Bah, charter and Infinitive are both sticking up for DLS. Could be a link between any of them. Could be Scum, Masons or Cult. Ain't much but at least something. IGMEOY.charter wrote:Yeah, I put someone at L-1 because I wasn't thinking and I was the prime suspect for scum for the rest of the game. (when I was in fact the cop)Infinitive wrote:Hey, I got L-1'd on the first page of my first game. Sometimes people just have a brain fart when they're setting the random votes. I'm still not convinced of anything.
The corollary is that I got lynched on the top of page 4, so maybe that just means that my first game was screwy.
Here, Infinitive is, IMO, defending DLS after Hang 'em High's vote on her. Afterwards, charter agrees with Infinitive, thus two people are possibly trying to get suspisoun (grr) off DLS.....charter wrote:Yeah, I put someone at L-1 because I wasn't thinking and I was the prime suspect for scum for the rest of the game. (when I was in fact the cop)Infinitive wrote:Hey, I got L-1'd on the first page of my first game. Sometimes people just have a brain fart when they're setting the random votes. I'm still not convinced of anything.
The corollary is that I got lynched on the top of page 4, so maybe that just means that my first game was screwy.
I agree with you Nudude, that we need people to post regardless of if they have something to post about, else we won't ever find scum.
See? I'd say your getting a bit over-defensive.... I didn't even vote or FOS you.... (well, okay. IGMEOY is pretty much the same).hang 'em high wrote:-- he merely pointed out a possible connection and didn't go overboard in his conclusions. At this point everything we have to go on is fairly insignificant, so I can hardly blame Vamp for doing so. It's not as if he is advocating a lynch based on this post.
What? You say that it's "interestng that" I "used HeH's words to support my own defence", then you say the exact same thing as him and unvote me? That seems a little.... odd to me... FOSGorgon wrote:VL using HeH's words to support his own defense is interesting and worthy of note.
However, I agree that what he did isn't lynchworthy.
Unvote, for now.
It's almost like he's telling his scum-buddies to do one of these things, or a quick way to raise a topic to discuss during the night.Thanatos wrote: By not killing you, the scum has two options. (assuming you're town)
1. They kill you, deciding that you're worth the effort because you're a Doc.
2. They let you live, and kill someone else. By doing this, they have the ability to kill someone else, and then you're almost sure to be dead on D2 or 3. By doing this, they draw alot of suspicion off of themselves, take away a lynch from the town, give us the moral defeat of killing off our own doc, and get one more townie killed than they would have if they killed you.
If there was a vig, a SKThanatos wrote:hmm..I did a short re-read over some things, and noticed that it was insurgent that pushed me over the edge about the the DT lynch. If there was a vig, that might be a reason.
charter wrote:102- Finds a post of DLS's scummy. Now that I reread it, even though it's meant to be a sarcastic post, it could be made out to look like a joke, anyhow, I find it HIGHLY scummy as well. She thinks in 101 that HeH and DT are scum buddies. Who got lynched yesterday? Who got killed last night? Quite the remarkable coincidence to me.
DLS wrote:If only things were that simple.....
Humm, I see.... and agree.Disciple Slayer wrote:I make a prediction. DLS accuses me of assuming things.Dark_Lady_Shaiann wrote:Wait....what did all of that have to do with me? Are you assuming that simply because I defended S_K that I shall now defend Thanatos, because HeH hinted that there was a possible link between me and S_K becuase I defended her and we had consecutive votes on the player who died N1?Disciple Slayer wrote:I just gave a PBPA and you FOS me for quoting the words of a dead townie? I think your reasoning is flawed. Here's a vote to pressure you into more information.
Vote: Thanatos
Now watch as DLS rushes to defend him in her next post.
Thanatos backs DLS up.Thanatos wrote:I believe/believed that DSes comments about me were him saying "HeH suspected Thanatos, because SK lurked." which is stupid. I may have missinterepreted it, I don't know. But, if I read correctly, DLS read it that way, so maybe I didn't...
DLS backs up Thanatos, just as I predicted.Dark_Lady_Shaiann wrote:I agree with this.Thanatos wrote: My Vote on him is because he continues to ignore things brought up against him. Like, for example, how he has yet to comment on the fact that the "good points brought up against me" were dropped within that same page, and because he continues to be unreasponcive.
I never went on an all-out offensive against anyone, but at the first sign of trouble (a list of players suspected by HeH at some point during the game, regardless whether he cleared them afterwards or not), DLS and Thanatos once again reveal their ties to each other.
Other people please comment and add your own thoughts on this fiasco. It seems to be growing into what could potentially be the most important discussion of D2.
Me aswell, but I'm leaning closer to scum for Thanatos and DLS.Nudude wrote:I'm finding it hard to get a read on DLS, Thanatos and DS at the moment...there's way to much static in there, and I feel the reason is it's a bit confusing trying to figure out what everyone means.
Who's are they?DLS wrote:No, I don't have anything to say about that. I'm commenting on DS's methods right now.... not really on his points, which really aren't even his.
I don't like that either.DLS wrote:OK...I lied.
Even if it's minor, IMO. (Not suggesting anything off this).mith wrote:Lying is bad for the town.
Defending DLS/Thanatos? It gets even better.Infinitive wrote:Anyway, in summary,FOS: Disciple Slayerfor a long, incongruous series of suspicious analyses of other peoples' thoughts, omitting quotations directly relevant to a PBPA, and seeming to bait out a supposed connection between two people that is on its face suspect at best.
Seems all big 'n happy now someone else is going against DS, 3 way scum? Don't get me wrong, I ain't all that suspicous of Infinitive. And Thanatos' vote seems like an OMGUS to me.Thanatos wrote:Thank you for your comments, Infinitive.
I'd say he means he isn't happy about my time of claiming etccharter wrote:By not happy do you mean you're not satisfied he's the cop? If so please tell me why. Or do you mean you're not satisfied that he claimed when he did?Infinitive wrote:And counterclaim or not, I'm still not happy with the VL copclaim. Sorry.
I'm puzzled, here you claim as townie- why didn't you want to claim before? Or were you claiming as Pro-Town?Thanatos wrote:Remember, if I'm scum, I have the ability to screw you around. It also means that, I as a townie, can lead you to something useful, far more than DLS has shown herself to be capable of.