NabakovNabakov wrote:Well, I'm clearly not happy with Elmo's contribution so far. An unaccompanied random vote I can handle, but staying entirely out of discussion until somebody specifically asks for his opinion is just bad form. Even when he gives his opinion, as with his vote, there's nothing to support it.
I'm also suspicious of McGriddle. His first move of the game is to play the bad scum card
Wrong, somebody ASKED me if I was good scum or not. I didn't just come in here with a "boo hoo I am bad at scum and town" attitude.
(as well as an implied "I'm the only non-invited player in an invitational" card)
Again, wrong, I never even said that. Once. Somebody else brought that up. Seems like you are just trying to pin a case on me without much.
, and his play since then has been almost purely reflexive.
Untrue, I have been doing what I can to help town, and also answering any questions I have been asked. Could you tell me how that is scummy?
The one thing he's taken initiative on was
59, where he claims pops can't have be a power-role. At first, this just struck me as some sloppy analysis, but things really get interesting in
80, where he sneaks in a declaration of pops' scumminess when the post in question had only dealt with PR status regardless of alignment. These two elements (the sloppy analysis and unsupported accusation, that is) combine to:
]
I didn't sneak anything in, I was explaining my reasoning about said post. I was telling everyone that my reasoning behind it was not so we knew who had/didn't have a PR, but that because of this he is more likely to be scum, and less likely to be detrimental.