Mafiascum.net

Seanald - 2 (penguin_alien, Baezu)
Nero Cain - 1 (Bulbazak)
Amethyst Kitty - 1 (PeregrineV)

All votes are in play.



Last votecount was page 216, post 5379.

*was scum so

In post 3388, Nachomamma8 wrote:

In post 3385, Nero Cain wrote:all that scum hunting from the Haylen slot.

vote: Haylen/Rena

Vote: Nero Cain

Both are generally solid votes.

Here Nacho votes me.

In post 3533, Nachomamma8 wrote:

In post 3471, Nero Cain wrote:Nacho, what made you switch your vote from Thad to me?

your "scumcho is voting him, so he's probably town" post.

Then Nacho lies about why he voted me.

<---doesn't see how that's a lie

<---also thinks this discussion is a distraction because it isn't about lynching rena

In post 5399, ffullisade wrote:

In post 5396, Nero Cain wrote:question: Nacho had attacked me for attacking Rena. What does this say about his slot?

he also attacked you before he realised rena scum so

ok and? Its impossible for scum to backtrack?

So, you think Nacho's attack on me has nothing to do with anything, right?

In post 5403, Cephrir wrote:<---doesn't see how that's a lie

^
is scum so it doesn't matter.

But it is a lie/backtrack.

Nacho said he switched his vote for reason X but he already switched his vote before reason X. And Nacho already admitted to lying/screwing up. I just think its not an honest mistake as he's trying to make it out to be.

In post 5404, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 5399, ffullisade wrote:

In post 5396, Nero Cain wrote:question: Nacho had attacked me for attacking Rena. What does this say about his slot?

he also attacked you before he realised rena scum so

ok and? Its impossible for scum to backtrack?

So, you think Nacho's attack on me has nothing to do with anything, right?

what are you doing

nero I want you to be town plz don't things that are not town like try to break up this beautiful bond we all have going on here.

so he backtracked on a read. town does it too. so why are you making this a thing like it doesn't ever happen.

????????

I'm not surprised that the whole conversation went over your head, Mollie.

But whatever. We can continue this conversation later 'cause we already have 3 good suspects in Bulb, Rena, Cephir.

In post 5336, Bulbazak wrote:@HD: I'm not trying to push anything. I'm just saying that you should have some line of reasoning behind your actions. Whether you think I'm town or scum, you should have some line of thought that led you to that conclusion in conjunction with ThAd's actions, who you are claiming is scum. I'm just curious about your thought process, because you have been hiding in the background since d2.

No.

There's a difference between "Do you believe ThAd's claimed kill choice affects my alignment?" or "C'mon, you think ThAd's kill choice affects my alignment !"

In post 5408, Nero Cain wrote:????????

I'm not surprised that the whole conversation went over your head, Mollie.

But whatever. We can continue this conversation later 'cause we already have 3 good suspects in Bulb, Rena, Cephir.

then vote rena

I think bulba may actually be town

In post 5393, Desperado wrote:

In post 5383, Baezu wrote:Desp, why not vote for Sean today?

Because everything Rena has said today has d fake/like she isn't reading the thread, despite her having an extremely powerful role that entirely depends on her ability to read the game and predict the scum's behavior. Her posts don't give any indication that she's capable of that, or even interested in doing so...which means she's faking it.

A role is only as good as the player. This player has no clue how to play this role, so she's playing it as vanilla. As I have said already.

In post 5409, ffullisade wrote:

In post 5408, Nero Cain wrote:????????

I'm not surprised that the whole conversation went over your head, Mollie.

But whatever. We can continue this conversation later 'cause we already have 3 good suspects in Bulb, Rena, Cephir.

then vote rena

I think bulba may actually be town

As a last resort sure. I want to see Bulb scum eat rope.

In post 5404, Nero Cain wrote:So, you think Nacho's attack on me has nothing to do with anything, right?

ok, in a concrete answer what do you think it is? cuz all im getting from your posts, is that your thinking nacho is buddies with rena.

*strangles Sean*

well you're not very clear with what you are trying to get across

Bulbie really shouldn't be getting lynched

In post 5375, PeregrineV wrote:
In 15 days, let's sum up your scumhunting:
Cephrir: Rena->PeregrineV->Rena
from 37 posts.

So, make a significant contribution or get vigged.

This is Ironic, really, really Ironic

In post 5347, Nachomamma8 wrote:Bulbazak, has Rena produced any valuable information? No. And watchers are strong as fuck. Do you really think it's that impossible for a different investigative role not to have any valuable information at this point if one even exists?

Personally, I don't see how Watchers are any stronger then, let's say, a cop, since they have to actually be watching the right person, and then they only find out who visited that person, meaning they get nothing alignment related. Cop would actually be stronger, since that role at least gets alignment information.

If we were to say that town doesn't have any watcher/tracker, then that leaves 2 possible investigative roles left: cop and gunsmith. If we had a cop, I'd expect that he would have had enough information by this point to reveal it and essentially ensure a town win (4 innocents creates a nice block.). Same for gunsmith, since the vig has already claimed, that only leaves mafia with a gun.

What I want you to explain is why we should lynch what could be our only remaining investigative role, because I'm not seeing the logic behind it.

In post 5353, Desperado wrote:there isn't a big enough for this shit. Seanald put on a nice show in the QT overnight and appeared to have committed himself to the game, and then he does nothing but sheep a post I made about Bulb and whatever these two posts were meant to do.

Let me get this straight... I called it right when I said that Seanald said something to you in your QT that made you question your scumread on him, and yet you attacked me for even suggesting it? What the heck, Desp?

In post 5364, Nero Cain wrote: ?????
So Bulb never joined the Sean wagon yesterday? I'll have to look into that.

I don't like this at all. You'd have to go out of your way to misunderstand what CTD said. There is no way you could have gotten this out of that, especially since a simple ISO would show you you're wrong. This is just a way to softly manipulate people into thinking I'm scummy, that way you don't have to work as hard to push my wagon.

The same can be said for everything else Nero has done in relation to my wagon recently. He's starting to go very subtle with his misinformation.

In post 5364, Nero Cain wrote:

Answer this question straight up, because you've dodged the fuck out of it, Nero:
Why was your vote on Slandaar at the end of the day and not on Bulba? You had to concede the only reason you had given to suspect Slandaar and you had been making a strong case and push against Bulba up until the deadline frenzy.

I don't think I've ever dodged this. I think Slan's explanation that "we should assume the max # of scum" was craptastic and the fact that scum already tried to push a 7-8 man scum game made me fairly suspicious. In hindsight, I goofed but its ok 'cause we can lynch Bulbscum today.

Answer the question.

In post 5389, Nachomamma8 wrote:

In post 5379, mastin2 wrote:4 days, 3 hours, 53 minutes.

and still no one wants to join the nero cain wagon

I don't like the Rena wagon, and Nero is still scum.

In post 5408, Human Destroyer wrote:

In post 5336, Bulbazak wrote:@HD: I'm not trying to push anything. I'm just saying that you should have some line of reasoning behind your actions. Whether you think I'm town or scum, you should have some line of thought that led you to that conclusion in conjunction with ThAd's actions, who you are claiming is scum. I'm just curious about your thought process, because you have been hiding in the background since d2.

No.

There's a difference between "Do you believe ThAd's claimed kill choice affects my alignment?" or "C'mon, you

must

think ThAd's kill choice affects my alignment

somehow

!"

All I'm trying to do is understand your thought process, especially since you've been coasting since d2. However, all you're doing is trying to squelch discussion, which is a humongous scumtell for me.

Seriously, what is it with people lately not wanting to discuss their motivations?

Nero

Stop, please

Pretty, pretty please?

Nacho isn't scum, I was wrong about that earlier but people can be wrong and still be town

Bulb

In post 5419, Amethyst Kitty wrote:Bulb

What?

Leave Nero alone

He's town

and Rena is scum, you can't not lynch a person just because they are an investigative or a PR

I'm not seeing Nero-town, and I have not seen an adequate reason why Rena should be lynched.

and the game isn't run on logic

not all the time

look at Slenderman mafia

Pedit: what do you think of Nacho's "Rena claimed, but is still not doing any contribution and doesn't have any information yet" case because I think it's a good reason