No lying about your role.
No claims before L-2. If you start the day with a guilty and you intend to claim on that day, keep it until the end of the day or when discussion dies down.
No quickhammering.
![Image](http://i292.photobucket.com/albums/mm19/bekkkkki/up-leon_the_professional.jpg)
No women, no kids.
I've gotta say Gamr, I don't like the way you wrote that.
It's not how I would describe it. It's the disrespect that IceNinja has for everyone voting for Garmr. He boasts like he knows a scum trap when he sees one. I have great doubts about the inferences that can be made from the Garmr wagon.In post 150, Thor665 wrote:How would you describe the wagon on him?In post 149, Albert B. Rampage wrote:"Garmr is the easy baitwagon." Please, don't insult us.
I'm not saying that IceNinja is scum at all. He isn't even annoying. He's simply insulting my intelligence, and everyone on the Garmr wagon.In post 153, Thor665 wrote:Are you saying Iec is scum or are you saying he's annoying to you on a personal levl?
Because if it's the first then your current vote makes no sense.
If it's the latter, I'm not sure the value in bringing it up if you don't care to defend the wagon and/or your vote instead of just tossing back annoyance at him.
You're welcomeIn post 154, toolenduso wrote:Why thank you.In post 151, Albert B. Rampage wrote:#147 is literally a piece of crap.
He's not part of my town list, and that's good enough reason. The list will remain undisclosed. As I said, I'm functioning by process of elmination and picking off whoever doesn't make the list.In post 152, toolenduso wrote:My question for you is this -- what led to your gut feeling that it was worth it to put Garmr at L-2?
On day 1, explaining this makes scum play better, and makes it easier for other players to meta me. I don't want to dwell on this. I'll explain a town read if I have to.In post 157, toolenduso wrote:@ABR: I don't get how saying who you think is town benefits the mafia. Could you explain?
You caught meIn post 163, ICEninja wrote:Now you're just being rude.ABR wrote: Thor, don't call IceNinja Iec. It's an insult to Iecerint.
Are you on crack? Because you clearly don't know who you're dealing with.In post 159, ICEninja wrote:Also, I never said it was a scum trap, it's the easy wagon. Scum jump on the easiest person to lynch day 1, which you've done.
Yup.In post 204, ICEninja wrote:a lot of my reasoning for finding him scum is wrong.
Could be a mix of trying to post content and getting into an argument with you.In post 208, Thor665 wrote:What about the misrep?In post 206, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I don't understand the reasons for voting Slandaar. His exchange with Thor isn't scummy IMO.
That's page 30. Being certain of something on page 30 is a long shot from page 10, with the amount of information we've both seen from Slandaar.In post 261, Thor665 wrote:Yes, I do.In post 252, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Nowhere in those games do you put a general call out to lynch the person you thought was scum.
Let's just go to the first game I linked.
There's one.In post 727, Thor665 wrote:All your votes are currently useless. Either start making *amazing* cases on your chosen target, or move somewhere useful.
Sheeping me is allowed.
There's another.In post 767, Thor665 wrote:I'm going to go ahead and lob 'not reading thread' as another reason people should sheep me on Slaine.
What other lies are you basing this case on?
The quote from Thor above is the only reason meta was brought up in the first place.In post 230, Thor665 wrote:Heck, i literally just had a Newbie end where I did this.
Day 1 *and* Day 2.
i can link if you'd like to continue to claim that you remotely understand how I play the game as town or scum.
The quote above is missing an "I" at the beginning of the sentence and is meant to be read from my perspective. In other words, "I've read the games you linked and it isn't a good defence."In post 246, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Read the first two games Thor has linked. Thor is scum.
I'll repeat again: the only reason his games were brought up was because he used "meta" as a defence. He posted some games and failed to show any correlation. I asked for the 3 most recent games because he said "I just completed a newbie where I did exactly this! Can link if you want!".In post 292, Sir Bastion wrote:Albert's original case relies too much on him appealing to authority and I frankly feel it's only gained weight because of the claim that thor's play is not consistent with the three other he posted.
I never said I know how Thor plays as scum, but I do recognize good play.In post 297, Thor665 wrote:Step 2: Later the same day, he knows exactly how Thor plays as scum or town, and can apply that in a case on Thor.
So you can lynch Slandaar with minimal contribution from most players on Day 1.In post 311, Thor665 wrote:Now we also need to point out that town do this sort of thing all the time.
So why do you think I am one of those players who, when town wouldn't, and when scum would change my playstyle and do exactly that?
Oh, look what I found. Were you describing yourself from the future?In post 70, Thor665 wrote:flailing is a tell that basically means 'looking desperate and trying to latch onto anything to prove they don't look scummy'