I am, in fact, scum right?
In post 1614, Tierce wrote:@Tammy: Christ, if you still have some kind of nagging feeling I'm scum, you have too much respect for my poor unfortunate scum play.
If you are town, you did suspect me wrongly. But, it's not that you suspected me, but the manner in which you went about it and rallied the troops and fueled the fire. You can't pretend that you didn't. And, I'm not going to blame anyone for me breaking down and name claiming, and MoI might think it was a stupid thing to do - I might beg to differ - but still I left enough hints yesterday that I had something, that I belonged to a country, and today that I thought I might be on the list, and all that was ignored in favor of the Tammy must be scum let's make her claim manhandle her to get her to show us her power insult and force her to submit tell her to replace out because she sucks. And no, you weren't insulting. Condescending, yes, but I'm condescending myself in my own right so I'll give you a hard time about it but I won't take offense. I don't have any ill will against you either and enjoy playing with you. But, still you helped to fuel it and there was no legitimate reason for it. Suspicion? Fine. Full crusade against me? No. Throwing up faulty evidence to start a counterwagon? No.
You literally said that you knew I was going to say I only post in games that I find interesting. You literally said that. You had no idea that I didn't actually read this game until the time that I started posting, and you were saying what you
knew
I was going to say. It's a sentiment I've never said. I've only ever said that I don't post in every single game every day, and sometimes if a game is nearing deadline I pay more attention to that game or if there's something major going on in a game I pay more attention to it. You claimed there was no excuse for me not to post, but I hadn't read the game. Those aren't accidental misreps Tierce, those are full blown mischaracterizations, and if you can't look at the sequence of events and see how I find it damn suspicious, well I don't know what to say. And I find your behavior along with DDD's behavior, the timing of it, the circumstances of it, everything, extremely suspect.