In post 285, MonkeyMan576 wrote:No one is saying how I'm not explaining myself well. I think I am being very reasonable.
In post 298, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Evidently I have poor people and logic skills.
that might be the case indeed
In post 285, MonkeyMan576 wrote:No one is saying how I'm not explaining myself well. I think I am being very reasonable.
In post 298, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Evidently I have poor people and logic skills.
In post 301, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Nevermind I am an above average poker player and my job is in technical support.
In post 221, curiouskarmadog wrote:also for those who are curious as to why I have issues with lurkers (who are posting else where) check out the last game I was in...it is current, so cant say more than that. might shed some light.
In post 235, Luca Blight wrote:Evilpacman, are you reading a different game to me?
You think Lapsa has "actually answered most things he's asked"? That is a very weird reason to townread someone, given they have avoided more questions than anyone this game!
In what possible way do I look 'way scummier' than Katie in the page 4 exchange?
In post 258, droog wrote:anen's big posts look town to me
but admittedly any meta there is based on [ongoing]
could go both ways on aero
notice how he voted monkey while calling monkey opportunist?
minor townread on kate and minor scumread on monkey
theres been to much of that reently so i dont want to make more rn
In post 269, KatieB wrote:Luca was gonna scumread me no matter what I said. And I felt there was still potential for discussion there, plus I wanted to see if anyone agreed with me.
In post 168, Aneninen wrote:
Whyttyfyck?
Luca did not OMGUS you.
In post 269, KatieB wrote:
Yes he did. I expressed suspicions of him. He voted me, with no reasoning as to why I'm scum.
In post 215, Luca Blight wrote:
No, Lapsa's vote on AnenWASN'Tan RVS vote - how many times do I have to keep saying this? He said in 37 that he voted Anen 'because of fluff' - linking it to a specific example, which occurred after said vote.
In post 269, KatieB wrote: His vote. For Anen. Was the. Fifth real. Post in. The thread.
In post 37, Lapsa wrote:In post 35, Wake1 wrote:(..) Would you be willing to give a rough estimate of how many years you've been playing? (..)
Do you, perhaps, have any slight reads on anyone as of yet? Maybe you have a bit of insider knowledge on someone's meta here?
(..) However, my memory on the details is foggy. As time wears on the memory fades ever so slightly.
you can call me Lapsa88
vote on Aneninen because of fluff
vote on Aeronaut because of doubling on you
zero insider knowledge
thing in common - can't remember losing my memory
In post 216, Luca Blight wrote:In post 152, KatieB wrote:In post 150, curiouskarmadog wrote:and taking actions out of context.
Luca did the same thing, worse. I still think he's a better vote.
That is just a lie - where have I ever taken anything out of context this game?
In post 269, KatieB wrote:your interpretation of Lapsa's vote. your post 95, and suggesting in the post where you voted me that my townread on Lapsa should somehow be influenced by my read on anen and wake. your 219. All of those are robbing events of context.
In post 315, Luca Blight wrote:and the specific example on which he based his vote
In post 313, Luca Blight wrote:I'm curious as to your townread of Katie, as the only thing you have posted about her so far has been negative.
In post 315, Luca Blight wrote:1) I interpreted Lapsa's post in the context it was given - he provided the context himself by specifically saying the reason for voting Anen, and the specific example on which he based his vote. To say I am taking that out of context, you are either lying or are severely mistaken.
2) My post 95 took nothing out of context - it was an observation that could prove correct or incorrect. It was actually your 96 that was taking MY argument out of context.
3) I actually said it made no sense for you to be scumreading three players for 'focusing on irrelevant things' while townreading another player who has done this more than anyone. Another misrep!
4) You say my 219 is taking things out of context, yet dodge the points raised in this post? They were legitimate points, and you have ignored them like you ignore everything!
I'm just about ready to vote park myself on this slot. You are either scum or terrible, terrible town.
In post 321, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Geesh, last time i unvote you, droog.
My scumreads right now are katie and lapsa. pacman and droog look town. Unsure on everyone else.