In post 1170, Wisdom wrote:
?
You said my playstyle is the same as town and as scum, but the only explanation you gave to that was "you posted a lot as scum too"
So all there is to my playstyle is how much I post?
no. I read a non-zero part of that game's ISO, and the game you linked-'s ISO. it seems that you really almost never build big cases and stuff. dat playstyle change that you talked about - you failed miserably
^^^gotta love using the word 'miserably' with a smile
~~
Nacho: I'll do the reasearch once I'm fully caught up with the game.
Wisdom wrote:
Townreading Mala because she threatened to replace out.
Somehow that's immoral to do.
mala's threat is immoral, I don't think that townreading for it is immoral. it's just wrong, I think. I'll have to do dat research tho. a man needs 36 hours a day, at least once a week, dammit...
MattP wrote: In post 1174, Wisdom wrote:Matt, you sound pretty frustrated - were me and Grim dead on with our theory?
You seem to be begging the question of why I would be irritated by you calling me immoral while simultaneously threatening me for begging the question.
okay, I lost you. entirely.
Nachomamma8 wrote: In post 1168, Wisdom wrote:@nacho
Yeah, right after everyone and their dog commented on how this buddying is weird. What's better than act a little suspicious to dispel that?
From what I remembered, Matt townread shos for a dumb reason, you townread shos immediately after, cue paranoia train.
or blatant sheeping. I've called that before. Matt townread me for posting a wall, not even reading it. that's an interesting cue that I dunno how I didn't push earlier. probably because I was biased v wisdom.
I often use the [post ] thing, but usually I just link once to every game page. as in, fi I talk about 150, 155, 159, 165,177, no need to link to all, just one because it's the same page, and 177.