Mini 471: End.

pickemgenius · Post Post #6 (isolation #0) » Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:23 am

Vote:Adel
Vote:Albert B. Rampage
Vote:kravhen
Vote:deadscilent
Vote:Erotomachia
Vote:camisade
Vote:NabakovNabakov
Vote:pickemgenius
Vote:CrashTextDummie
Vote:Patrick
Vote:Sir Tornado
Vote:Blue Zebra

How's that for casting the widest net ever in the first post?

pickemgenius · Post Post #7 (isolation #1) » Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:23 am

EBWOP: SECOND POST DAMZ JOO ALBERT

pickemgenius · Post Post #9 (isolation #2) » Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:25 am

Unvote: EVERYONE!!!!

Vote: Camisade

FOS:

deadscilent, Adel

K, found our scum, can we end this game already?

pickemgenius · Post Post #18 (isolation #3) » Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:51 am

Sir Tornado wrote:
Erotomachia wrote:I'll throw out a random
vote: deadscilent
for having a name I don't understand.
Er... I thought it was simple: "dead's client"

Right?

OMFG SO WRONG.

Unvote:

Vote: SIR TORNADO

ALSO I CALL BULLSHIT ON Blue Zebra, his display pic is a fucking monkey, LAL!!!!!!!!

P.S <3 random voting stage

pickemgenius · Post Post #24 (isolation #4) » Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:35 pm

Well' since i've already picked the scum, can we just lynch them and get it over with, this game is taking foreverz ZOMFG

pickemgenius · Post Post #30 (isolation #5) » Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:45 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote:
Who are they again, Pickem?

ME BITCHES!!!! wrote:Vote: Camisade

FOS: deadscilent, Adel

K, found our scum, can we end this game already?

pickemgenius · Post Post #31 (isolation #6) » Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:46 pm

IN that case, I'm ignoring my own advice,SHIT!!!!!

UNVOTE:

VOTE: ADEL

HAI ADELZZ

FUX JOO STILLZ

pickemgenius · Post Post #60 (isolation #7) » Wed Jul 11, 2007 12:20 pm

I totally rule at getting the game started FTR..

pickemgenius · Post Post #66 (isolation #8) » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:20 pm

Adel wrote: esp. if it is a VI who cast the hammer vote.

pssssst.

How do you know we have a VI?

pickemgenius · Post Post #75 (isolation #9) » Wed Jul 11, 2007 5:49 pm

camisade wrote:Is Village Idiot an actual role? Or is it just someone that's stupid? [/noob]

Cause pickemgenius sure acts like one, no offense.

No.

How dare you....

pickemgenius · Post Post #86 (isolation #10) » Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:32 am

kravhen wrote:
and it wasn't a "OMG ADEL FUXKZ U STILZ" vote.

My reputation is spreading throughout the masses

pickemgenius · Post Post #101 (isolation #11) » Thu Jul 12, 2007 11:45 am

Blue Zebra wrote:
BTW, pickem is active lurking, which is worse than regular lurking.

unvote, vote: pickemgenius

You make me laugh, actively lurking on page 4

.

Says the guy with 2 posts that only have even a smidgeon of content.

FTR: I don't start playing till everyone has shown up.(CTD)

pickemgenius · Post Post #104 (isolation #12) » Thu Jul 12, 2007 11:57 am

EBWOTP:

Page 5....

pickemgenius · Post Post #123 (isolation #13) » Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:07 am

Oh hai!!

I can start playing now!

pickemgenius · Post Post #126 (isolation #14) » Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:01 am

kravhen dops fourth vote on Adel post 42.
kravhen's post 56 is somewhat icky.

Adel is a bit defensive in post 57, don't like the

Adel wrote: Placing a forth vote on someone on page two means that you are awfully willing to see a quicklynch based upon two or three posts from most people.

part of it for sure.

Sir Tornado defends Adel in post 58 (nothing scum-worthy, just worth a mention), and goes after kravhen.
My post 60 is totally true.... STILL

Adel wrote:Common scum tactic:

1. Place vote on someone who already has a vote.
2. Wait patiently
...
4. Mislynch!

Lynches on day one are often close to random, so resting a vote on a player early is an easy way to shift the odds a little in the direction of that innocent townie player getting lynched. I think it is interesting that lynch -2 isn't close to a mislynch in your eyes... two votes away, and those two can come quick, and when the result is a mislynch it is hard to say who is the scummiest, esp. if it is a VI who cast the hammer vote.

I disagree completely that lynches day one are random, and if they are, you have a really shitty town. L-3, not L-2 is fine for where we were at this point of the game. Don't like mention of VI hammering/voting you to quicklynch reference, almost like anticipating a scum buddy to be the VI, and then being all, but he/she is just the VI so we can write them off.

I like Eroto post 69.

I totally hate Camisade's post 72, well the second half of it anyway.

kravhen in post 73 calls his vote the only valid one out of the four on ADel.

Not sure what to make of the middle portion of post 73 yet.

Second half of Adel's post 76 is skecthy.

To Answer ABR post 90 I give the quoted post an N- no tell or read of alignment can be made from it.

kravhen wrote:
I also want to use this opportunity to shift some focus to those who still have their votes on Adel
. For all we know they could be scum that placed their votes first disguised in randomvoteness and patiently waiting for lynch. Or they could be scumbuddies that think Adel's identity is compromised and dont dare defend her =P

I personally don't like this part of your post 92, it's like hey now that I'm off the Adel wagon I can start criticizing those still on it.

Sir T, more defense of Adel/ attack on kravhen in post 94.

Sir T asking for clarification from Adel in post 98

Blue Zebra votes me for "actively lurking", which FTR he has been basically doing.

Adel wrote: Sometimes I'm willing to say things that I know will be misinterpreted. I think it was worth risking this conversation to make my point. I'm ok with appearing a little scummy when I play town so that I can be more free in what I say.

You shouldn't say things that could be misinterpreted.
If you are town it's not worth being scummy for the sake of being able to say crazy shit.

Eroto calls for more activity from others, and says ABR should share some of his own opinions, when Eroto hasn't really said alot this game.

w00t post 500!!! ZOMFG

pickemgenius · Post Post #128 (isolation #15) » Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:07 am

Adel wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:You shouldn't say things that could be misinterpreted.
If you are town it's not worth being scummy for the sake of being able to say crazy shit.
Hell, that is what I really enjoy about being town: I can really get into the psychological warfare aspect of this game. I am all about forcing scumtells by using torture as an interrogation technique.

You do roll crazy.

pickemgenius · Post Post #131 (isolation #16) » Sat Jul 14, 2007 1:01 pm

unvote: Adel

Vote: Camisade

pickemgenius · Post Post #134 (isolation #17) » Sat Jul 14, 2007 2:16 pm

Blue Zebra wrote:
Is there a specific reason you voted camisade, pickem?

Heh, hasn't said much, ofcourse Patrick hasn't said much (he will though) and CTD hasn't been able to post a bunch, and from what I've seen from him doesn't post a shitload anyway, so that's why for now.

pickemgenius · Post Post #183 (isolation #18) » Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:26 pm

kravhen wrote: Pickemgenius: He has been pretty active, yet he doesn't have alot of content. He's got that huge post of is which is alot more a resumÃ© of the game so far than it is about giving his opinion. Alot of posts but nothing that really stands out or helps town. Hey he might really be an active lurker.

- Umm how can I say this..... I am always brief, I let people do dumb shit on their own, and hey that's where I come in and briefly beat the shit out of it.

Now on for a true gem in this post:

kravhen wrote:
CrashTextDummie: <snip>Does anyone think this is a hint at being cop?

.

-

Trying to out possible power roles= SCUMMIER THEN FUCK.

- I don't ever recall getting worked up over your fourth vote on Adel(see:Patrick).

The second one isn't really bad, but I seriously don't remember getting worked up over it.

pickemgenius · Post Post #196 (isolation #19) » Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:28 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:Is it me or does Patrick always feel town ?

Is it just me or does anybody else feel uncomfortable with this.

I'll beat more shit down later, I usually do shit that nobody else has touched on.

pickemgenius · Post Post #219 (isolation #20) » Fri Jul 20, 2007 11:13 am

Sorry, busy day yesterday, and a pretty busy one today aswell.

*need to do shit for sure though tonight barring something awkward like last night*

- want to hear from Camisade aswell since i'm still liking my vote right now.

pickemgenius · Post Post #225 (isolation #21) » Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:24 pm

camisade wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:Sorry, busy day yesterday, and a pretty busy one today aswell.

*need to do shit for sure though tonight barring something awkward like last night*

- want to hear from Camisade aswell since i'm still liking my vote right now.
I don't even understand what the basis for your vote is (considering you gave no reason) besides that I called you a Village Idiot because you posted nothing but nonsense until CTD showed up.

Hmmm. Looks like I got you're attention.

Unvote

For now.

pickemgenius · Post Post #239 (isolation #22) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 7:49 am

kravhen wrote: I think we should make sure to point the spotlight at deadscilent for a while

^^^^^^^wtf

pickemgenius · Post Post #243 (isolation #23) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 8:43 am

kravhen wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
kravhen wrote: I think we should make sure to point the spotlight at deadscilent for a while

^^^^^^^wtf
You do realize that wtf isn't really a good question, right?

You do realize that the part I quoted is very very meh.

Somebody random votes, then the tell us they'll be gone for awhile.

To me that really doesn't sound like somebody that needs to be in the spotlight.

DS will post shit when he gets back, and if he doesn't then I will get on him.

pickemgenius · Post Post #247 (isolation #24) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 9:17 am

deadscilent wrote:
Sorry, Been busy the past few days
XD

Atticus, Im gunna be away the 19 to the 24th.

kravhen wrote:did you only read the part you quoted or did you actually read my whole post? because I think I explain myself clearly enough..

kravhen wrote: Deadscilent had been completely silent since his random vote until saying he had to go away

pickemgenius wrote: DS will post shit when she gets back, and if he doesn't then I will get on him.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So you're saying since she had other shit going on that automatically we need to throw her into the spotlight for no fucking reason.

pickemgenius · Post Post #249 (isolation #25) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 9:36 am

kravhen wrote: Yes.
No wait, you're saying there's no fking reason? That's weird. I think any town would agree that it's for the best of the town to poke someone that hasn't talked at all yet.
Why do you think otherwise?

1. She was busy and said so.
2. She is gone and said so.

There is nothing gamewise that makes it worth lying about either one of those two.

pickemgenius · Post Post #252 (isolation #26) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:18 am

kravhen wrote:
here is nothing gamewise that makes it worth lying about either one of those two.
I think there is. Getting pickem to defend you is worthy enough.

Go after a "lurker" as you somehow put it is incredibly easy to do if you are scum.

I can defend whoever the fuck I want whenever I want.

pickemgenius · Post Post #253 (isolation #27) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:21 am

kravhen wrote:
There is nothing gamewise that makes it worth lying about either one of those two.
I think there is. Getting pickem to defend you is worthy enough.

What does she gain from this?

pickemgenius · Post Post #256 (isolation #28) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 11:24 am

kravhen wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
kravhen wrote:
here is nothing gamewise that makes it worth lying about either one of those two.
I think there is. Getting pickem to defend you is worthy enough.

Go after a "lurker" as you somehow put it is incredibly easy to do if you are scum.

I can defend whoever the fuck I want whenever I want.
Isn't it just as incredibly easy for a lurker to just say "i was busy" and "im going away"?

MAYBE IT'S THE FUCKING TRUTH......

ZOMG MAYBE SHE HAS A LIFE OH NOES!!!! SCUM SCUM SCUM!!!!

pickemgenius · Post Post #257 (isolation #29) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 11:27 am

kravhen wrote:Your love.
Seriously, im more concerned about why you're opposed to her being the center of attention for a bit when she comes back. I dont see why you'd see that as anti-town.

If she doesn't post something when she comes back then I will get on her ass(haven't I said that like a million times).

AORN(as of right now) all she's done is be busy and go on vacation (presumably) OMG!!!

pickemgenius · Post Post #261 (isolation #30) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:07 pm

kravhen wrote:pickem chill.. even with my accusations I have still kept in consideration that she may have told the truth... I'm just voicing that there is still the possibility that she is lying... You keep assuming that I'm saying "zomg 100% scum, lets lynchgogo". On the other side, you seem 100% sure she AINT scum.

When have I said this?

kravhen wrote:so for you it's completely out of this world that a scum LIES?

I'm not saying she lied on all her statements, but
come on. Zero content. Not a single little opinion. Ok maybe she IS away until the 24th. She could still post just once or twice before leaving. I raise my eyebrow at you suddenly hopping on your horses to defend DS like that.

kravhen wrote:
And as I've said a million times already too, without an answer from you, why did you suddenly hop on your horses and think I did this extremely horribly controversial thing when I just said we should put the spotlight on deadscilent
when she's back
?
Why dont you agree?

SHE GAINS

NOTHING

FROM LYING ABOUT BEING BUSY IRL, AND BEING ON VACATION.

What statements is she lying about, you seem to think she is lying about something, what is it?????

Maybe she was busy.... FTW??

Raise your eyebrow, I really could care less.

Why don't I agree?

*sigh*

If she comes back and doesn't post something then I will get on her....

kravhen wrote:Gee another replacement... And tomorrow deadscilent's back. I think we should make sure to point the spotlight at deadscilent for a while. All these replacements and people going away make it hard and confusing to get a good read on people and associating the previous person's behavior to the new. Deadscilent had been completely silent since his random vote until saying he had to go away. IMO this could very well be an opportunity to continue lurking for a bit in hopes that we elect a lynchee in the meantime.

FOS: deadscilent
because no one can read him since he has 0 non-random posts.

YOU PUT THE SPOTLIGHT ON HER

BEFORE

SHE WAS BACK WITH THIS POST(see: italics/part bolded above not in this quote, but other one)

pickemgenius · Post Post #263 (isolation #31) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:15 pm

kravhen wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
kravhen wrote:pickem chill.. even with my accusations I have still kept in consideration that she may have told the truth... I'm just voicing that there is still the possibility that she is lying... You keep assuming that I'm saying "zomg 100% scum, lets lynchgogo". On the other side, you seem 100% sure she AINT scum.

When have I said this?

When have I said ZOMG SHE HAS A LIFE SCUM SCUM SCUM! ?
It sucks having people make you say things you haven't, doesn't it?

You need your sarcas-o-meter checked out or something.....

kravhen wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
kravhen wrote:so for you it's completely out of this world that a scum LIES?

I'm not saying she lied on all her statements, but
come on. Zero content. Not a single little opinion. Ok maybe she IS away until the 24th. She could still post just once or twice before leaving. I raise my eyebrow at you suddenly hopping on your horses to defend DS like that.

kravhen wrote:
And as I've said a million times already too, without an answer from you, why did you suddenly hop on your horses and think I did this extremely horribly controversial thing when I just said we should put the spotlight on deadscilent
when she's back
?
Why dont you agree?
SHE GAINS
NOTHING
FROM LYING ABOUT BEING BUSY IRL, AND BEING ON VACATION.

What statements is she lying about, you seem to think she is lying about something, what is it?????

Maybe she was busy.... FTW??
lying about being away, being busy, duh...

pickemgenius wrote:
If she comes back and doesn't post something then I will get on her....

Wait, that means we agree with each other doesn't it? . . .
Spotlight = get on her

right? you thought so right?

WHAT THE HELL GAME-WISE DOES SHE GAIN BY LYING ABOUT BEING BUSY/ON VACATION????

ALSO NO WE DON'T AGREE.

pickemgenius wrote:
kravhen wrote:Gee another replacement... And tomorrow deadscilent's back. I think we should make sure to point the spotlight at deadscilent for a while. All these replacements and people going away make it hard and confusing to get a good read on people and associating the previous person's behavior to the new. Deadscilent had been completely silent since his random vote until saying he had to go away. IMO this could very well be an opportunity to continue lurking for a bit in hopes that we elect a lynchee in the meantime.

FOS: deadscilent
because no one can read him since he has 0 non-random posts.

YOU PUT THE SPOTLIGHT ON HER
BEFORE
SHE WAS BACK WITH THIS POST(see: italics/part bolded above not in this quote, but other one)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I WANT THE PRESSURE ON HRE ONLY

IF

SHE DOESN'T RESPOND WHEN SHE GETS BACK.

YOU

PUT THE SPOTLIGHT ON HER

NOW

.... WITH THAT POST.....

pickemgenius · Post Post #265 (isolation #32) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:06 pm

kravhen wrote:You need to get your caps lock key checked out or something...

Anyway this bickering is useless... We agree on the same thing, dude.
I dont get the "you put spotlight on her NOW" thing. You make it sound like I want everyone to bitch about her while she's gone and lynch her before she's back. That's crazy. When she's back, everyone will turn one of their two eyes on her, expecting some activity at last. That's it, that's all. And don't say "IF" she doesn't post. I think even if she's a lurking scum she will post after the date she's back. The point is not to beat on her IF she doesn't post. She WILL post. The point is to
listen
to her.[/i]

This bickering is only a little bit useless...
Yet if this has been so useless how is it that you've noted shit from it??

Yes you were putting the spotlight on her before she got back.

I still say if she posts, i'm not 100% she'll post something good.

pickemgenius · Post Post #268 (isolation #33) » Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:21 pm

Adel wrote:
pickemgenius wrote: I still say if she posts, i'm not 100% she'll post something good.
She'd have to be an idiot to not be on her toes after all of the post about here that you two just made. I think both of you probably had protown motivations to bicker, but the result is that a player is now less likely to drop accurate scumtells. Sometimes it is better to shut your mouth and just
wait
.

So like do what I did before hand, and got bitched at for?

awesome.

this is somewhat sarcastic

pickemgenius · Post Post #272 (isolation #34) » Tue Jul 24, 2007 7:12 pm

Prod:deadscilent

Please

pickemgenius · Post Post #277 (isolation #35) » Tue Jul 24, 2007 9:03 pm

kravhen wrote:You also had stated you'd be back on the 24th. Your scumbuddy pickemgenius missed you, dont you like the love?

*plows through pile of nasty smoke, and a wretched foul smell*

What are you on again?

pickemgenius · Post Post #294 (isolation #36) » Wed Jul 25, 2007 1:47 pm

BOO SV- Just for a change of pace

[/sarcasm]

pickemgenius · Post Post #308 (isolation #37) » Sat Jul 28, 2007 3:44 pm

deadscilent wrote:hmm.

Hi.

pickemgenius · Post Post #310 (isolation #38) » Sun Jul 29, 2007 7:28 pm

Vote: DS

FOS:

Camisade

pickemgenius · Post Post #318 (isolation #39) » Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:11 pm

deadscilent wrote:No I take that back

unvote: Blue zebra.

vote:Haut boy

........

pickemgenius · Post Post #332 (isolation #40) » Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:27 am

Limited Access next 3 days because Czech Festival

.

pickemgenius · Post Post #361 (isolation #41) » Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:01 am

Erotomachia wrote:If you sign up for a game you should do your best to win and help out your team.

So like... whose team is she on?

pickemgenius · Post Post #365 (isolation #42) » Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:00 pm

deadscilent wrote:lol I know, but I thought I'd take a different swing on things.

I guarentee you I am on the townies side.

I fogot about my vote for crash text when I made the vote for zebra, so I changed it back, because I dont think I've heard enough from haut, but as it stands, Im keeping my vote for him.

Hey... umm...

Is it common practice to have jesters in a mini normal?

Unvote

until I mull that over.

pickemgenius · Post Post #371 (isolation #43) » Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:42 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote:I'm going to brand her the VI of this game.

Way ahead of you.

That's why I threw in the jester comment.

VI essentialy =jester- win condition of jester.

pickemgenius · Post Post #388 (isolation #44) » Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:46 pm

kravhen wrote:
Adel wrote: I'm not really committed to voting for Haut Boy, but I am interested in being a part of the wagon on him because I am interested in where it is going.
You do roll crazy.

Hey you.

I say that.

pickemgenius · Post Post #406 (isolation #45) » Wed Aug 08, 2007 5:58 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote:Pickem hasn't beaten nearly as much shit as he said he would.

There is very little shit beating needed right now.

pickemgenius · Post Post #415 (isolation #46) » Thu Aug 09, 2007 11:59 am

I'll be in Hawaii for 10 days starting August 9th (tomorrow).

I should have access, but like not alot of time to post stuff.

I would love to

not

be replaced.

and

Vote: Haut Boy

pickemgenius · Post Post #558 (isolation #47) » Fri Aug 17, 2007 5:16 pm

Hell why the hell did we lynch Adel?

That's is seriously all i've gotten/ and have time to post.

There is shit in her sig for a reason.

I'd love to post more Wifi blows out here.

pickemgenius · Post Post #560 (isolation #48) » Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:47 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:What shit in her sig ?

Adel's sig wrote:You do roll crazy.- pickemgenius
arrogant bitch - Occult
Quite eloquent, but severely misguided... - LML

stinking people with sigs turned off.

pickemgenius · Post Post #570 (isolation #49) » Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:36 pm

Hi this game along with a few others will need to be reread piece by piece over the next few days, should be full done by weekend, or end of weekend.

pickemgenius · Post Post #587 (isolation #50) » Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:43 pm

UP TO PAGE 8(not including)

quote="NabakovNabakov"]

Patrick wrote:CTD is scum in this game, I'm pretty sure of it.

Vote: CrashTextDummie

Ok, let's just go back over his posts:

CTD wrote:

Sounds scummy as hell to me.[/quote]

WORD!

Blue Zebra wrote:
Sir Tornado wrote:Adel wagon seems to have 4 votes now...
This is catastrophe!

I blame you.

unvote, vote: Sir Tornado

Jokey?

Blue Zebra wrote:
unvote, vote: camisade

....

camisade wrote:Is Village Idiot an actual role? Or is it just someone that's stupid? [/noob]

Cause pickemgenius sure acts like one, no offense.

Mad BOO.

-I can see post 94 being a post both scum and town would make, along with 87 to a lesser extent.

camisade wrote: I want to know why you're unvoting Adel just to get the suspicion off of you.
You even say in your post that's why you unvoted, which is very suspicious
. Then you want to question the people who did the exact same thing you did?

@ Bold- I disagree

Blue Zebra wrote:
kravhen wrote:I also want to use this opportunity to shift some focus to those who still have their votes on Adel. For all we know they could be scum that placed their votes first disguised in randomvoteness and patiently waiting for lynch. Or they could be scumbuddies that think Adel's identity is compromised and dont dare defend her =P
I don't like this. How are either of those possibilities more likely than the votes just being lingering random votes?

BTW, pickem is active lurking, which is worse than regular lurking.

unvote, vote: pickemgenius

High quality hypocrisy.

camisade wrote: You wanted to question the other people who voted for Adel, which you also did. That's what I meant by that.
I came out of lurking mode,
because I didn't have anything to add until you made the post, and you also asked for everyone else's take on the whole you vs Adel thing.

@Bold-ORLY?

NabakovNabakov wrote: Adel has proven that she has a tendancy to wagon townies
when she's playing as town
. This is an unfortunate tendancy,
but it seems to be an essential element to her townie playstyle
. That she
didn't
bus Krave into oblivion indicates a change in playstyle.
Hopefully, this is a permanent improvement in her townie playstyle
,<snip last part cause we know her role now>

Meh, but *see italics*

Blue Zebra wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:Speaking of which, what is your position ?
What's YOUR position?

awesome...

NabNab and ABR hop on, which *could* be a connection used later to lynch scum.

-Sir T goes after Kravhen in post 140.
-NabNab says

NabakovNabakov wrote:Sir T: I do feel you misrepresented Kravhen a bit in your analysis. You took everything he said to the extreme and said that he contradicted himself several times just because he threw out multiple therories. As much as his request for a focus elsewhere seems scummy, I feel he has a bit of a point, and I'm becoming more and more suspicious of the poeple who now seem too intent on making Kravhen look scummy.

in response, again interesting.

pickemgenius · Post Post #593 (isolation #51) » Thu Aug 30, 2007 5:22 pm

ChronX wrote:Hi I'm replacing Haut Boy and will be up to speed....er, as soon as possible.

yo...

looking forward to mroe fodder.

pickemgenius · Post Post #596 (isolation #52) » Fri Aug 31, 2007 1:36 pm

ChronX wrote:
Why was Kravkhen the scum's night kill?

yuck...

kthxbai

pickemgenius · Post Post #598 (isolation #53) » Fri Aug 31, 2007 2:33 pm

ChronX wrote:Geez I pay you a compliment and you toss out a cryptic nugget like that?

I basically read that.

Stopped.

POsted.

Started to read again.

I just don't like NK talk.

pickemgenius · Post Post #600 (isolation #54) » Fri Aug 31, 2007 3:39 pm

ChronX wrote:
Why was Kravkhen the scum's night kill?

pickemgenius wrote: I just don't like NK talk.

Atticus wrote:
Reminder
: Unless your role permits you to talk about the game outside of the thread, you may not.

I think that was what you did that for. If not ignore this.

pickemgenius · Post Post #611 (isolation #55) » Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:36 pm

Sir Tornado wrote:Ah, yes, this is, actually a good idea.

People who frequent scum chat and are playing this game:

Pickem
CTD
Sir T.

CTD was replaced by Haut Boy and then by Chronx, and is out of the game, but he still knows his role. It is likely he made a mistake and let his role slip out. Or, Pickem could.

na.

I kind of dig the vote on chronx.... in a weird gut wrenching wtf? kind of way.

pickemgenius · Post Post #613 (isolation #56) » Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:41 pm

ChronX wrote:I would say that given the result, a vote on me, Patrick's comment on his leaving the game is rather out of bounds.

mod?

/confused....

pickemgenius · Post Post #615 (isolation #57) » Sat Sep 01, 2007 6:50 pm

ChronX wrote:To clarify, my prod of the
mod
is to suggest that this game is an official clusterfuck. The day 1 lynch was based entirely on poor sportsmanship and CROSSgaming not metagaming. Now we have a person in the game and either a current or former player discussing the game while it is active.

I personally think it should be abandoned. This is not because the vote went to me, but because someone drew a conclusion based on improperly received information, which was a post that the poster got improper information.

What a mess.

Umm....

Patrick never even mentioned anybody in his post at all.....

pickemgenius · Post Post #616 (isolation #58) » Sat Sep 01, 2007 10:06 pm

UP TO PAGE 15 (and including!!!)

-Not a fan of post 208.By Blue Zebra, it rubs me the wrong way.

-I feel some of the CTD/Patrick interactions could be sucm distancing, but that's for later.

-

Haut Boy wrote:Here's what I have:

Unvote: Blue Zebra, Vote: Sir Tornado
. Dude, noncommittal is you! Going mostly off your post against kravhen, it seems you find him plenty suspiscious, so why the carp don't you vote for him?

-Weak reason for a vote imo.

-Post 282 makes me uneasy somewhat

camisade wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
Erotomachia wrote:If you sign up for a game you should do your best to win and help out your team.
So like... whose team is she on?
Blue Team

-quality answer here

pickemgenius · Post Post #623 (isolation #59) » Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:34 am

Atticus wrote:
kravhen replaces deadscilent! Be jovial!

/jovial

pickemgenius · Post Post #625 (isolation #60) » Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:37 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:...I'll lynch her again.

yeah... cause last time was...

"Great Success"

well... maybe to you it was anyway...

pickemgenius · Post Post #634 (isolation #61) » Sun Sep 02, 2007 4:52 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote: Now we will have a chance to determine her allignment for ourselves (and we already have a handy in-thread meta-game of Kravhen's town play).

I don't like this.

Seriously don't like this.

This is far from true... you're smarter then this NabNab...

pickemgenius · Post Post #640 (isolation #62) » Mon Sep 03, 2007 11:51 am

NabakovNabakov wrote:Pickem: I don't get what you're saying. My main complaint about VI's is that they're unscrutable. Now that we have a competent player in that role, we will actually have behavior to examine. How is that far from the truth?

You were basically saying that if kravhen acts like he did previously (we know his alignment), and if he does it again, he must be a townie again...

That's not neccessarily true....

pickemgenius · Post Post #642 (isolation #63) » Mon Sep 03, 2007 6:31 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote:Pickem: You read into me too much. All I said is that we now have a basis to form an opinion. I only mentioned the meta-game as an aside. I don't propose to rigidly adhere to it (you know I'm not a huge meta-gamer), I would treat it as I would a meta from a seperate game (looking for common tells and behavioral tics). I'm not sure how smart it would be to give wieght to differences in who New Kravhen defends or attacks (as opposed to Old Kravhen), it's too obvious WIFOM and feels vaguely unethical.

I go on these akward/weird questioning phases sometimes.

pickemgenius · Post Post #659 (isolation #64) » Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:30 am

ChronX wrote:/ooc Curious about this site: Do people conventionally consider themselves to have "won" if they are dead but their role was the side which ultimately wins?

Yes.

ChronX wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:We have to vote for someone, NOW.
Why? And why have you gotten a free pass for the horrible bandwagon you led against Adel?

He really hasn't gotten a free pass for leading the uber shitty Adel wagon...

In other news...

/giggles

pickemgenius · Post Post #668 (isolation #65) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 7:03 am

Blue Zebra wrote:Right now I want to know who Erotomachia and pickemgenius think are scum.

You, Albert, Theo(Camisade)

pickemgenius · Post Post #670 (isolation #66) » Sun Sep 09, 2007 1:22 pm

pickemgenius wrote:
Blue Zebra wrote:Right now I want to know who Erotomachia and pickemgenius think are scum.

You,
Albert, Theo(Camisade)

You, Chronx, D3sisted.

pickemgenius · Post Post #673 (isolation #67) » Mon Sep 10, 2007 7:08 pm

Vote: ChronX

pickemgenius · Post Post #686 (isolation #68) » Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:01 pm

ChronX wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
Vote: ChronX
Strong case, there. Do you have a posting restriction?

no....

you're probably scum.... i'd like to see you lynched atm.

pickemgenius · Post Post #688 (isolation #69) » Wed Sep 12, 2007 3:26 pm

ChronX wrote:Hmm, I may recondsider my vote and post an OMGUS on you, not because you are voting me but because, well....the acronym says it.

he he he

pickemgenius · Post Post #702 (isolation #70) » Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:19 am

ChronX wrote: I stand on my vote of Albert. Nothing scummy about voting to -3 the guy who lynched the doc.

I'm happy with my vote...

pickemgenius · Post Post #706 (isolation #71) » Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:32 pm

d3sisted wrote: Pickemgenius seems to have no attention span, so would be a good likely candidate to pile on eventually..as an example.

Excuse me...

pickemgenius · Post Post #728 (isolation #72) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:19 am

ChronX is at L-1 (if im counting right)

I agree with Albert.

(claim plz)

pickemgenius · Post Post #729 (isolation #73) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:19 am

pickemgenius wrote:ChronX is at L-1 (if im counting right)

I agree with Albert.

(claim plz
)

ima dumbass

i clicked last page, and it didnt give me the last page.

i blame the site..

pickemgenius · Post Post #730 (isolation #74) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:20 am

ChronX wrote: My vote on NabNab is OMGUS, but with reason, he tried to do this to SirT on day 1.

what?!?!?!

.....

pickemgenius · Post Post #732 (isolation #75) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 8:23 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
Unvote
.

I want to ask everyone this, if not for ChronX, who would you lynch ?

Blue Zebra.

But ChronX is scum, so i'd like to lynch him.

pickemgenius · Post Post #753 (isolation #76) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:26 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote: Nab, you're going down. Pickem, D3sisted, your next. If a single one of you is killed tonight, shame on me.

If you're wrong (*hint*you are) then shame on you....

pickemgenius · Post Post #757 (isolation #77) » Sun Sep 16, 2007 10:33 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:This is an official Rampage announcement:

READ MY LAST POSTS AND LET IT SINK IN. DON'T BE LAZY BASTARDS.

your lasts

two

four posts have been fucking retarded...

ive read it... reread it.... it's sunk in as BS...

they've barely been coherent....and make little sense...

pickemgenius · Post Post #763 (isolation #78) » Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:48 am

Vote: Blue Zebra

pickemgenius · Post Post #767 (isolation #79) » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:51 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:LOL!!

It seems that Rampage has once again, successfully saved the day. Reminiscent of when I caught Nab in another game, but nobody would listen to me. There you have it folks.

Nab
Pickem
D3sisted

Let's wrap this bitch up.

your rrogance is annoying.
you aren't 100% right (hi im not scum)
Lets bet on it.

pickemgenius · Post Post #774 (isolation #80) » Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:28 pm

ABR might be right about NabNab

other two (mainly d3sisted, not so sure, me, no...)

Unvote

Vote: NABNAB

pickemgenius · Post Post #781 (isolation #81) » Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:40 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:LOL!!

It seems that Rampage has once again, successfully saved the day. Reminiscent of when I caught Nab in another game, but nobody would listen to me. There you have it folks.

Nab
Pickem
D3sisted

Let's wrap this bitch up.

WHY?

Albert B. Rampage wrote:God I love this game. I get to lynch all the people I want.

Adel - Wooohoooo! Adel lynch!

Nab - Heehee, I am the only 'holier than thou' bitch on THIS campus. Don't fuck around with me.

D3sisted - I lurve to mess with d3sisted.

Pickem - Hm...Idk he looks dirty.

DIE SCUMBAGS!

oh yeah these are perfect reasons.

Your

constant

bullshit is pissing me off.

pickemgenius · Post Post #802 (isolation #82) » Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:21 pm

NabNab
d3sisted

ummm

#3 please claim.

pickemgenius · Post Post #804 (isolation #83) » Fri Sep 21, 2007 4:36 pm

d3sisted wrote:Right now it's me and nab's word versus Kravhen's. I dont like the idea of sacrificing 2 towns (1 of which is a power) to take out 1 scum, but town will have to do what they have to do.

i don't believe anybody could forget they had an innocent on someone.

i don't believe you have an innocent on NabNab.

end of story.

real cop please

don't

claim kthx.

pickemgenius · Post Post #809 (isolation #84) » Fri Sep 21, 2007 5:49 pm

d3sisted wrote:Kill me = definitive proof of my role to show Kravhen is lying. Like I said, 2 townies for 1 scum.

you do realize we're likely in lylo...

pickemgenius · Post Post #812 (isolation #85) » Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:32 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote: If we
don't
lynch today, then we get another day. Could be useful in figuring out which claim to trust (a.k.a. the one that gets NK'd).

A.K.A leave it to wifomy NK's

brilliant.

pickemgenius · Post Post #814 (isolation #86) » Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:56 pm

d3sisted wrote:
kravhen wrote:Considering myself lucky to have lived until now ( as deadscilent's replacer ), it's time for me to
Claim: Watcher
.

Last night I followed NabNab. He paid Sir Tornado a little visit. 'Nuff said.
Before me, deadscilent followed Albert but didn't see him visit anyone.

Obviously, I will
Vote: NabNab
and encourage everyone to do the same. I've never been a watcher before and I would've claimed yesterday if it could've saved my skin at the brink of a lynch on me, but thankfully I live for one more day just like I had hoped because I wanted to have a target of my own after deadscilent's N1 action. I targeted NabNab because I've always had mixed feelings about him and I was interested in what he could show me.

I'm pleased, very pleased.

deadscilent wrote:Im a norm Townie I dont really care if Im killed. Ill just be laughing when you finally do kill me and realize Im telling the truth.

XD
Didn't anyone else find it kinda funny how kravhen counterclaimed his predecessor? No? Maybe it's just me then.

omg d3sisted has a point...

pickemgenius · Post Post #835 (isolation #87) » Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:12 pm

d3sisted wrote:Wait a second, why are you even speculating when you know your own alignment? If you are really town, then it should be obvious kravhen is lying.

d3sisted... has a point....

*oh the irony*

pickemgenius · Post Post #839 (isolation #88) » Sat Sep 22, 2007 5:50 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote: @Pickem: Can we
please
have a post that makes use of word-wrap?

trying to make sense of claims like most people.

other then that no much is going on.

i've made it pretty clear where i stand atm.

pickemgenius · Post Post #861 (isolation #89) » Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:02 pm

Guys a no lynch is starting to make more and more sense.

I'm sorry but like... we're at an even number. If we lynch wrong we're done for. If we no lynch we get more info about claims, we're still in lylo, but we'll know more about who is lying.

pickemgenius · Post Post #865 (isolation #90) » Wed Sep 26, 2007 4:41 pm

Erotomachia wrote:How does a no lynch make the choice any easier? Either kravhen or Nabakov is scum and we've inevitably got to decide between them.

well see.... we're at 8 and in lylo.... we nl we're at 7 and in lylo.... same diff basically....

if

desisted is nk'ed as cop, we know nabnab is innocent, thusly making kravhen scum.

pickemgenius · Post Post #870 (isolation #91) » Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:47 pm

roflcopter@kravhen

pickemgenius · Post Post #873 (isolation #92) » Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:16 pm

d3sisted wrote:You're missing the point. The cop investigation on Nabakov came up innocent, but that does not necessarily mean he is town. He could be GF, simple as that.

d3sisted wrote:
kravhen wrote:Well that's one person who I see will not give thought to my word. I guess I'm not that surprised.

Anyone else want to follow desisted and vote me?

Any scum wanna use the opportunity to appear super pro-town by mocking my post and discarding it completely ( conveniently ) and vote me?
So first you claim watcher in Ly-Lo and call a guilty on a vanilla town. When the cop comes out to tell you he is town-aligned, you keep pushing for his lynch knowing that we automatically lose if we do? Moreover, you accuse the cop for being scum with the target for which you have no credible evidence?

i can has inconsistency?

pickemgenius · Post Post #889 (isolation #93) » Thu Sep 27, 2007 10:38 am

ABR always wants to lynch two people every game:

Adel(not sure why)
Me(not sure why)

he's good at mislynching the two of us by now.

i almost just ignore him.

pickemgenius · Post Post #892 (isolation #94) » Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:37 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote: So I've basically come to the conclusion that the following players are town:
-Me (duh)
-D3isted (duh again)
-Albert (As I've maintained on faith)
-Kravhen (Major surprise)

-puff puff pass? srsly.

So 3 of the following 4 players must be scum:
-
Pickem

-
Theo

-Eroto
-Blue Zebra

-wrong again I see...

Your last paragraph was one of the biggest piles of shit I think I have ever seen.

pickemgenius · Post Post #909 (isolation #95) » Fri Sep 28, 2007 10:02 am

unvote:

vote: Blue Zebra.

silently confident about this.

pickemgenius · Post Post #918 (isolation #96) » Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:46 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:theopor_COD voted for Ero from the beginning of day 3. I am less sure of them being a scum team.

The one person that I can be certain is scum is pickem, for all that bandwagoning he did.

Vote: Pickemgenius

ummm...

seriously...

this post is def top 3 funniest i've ever seen.

@bold-roflcopter.... epic

pickemgenius · Post Post #920 (isolation #97) » Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:03 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:pick attacks BZ

pick attacks Nab

BZ attacks Ero

theo attacks Ero

Thus pick is scum.

this one is def top 5, just below that last post.

this post is a pile of shit, and makes zero sense.

that isn't bandwagoning alot.

P.S. (for an example of bandwagoning alot, look in the mirror)

pickemgenius · Post Post #937 (isolation #98) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:59 am

we need moar BZ lynching.

who is this pockemgenius fellow?

pickemgenius · Post Post #944 (isolation #99) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 3:47 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:I think he's town, by process of elimination.

i think this is proof you're on something.

pickemgenius · Post Post #946 (isolation #100) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:06 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:I think he's town, by process of elimination.

i think this is proof you're on something.
Meh who knows. Why are you going against BZ ?

The reasons have been pretty obvious.(look around)

I would love to restate them again hopefully tomorrow.

I was just unaware that you could eliminate people by process of elimination.

pickemgenius · Post Post #948 (isolation #101) » Mon Oct 01, 2007 4:32 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:I think he's scum, by process of elimination.

i think this is proof you're on
(to)
something.

this isn't that hard to do really.

pickemgenius · Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:34 am

i got caught up with doing shit on scumchat last night.

(that and homework, hooray english, and speech class)

so something should be done later tonight.

pickemgenius · Post Post #960 (isolation #103) » Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:59 pm

kravhen wrote:
Ok, here's what I think.

d3sisted is cop.
NabNab is innocent.
I'm mason.
Albert is mason.
Theopor is scum.
BlueZebra is scum.
Ero and pickem...still hard to say. But their case can come later, IMO.

hold the fucking phones. fuck BZ.

cop+doc+2masons=unbalanced.

fuck how was something that obvious so blind to me. better yet how has everyone missed that fact.

Vote: ABR

let's lynch the 2 obvious scum already plz.

pickemgenius · Post Post #964 (isolation #104) » Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:40 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
kravhen wrote:
Ok, here's what I think.

d3sisted is cop.
NabNab is innocent.
I'm mason.
Albert is mason.
Theopor is scum.
BlueZebra is scum.
Ero and pickem...still hard to say. But their case can come later, IMO.

hold the fucking phones. fuck BZ.

cop+doc+2masons=unbalanced.

fuck how was something that obvious so blind to me. better yet how has everyone missed that fact.

Vote: ABR

let's lynch the 2 obvious scum already plz.
Is you stupid ?

I am in a game with a dead vig, doc, role-blocker, cop AND mason. 12 player.

doesn't make it balanced...

p.s. that sounds like an open setup.

pickemgenius · Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:55 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote:I'm no master of game balance, but I wouldn't say that Cop+Doc+Masons is game-breakingly unbalanced. Cop + Doc + RB/Vig doesn't seem uncommon, and a Mason pair is a bit stronger than an RB or Vig, but not much. (Remember, they're most effective after one has died anyway.)

I would say Cop + Doc + Masons leans towards the town about as much as Cop + Doc (the setup Pickem is basically proposing) leans towards the scum.

This just seems to be a case of outguessing the mod.

3 scum+cop+doc+7 townies= the generally accepted most balanced game. *there was a poll somewhere in MD*

I hold Atticus to a higher standard, and think it's ridiculous that you could have 4 confirmed people in a 12p game, that's just fucking crazy.

pickemgenius · Post Post #971 (isolation #106) » Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:47 pm

hey nabnab.

i didn't know you could fall to abr's level.

i had a greater respect for you.

i never know 4 fucking confirmable roles was balanced.

i'm not sure many people would hop on the opportunity of being scum in a 12p with 4 people that could be fucking confirmed.

if you're going to tell me that you want 4 confirmed roles in a 12p as scum, then you're fucking on something.

don't even fucking tell me that's balanced.

it doesn't make any fucking sense.

kravhen FUCKING LIED ABOUT HIS CLAIM.

ABR SHOULD HAVE FUCKING SAID SOMETHING RIGHT THEN.

FOR FUCK'S SAKE HOW MUCH MORE FUCKING OBVIOUS DO I HAVE TO MAKE IT TO YOU.

pickemgenius · Post Post #972 (isolation #107) » Thu Oct 04, 2007 2:49 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote: Seems like this town will see another day.

Vote: Pickemgenius

I have a better chance of winning the lottery then the town lasting another day if i'm lynched. (to put it in perspective)

use your fucking brain, you're better then this.

pickemgenius · Post Post #976 (isolation #108) » Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:57 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote:best case scenario for ABR:lynch town-pickem, and win.

orly.

abr,kravhen, bz/eroto

i say we lynch either lying kravhen, or her for sure scum buddy abr.

pickemgenius · Post Post #978 (isolation #109) » Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:44 pm

kravhen wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:best case scenario for ABR:lynch town-pickem, and win.
orly.

abr,kravhen, bz/eroto

i say we lynch either lying kravhen, or her for sure scum buddy abr.
dude youve gone mad... you can have your theories but this overblown fixation on me and abr is unneeded and annoying. I still want the most quiet ones to speak up, dammit

i wouldnt be doing this.

UNLESS YOU HADNT FUCKING BLATANTLY LIED ABOUT YOUR FUCKING CLAIM.

FOR FUCKS SAKE YOU CLAIMED YOU SAW NABNAB KILL SIR T, THEN THE NEXT FUCKING MINUTE YOU'RE MASONS WITH ABR. SORRY, BUT CLAIMING YOU SAW SOMEBODY KILL SOMEBODY, THEN SAY YOU'RE A MASON IS PRETTY FUCKIGN SHADY.

pickemgenius · Post Post #980 (isolation #110) » Thu Oct 04, 2007 6:11 pm

d3sisted wrote:Pickem, chill out man. I follow your case on krav/albert, but keep it civil.

once they die, i'll be civil then.

until people pull their heads outta their asses and vote the most obvious fucking lying pair we have, then there is little hope for the game of mafia.

pickemgenius · Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:44 am

Blue Zebra wrote:
pickemgenius wrote:FOR FUCKS SAKE YOU CLAIMED YOU SAW NABNAB KILL SIR T, THEN THE NEXT FUCKING MINUTE YOU'RE MASONS WITH ABR. SORRY, BUT CLAIMING YOU SAW SOMEBODY KILL SOMEBODY, THEN SAY YOU'RE A MASON IS PRETTY FUCKIGN SHADY.
You only noticed this just now?

no what occurred to me was that I doubt there would be 4 confirmable roles in a 12p.

doc+masons is fine
cop+masons is fine
cop+do+masons=/=fine

pickemgenius · Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:44 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:Meh there you have it. Pickem and theo as mafia scum.

D3sisted....I don't know what to say. Guys. Lynch pickem & theo.

yeah, sorry about us not lying about basically everything.

pickemgenius · Post Post #991 (isolation #113) » Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:24 pm

Blue Zebra wrote:You seem to think kravhen would be scum even without the balance issues. Why did you vote for me instead?

i wanted you to say stuff.

like stuff like you just said.

that is actually being helpful.

pickemgenius · Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:38 am

Blue Zebra.... it's a good thing I have no expectations of you as a player.

Cause if I did, my standards would have droppped significantly.

Could I get

any

reasoning for your vote btw?

this game should be over.

abr,kravhen,bz

end of story.

pickemgenius · Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:51 pm

Albert B. Rampage wrote: All mafia and masons are always able to talk during the confirmation stage.

um i rarely find myself saying this but....

ABR is right about this...atleast in any game i've seen

pickemgenius · Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:10 pm

kravhen wrote:And the question to pickem is: are you okay now? did you take your pills?

I'll answer your question with another/probably already been asked question: Give me one logical explanation to lie(as town, this is presuming) about saying you saw somebody nightkill somebody else, only to retract it, and claim something totally fucking different?

pickemgenius · Sun Oct 07, 2007 6:07 pm

unvote vote:ABR

unvote: vote: theopor

your welcome?

pickemgenius · Sun Oct 07, 2007 6:24 pm

pickemgenius wrote:
your welcome?

you're

pickemgenius · Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:03 pm

kravhen wrote: I should've stayed watcher and stick with it until the end.

yes. fake claiming as town rarely is good

ABR, you lose too, feel proud about yourself now.